Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the psychiatric post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: A one-year retrospective cohort analysis of 33,908 patients

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), a rare stroke variant, poses treatment challenges, especially in young individuals. While guidelines recommend heparin followed by warfarin, warfarin has limitations. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer a potential alternative, but evidence on their use in CVT management is limited. The TriNetX study aimed to provide real-world insights into DOAC efficacy and safety for CVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from TriNetX to identify patients with CVT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the covariates between patients receiving DOACs and those receiving warfarin. The primary outcome was recurrent CVT, with secondary outcomes including intracerebral hemorrhage and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 1,507 patients with CVT, PSM generated 551 matched individuals in both the study and control groups. The study group that received DOACs exhibited a lower risk of CVT recurrence (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.77; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 0.628-0.97) and a higher 360-day event-free survival rate (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly reduced recurrent CVT risk in the study group, particularly among females (HR, 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.50-0.89), individuals aged 41-64 years (HR, 0.52; 95 % CI, 0.35-0.75), and patients with normal weight (HR, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.50-0.84). Moreover, recipients of DOACs had a lower risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (HR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.43-0.91) and comparable all-cause mortality (HR, 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.67-1.59).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the potential of DOACs as a promising treatment for CVT, demonstrating reduced recurrence and intracerebral hemorrhage risks with comparable all-cause mortality.

Association between catheter ablation and psychiatric disorder risk in adults with atrial fibrillation: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

Background

Given that atrial fibrillation (AF) s associated with a high risk of psychiatric disorders, understanding the potential benefits of catheter ablation is clinically significant. This study was conducted to examine whether catheter ablation can prevent psychiatric disorders in patients with AF.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted over two years using data from the TriNetX electronic health record network. The study included adults diagnosed with AF and treated with either antiarrhythmic or rate-control medications. Participants were divided into two groups: those who underwent catheter ablation and a control group without ablation. The primary outcome measured was a composite of anxiety, depression, and insomnia occurrence within one to three years post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included individual psychiatric disorders, suicidal ideation or attempts, dementia, cerebral infarction, and atopic dermatitis (as a negative control).

Results

We included 21,019 patients in each matched group. The ablation group demonstrated a lower risk of the primary combined outcome (hazard ratio(HR):0.873, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.784-0.973, p<0.01), and secondary outcomes including anxiety (HR:0.822, 95% CI:0.700-0.964; p=0.016), depression (HR:0.614, 95% CI:0.508-0.743; p<0.001), suicidal ideation or attempts (HR:0.392, 95% CI:0.165-0.934; p=0.028), dementia (HR:0.569, 95% CI:0.422-0.767; p<0.001), and cerebral infarction (HR:0.704, 95% CI:0.622-0.797; p<0.001) compared to the non-ablation group.

Conclusions

In patients with atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation was associated with a reduced risk of developing psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, depression, insomnia, suicidal ideation or attempt, and dementia, in comparison to those who did not undergo ablation. Clinicians should consider incorporating psychiatric risk factors into their comprehensive patient assessment when evaluating candidates for catheter ablation.

Neuropsychiatric Manifestations of Long COVID-19: A Narrative Review of Clinical Aspects and Therapeutic Approaches

The COVID-19 (C-19) pandemic has highlighted the significance of understanding the long-term effects of this disease on the quality of life of those infected. Long COVID-19 (L-C19) presents as persistent symptoms that continue beyond the main illness period, usually lasting weeks to years. One of the lesser-known but significant aspects of L-C19 is its impact on neuropsychiatric manifestations, which can have a profound effect on an individual's quality of life. Research shows that L-C19 creates neuropsychiatric issues such as mental fog, emotional problems, and brain disease symptoms, along with sleep changes, extreme fatigue, severe head pain, tremors with seizures, and pain in nerves. People with cognitive problems plus fatigue and mood disorders experience great difficulty handling everyday activities, personal hygiene, and social interactions. Neuropsychiatric symptoms make people withdraw from social activity and hurt relationships, thus causing feelings of loneliness. The unpredictable state of L-C19 generates heavy psychological pressure through emotional suffering, including depression and anxiety. Neuropsychiatric changes such as cognitive impairment, fatigue, and mood swings make it hard for people to work or study effectively, which decreases their output at school or work and lowers their job contentment. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the clinical data present in the literature regarding the neuropsychiatric manifestations of L-C19, to identify current methods of diagnosis and treatment that lead to correct management of the condition, and to highlight the impact of these manifestations on patients' quality of life.

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in depression: insights from recent clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines evidence from recent clinical trials on the therapeutic potential of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in major depressive disorder (MDD). We focus on the effects in MDD with comorbidities, younger populations, and high-inflammation presentations.

RECENT FINDINGS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies published between May 2022 and May 2024. The search was conducted on randomized controlled trials using omega-3 PUFAs with participants with a clinical diagnosis of depression.Higher doses of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (>1 g/day) improved measures of depression, particularly in MDD with elevated inflammation markers, comorbid cardiovascular diseases, late-life onset, and children and adolescent populations. Improvements in depressive symptoms were associated with increases in omega-3 PUFA-derived anti-inflammatory and proresolving lipid mediators. As adjuvant treatments, omega-3 PUFAs have potential benefits in mood, cognitive and metabolic functions, kynurenine and serotonin pathways, and alterations in corticolimbic functional connectivity.

SUMMARY

While evidence suggests promise, particularly for high-dose EPA and in inflammatory MDD subtypes, more research is needed to establish optimal dosing regimens, treatment duration, and patient subgroups most likely to benefit. Future studies should focus on sex differences, long-term effects, and potential synergies with other treatments.

Ocular neuroinflammatory response secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection-a review

With the consistent occurrence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the prevalence of various ocular complications has increased over time. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown to have neurotropism and therefore to lead to not only peripheral inflammatory responses but also neuroinflammation. Because the receptor for SARS-CoV-2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), can be found in many intraocular tissues, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may also contribute to persistent intraocular neuroinflammation, microcirculation dysfunction and ocular symptoms. Increased awareness of neuroinflammation and future research on interventional strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection are important for improving long-term outcomes, reducing disease burden, and improving quality of life. Therefore, the aim of this review is to focus on SARS-CoV-2 infection and intraocular neuroinflammation and to discuss current evidence and future perspectives, especially possible connections between conditions and potential treatment strategies.

Beyond Antivirals: Alternative Therapies for Long COVID

Long COVID or Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is a condition characterized by numerous lingering symptoms that persist for weeks to months following the viral illness. While treatment for PASC is still evolving, several therapeutic approaches beyond traditional antiviral therapies are being investigated, such as immune-modulating agents, anti-inflammatory drugs, and various supportive interventions focusing at alleviating symptoms and enhancing recovery. We aimed to summarize the breadth of available evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and highlight promising non-antiviral therapies for Long COVID/PASC. We followed the framework of a scoping methodology by mapping existing evidence from a range of studies, including randomized clinical trials, observational research, and case series. Treatments evaluated include metformin, low-dose naltrexone (LDN), dexamethasone, statins, omega-3 fatty acids, L-arginine, and emerging therapies like intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and therapeutic apheresis. Early findings suggest that metformin has the strongest clinical evidence, particularly from large phase 3 trials, while LDN and dexamethasone show potential based on observational studies. However, many treatments lack robust, large-scale trials. This review emphasizes the need for further research to confirm the efficacy of these treatments and guide clinical practice for Long COVID management.

Utilization frequency and patient-reported effectiveness of symptomatic therapies in post-COVID syndrome

BACKGROUND

To date there is no causal treatment for post-COVID syndrome, leaving symptomatic treatments as the primary recourse. However, the practical implementation and effectiveness of these interventions remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the utilization frequency of symptomatic therapies and patient-reported effectiveness across various treatment modalities at a German post-COVID center.

METHODS

As the baseline investigation we conducted a single-cohort retrospective study to analyze the frequency of symptomatic therapies among post-COVID patients who attended the post-COVID center of the University Hospital of Erlangen, between December 2022 to July 2023. Additionally, we administered a follow-up at least 3 months after the initial presentation, using a questionnaire to assess patient-reported improvements in post-COVID symptoms associated with the symptomatic therapies received.

RESULTS

Our study included 200 patients (mean age: 44.6 ± 12.6 years; 69.0% women; mean duration since acute infection: 15.3 ± 8.3 months). Pharmacotherapy was the predominant symptomatic treatment (79.5%), with psychotropic drugs (32.5%) and analgesics (31.5%) being the most frequently prescribed. Over half of the patients (55.5%) utilized vitamins and nutritional supplements. Hospital admission rates to acute care occurred in 35.5% of cases; 33.0% underwent inpatient rehabilitation and 31.0% pursued outpatient psychotherapy. Cardiologists (76.5%), pulmonologists (67.5%), and neurologists (65.5%) were the most consulted specialists. Therapies involving medical devices were infrequently employed (12.0%). In a follow-up questionnaire (response rate: 82.5%, 6.3 ± 2.2 months post-baseline), beta-blockers were the most effective pharmacological intervention with 31.5% of patients reporting strong to very strong symptom improvement, followed by antibiotics (29.6%). Furthermore, 33.0% of the patients perceived plasmapheresis to strongly alleviate symptoms. Only a small proportion of the sample attributed a strong or very strong symptom improvement to outpatient psychotherapy (11.0%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides initial insights into symptomatic therapy utilization and patient-reported symptom improvement in post-COVID syndrome. Further research into symptoms clusters and interdisciplinary collaboration are warranted to comprehensively address the multifaceted physical and psychological symptomatology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00033621) on March 20, 2024.

Addressing Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome in Cancer Patients, from Visceral Obesity and Myosteatosis to Systemic Inflammation: Implications in Cardio-Onco-Metabolism

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. The emerging field of cardio-oncology described several shared risk factors that predispose patients to both cardiovascular disease and cancer. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome is a chronic condition that occurs in many patients who have experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection, mainly based on chronic fatigue, sedentary lifestyle, cramps, breathing difficulties, and reduced lung performance. Post-acute COVID-19 exposes patients to increased visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, myosteatosis, and white adipose tissue content (surrounded by M1 macrophages and characterized by a Th1/Th17 phenotype), which increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and cancer recurrence. In this review, the main metabolic affections of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in cancer patients at low and high risk of cardiomyopathies will be summarized. Furthermore, several non-pharmacological strategies aimed at reducing atherosclerotic and cardiac risk will be provided, especially through anti-inflammatory nutrition with a low insulin and glycemic index, appropriate physical activity, and immune-modulating bioactivities able to reduce visceral obesity and myosteatosis, improving insulin-related signaling and myocardial metabolism.

Effectiveness of molnupiravir for treating COVID-19 in patients with psychiatric disorders

Objectives

This study investigated the clinical effectiveness of molnupiravir for treating non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pre-existing psychiatric disorder.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX research network to identify patients with psychiatric disorder who experienced non-hospitalized COVID-19 between 1 January 2022, and 1 May 2023. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to match patients receiving molnupiravir (treated group) with those who did not (untreated group). The outcome included short-term outcomes - the composite of all-cause hospitalization or death within 30 days and the risk of post-COVID-19 conditions up to a year after COVID-19 diagnosis.

Results

Two groups of 9,421 patients, each with balanced baseline characteristics, were identified using the PSM method. During the 30-day follow-up, treated group was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization or mortality compared to untreated group (HR, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.665-0.869). Compared to untreated group, treated group also exhibited a decreased risk of experiencing post-COVID-19 conditions, including chest/throat pain (HR, 0.615; 95% CI, 0.543-0.696), abnormal breathing (HR, 0.761; 95% CI, 0.687-0.884), abdominal symptoms (HR, 0.748; 95% CI, 0.674-0.831), fatigue (HR, 0.718; 95% CI, 0.638-0.808), headache (HR, 0.753; 95% CI, 0.665-0.852), cognitive symptoms (HR, 0.769; 95% CI, 0.630-0.940), myalgia (HR, 0.647; 95% CI, 0.530-0.789), cough (HR, 0.867; 95% CI, 0.770-0.978), and palpitation (HR, 0.641; 95% CI, 0.534-0.770) during the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Molnupiravir could be associated with lower rates of all-cause hospitalization or death and also lower risk of post-COVID-19 condition among non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pre-existing psychiatric disorder.

Post-sepsis psychiatric disorder: Pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment

Post-sepsis psychiatric disorder, encompassing anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and delirium, is a highly prevalent complication secondary to sepsis, resulting in a marked increase in long-term mortality among affected patients. Regrettably, psychiatric impairment associated with sepsis is frequently disregarded by clinicians. This review aims to summarize recent advancements in the understanding of the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of post-sepsis mental disorder, including coronavirus disease 2019-related psychiatric impairment. The pathophysiology of post-sepsis psychiatric disorder is complex and is known to involve blood-brain barrier disruption, overactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, neurotransmitter dysfunction, programmed cell death, and impaired neuroplasticity. No unified diagnostic criteria for this disorder are currently available; however, screening scales are often applied in its assessment. Modifiable risk factors for psychiatric impairment post-sepsis include the number of experienced traumatic memories, the length of ICU stay, level of albumin, the use of vasopressors or inotropes, daily activity function after sepsis, and the cumulative dose of dobutamine. To contribute to the prevention of post-sepsis psychiatric disorder, it may be beneficial to implement targeted interventions for these modifiable risk factors. Specific therapies for this condition remain scarce. Nevertheless, non-pharmacological approaches, such as comprehensive nursing care, may provide a promising avenue for treating psychiatric disorder following sepsis. In addition, although several therapeutic drugs have shown preliminary efficacy in animal models, further confirmation of their potential is required through follow-up clinical studies.