Psychosis as an adverse effect of monoclonal antibody immunotherapy

Brain microvascular endothelial cells and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in psychotic disorders

Although there is convergent evidence for blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction and peripheral inflammation in schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD), it is unknown whether BBB deficits are intrinsic to brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) or arise via effects of peripheral inflammatory cytokines. We examined BMEC function using stem cell-based models to identify cellular and molecular deficits associated with BBB dysfunction in SZ and BD. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from 4 SZ, 4 psychotic BD and 4 healthy control (HC) subjects were differentiated into BMEC-"like" cells. Gene expression and protein levels of tight junction proteins were assessed. Transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and permeability were assayed to evaluate BBB function. Cytokine levels were measured from conditioned media. BMECs derived from human iPSCs in SZ and BD did not show differences in BBB integrity or permeability compared to HC BMECs. Outlier analysis using TEER revealed a BBB-deficit (n = 3) and non-deficit (n = 5) group in SZ and BD lines. Stratification based on BBB function in SZ and BD patients identified a BBB-deficit subtype with reduced barrier function, tendency for increased permeability to smaller molecules, and decreased claudin-5 (CLDN5) levels. BMECs from the BBB-deficit group show increased matrix metallopeptidase 1 (MMP1) activity, which correlated with reduced CLDN5 and worse BBB function, and was improved by tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and MMP1 inhibition. These results show potential deficits in BMEC-like cells in psychotic disorders that result in BBB disruption and further identify TNFα and MMP1 as promising targets for ameliorating BBB deficits.

Anti-Inflammatory Therapy as a Promising Target in Neuropsychiatric Disorders

This chapter analyzes the therapeutic potential of current anti-inflammatory drugs in treating psychiatric diseases from a neuro-immunological perspective. Based on the bidirectional brain-immune system relationship, the rationale is that a dysregulated inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis of psychiatric and neurological disorders, while the immunology function is associated with psychological variables like stress, affective disorders, and psychosis. Under certain social, psychological, and environmental conditions and biological factors, a healthy inflammatory response and the associated "sickness behavior," which are aimed to resolve a physical injury and microbial threat, become harmful to the central nervous system. The features and mechanisms of the inflammatory response are described across the main mental illnesses with a special emphasis on the profile of cytokines and the function of the HPA axis. Next, it is reviewed the potential clinical utility of immunotherapy (cytokine agonists and antagonists), glucocorticoids, unconventional anti-inflammatory agents (statins, minocycline, statins, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)), the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and particularly celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitor, as adjuvants of conventional psychiatric medications. The implementation of anti-inflammatory therapies holds great promise in psychiatry. Because the inflammatory background may account for the etiology and/or progression of psychiatric disorders only in a subset of patients, there is a need to elucidate the immune underpinnings of the mental illness progression, relapse, and remission. The identification of immune-related bio-signatures will ideally assist in the stratification of the psychiatric patient to predict the risk of mental disease, the prognosis, and the response to anti-inflammatory therapy.

Proposed protocol for the investigation of the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine for patients with psychosis, with pilot safety findings from a Chinese psychiatrist's self-experiment

We present a study protocol designed to test the safety and efficacy of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine in patients with major psychotic disease. A secondary objective is to investigate optional vaccination methods for these patients. In a self-experiment, a Chinese psychiatrist examined the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine under clinical use of typical antipsychotic agents and sedatives (olanzapine, duloxetine, and diazepam). For patients with extremely drug-resistant conditions, the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine under electroconvulsive therapy was also investigated. The entire study process was recorded on high-definition video. This clinical study protocol is, to our knowledge, the first of its kind. Our findings will shed new light on the protection of patients with psychotic diseases from COVID-19 infection. The protocol was registered at Chinese clinical trial registry (www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100051297).

SARS-CoV-2 Psychiatric Sequelae: A Review of Neuroendocrine Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies

From the earliest days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there have been reports of significant neurological and psychological symptoms following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This narrative review is designed to examine the potential psychoneuroendocrine pathogenic mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 elicits psychiatric sequelae as well as to posit potential pharmacologic strategies to address and reverse these pathologies. Following a brief overview of neurological and psychological sequelae from previous viral pandemics, we address mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 could enter or otherwise elicit changes in the CNS. We then examine the hypothesis that COVID-19-induced psychiatric disorders result from challenges to the neuroendocrine system, in particular the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis and monoamine synthesis, physiological mechanisms that are only further enhanced by the pandemic-induced social environment of fear, isolation, and socioeconomic pressure. Finally, we evaluate several FDA-approved therapeutics in the context of COVID-19-induced psychoneuroendocrine disorders.

Impulsive conditions in Parkinson's disease: A pharmacosurveillance-supported list

BACKGROUND

"Impulse Control Disorders" are behavioral conditions (e.g., gambling, hypersexuality), which are increasingly reported as reactions to dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. The Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's disease focuses only on 6 behaviors. Nonetheless, impulsivity could affect the entire range of human practices. Because of their heterogeneity and undefined boundaries, it is not clear what conditions should be considered as Impulse Control Disorders. This results in poorly standardized scientific literature and underdiagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to create a comprehensive list of possible manifestations of drug-induced Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson's disease and test it on pharmacosurveillance data.

METHODS

PubMed was used to identify reviews in English about Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson's disease. Mentioned conditions were charted and translated to the lexicon of MedDRA, ICD-11, and DSM-5. The relevant MedDRA terms were used to test potential association with dopamine agonists on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

RESULTS

50 reviews published between 2001 and 2020 were identified. 66 conditions were collected as possible Impulse Control Disorders. Pathological gambling, shopping, eating and sexuality, dopamine dysregulation syndrome, hobbyism and punding were the most frequently mentioned, together with leisure activities, body-focused compulsivity, disruptive, impulse control and conduct disorders, and substance abuse. All these conditions were disproportionately reported with dopamine agonists, except for substance abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

We defined a potential extended list of ICDs, which, along with its conversion to international taxonomies, can support the identification of drug-induced conditions in pharmacovigilance archives, as well as monitoring processes in clinical practice.

Neuropathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019: neuroinflammation and blood brain barrier disruption are critical pathophysiological processes that contribute to the clinical symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) first discovered in Wuhan, Hubei province, China in December 2019. SARS-CoV-2 has infected several millions of people, resulting in a huge socioeconomic cost and over 2.5 million deaths worldwide. Though the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is not fully understood, data have consistently shown that SARS-CoV-2 mainly affects the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence has implicated the central nervous system in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unfortunately, however, the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 induced impairment of the central nervous system are not completely known. Here, we review the literature on possible neuropathogenic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 induced cerebral damage. The results suggest that downregulation of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with increased activity of the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and cathepsin L in SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion may result in upregulation of proinflammatory mediators and reactive species that trigger neuroinflammatory response and blood brain barrier disruption. Furthermore, dysregulation of hormone and neurotransmitter signalling may constitute a fundamental mechanism involved in the neuropathogenic sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The viral RNA or antigenic peptides also activate or interact with molecular signalling pathways mediated by pattern recognition receptors (e.g., toll-like receptors), nuclear factor kappa B, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription, complement cascades, and cell suicide molecules. Potential molecular targets and therapeutics of SARS-CoV-2 induced neurologic damage are also discussed.

New Insight on the Safety of Erenumab: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports of Adverse Events Recorded in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database

AIM

The aim of this article was to provide an overview of adverse events reported for erenumab in post-marketing through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and perform a disproportionality analysis with other drugs used for acute or preventative treatment of migraine as controls.

METHODS

FAERS was screened from the first quarter of 2018 to the second quarter of 2020 (latest data update 30 June 2020). Clinical and demographic characteristics of cases were described along with the seriousness and outcome of adverse events. Disproportionality analyses were performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR).

RESULTS

In total, 23,312 cases were reported during the study period, 67.0% by consumers. Cases in the age range 18-64 years (10,922 cases; 45.8%), in female sex (15,099 cases; 64.8%), and with adverse events that were classified as non-serious (19,626 cases; 84.2%) were the most prevalent in the database. After the exclusion of duplicates, 146 fatal cases were identified. A total of 1303 unlabeled adverse events were reported, of which 49 had statistically significant disproportionality of reporting in comparison with other drugs used for acute or preventative treatment of migraine. Identified disproportionality signals included alopecia, depression, anxiety, myocardial infarction, increased heart rate, pulmonary embolism, weight alteration, insomnia, tinnitus, and influenza-like symptoms. Injection-site reactions (labeled events) were co-reported with errors in administration procedures.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events reported during the first 2 years of post-marketing surveillance were mostly non-serious and with a favorable prognosis. However, new safety aspects emerged for which further studies are needed to confirm the associations, prioritizing unlabeled events with consistent disproportionality signals (e.g., emerging in at least 4 out of 6 analyses).

Psychosis as an adverse effect of antibiotics

Adverse neuropsychiatric effects of antibiotic medications have been well documented. There is evidence suggesting a direct relationship between acute psychosis and antibiotic exposure. Conversely, the tetracycline antibiotic minocycline has been associated with improvements in psychopathology in patients with psychotic disorders. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of spontaneously reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of psychotic symptoms in adults for antibiotics and the odds of psychosis compared to minocycline for individual antibiotics and antibiotic classes. We searched the publicly available U.S. F.D.A. Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from inception through March 2020 for which an antibiotic was the suspected agent of an adverse drug reaction (ADR). We investigated 23 different antibiotics, comprising 183,265 adverse event reports and 2955 psychosis ADRs. For individual antibiotics, the prevalence of psychosis ADRs ranged from 0.3 to 3.8%. Fifteen antibiotics were associated with a significantly increased odds of psychosis (OR ​= ​1.67-9.48), including penicillins, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, cephalosporins, and doxycycline. Our results suggest that psychosis is a potential adverse effect of antibiotic treatment, but risks vary by specific agents. Future studies in this area are needed to identify specific underlying biological mechanisms that contribute to these associations. Findings may also inform on clinical decisions regarding the selection of antibiotic therapy in vulnerable patient populations.

COVID-19 and psychosis risk: Real or delusional concern?

Historical epidemiological perspectives from past pandemics and recent neurobiological evidence link infections and psychoses, leading to concerns that COVID-19 will present a significant risk for the development of psychosis. But are these concerns justified, or mere sensationalism? In this article we review the historical associations between viral infection and the immune system more broadly in the development of psychosis, before critically evaluating the current evidence pertaining to SARS-CoV-2 and risk of psychosis as an acute or post-infectious manifestation of COVID-19. We review the 42 cases of psychosis reported in infected patients to date, and discuss the potential implications of in utero infection on subsequent neurodevelopment and psychiatric risk. Finally, in the context of the wider neurological and psychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 and our current understanding of the aetiology of psychotic disorders, we evaluate possible neurobiological and psychosocial mechanisms as well as the numerous challenges in ascribing a causal pathogenic role to the infection.

Cellular mechanisms and molecular signaling pathways in stress-induced anxiety, depression, and blood-brain barrier inflammation and leakage

Depression and anxiety are comorbid conditions in many neurological or psychopathological disorders. Stress is an underlying event that triggers development of anxiety and depressive-like behaviors. Recent experimental data indicate that anxiety and depressive-like behaviors occurring as a result of stressful situations can cause blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, which is characterized by inflammation and leakage. However, the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. This paper sought to review recent experimental preclinical and clinical data that suggest possible molecular mechanisms involved in development of stress-induced anxiety and depression with associated BBB inflammation and leakage. Critical therapeutic targets and potential pharmacological candidates for treatment of stress-induced anxiety and depression with associated BBB dysfunctions are also discussed.