Treatment of Lymphatic Complications after Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy

Evaluation of balloon and self-expandable stents for common femoral artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation is currently recommended for patients with hostile groin (prior femoral bifurcation open surgery, history of radiotherapy) or severe comorbidities (advanced age, frailty, obesity). Preliminary results have shown favorable outcomes. Among the different endovascular techniques (atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, plain balloon angioplasty, drug-coated balloon angioplasty, stenting), stents are mainly used but the best type of stent to use is still debated. The aim of this study was to assess the value of balloon-expandable stents (BES) and self-expandable stents (SES) for stenosis of the femoral bifurcation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with stenosis of the CFA and its bifurcation were included from 2016 to 2022. Demographic data, the type of stent used, procedural data, and angiographic variables were collected. Groups were defined according to the type of stent implanted. Primary patency was defined as a binary end point based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio of ≤2.4 as assessed by duplex ultrasound examination, in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Secondary outcomes were clinical sustained improvement, freedom from TLR at 12 months, mean ankle-brachial index improvement, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency.

RESULTS

A total of 90 procedures conducted in 77 patients were included in this study, 26 in the SES group and 64 in the BES group. The most common symptomatology according to the Rutherford classification was class 2, 3, and 4 (28%, 48%, and 8%, respectively). The type of lesions in the CFA, assessed using the Azema classification, were comparable between both groups (SES/BES group type 2: 31%/27%; type 3: 54%/62%). At 12 months, the primary patency rates for SES and BES were 88% (26/26 patients) and 72% (58/64 patients) (P = .10). At 12 months, freedom from TLR rates for SES and BES were 97% vs 81%, respectively (P = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

SES for CFA stenosis show a trend toward better patency and freedom from TLR rates at 12 months. However, controlled studies are warranted to further investigate the significance of this trend.

Morbidity and mortality of common femoral endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Common femoral endarterectomy (CFE) comprises the current standard-of-care for symptomatic common femoral artery occlusive disease. Although it provides effective inflow revascularization via a single incision, it remains an invasive procedure in an often-frail patient population. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the morbidity and mortality of CFE in a contemporary cohort.

METHODS

Consecutive CFEs performed at a large, urban hospital were reviewed. Six-month mortality, local complications (hematoma, lymphatic leak, pseudoaneurysm, wound infection, and/or dehiscence), and systemic complications were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 129 isolated CFEs were performed over 7 years for claudication (36%), rest pain (16%), tissue loss (29%), or acute on chronic limb ischemia (21%). Mean age was 75 ± 9 years, and 68% of patients were male. Comorbidities were prevalent, including coronary artery disease (54%), diabetes (41%), chronic pulmonary disease (25%), and congestive heart failure (22%). The majority of CFEs were performed under general anesthesia (98%) with patch angioplasty using bovine pericardium (73% vs 27% Dacron). Twenty-two patients (17%) sustained local complications following the procedure; their occurrence was significantly associated with obesity (P = .002) but no technical or operative factors. Nineteen patients (15%) sustained serious systemic complications; their occurrence was significantly associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (P < .001), and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (P = .002). By 6 months, 17 patients (13%) had died. Being on dialysis, presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and being in a high ASA class at the time of operation were all associated with 6-month mortality; a high ASA class at the time of operation was independently predictive of mortality (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-9.24; P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Although commonly performed, CFE is not a benign vascular procedure. Disease presentation, anesthetic risk, and expected longevity play an important role in clinical outcomes. Evolving endovascular approaches to the common femoral artery could serve to reduce morbidity and mortality in the future.

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Occlusive lesions of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation have traditionally been treated with open surgery. Although long-term patency rates after open surgery are excellent, such repairs are associated with substantial local and general morbidity. In recent years, different treatment options have emerged within percutaneous endovascular repair. We hereby present a narrative review on endovascular treatment modalities and a treatment algorithm for endovascular revascularisation of the CFA and its bifurcation. Lesion analysis, access issues, vessel preparation tools, and types of repairs with or without the involvement of the bifurcation are described. Based on current data, an interventional approach can result in high technical success and acceptable mid-term patency rates. Further comparative evidence with open surgery and/or between the different types of endovascular repairs is required to improve the current treatment algorithm.

Percutaneous fractionated radiotherapy of the groin to eliminate lymphatic fistulas after vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Vascular surgery of the inguinal area can be complicated by persistent lymphatic fistulas. Rapid and effective treatment is essential to prevent infection, sepsis, bleeding, and possible leg amputation. Current data on irradiation of lymphatic fistulas lack recommendation on the appropriate individual and total dose, the time of irradiation, and the target volume. Presumably, a dose of 0.3-0.5 to 1-12 Gy should be sufficient for the purpose. Currently, radiotherapy is a "can" recommendation, with a level 4 low evidence and a grade C recommendation, according to the DEGRO S2 guidelines. As part of a pilot study, we analyzed the impact and limitations of low-dose radiation therapy in the treatment of inguinal lymphatic fistulas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

As a part of an internal quality control project, patients with lymphatic fistulas irradiated in the groin area after vascular surgery for arterial occlusive disease (AOD) III-IV, repair of pseudo aneurysm or lymph node dissection due to melanoma were selected, and an exploratory analysis on retrospectively collected data performed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (10 males and 2 females) aged 62.83 ± 12.14 years underwent open vascular reconstruction for stage II (n = 2), III (n = 1), and IV (n = 7) arterial occlusive disease (AOD), lymph node dissection for melanoma (n = 1) or repair of a pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). Surgical vascular access was obtained through the groin and was associated with a persistent lymphatic fistula, secreting more than 50 ml/day. Patients were irradiated five times a week up to a maximum of 10 fractions for the duration of the radiation period. Fraction of 0.4 Gy was applied in the first 7 cases, while 5 patients were treated with a de-escalating dose of 0.3 Gy. There was a resolution of the lymphatic fistula in every patient without higher grade complications.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose irradiation of the groin is a treatment option for persistent lymphatic fistula after inguinal vascular surgery.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Techniques for Management of Postoperative Lymphatic Leaks After Groin Surgery

PURPOSE

Plastic surgeons are often consulted to manage postoperative groin lymphatic leaks that may lead to serious sequelae if not promptly treated. Because there are no standardized guidelines for best treatment practices, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of multiple management modalities to ultimately guide decision making for surgeons.

METHODS

Literature surrounding lymphatic leaks in the groin was reviewed from PubMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2000, to December 1, 2020 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. The inciting procedure, postoperative lymphatic complication, used management, and days to resolution were recorded. Pairwise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni continuity correction were used to determine which treatment modalities differed significantly and accounted for multiple hypothesis testing.

RESULTS

A total of 1468 total studies were initially found, which narrowed to 267 unique articles after duplicates were removed. Twelve articles ultimately met the inclusion criteria and were included in the data analysis. There were 264 groin complications, of which 217 were initially treated with conservative management, 81 with a minimally invasive procedure, and 125 with surgery. More than 95% of all cases had an inciting procedure of a vascular nature.For vascular surgery-induced lymphatic leak treated by minimally invasive and surgical techniques, a significantly higher number of cases resolved compared with those treated conservatively (100% and 96.7% compared with 29.5%, respectively, P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the proportion that resolved between the minimally invasive and surgical cases (P = 0.11). Vascular cases that were only managed with surgery had significantly shorter days to resolution compared with cases that first attempted conservative management (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both minimally invasive and surgical options have increased odds of resolution and lower failure rates compared with conservative management alone. The odds of resolution were higher when treated with more invasive procedures compared with conservative-only management, but the mean days to resolution was longer. This meta-analysis depicts successful resolution with procedural management and supports an initial trial of minimally invasive techniques.

Nonoperative Management of a Recurrent Postoperative Inguinal Lymphatic Leak via Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

Lymphatic leaks are common following common femoral vessel exposure for cardiac surgical procedures. The management of this complication can be difficult and is often uncomfortable for the patient. This case report describes the successful nonoperative treatment of a recurrent lymphatic leak from an inguinal surgical wound via negative-pressure wound therapy. Negative pressure may be considered a minimally invasive, effective, and acceptable way to treat postoperative lymphatic leaks at the groin.

Radiotherapy of Lymphatic Fistulas after Vascular Surgery in the Groin

PURPOSE

Lymphatic fistulas are common complications after vascular surgery especially in the groin, which can lead to a prolongation of the inpatient stay, wound infections and follow-up operations. Radiotherapy is one of the non-surgical treatment options. However, there is limited evidence and discussion about the ideal dosage and timing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis was performed on patients from a German university hospital and included 191 patients with 206 lymphatic fistulas from 2005 to 2016. Four different endpoints were analyzed. The patients were irradiated with a fraction dose of 3 Gy up to a cumulative dose of 9 Gy (94/206 cases) or 18 Gy (112/206 cases). The median age of the patients was 70.5 years with 74% male and 26% female patients. Vascular surgery included bypass grafts (52%), thrombendarterectomy/patch angioplasty (26%), and vascular access for aortic endografts (22%).

RESULTS

The response to radiotherapy for the four different endpoints was 88% (25% decrease in secretion volume), 80% (secretion below 50 ml/24 hours), 81% (removal of the drainage) and 75% (freedom from any intervention), respectively. The overall response for all four endpoints was 63% (129/206) after completion of radiotherapy, and 34% (70/206) after one course with a total dose up to 9 Gy. The median lymphatic secretion was 150 ml/24 hours before radiotherapy and 60 ml/24 hours one day after the end of therapy. The drainage could be removed a median of 3 days after radiotherapy completion. There was no significant difference between patients starting the radiation within 5-9 days or ≥10 days postoperatively (p = .971 OR = 0.99; 95%-CI: 0.56 to 1.74). No relevant factors influencing the response rate could be identified. Re-operation was required in 50/206 cases (25%), in 24/206 cases (12%) due to persistent lymphatic fistula and complications and in 26/206 cases (13%) due to wound and/or vascular complications.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy seems to be an effective, non-surgical treatment option for reducing lymphatic secretion after vascular surgery in the groin. Starting radiation early (≤9 days) or late (≥10 days) postoperatively does not affect the success rate.

[Fluorescence lymphangiography in the diagnosis and navigated microsurgical treatment of iatrogenic lymph vessel lesion]

Injuries of lymph vessels can occur due to trauma or surgery and may result in significant difficulties for patients. Wound healing is often severely impaired and patients may need extensive surgical treatment. A case of iatrogenic lymph vessel injury after excision of a skin tumor in the axillary region is reported, as is the reconstructive procedure by lymphaticovenous anastomosis.

Isolated femoral artery revascularisation with or without iliac inflow improvement - a less invasive surgical option in critical limb ischemia

Background: Isolated femoral artery revascularisation (iFAR) represents a well-established surgical method in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving common femoral artery disease. Data for iFAR in multilevel PAD are inconsistent, particularly in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of iFAR in CLI regarding major amputation and reintervention and to identify associated risk factors for this outcome. Patients and methods: The data used have been derived from the German Registry of Firstline Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia (CRITISCH). A total of 1200 patients were enrolled in 27 vascular centres. This sub-analysis included patients, which were treated with iFAR with/without concomitant iliac intervention. For detection of risk factors for the combined endpoint of major amputation and/or reintervention, selection of variables for multiple regression was conducted using stepwise forward/backward selection by Akaike's information criterion. Results: 95 patients were included (mean age: 72 years ± 10.82; 64.2% male). Of those, 32 (33.7%) participants reached the combined endpoint. Risk factor analysis revealed continued tobacco use (odds ratio [OR] 2.316, confidence interval [CI] 0.832-6.674), TASC D-lesion (OR: 2.293, CI: 0.869-6.261) and previous vascular intervention in the trial leg (OR: 2.720, CI: 1.037-7.381) to be associated with reaching the combined endpoint. Conclusions: iFAR provides a reasonable, surgical option to treat CLI. Lesion length (TASC D) seems to have a negative impact on outcome. Further research is required to better define the future role of iFAR for combined femoro-popliteal lesions in CLI - best in terms of a randomised controlled trial.