Therapeutical Options in the Management of Carotid Dissection

Classification and management strategy of spontaneous carotid artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous carotid artery dissections (sCAD) are the common cause of stroke in middle-aged and young people. There is still a lack of clinical classification to guide the management of sCAD. We reviewed our experience with 179 sCAD patients and proposed a new classification for sCAD with prognostic and therapeutic significance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from June 2018 to June 2023 of sCAD patients treated at a large tertiary academic institution in an urban city in China. Based on imaging results, we categorize sCAD into four types. Type Ⅰ: intramural hematoma or dissection with < 70% luminal narrowing; type Ⅱ: intramural hematoma or dissection with ≥ 70% luminal narrowing; type Ⅲ: dissecting aneurysm; type ⅣA: extracranial carotid artery occlusion; type ⅣB: tandem occlusion. We compared the clinical data and prognostic outcomes among various types of sCAD.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients and 197 dissected arteries met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the 179 sCAD patients was 49.5 years, 78% were male, 18 patients (10%) had bilateral sCAD. According to our classification, there were 56 (28.4%) type Ⅰ, 50 (25.4%) type Ⅱ, 60 (30.5%) type Ⅲ, and 31 (15.7%) type Ⅳ dissections. During a mean hospitalization length of 11.4±47.0 days, there were 9 recurrent strokes (4.6%) after medical treatment, 2 (1.0%) type Ⅲ dissections, 7 (3.6%) type Ⅳ dissections, all ipsilateral, and 1 death. Overall, there were 7 (3.6%, 1 type Ⅰ dissection, 3 type Ⅱ dissections, 2 type Ⅲ dissections, and 1 type Ⅳ dissection) recurrent stroke and 3 (1.5%, all type Ⅲ dissections) recurrent TIA in patients treated with just medical therapy during the follow-up period, all ipsilateral, with a mean follow-up of 26 months (3-59 months). These patients did not undergo further intervention due to the high difficulty associated with endovascular treatment or the mild nature of recurrent cerebral ischemic symptoms. Twenty-nine (51.8%) type I dissections were completely recanalized after antithrombotic therapy. A total of 19 (38 %) of type II dissections and 44 (73%) of type III dissections received endovascular treatment (EVT) for persistent flow-limited dissections, enlargement of dissecting aneurysms, or aggravation of neurological symptoms despite antithrombotic therapy. Type Ⅳ dissections are more likely to lead to the occurrence of ischemic stroke and presented with more severe symptoms. Eight (33%) type IVB dissections received acute phase intervention due to distal thromboembolism or aggravation of neurological symptoms after medical treatment. In terms of cerebral ischemic events and mortality, there were no statistically significant differences among the four types of sCAD (all p > .05). Favorable outcome was achieved in 168 (93.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a novel and more comprehensive classification method and the modern management strategy for sCAD. Antithrombotic therapy is beneficial to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke for stable sCAD. Non-emergent EVT can be an alternative therapeutic approach for patients who meet indications as in type II to IVA dissections. Urgent procedure with neurovascular intervention is necessary for some type IVB dissections. The short-term results of EVT for sCAD are encouraging, and long-term device-related and functional outcome should undergo further research.

Medical and interventional outcome of dissection of the cervical arteries: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The management of cervical artery dissections (CADs) is poorly standardized given the scarce number of prospective studies comparing medical and interventional approach to CAD. The aim of the present study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the treatments of CAD.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis (pre-registered on PROSPERO [CRD42022297512] are performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines searching in three different databases [PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Database]) of studies on medical or interventional approach to CAD. Only prospective studies were selected to reduce the risk of bias for the primary meta-analysis. Secondarily, retrospective studies were also included. The aim was to assess the rate of stroke and of stroke/death/bleeding (major or intracranial) by Der Simonian-Laird weights of random effects model.

RESULTS

After screening 456 articles, 6 prospective and 22 retrospective studies were identified. Two randomized controlled trials and five retrospective studies comparing antiplatelet (APT) vs oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) for CAD were identified, as well as four prospective and 17 retrospective single-arm studies evaluating stenting for CAD. In the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing APT vs OAC, 444 patients were considered, and a borderline significant association was identified in terms of stroke/death in the APT vs OAC groups (odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-33.38; P = .06; I2 = 0%). No differences were found for the stroke/death/bleeding outcome (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.19-8.18; P = .81; I2 = 0%) between the two treatments. In the meta-analysis including also retrospective studies, overall risk of bias was considered "serious," and 4104 patients were included with no differences in APT vs OAC for stroke (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.53-2.11; P = .29; I2 = 18%); no other comparisons were possible. The pooled meta-analysis of prospective studies on stenting for CAD included four series, for a total of 68 patients, in whom stenting was adopted primarily after failed medical therapy or after traumatic dissection. The pooled rate of stroke/death was 7% (95% CI, 3%-17%; I2 = 0%). The analysis of moderators identified a significant inverse association between the percentage of traumatic dissection and a reduction in postoperative stroke (Y = -1.60-2.02X; P = .03). The pooled rate of the composite endpoint of stroke/death/ or major bleeding was 8% (95% CI, 3%-18%; I2 = 0%). Secondarily, the meta-analysis also included 17 retrospective studies with overall 457 patients and showed a 2.1% pooled rate of stroke/death (95% CI, 1.0%-3.3%; I2 = 0%) and 3.2% stroke/death/bleeding (95% CI, 1.8%-4.7%; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Few prospective studies on CAD treatment are present in literature. APT and OAC seem to have similar efficacy in reducing the recurrence of stroke after CAD. No definitive conclusion can be drawn for stenting, due to the low number of studies available. More prospective studies are necessary to evaluate its potential additional value over medical therapy alone in the early phase after CAD.

Cervical Artery Dissections-A Demographical Analysis of Risk Factors, Clinical Characteristics Treatment Procedures, and Outcomes-A Single Centre Study of 54 Consecutive Cases

Cervical artery dissections (CAD) are a common cause of ischemic cerebrovascular events among the younger and middle-aged population. Altogether, CAD counts for up to 15% of all causes of stroke in patients aged 50 or younger. Among the known etiological causes, especially addressing the younger population with mechanical traumas and whiplash injuries are regarded as the main culprits. However, cases of spontaneous dissection are also widespread, with risk factors such as hypertension, migraine, and lifestyle factors increasing the risk of occurrence. Clinically, the symptoms associated with a cerebrovascular event caused by CADs are highly variable and can be classified as either compressive symptoms (such as Horner's syndrome and cervical pain) or stroke syndromes attributable to cerebral ischemia. Therefore, establishing an early diagnosis might be particularly challenging as it requires particular attention and quick clinical reasoning when interviewing the patient. With these certain particularities, our main focus was to conduct a prospective study involving up to 54 patients who were diagnosed with CAD in our clinical facility between January 2015 and December 2022, with the focus of assessing certain individual parameters attributable to each patient and their influence and prognosis value for their short and long term evolution. An important emphasis was placed on parameters such as topographical localization, clinical presentation, severity of the questioned cerebrovascular event, outcomes, and causative factors. Statistical validity tools were applied when possible.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of cervical carotid artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery dissection (CAD).

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Data from the eligible studies were extracted and meta-analyzed. Primary endpoints included postoperative mortality, cerebrovascular events (CE) and modified Rankin Score for neurologic disability (mRS) at 90 days. We performed subgroup analyses between stenting of spontaneous and traumatic CAD, primary stenting versus stenting after failed medical therapy (FMT) and stenting of CAD in the presence of tandem occlusions versus stenting of isolated extracranial CAD.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 1,224 patients were included. Pooled post-operative mortality, CE and mRS 0-2 rates were 1.71% (95%CI:0.83-2.80), 6.45% (95%CI:2.80-11.10) and 76.13% (95%CI:64.15-86.50), respectively. The pooled stroke rate was 2.16% (95%CI:0.0-6.64). Spontaneous versus traumatic CAD mortality rates were 3.20% (95%CI:1.80-4.88) and 0.00% (95%CI:0.00-1.59) while CE rates were 14.26% (95%CI:6.28-24.36) and 1.64% (95%CI:0.0-6.08). Primary stenting and stenting after FMT mortality rates were 0.63% (95%CI:0.0-5.63) and 0.0% (95%CI:0.0-2.24), while CE rates were 5.02% (95%CI:0.38-12.63) and 3.33% (95%CI:0.12-9.03). Mortality rates for tandem occlusions and isolated extracranial CAD were 5.62% (95%CI:1.76-10.83) and 0.23% (95%CI:0.0-1.88) respectively, while CE rates were 15.28% (95%CI:6.23-26.64) and 1.88% (95%CI:0.23-4.51). The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score was 8.66 (low).

CONCLUSION

Both primary stenting and stenting of spontaneous CAD yielded unfavorable results regarding stent thrombosis and stroke rates. Conversely, stenting following FMT displayed acceptable mortality and complication rates corroborating the use of stenting in the setting of CAD as a second line treatment. Due to the low quality of the included studies, definite conclusions cannot be drawn necessitating further research.

Systematic review of the effectiveness of carotid surgery and endovascular carotid stenting versus best medical treatment in managing symptomatic acute carotid artery dissection

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) with an intramural haematoma can lead to stroke risk, especially in young patients. We performed comprehensive searches of the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE to review the effectiveness of surgical and endovascular interventions versus best medical treatment alone for symptomatic CeAD. Furthermore, we aim to elaborate on the phenotypic individual disease manifestations of spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection (sCAD) and how they translate into stroke and risk of dissection recurrence. Primary outcomes were ipsilateral stroke and disability. Secondary outcomes were death, any stroke, or transient ischaemic attack, residual stenosis >50%, recurrence of CeAD, expanding pseudo-aneurysm or major bleeding. Our search yielded no randomised controlled trials and/or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing either carotid surgery or endovascular therapy with optimal medical management; thus there was no evidence to support the use of any specific method for management of extracranial CeAD in patients who fail antithrombotic therapy. However, despite the absence of controlled studies to compare surgery or endovascular therapy in patients who fail antithrombotic therapy, carotid surgery in young patients can be justified as a personalized precision approach given the high morbidity and mortality in this age group.

Stenting as a treatment for cranio-cervical artery dissection: Improved major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival

INTRODUCTION

Cranio-cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a common cause of cerebrovascular events in young subjects with no clear treatment strategy established. We evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in CeAD patients treated with and without stent placement.

METHODS

COMParative effectiveness of treatment options in cervical Artery diSSection (COMPASS) is a single high-volume center observational, retrospective longitudinal registry that enrolled consecutive CeAD patients over a 2-year period. Patients were ≥ 18 years of age with confirmed extra- or intracranial CeAD on imaging. Enrolled participants were followed for 1 year evaluating MACE as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

One-hundred ten patients were enrolled (age 53 ± 15.9, 56% Caucasian, and 50% male, BMI 28.9 ± 9.2). Grade I, II, III, and IV blunt vascular injury was noted in 16%, 33%, 19%, and 32%, respectively. Predisposing factors were noted in the majority (78%), including sneezing, carrying heavy load, chiropractic manipulation. Stent was placed in 10 (10%) subjects (extracranial carotid n = 9; intracranial carotid n = 1; extracranial vertebral n = 1) at the physician's discretion along with medical management. Reasons for stent placement were early development of high-grade stenosis or expanding pseudoaneurysm. Stented patients experienced no procedural or in-hospital complications and no MACE between discharge and 1 year follow up. CeAD patients treated with medical management only had 14% MACE at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

In this single high-volume center cohort of CeAD patients, stenting was found to be beneficial, particularly with development of high-grade stenosis or expanding pseudoaneurysm. These results warrant confirmation by a randomized clinical trial.

Antithrombotic choice in blunt cerebrovascular injuries: Experience at a tertiary trauma center, systematic review, and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) may occur following trauma and lead to ischemic stroke if untreated. Antithrombotic therapy decreases this risk; however, the optimal agent has yet to be determined in this population. The aim of this study was to compare the risk-benefit profile of antiplatelet (AP) versus anticoagulant (AC) therapy in rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic complications in BCVI patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of BCVI patients at our tertiary care Trauma hospital from 2010 to 2015, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. The OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to September 16, 2019. References of included publications were searched manually for other relevant articles. The search was limited to articles in humans, in patients 18 years or older, and in English. Studies that reported treatment-stratified clinical outcomes following AP or AC treatment in BCVI patients were included. Exclusion criteria included case reports, case series with n < 5, review articles, conference abstracts, animal studies, and non-peer-reviewed publications. Data were extracted from each study independently by two reviewers, including study design, country of origin, sex and age of patients, Injury Severity Score, Biffl grade, type of treatment, ischemic stroke rate, and hemorrhage rate. Pooled estimates using odds ratio (OR) were combined using a random-effects model using a Mantel-Hanzel weighting. The main outcome of interest was rate of ischemic stroke due to BCVI, and the secondary outcome was hemorrhage rate based on AC or AP treatment.

RESULTS

In total, there were 2044 BCVI patients, as reported in the 22 studies in combination with our institutional data. The stroke rate was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (OR, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-3.99); however, the hemorrhage rate was decreased in AP versus AC treated groups (OR, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.00).

CONCLUSION

Based on this meta-analysis, both AC and AP seem similarly effective in preventing ischemic stroke, but AP is better tolerated in the trauma population. This suggests that AP therapy may be preferred, but this should be further assessed with prospective randomized trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Review article, level II.

Surgical and radiological interventions for treating symptomatic extracranial cervical artery dissection

BACKGROUND

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a pathological bleed or tear, or both, in the wall of the carotid or vertebral arteries as they course through the neck, and is a leading cause of stroke in young people.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of surgical and radiological interventions versus best medical treatment alone for treating symptomatic cervical artery dissection.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed comprehensive searches of the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched March 2020), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 2020, Issue 4, in the Cochrane Library (searched March 2020), MEDLINE (1946 to March 2020) and Embase (1974 to March 2020). We searched relevant ongoing trials and research registers (searched March 2020), checked references in all relevant papers for additional eligible studies, and contacted authors and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of either surgical or endovascular intervention for the management of symptomatic CeAD were eligible for inclusion. Only studies with anticoagulants or antiplatelet treatment as the control group were included. Two review authors planned to independently extract data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcomes were ipsilateral stroke and disability. Secondary outcomes were death, any stroke, or transient ischaemic attack, residual stenosis (> 50%), recurrence of cervical dissection, expanding pseudoaneurysm, or major bleeding. We analysed the studies according to the first choice of treatment. We planned to assess for risk of bias and apply GRADE criteria for any included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not find any completed RCTs or CCTs undertaken in this area of research.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No RCTs or CCTs compared either surgery or endovascular therapy with control. Thus, there is no available evidence to support their use for the treatment of extracranial cervical artery dissection in addition to antithrombotic therapy in people who continue to have neurological symptoms when treated with antithrombotic therapy alone.

Stent-Assisted Angioplasty in Spontaneous Bilateral Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection

Internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) results from a tear in the intima or rupture of the vasa vasorum with bleeding within the media resulting in separation of the vessel wall layers and a false lumen. It may cause arterial stenosis, occlusion, or dissecting pseudoaneurysm. Currently, the treatment of ICAD is controversial, including drug therapy and endovascular stent implantation. Simultaneous spontaneous dissection of bilateral carotid artery is rarely reported. We reported a 39-year-old-man with bilateral ICAD. Although the long-term durability of endovascular stent remains to be determined, for ICAD failed with active drug treatment and combined with hemodynamic impairment, early endovascular stent should be considered.

Modified Split-Scan Computed Tomography (CT) Diagnostics of Severely Injured Patients: First Results from a Level I Trauma Center Using a Dedicated Head-and-Neck CT-Angiogram for the Detection of Cervical Artery Dissections

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic cervical artery dissections are associated with high mortality and morbidity in severely injured patients. After finding even higher incidences than reported before, we decided to incorporate a dedicated head-and-neck computed tomography angiogram (CT-A) in our imaging routine for patients who have been obviously severely injured or, according to trauma mechanism, are suspected to be severely injured.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 134 consecutive trauma patients with an ISS ≥ 16 admitted to our level I trauma center during an 18 month period were included. All underwent standardized whole-body CT in a 256-detector row scanner with a dedicated head-and-neck CT-A realized as single-bolus split-scan routine. Incidence, mortality, patient and trauma characteristics, and concomitant injuries were recorded and analyzed in patients with carotid artery dissection (CAD) and vertebral artery dissection (VAD).

RESULTS

Of the 134 patients included, 7 patients had at least one cervical artery dissection (CeAD; 5.2%; 95% CI 1.5-9.0%). Six patients (85.7%) had carotid artery dissections, with one patient having a CAD of both sides and one patient having a CAD and contralateral VAD combined. Two patients (28.6%) showed a VAD. Overall mortality was 14.3%, neurologic morbidity was 28.6%. None of the patients showed any attributable neurologic symptoms on admission. The new scanning protocol led to further 5 patients with suspected CeAD during the study period, all ruled out by additional magnetic resonance imaging with angiogram (MRI/MR-A).

CONCLUSION

A lack of specific neurologic symptoms on admission urges the need for a dedicated imaging pathway for severely injured patients, reliable for the detection of cervical artery dissections. Although our modified CT protocol with mandatory dedicated CT-A led to false positives requiring additional magnetic resonance imaging, it likely helped reduce possible therapeutic delays.

Forensic and Clinical Issues in a Case of Motorcycle Blunt Trauma and Bilateral Carotid Artery Dissection

Internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) after motorcycle accidents is unusual but life threatening if not promptly diagnosed and treated. We report the case of a motorcyclist involved in a frontal collision with a car, suffering injuries due to direct blunt trauma and indirect trauma by sudden deceleration force. Bilateral ICAD was diagnosed by computed tomography angiogram 5 days after the accident. Here in, starting from a medicolegal case, we emphasized some clinical criteria to make a prompt diagnosis to prevent permanent neurological deficit in this pathology whose best management is still under the debate. An unusual case of ICAD is described with regard to both forensic and promptly diagnostic therapeutic management.

Endovascular management of carotid and vertebral artery dissections with new generation double-mesh stent and protection systems - single-center early and midterm results

INTRODUCTION

Symptomatic dissections (SD) of cervical arteries are still a therapeutic problem. Although endovascular management (EM) is currently a preferred method of treatment of SD, complications associated with this method of treatment in published reports are quite frequent (3-16%).

AIM

In this retrospective study we analyzed the results of EM with novel, double-mesh stent and protection systems (PS) for SD of the internal carotid (IC) or vertebral arteries (VA) that coexisted with hemodynamically significant stenosis or aneurysmatic dilatation of the dissected artery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated the results of EM in 19 patients (men 15, median age: 55, range: 25-83), presenting with SD of the IC or VA with coexisting stenosis and/or aneurysmatic dilatation of the artery in segments C1-C5 of IC or V0-V4 of VA. Twelve patients had a stroke, 6 TIA, and 3 patients a headache and/or a neck pain with Horner syndrome. Stents and PS were tailored according to the location, length of dissection and coexisting stenotic or aneurysmatic lesions.

RESULTS

There were no new strokes, in-hospital deaths or other serious morbidities during the procedure and postprocedural hospital stay. There were no fatalities during 6-40 months of follow-up. In control angiographies performed after interventions all patients demonstrated a patent target artery, complete coverage of the dissection and aneurysm by stents and no new lesions in the area of the previous dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that EM of SD of IC and VA with the new stents and PS is safe and effective with good early and midterm results.

Dissecting Aneurysm of the Internal Carotid Artery as a Complication of Facial Bone Trauma

The involvement of the internal carotid artery in dissecting aneurysm is rarely reported in the literature and may occur as a complication of trauma, surgery, and other medical conditions. We report a case of a 22-year-old male who was involved in a motor vehicle accident with associated multiple orthopedic and maxillofacial fractures. During surgical management, the patient was incidentally diagnosed with a dissecting aneurysm involving the right internal carotid artery.

Incidence of traumatic carotid and vertebral artery dissections: results of cervical vessel computed tomography angiogram as a mandatory scan component in severely injured patients

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the true incidence of cervical artery dissections (CeADs) in trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥16, since head-and-neck computed tomography angiogram (CTA) is not a compulsory component of whole-body trauma computed tomography (CT) protocols.

Patients and methods

A total of 230 consecutive trauma patients with an ISS of ≥16 admitted to our Level I trauma center during a 24-month period were prospectively included. Standardized whole-body CT in a 256-detector row scanner included a head-and-neck CTA. Incidence, mortality, patient and trauma characteristics, and concomitant injuries were recorded and analyzed retrospectively in patients with carotid artery dissection (CAD) and vertebral artery dissection (VAD).

Results

Of the 230 patients included, 6.5% had a CeAD, 5.2% had a CAD, and 1.7% had a VAD. One patient had both CAD and VAD. For both, CAD and VAD, mortality is 25%. One death was caused by fatal cerebral ischemia due to high-grade CAD. A total of 41.6% of the patients with traumatic CAD and 25% of the patients with VAD had neurological sequelae.

Conclusion

Mandatory head-and-neck CTA yields higher CeAD incidence than reported before. We highly recommend the compulsory inclusion of a head-and-neck CTA to whole-body CT routines for severely injured patients.