Is Suprarenal Fixation of Aortic Stent Grafts Really without Consequence on the Renal Function?

A Comparison of Suprarenal and Infrarenal Fixation and Renal Volumetric Analysis after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

Clinical and experimental studies of the stent-graft fixation impact on renal volume after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have focused on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the results were controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the impact of the supra (SRF group) and infra (IRF group) renal stent-graft fixation on the renal volume.

METHODS

Between December 2016 and December 2019, all patients treated with EVAR were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with atrophic or multicystic kidney, renal transplantation, ultrasound or incomplete follow-up were excluded. Renal volume in both groups was extracted with a semi-automatic segmentation from contrast-enhanced CT-scan performed before the procedure, at 1 month and at 12 months follow-up. A subgroup analyze of the SRF group was performed in order to study impact of the stent struts position relative to the renal arteries.

RESULTS

63 patients were analyzed (SRF: 32, IRF: 31). Demographic and anatomical characteristics were similar between the groups. Procedure contrast volume was higher in the IRF group (P= 0.01). At 12-months, the renal volume decreased of 1.4 % in the SRF group and 2.3 % in the IRF group (P=0.86). The SRF sub group analysis showed only 2 patients with no stent struts crossing renal arteries. In the remaining cases, struts crossed one renal artery in 60% of cases (19 patients) and 2 renal arteries in 34% of cases (11 patients). The renal volume decrease was not correlated to the presence of stent wires struts, crossing renal artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent-graft with supra renal fixation seems not to be correlated with renal volume deterioration. A randomized clinical trial with a higher effective and longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of SRF on the renal function.

Impact of Accessory Renal Artery Coverage on Renal Function during Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are unknown. We analyzed the impact of ARA coverage on renal function long-term.

METHODS

This retrospective, monocentric study included patients treated by EVAR between 2008 and 2016. Patients with at least one ARA covered with EVAR (ARA group) were compared with patients with no covered ARA (control group). Renal function was determined by estimating the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and graded according to chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification stages.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included (ARA group, n = 25; control group, n = 159). Renal risk factors were similar in the 2 groups. Mean (±standard deviation) duration of follow-up was 41.6 ± 25.8 months. Preoperative eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) was 68.9 ± 17.8 in the ARA group and 72.5 ± 17.4 in the control group (P = 0.33), with a similar decline in the 2 groups during follow-up (-6.52 ± 11.6 ARA group vs. -6.43 ± 13.8 control group; P = 0.97). At the end of the study, 8 ARA patients and 56 controls had deteriorated by one CKD stage (32% vs. 35.2%, respectively; P = 0.75). Rate of renal infarction was significantly higher in the ARA group (96% vs. 1.9%; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, suprarenal fixation was identified as a risk factor for a decline in renal function (odds ratio = 2.01 [95% confidence interval: 1.05-3.84]; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

ARA coverage after EVAR does not appear to affect renal function long-term. Suprarenal fixation led to a greater decline in renal function.

To assess hemodynamic disturbances to the ostia of the renal arteries generated by the implantation of EVAR with a suprarenal fixation

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is increasingly performed via endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Different types of fixation are possible with EVAR, i.e., below (infrarenal fixation) or above (suprarenal fixation) the renal arteries. Hemodynamic alterations in renal arterial flow with suprarenal (SR) fixation remain to be demonstrated. The IFIXEAR (Impact of Supra-renal Fixation of EVAR on Hemodynamics of Renal Arteries) study is designed to assess the hemodynamic effects at the ostia of at least 1 renal artery, generated immediately post-surgery by the implantation of an aortic stent with SR fixation.

METHODS

IFIXEAR is a prospective, 2 center study. Every patient undergoing elective EVAR with SR fixation is eligible for inclusion. Patients with previous hemodynamic disturbances to the ostia of 1 of the renal arteries are not eligible. All patients undergo echocardiography and renal arteries duplex ultrasound within a month before surgery, and at 1 and 12 months after surgery. The primary endpoint is hemodynamic disturbance, defined as a peak systolic velocity greater than 120 cm/second, at the ostia of 1 of the renal arteries in the immediate postoperative period.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee "Comité de Protection des Personnes Ouest V" under the number 18/019-2 on April 20, 2018. All patients provide written informed consent before inclusion. The University Hospital of Besancon is the trial sponsor. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed international medical journal.

REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03594786, principal investigator: Dr Patricia Costa, Registered on April 24, 2018).

Long-term results after standard endovascular aneurysm repair with the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts

OBJECTIVE

Many endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison of long-term outcomes between devices might aid in this decision process, but comparative data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of two commercially available endoprosthesis, the Endurant (Medtronic Vascular, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts.

METHODS

Patients undergoing standard endovascular repair from July 2004 to December 2011 in a single institution with the Endurant or the Low-Porosity Excluder endografts were eligible. Only patients treated for intact degenerative abdominal infrarenal aneurysms were included. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. The primary end point was primary clinical success, defined as clinical success without the need for an additional or secondary surgical or endovascular procedure. Neck-related events (a composite of type IA endoleak, neck-related secondary intervention, or migration of >5 mm), neck morphology changes, renal function, and overall survival were secondary end points.

RESULTS

The study included 277 patients (156 Endurants; 121 Excluders). The median follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.1-12.4 years) and did not differ between groups (P = .18). Patients treated with the Endurant stent graft had wider (neck diameter of >28 mm, 27.3% vs 1.7% [P < .001]; neck diameter of 27 mm, [interquartile range (IQR), 24-29 mm] for Endurant and 24 mm [IQR, 22-25 mm] for Excluder; P < .001) and more angulated necks (β-angle of >60°, 26.7% vs 12.5%; P = .004). Oversizing was greater in the Endurant group (16% [IQR, 12%-22%] vs 13% [IQR, 8%-17%], respectively; P < .001). Patients were treated outside device instructions for use regarding proximal neck: 16.7% in the Endurant and 17.3% in the Excluder group (P = .720). The 7-year primary clinical success was 54.7% for the Endurant and 58.1% for the Excluder groups (P = .53). Freedom from neck-related events at 7 years was 76.7% for the Endurant and 78.8% for Excluder group (P = .94). The Endurant stent graft (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.8; P = .009) was an independent predictor of significant renal function decline. Neck dilatation was greater in Endurant-implanted patients (13% [95% CI, 2%-22%] vs 4% [95% CI, 0%-10%]; P < .001). Overall survival at 7 years was 61.4% in the Endurant and 50.3% (n = 50; standard error, 0.047) in the Excluder group (P = .39).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that durable and sustainable results can be obtained with either of these late generation devices. This finding suggests that careful planning and a tailored device selection taking into account the patient's anatomy are more relevant determinants than the graft model itself to obtain clinical success. The Endurant endoprosthesis seems to be associated with a higher rate of neck dilatation and faster decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, but further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre- and post-procedural imaging

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common, potentially life-threatening disorder. Rupture of AAA is potentially catastrophic with high mortality. Intervention for AAA is indicated when the aneurysm reaches 5.0-5.5 cm or more, when symptomatic, or when increasing in size > 10 mm/year. AAA can be accurately assessed by cross-sectional imaging including computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Current options for intervention in AAA patients include open surgery and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with EVAR becoming more prevalent over time. Cross-sectional imaging plays a crucial role in AAA surveillance, pre-procedural assessment, and post-EVAR management. This paper will discuss the current role of imaging in the assessment of AAA patients prior to intervention, in evaluation of procedural complications, and in long-term follow-up of EVAR patients.