Management of Tumor- and Nontumor-related Aorto-esophageal and Aorto-bronchial Fistulas

Neoaortoiliac system and cryopreserved human allograft for the treatment of aortic graft infections

OBJECTIVE

To report and compare neoaortoiliac system reconstruction and cryopreserved human allograft in treating aortic graft infections.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the data of the patients treated for aorto graft infections between January 2015 and May 2021 in our hospital. The clinical data, diagnostic procedures, and surgical options were evaluated. The primary endpoint of this study was the 30-day and 1-year mortality; secondary endpoints were major postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed a series of 31 consecutive patients (28 males; median age 72 years, range, 50-87 years) with aortic graft infection treated with NAIS (n = 20, 65%) or cryopreserved allograft (n = 11, 36%). The clinical presentation included fever attacks in 18 (58%) patients, abdominal pain in 15 (48%) patients, haemodynamic instability in 6 (19%) patients, and haematemesis in 2 (7%) patients. The median operative time of the NAIS was longer than CHA without a statistically significant difference (458 min vs. 359 min, p = .505). The postoperative morbidity for all patients was 81%, with no significant difference between NAIS and CHA groups (85% vs. 73%, p = .638). There was no limb thrombosis of the new reconstructions. Limb loss occurred in 4 (13%) patients, including 2 (10%) NAIS patients and 2 (18%) CHA patients. One NAIS patient developed complications in the form of a distal (femoral) disruption of the vein 15 days after surgery. There were no significant differences between NAIS and CHA groups in ICU stay (12 vs 8 days, .984) but in hospitalization (22 vs 33, p = .033). The most common bacteria isolated were staphylococci strains in 15 (48%). In 13 (36%) patients, candida was positive. The in-hospital 30-day and 1-year mortality for all patients was 16% (5/31) and 29% (9/31), with no significant differences between NAIS and CHA at 30 days (25% vs. 0, p = .133) or 1 year (35% vs. 18%, .429). Five NAIS patients died during the hospital stay; three of them had end-of-life decisions. After a median follow-up of 16 months (1-66 months), 12 (39%) patients died, including 9 patients with NAIS and 3 with CHA reconstructions. The causes of death included overwhelming sepsis in 5 (42%) patients, graft disruption in one (8%) NAIS patient, non-small cell lung cancer in one (8%) patient, COVID-19 in one (8%) patient and unknown causes (8%) in one.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-staged neoaortoiliac system reconstruction and cryopreserved human allografts show comparable short- and midterm results for treating aortic graft infections. However, both procedures remain challenging with high morbidity and mortality rates.

Who needs their descending thoracic aorta anyway? Extra-anatomic bypass for aorto-bronchial fistula after TEVAR

BACKGROUND

Aortobronchial fistula after TEVAR remains a vexing clinical problem associated with high mortality. Although a combination of endovascular and open surgical strategies have been reported in managing this pathology, there is as yet no definitive treatment algorithm that can be used for all patients. We discuss our approach to an aortobronchial fistula associated with an overtly infected aortic endograft.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old female sustained a traumatic aortic transection 14 years prior, managed by an endovascular stent-graft. Due to persistent endoleak, she underwent open replacement of her descending thoracic aorta 4 years later. Ten years after her open aortic surgery, the patient presented with hemoptysis, and a pseudoaneurysm at her distal aortic suture line was identified on computed tomography, whereupon she underwent placement of an endograft. Eight weeks later, she presented with dyspnea, recurrent hemoptysis, malaise and fever, with clinical and radiographic evidence of an aortobronchial communication and an infected aortic stent-graft. The patient underwent management via a two-stage open surgical approach, constituting an extra-anatomic bypass from her ascending aorta to distal descending aorta and subsequent radical excision of her descending aorta with all associated infected prosthetic material and repair of the airway.

CONCLUSION

Aortobronchial fistula after TEVAR represents a challenging complex clinical scenario. Extra-anatomic aortic bypass followed by radical debridement of all contaminated tissue may provide the best option for durable longer-term outcomes.

Single-Center Retrospective Subgroup Analysis of "Primary Aortic" (Aneurysm, Aortic Dissection, PAU) and "Secondary Aortic" (Iatrogenic, Trauma, Aortoesophageal Fistula) Indications for Emergency TEVAR

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the treatment of "primary aortic" (aneurysm, aortic dissection, penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU)) and "secondary aortic" (iatrogenic, trauma, and aortoesophageal fistula) pathologies.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a cohort of patients treated at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2021. The primary end point was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were the duration of the procedure, duration of postoperative intensive care treatment, length of hospital stay, and the nature and severity of postoperative complications according to the Dindo-Clavien classification.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients underwent TEVAR for emergency indications. Twenty-two patients were treated for primary and twelve patients for secondary aortic pathologies. Concerning in-hospital mortality, no statistically significant difference could be observed between the primary and secondary aortic groups (27.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.711). Patients with an aortoesophageal fistula had a mortality rate of 66.7%. Postoperative morbidity (Dindo-Clavien > 3) was also not statistically significantly different between the primary and secondary aortic groups (36.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.86). Preoperative hemoglobin level (p < 0.001 for mortality, p = 0.002 for morbidity), hemoglobin level difference (p = 0.022, p = 0.032), postoperative creatinine level (p = 0.009, p = 0.035), and pre- and postoperative lactate levels (p < 0.001 for both mortality and morbidity) were found to be independent factors associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity (Dindo-Clavien > 3), respectively. The preoperative creatinine level was found to be associated with mortality (p = 0.024) but not morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and in-hospital mortality are still considerable after emergency TEVAR for both primary and secondary aortic indications. Pre- and postoperative levels of hemoglobin, creatinine, and lactate may be valuable to predict patient outcomes.

Outcomes of Candida and Non-Candida Aortic Graft Infection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the outcomes of Candida- and non-Candida-associated aortic graft infections.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients treated for aortic graft infection from 2015 to 2021 in our hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients (56 men; median age, 69 years; range, 50-87 years) were admitted with aortic graft infection, including 21 (32%) patients in the Candida group and 45 (68%) in the non-Candida group. The average time between initial operation and presentation of aortic graft infection was 50 months (range, 1-332 months). Graft-enteric fistulas (GEFs) were more often in the Candida group (57% vs 27%, P = .017). The most proven causative fungal specimen was C. albicans in 16 (76%) patients. Non-albicans Candida was found in 9% of all patients and 29% of the Candida patients. The median ICU length of stay was longer in the Candida group than non-Candida (10 vs 9 days, P = .012). Additionally, the median hospital length of stay was longer in the Candida group (33 vs 22 days, P = .048). There were no statistically significant differences between Candida and non-Candida groups according to the in-hospital mortality (24% vs 24%, P = .955), and 1-year mortality (38% vs 38%, P = .980).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with bacterial and fungal aortic graft infections have high rates of morbidity and mortality. We found no significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality between Candida and non-Candida patients. However, the ICU and hospital length of stay were longer in the Candida group.

Isolated Ruptured Paravisceral Penetrating Aortic Ulcers

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study is to investigate the clinical presentation, treatment options, and outcomes of the patients with isolated ruptured paravisceral penetrating aortic ulcers (PV-PAU).

METHODS

All patients presenting with acute aortic syndrome from 2015 to 2020 were screened, of which patients with isolated ruptured PV-PAU were included in this retrospective study. Study endpoints were the assessment of treatment options, technical success, and clinical outcome. Outcome measures included major perioperative complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (11 men; median age 68; IQR 60 - 75 years) presented with isolated ruptured PV-PAU were included in this study. The median follow-up was 25 months (range 1 - 51). Ruptured PV-PAUs represented 12.3% of the ruptured aortic aneurysms in all locations. PV-PAUs were found in segment A (n = 8, 50%), segment B (n = 5, 31%), and segment C (n = 3, 19%). PV-PAUs showed a mean protrusion distance of 27±10 mm, a mean neck diameter of 21 ± 7 mm, and maximal aortic diameter of 50 ± 11 mm. Five patients (31%) showed hemodynamic instability on admission and needed intense fluid resuscitation. Of those, 2 patients needed urgent laparotomy with a fast transabdominal supraceliac aortic clamping, one needed an aortic balloon occlusion to obtain rapid aortic control. The open aortic repair was the most frequently performed surgery (11/16, 69%), followed by hybrid procedures (3/16) and parallel graft chimney technique (2/16). Two patients died during the follow-up, calculating for in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates of 6 - 12%, respectively. The postoperative morbidity rate was 31%. Postoperative complications included acute renal failure (31%), pneumonia (25%), and 1case of ischemic colitis (6%). No spinal cord ischemia was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Ruptured PV-PAU is a rare and challenging diagnostic and therapeutic entity. Open aortic repair seems to be a reliable option in treating patients with isolated ruptured PV-PAUs. Hybrid procedures and parallel stent-graft techniques can only be used in selected patients.

Preoperative and ICU Scoring Models for Predicting the In-Hospital Mortality of Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

This study's objective was to compare several preoperative and intensive care unit (ICU) prognostic scoring systems for predicting the in-hospital mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary university center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 157 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 157 patients (82% male) presented with RAAA at Charité University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2020. The mean age was 74 years (standard deviation ten years). In-hospital mortality was 29% (n = 45), of whom nine patients (6%) died en route to the operating room, 13 (8%) on the operating table, and 23 (15%) in the ICU. A total of 135 patients (86%) were admitted to the ICU. All six models demonstrated good discriminating performance between survivors and nonsurvivors. Overall, the area under the curve (AUC) for RAAA preoperative scores was greater than those for ICU scores. The largest AUC was achieved with the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) RAAA risk score (AUC = 0.87 for all patients, AUC = 0.84 for patients admitted to the ICU), followed by Hardman Index (AUC = 0.83 for all patients, AUC = 0.81 for patients admitted to the ICU), and Glasgow Aneurysm Score (AUC = 0.74 for all patients, AUC = 0.83 for patients admitted to the ICU). The largest AUC for ICU scores (only patients admitted to the ICU) was achieved with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (0.75), followed by Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (0.73), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative and ICU scores can predict the mortality of patients presenting with RAAA. In addition, the discriminatory ability of preoperative scores between survivors and nonsurvivors was larger than that for ICU scores.