Assessment of emergency department staff awareness, access and utilisation of advance care directives and goals of care: A cross-sectional survey

Experiences of Australian emergency doctors and nurses using advance care directives in the provision of care at the end of life

OBJECTIVE

An advance care directive is a legal document outlining the wishes made by a person about treatment options. However, there is increasing evidence that an advance care directive that has previously been documented may not always benefit the current prognosis of the patient. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the experiences of Australian emergency doctors and nurses concerning the use of previously documented advance care directives at the point of care for patients and their families.

METHODS

A qualitative study guided by a phenomenological interpretive approach was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ED doctors and nurses across Australia. Data were thematically analysed using a seven-stage data analysis framework.

RESULTS

An analysis of the interview data resulted in four major themes: (i) Benefits of Advance Care Directives; (ii) Knowledge and Awareness; (iii) Communication; and (iv) Availability of Advance Care Directive Information.

CONCLUSIONS

From the findings, advance care directives were believed to be beneficial in decision making when patients, families, and ED staff agreed with the decisions made. Advance care directives were often made a long time ago but were useful to start conversations around goals of care and end-of-life care relevant to the patient's current situation. Findings in the present study further reinforced that an advance care directive was beneficial when used alongside goals of care at the point of care in EDs.

Examining emergency departments practices on advance care directives and medical treatment decision making using the victorian emergency minimum dataset

INTRODUCTION

Existence of Advance Care Planning (ACP) documents including contact details of Medical Treatment Decision Makers (MTDM), are essential patient care records that support Emergency Department (ED) clinicians in implementing treatment concordant with patients' expressed wishes. Based upon previous findings, we conducted a statewide study to evaluate the performance of Victorian public hospital emergency departments on reporting of availability of records for ACP.

METHOD

The study is a quantitative retrospective observational comparative design based upon ED tier levels as defined by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) for the calendar year 2021.

RESULTS

Of 1.8 million total Victorian ED attendances, 15,222 patients had an ACP alert status recorded. Of these, 7296 were aged ≥ 65 years (study group). Of the thirty-one public EDs that submitted data, 65 % were accredited and assigned a level of service tier. The presence of ACP alerts positively correlated to location, tier level, age and gender (MANOVA wilk's; p < 0.001, value=.981, F = (12, 15,300), partial ƞ2 = .006, observed power = 1.0 = 95.919).

CONCLUSION

The identified rate of ACP reporting is low. Strategies to improve the result include synchronising ACP (generated at different points) electronically, staff education, training and further validation of the data at the sending and receiving agencies.