Effect of comorbid and fatal coexistent conditions on sex and race differences in vascular surgical mortality

Comparison of conservative and operative treatment for blunt carotid injuries: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank

OBJECTIVES

Blunt carotid injury (BCI) is uncommon but potentially devastating. The best treatment modality for this injury remains undetermined. We conducted this study to better understand the hospital course and treatment outcomes for patients with BCI who received different interventions.

METHODS

BCI and related vascular procedures were identified by ICD-9-CM codes from the National Trauma Data Bank(1) using data gathered from 2002 to 2006. Conservative and operative treatment groups were compared by variables of patient demographics, initial assessment in the emergency department (ED), hospital course, and treatment outcomes. Open surgical and endovascular interventions were further compared.

RESULTS

A total of 842 BCI were identified from 1,633,126 discharged blunt trauma patients (0.05%). Of these, 762 (90.5%) were treated conservatively and 80 (9.5%) received operative intervention. No differences in demographics were observed between these treatment groups. On initial assessment, no differences between conservative and operative treatment groups were noted with regard to vital signs, Glasgow coma scale, presence of drugs or alcohol in blood, or Trauma Related Injury Severity Score survival probability. Significant differences were seen in terms of the presence of a base deficit (-3.1 +/- 6.8 vs -7.6 +/- 8.3; P = .01), likelihood of a positive head computed tomography (CT) scan (58.6% vs 26.1%; P = .003), and total Injury Severity Score (29.8 +/- 13.3 vs 26.1 +/- 14.1; P = .02). Hospital course and treatment outcomes were comparable, with no differences in hospital length of stay (13.4 +/- 15.3 days vs 13.7 +/- 13.6 days; P = .86), total Functional Independence Measure (8.8 +/- 3.3 vs 9.3 +/- 3.1; P = .38), progression of original neurologic insult (7.5% vs 4.6%; P = .61) or mortality (28.1% vs 19%; P = .08). When comparing open surgical to endovascular interventions (46 open, 34 endovascular, including 3 combined), the only significant differences were in the total Injury Severity Score (22.4 +/- 12.2 vs 31.4 +/- 15.4; P = .01) and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay (5.0 +/- 6.0 days vs 10.7 +/- 10.4 days; P = .01, and 10.3 +/- 9.2 days vs 19.3 +/- 17.7 days; P = .01). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that neither Functional Independence Measure (FIM) nor mortality was associated with conservative or operative treatment.

CONCLUSION

BCI is rare and carries a poor prognosis. Operative intervention is not associated with functional improvement or a survival advantage. This study was unable to support that less invasive endovascular treatment improves treatment outcome when compared to open surgery.

Value of early cardiac troponin I to predict long-term adverse events after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

High values of both preoperative and postoperative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) contribute to higher rates of short-term cardiac events following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The prognostic value of very early cTnI in this context is unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Measurement of cTnI very early after admission to the emergency room can be used as a prognosticator for long-term outcomes after CABG.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study on 160 consecutive patients with ACS undergoing CABG at The John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County (Chicago, IL) representing a total follow-up of 290.42 person-years. Adverse outcomes were defined as death or reinfarction. We used robust multivariate survival analyses to determine whether early cTnI measurement can independently predict the adverse outcomes in the study subjects.

RESULTS

In univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling we found that unit rise in early cTnI is associated with a 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%- 5%, p < 0.001) faster progression to long-term adverse events after CABG even after adjusting for the type of ACS. Prognostically, the most informative cut off value for cTnI was 5.6 ng/mL. Above this value, CABG patients progressed 2.58 times faster to adverse outcomes (95% CI: 1.05-6.36, p = 0.039). This effect remained after adjustment for other significant confounders namely, poor compliance to medications, female sex, Medicaid insurance, and electrocardiographic ischemia.

CONCLUSION

Early cTnI measurement after admission can predict adverse outcomes after CABG. This association extends to long-term adverse events after CABG.

Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes and appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy: impact of patient and provider factors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prior work documented racial and ethnic disparities in incidence of stroke, stroke risk factors, and use of carotid endarterectomy. Less is known about disparities in outcomes and appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy or reasons for such inequalities.

METHODS

This was a population-based cohort of carotid endarterectomy performed in Medicare beneficiaries in New York. Clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess sociodemographics, clinical indication for carotid endarterectomy, disease severity, comorbidities, and deaths and strokes within 30 days of surgery. Appropriateness was based on validated criteria from a national expert panel. Differences in patients, providers, outcomes, and appropriateness were compared using chi(2) tests. Differences in risk-adjusted rates of death or nonfatal stroke were compared using multiple logistic regression accounting for patient, physician, and hospital-level risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 95.3% of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were white, 2.5% black, and 2.2% Hispanic (N=9093). Minorities had more severe neurological disease and more comorbidities and were more likely to be cared for by lower-volume surgeons and hospitals (P<0.0001). Rates of 30-day death/stroke were higher in Hispanics (9.5%) and blacks (6.9%) than whites (3.8%; P<0.0001). Multivariable analyses that adjusted for presurgical patient risk and provider characteristics found that blacks no longer had significantly worse outcomes (OR=1.37; CI, 0.78 to 2.40), although the higher risk of death/stroke in Hispanics persisted (OR=1.87; CI, 1.09 to 3.19). Minorities had higher rates of inappropriate surgery (Hispanics 17.6%, black 13.0%, white 7.9%; P<0.0001) largely due to higher comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Minorities had worse outcomes and higher rates of inappropriate surgery. Differences in underlying presurgical risk factors and provider characteristics explained the higher risk of complications in blacks, but not Hispanics.

The association of socioeconomic disadvantage with postoperative complications after major elective cardiovascular surgery

Background:

Understanding the mechanism by which both patient- and hospital level factors act in generating disparities has important implications for clinicians and policy-makers.

Objective:

To measure the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and postoperative complications after major elective cardiovascular procedures.

Design:

Multicity hospital-based study.

Subjects:

Using Hospital Discharge Registries (ICD-9-CM codes), 19 310 patients were identified undergoing five cardiovascular operations (coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve replacement, carotid endarterectomy, major vascular bypass, repair of unruptured abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA repair)) in four Italian cities, 1997–2000.

Measures:

For each patient, a five-level median income index by census block of residence was calculated. In-hospital 30-day mortality, cardiovascular complications (CCs) and non-cardiovascular complications (NCCs) were the outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with multilevel logistic regression adjusting for city of residence, gender, age and comorbidities taking into account hospital and individual dependencies.

Main results:

In-hospital 30-day mortality varied by type of surgery (CABG 3.7%, valve replacement 5.7%, carotid endarterectomy 0.9%, major vascular bypass 8.8%, AAA repair 4.0%). Disadvantaged people were more likely to die after CABG (lowest vs highest income OR 1.93, p trend 0.023). For other surgeries, the relationship between SEP and mortality was less clear. For cardiac surgery, SEP differences in mortality were higher for publicly funded patients in low-volume hospitals (lowest vs highest income OR 3.90, p trend 0.039) than for privately funded patients (OR 1.46, p trend 0.444); however, the difference in the SEP gradients was not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Disadvantaged people seem particularly vulnerable to mortality after cardiovascular surgery. Efforts are needed to identify structural factors that may enlarge SEP disparities within hospitals.

Is there a sex or race difference in 30-day mortality after interruption of vena cava in a Medicare population?

PURPOSE

Disparities in health care and its outcome often indicate an opportunity for improving the quality of health care. Sex and rare differences in short-term mortality following interruption of vena cava are not known. The objective of this study was to determine such differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With use of Medicare administrative data, 1,823 interruption of vena cava procedures performed between 1994 and 1997 were identified among beneficiaries aged 65-99 years residing in Indiana and Kentucky. In Cox proportional hazard regression models, male-to-female and nonwhite-to-white 30-day mortality ratios were adjusted for age, sex or race, weighted Charlson comorbidity score, length of hospital stay, and fatal coexisting conditions (ascertained from death certificate data).

RESULTS

Altogether, 277 patients died within 30 days after the procedure. Women were older than men. The comorbidity score was associated with male sex and mortality. There was no significant race difference in unadjusted or adjusted 30-day mortality after interruption of the vena cava. Unadjusted mortality was higher in men than in women (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15, 1.92). Although adjustment for age, race, Charlson score, and length of hospital stay reduced the magnitude of sex difference, it remained significant. Further adjustment for fatal coexistent conditions reduced the sex difference to an insignificant level (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI=0.96, 1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant sex or race difference in adjusted 30-day mortality after interruption of vena cava procedure in the elderly Medicare beneficiary population of two states.