1
|
Godfrey CM, Grogan EL, Marmor HN, Johannesen Ringenberg SL, Demarest C, Lambright ES, Nesbitt JC. Outcomes of a novel double-stapled anastomotic technique in esophagectomy. JTCVS Tech 2024; 28:168-172. [PMID: 39669326 PMCID: PMC11632342 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The double-stapled (DS) anastomotic technique associates with lower odds of anastomotic leak and stricture. SS, Single posterior stapled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M. Godfrey
- Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Eric L. Grogan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Hannah N. Marmor
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | | | - Caitlin Demarest
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tenn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Eric S. Lambright
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Jonathan C. Nesbitt
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang Y, Xie Q, Wei X, Shi Q, Zhou Q, Leng X, Miao Y, Han Y, Wang K, Fang Q. Enhanced Recovery Protocol Versus Conventional Care in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Cancer: Advantages in Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5706-5716. [PMID: 38833056 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15509-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and conventional care in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer, which have not previously been compared. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included prospective PRO data from August 2019 to June 2021. Clinical outcomes included perioperative complications and postoperative length of stay (PLOS). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and esophagus-specific module (QLQ-OES18) preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively. Mixed-effects models were used to longitudinally compare quality of life (QOL) scores between the two modes. RESULTS Patients undergoing conventional care and ERAS were analyzed (n = 348 and 109, respectively). The ERAS group had fewer overall complications, pneumonia, arrhythmia, and a shorter PLOS than the conventional group, and outperformed the conventional group in five functional QLQ-C30 domains and five symptom QLQ-OES18 domains, including less dysphagia (p < 0.0001), trouble talking (p = 0.0006), and better eating (p < 0.0001). These advantages persisted for 3 months postoperatively. For the cervical circular stapled anastomosis, the initial domains and duration of benefit were reduced in the ERAS group. CONCLUSIONS The ERAS protocol has significant advantages over conventional care in terms of clinical outcomes, lowering postoperative symptom burden, and improving functional QOL in patients who have undergone esophagectomy. Selection of the optimal technique for cervical anastomosis is a key operative component of ERAS that maintains the symptom domains and duration of the advantages of PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixuan Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qin Xie
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xing Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiuling Shi
- School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Qiang Zhou
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuefeng Leng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Miao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongtao Han
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Kangning Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Qiang Fang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alcasid NJ, Velotta JB. Challenges in Discovering the Optimal Anastomotic Approach to Improve Quality of Life in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 117:1033-1034. [PMID: 37633583 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan J Alcasid
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 3600 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611
| | - Jeffrey B Velotta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 3600 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611.
| |
Collapse
|