1
|
Bühler S, Akhoundova D, Jeker B, Legros M, Seipel K, Daskalakis M, Bacher U, Pabst T. Stem Cell Mobilization with Ixazomib and G-CSF in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020430. [PMID: 36672379 PMCID: PMC9856560 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard consolidation strategy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and for a subset of patients with relapsed/refractory disease. For stem cell mobilization, G-CSF alone or in combination with chemotherapy mobilizing agents and/or plerixafor are commonly used. Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor with less neurotoxic potential, which previously showed the ability to mobilize stem cells in preclinical studies. (2) Methods: Prospective single-center phase 1 study assessing the efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with ixazomib and G-CSF in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM undergoing HDCT and ASCT. Primary endpoint was percentage of patients achieving a yield of at least 6.0 × 106/kg CD34+ cells within the first apheresis. G-CSF (filgrastim) 10 μg/kg/day was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) from day 1 to day 5 (planned apheresis) and ixazomib 4 mg orally at day 4. Plerixafor 24 mg s.c. was administered if the stem cell mobilization with ixazomib and G-CSF was not sufficient. (3) Results: 19 patients were treated within the study between 06/2020 and 02/2021. The primary endpoint was reached in 17 (89%) patients, with a median of 7.1 × 106/kg CD34+ cells collected within the first apheresis, comparable to previously published results, and only 2 (11%) patients required a second apheresis. Median number of circulating CD34+ cells was 14.0 × 106/L (2.0-95.2) before the administration of ixazomib, and 33.0 × 106/L (4.2-177.0) pre-apheresis. However, 9 (47%) patients required the addition of plerixafor to ensure optimal stem cell collection. (4) Conclusions: The combination of ixazomib and G-CSF showed promising stem cell mobilizing activity in patients with MM prior to HDCT and ASCT. Future larger studies might further investigate the role of ixazomib in stem cell mobilization regimens for MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina Bühler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dilara Akhoundova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Jeker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Myriam Legros
- Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Katja Seipel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Daskalakis
- Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Bacher
- Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Pabst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luo C, Wu G, Huang X, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Huang Y, Huang Z, Li H, Hou Y, Chen J, Li X, Xu S. Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022; 13:123. [PMID: 35317856 PMCID: PMC8939102 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-02802-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Efficient mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from bone marrow niche into circulation is the key to successful collection and transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. The efficacy of various HSCs mobilization regimens has been widely investigated, but the results are inconsistent. Methods We performed comprehensive databases searching for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that comparing the efficacy of HSCs mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed with WinBUGS. Standard dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF SD) was chosen as the common comparator. Estimates of relative treatment effects for other regimens were reported as mean differences (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with associated 95% credibility interval (95% CrI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were obtained to present rank probabilities of all included regimens. Results Databases searching and study selection identified 44 eligible RCTs, of which the mobilization results are summarized. Then we compared the efficacy of mobilization regimens separately for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) by including 13 eligible trials for network meta-analysis, involving 638 patients with MM and 592 patients with NHL. For patients with MM, data are pooled from 8 trials for 6 regimens, including G-CSF in standard dose (SD) or reduced dose (RD) combined with cyclophosphamide (CY), intermediate-dose cytarabine (ID-AraC) or plerixafor. The results show that compared with G-CSF SD alone, 3 regimens including ID-AraC + G-CSF SD (MD 14.29, 95% CrI 9.99–18.53; SUCRA 1.00), G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD (MD 4.15, 95% CrI 2.92–5.39; SUCRA 0.80), and CY + G-CSF RD (MD 1.18, 95% CrI 0.29–2.07; SUCRA 0.60) are associated with significantly increased total number of collected CD34+ cells (× 106/kg), among which ID-AraC + G-CSF SD ranked first with a probability of being best regimen of 100%. Moreover, ID-AraC + G-CSF SD and G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD are associated with significantly higher successful rate of achieving optimal target (collecting ≥ 4–6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg). For patients with NHL, data are pooled from 5 trials for 4 regimens, the results show that compared with G-CSF SD alone, G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD (MD 3.62, 95% CrI 2.86–4.38; SUCRA 0.81) and G-CSF SD plus the new CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR-4) antagonist YF-H-2015005 (MD 3.43, 95% CrI 2.51–4.35; SUCRA 0.69) are associated with significantly higher number of total CD34+ cells collected. These 2 regimens are also associated with significantly higher successful rate of achieving optimal target. There are no significant differences in rate of achieving optimal target between G-CSF SD + Plerixafor SD and G-CSF + YF-H-2015005. Conclusions In conclusion, ID-AraC plus G-CSF is associated with the highest probability of being best mobilization regimen in patients with MM. For patients with NHL, G-CSF in combination with plerixafor or YF-H-2015005 showed similar improvements in HSCs mobilization efficacy. The relative effects of other chemotherapy-based mobilization regimens still require to be determined with further investigations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-022-02802-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengxin Luo
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Guixian Wu
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiangtao Huang
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Yali Zhang
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Yanni Ma
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Yarui Huang
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhen Huang
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu Hou
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Jieping Chen
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Xi Li
- Institute of Infectious Disease, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China.
| | - Shuangnian Xu
- Center for Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, #30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, China. .,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunotherapy of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|