1
|
Schoemans H, Goris K, Fieuws S, Theunissen K, Buvé K, Lammertijn L, Bries G, Demuynck H, Maertens V, Maes H, Meers S, Schuermans C, Vrelust I, De Samblanx H, Huysmans G, Vergote V, Beckers M, Maertens J, De Geest S, Dobbels F. Life 2.0: a comprehensive cross-sectional profiling of long-term allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors compared to a matched general population cohort. Bone Marrow Transplant 2025; 60:507-518. [PMID: 39915542 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-025-02521-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 04/06/2025]
Abstract
Long-term survivors after allogeneic cell transplantation (HCT) have unique needs. We performed a cross-sectional case-control study to describe the survivorship profile of 244 adult allogeneic transplantation recipients at a median of 8.4 years post-HCT and compared it to controls from the general population (matched 1:3 based on age, gender, and province of residence). The most prevalent medical complications were graft versus host disease (46.7%), impaired kidney function (63.9%), and the presence of a metabolic syndrome (33.6%). Survivors were significantly more likely to report a sub-optimal perceived health status than controls (82.0% versus 52.1% respectively, OR 4.57, p < 0.0001). They also reported significantly lower employment rates (42.6% versus 55.6% respectively, OR 0.389, p < 0.0001) and more polypharmacy (32.0% versus 9.6% respectively, OR 5.0, p < 0.0001) than matched counterparts. Social support and mental health were generally preserved. Apart for a concerning tendency to medication non-adherence, low physical activity (54.5%), and inappropriate exposition to UV (44.7%), health-related behavior was adequate. Many survivors have a health status comparable to chronically ill patients and, if so, should be managed as such. Novel patient-centered initiatives based on chronic care models could support survivors in preventing and dealing with long-term complications, regaining functionality, and returning to their role in society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Schoemans
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Kathy Goris
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- L-BioStat, KU Leuven-University of Leuven & Universiteit Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Theunissen
- Department of Hematology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Kristel Buvé
- Department of Hematology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Liesbet Lammertijn
- Department of Hematology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Greet Bries
- Department of Hematology, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Belgium
| | - Hilde Demuynck
- Department of Hematology, Jan Yperman Ziekenhuis, Ieper, Belgium
| | | | - Helena Maes
- Department of Hematology, Imeldaziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Stef Meers
- Department of Hematology, AZ Klina, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Inge Vrelust
- Department of Hematology, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium
| | | | - Griet Huysmans
- Department of Hematology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Vibeke Vergote
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marielle Beckers
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Maertens
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne Dobbels
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yi JC, Ballard S, Walsh C, Friedman DN, Ganz PA, Jacobs LA, Partridge AH, Mitchell SA, Leisenring WM, Syrjala KL, Baker KS. INteractive survivorship program to improve health care REsources [INSPIRE]: A study protocol testing a digital intervention with stepped care telehealth to improve outcomes for adolescent and young adult survivors. Contemp Clin Trials 2025; 148:107745. [PMID: 39561920 PMCID: PMC11700757 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAs, ages 15-39 at the time of diagnosis) experience significant adverse health and psychosocial outcomes. AYAs live with emotional distress and health care demands that exceed those of their healthy peers but can have difficulty accessing care. Digitally delivered interventions are an attractive option for AYA survivors, a population that routinely utilizes online resources when seeking health information and support. AIM By improving access to survivorship resources and support and strengthening health literacy and self-management skills, the INteractive Survivorship Program to Improve Health care REsources [INSPIRE] is designed to improve adherence to AYA health care guidelines and reduce cancer-related distress. We describe the protocol for a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the AYA-adapted INSPIRE program. METHODS/DESIGN The intervention includes an interactive mobile app, study website, and social media platforms, adding telehealth for those with continued distress, lower survivorship health care literacy, or poor engagement with the digital program at 6 weeks. Participants are randomized to INSPIRE or an active control. In the active control arm, survivors receive access to a study website with links to existing AYA survivor resources followed by delayed access to the INSPIRE program. Participants are not blinded; study staff not providing telehealth are blinded. The primary outcomes are cancer-related distress and health care adherence specific to second cancer and cardiometabolic screenings. DISCUSSION If effective, the program is positioned for accelerated implementation to improve care for AYA survivors by using a scalable informatics-based administration and largely digital intervention program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rotz SJ, Bhatt NS, Hamilton BK, Duncan C, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Beebe K, Buchbinder D, Burkhard P, Carpenter PA, Chaudhri N, Elemary M, Elsawy M, Guilcher GMT, Hamad N, Karduss A, Peric Z, Purtill D, Rizzo D, Rodrigues M, Ostriz MBR, Salooja N, Schoemans H, Seber A, Sharma A, Srivastava A, Stewart SK, Baker KS, Majhail NS, Phelan R. International recommendations for screening and preventative practices for long-term survivors of transplantation and cellular therapy: a 2023 update. Bone Marrow Transplant 2024; 59:717-741. [PMID: 38413823 PMCID: PMC11809468 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02190-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
As hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy expand to new indications and international access improves, the volume of HCT performed annually continues to rise. Parallel improvements in HCT techniques and supportive care entails more patients surviving long-term, creating further emphasis on survivorship needs. Survivors are at risk for developing late complications secondary to pre-, peri- and post-transplant exposures and other underlying risk-factors. Guidelines for screening and preventive practices for HCT survivors were originally published in 2006 and updated in 2012. To review contemporary literature and update the recommendations while considering the changing practice of HCT and cellular therapy, an international group of experts was again convened. This review provides updated pediatric and adult survivorship guidelines for HCT and cellular therapy. The contributory role of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) to the development of late effects is discussed but cGVHD management is not covered in detail. These guidelines emphasize special needs of patients with distinct underlying HCT indications or comorbidities (e.g., hemoglobinopathies, older adults) but do not replace more detailed group, disease, or condition specific guidelines. Although these recommendations should be applicable to the vast majority of HCT recipients, resource constraints may limit their implementation in some settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth J Rotz
- Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | | | - Betty K Hamilton
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Christine Duncan
- Dana Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mahmoud Aljurf
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yoshiko Atsuta
- Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
- Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Kristen Beebe
- Phoenix Children's Hospital and Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - David Buchbinder
- Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Peggy Burkhard
- National Bone Marrow Transplant Link, Southfield, MI, USA
| | | | - Naeem Chaudhri
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Elemary
- Hematology and BMT, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Mahmoud Elsawy
- Division of Hematology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Gregory M T Guilcher
- Section of Pediatric Oncology/Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Alberta Children's Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nada Hamad
- Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School Sydney, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, WA, Australia
| | - Amado Karduss
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Clinica las Americas, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Zinaida Peric
- BMT Unit, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Duncan Purtill
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Douglas Rizzo
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Maria Belén Rosales Ostriz
- Division of hematology and bone marrow transplantation, Instituto de trasplante y alta complejidad (ITAC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nina Salooja
- Centre for Haematology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Helene Schoemans
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, ACCENT VV, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Akshay Sharma
- Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Alok Srivastava
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Susan K Stewart
- Blood & Marrow Transplant Information Network, Highland Park, IL, 60035, USA
| | | | - Navneet S Majhail
- Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cellular Therapy Network, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rachel Phelan
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rotz SJ, Bhatt NS, Hamilton BK, Duncan C, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Beebe K, Buchbinder D, Burkhard P, Carpenter PA, Chaudhri N, Elemary M, Elsawy M, Guilcher GM, Hamad N, Karduss A, Peric Z, Purtill D, Rizzo D, Rodrigues M, Ostriz MBR, Salooja N, Schoemans H, Seber A, Sharma A, Srivastava A, Stewart SK, Baker KS, Majhail NS, Phelan R. International Recommendations for Screening and Preventative Practices for Long-Term Survivors of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: A 2023 Update. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:349-385. [PMID: 38413247 PMCID: PMC11181337 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
As hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy expand to new indications and international access improves, the number of HCTs performed annually continues to rise. Parallel improvements in HCT techniques and supportive care entails more patients surviving long term, creating further emphasis on survivorship needs. Survivors are at risk for developing late complications secondary to pretransplantation, peritransplantation, and post-transplantation exposures and other underlying risk factors. Guidelines for screening and preventive practices for HCT survivors were originally published in 2006 and then updated in 2012. An international group of experts was convened to review the contemporary literature and update the recommendations while considering the changing practices of HCT and cellular therapy. This review provides updated pediatric and adult survivorship guidelines for HCT and cellular therapy. The contributory role of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) to the development of late effects is discussed, but cGVHD management is not covered in detail. These guidelines emphasize the special needs of patients with distinct underlying HCT indications or comorbidities (eg, hemoglobinopathies, older adults) but do not replace more detailed group-, disease-, or condition-specific guidelines. Although these recommendations should be applicable to the vast majority of HCT recipients, resource constraints may limit their implementation in some settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth J Rotz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Neel S Bhatt
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Betty K Hamilton
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christine Duncan
- Dana Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mahmoud Aljurf
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yoshiko Atsuta
- Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Kristen Beebe
- Phoenix Children's Hospital and Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - David Buchbinder
- Division of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California
| | | | | | - Naeem Chaudhri
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Elemary
- Hematology and BMT, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Mahmoud Elsawy
- Division of Hematology, Dalhousie University, QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Gregory Mt Guilcher
- Section of Pediatric Oncology/Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Alberta Children's Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Nada Hamad
- Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, St Vincent's Clinical School Sydney, University of New South Wales, School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame Australia, Australia
| | - Amado Karduss
- Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Clinica las Americas, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Zinaida Peric
- BMT Unit, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Duncan Purtill
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Australia
| | - Douglas Rizzo
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Maria Belén Rosales Ostriz
- Division of hematology and bone marrow transplantation, Instituto de trasplante y alta complejidad (ITAC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nina Salooja
- Centre for Haematology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helene Schoemans
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, ACCENT VV, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Akshay Sharma
- Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Alok Srivastava
- Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | | - Navneet S Majhail
- Sarah Cannon Transplant and Cellular Therapy Network, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rachel Phelan
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gandhi AP, Lee CJ. Telemedicine in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4108. [PMID: 37627136 PMCID: PMC10452361 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Telemedicine has played an important role in delivering healthcare for primary care, chronic disease patients, and those with solid organ malignancies. However, its application in subspecialties such as hematologic malignancies, hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), or chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy is not widespread since physical examination is a vital component in delivering care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we widely used telemedicine, since protecting our immunocompromised patients became our top priority. The employment of HCT and CAR-T therapies continues to grow for high-risk hematologic malignancies, particularly in older and frail patients who must visit specialty centers for treatment access. Generally, HCT and CAR-T therapy care is highly complex, necessitating commitment from patients, caregivers, and a multidisciplinary team at specialty academic centers. All healthcare systems adapted to the crisis and implemented rapid changes during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE). Telemedicine, a vital modality for delivering healthcare in underserved areas, experienced rapid expansion, regardless of the geographic region, during the COVID-19 PHE. The data emerging from practices implemented during the PHE are propelling the field of telemedicine forward, particularly for specialties with complex medical treatments such as HCT and CAR-T therapy. In this review, we examine the current data on telemedicine in HCT and cellular therapy care models for the acute and long-term care of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpita P. Gandhi
- Center for Hematologic Malignancies, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Catherine J. Lee
- Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walsh CA, Yi JC, Leisenring WM, Syrjala KL. Social Support, Coping, and Cancer-Related Health Burden in Long-term Survivors Treated with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as Adolescents or Young Adults. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:496-502. [PMID: 36282798 PMCID: PMC10457605 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Long-term adolescent and young adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) survivors face complex physical and psychological treatment effects that contribute to cancer-related health burden. We aimed to identify the role of social support and coping strategies on cancer-related health burden. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included HCT recipients from the INSPIRE trial [NCT00799461], who received their first transplant between ages 15 and 39. As our primary outcome, we used the health burden subscale of the Cancer and Treatment Distress measure. We assessed correlates using the Short Form-36v2 physical component summary, brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE), and ENRICHD Social Support Inventory. We used hierarchical multivariable linear regression to identify factors associated with cancer-related health burden, with the first step including sociodemographic and clinical factors, the second step adding physical function, and the third step including social support and coping. Results: Participants (N = 293) were 52% male and 93% white, non-Hispanic, with a mean age of 30.2 (standard deviation 6.6) at first transplant. In step one, sex accounted for ∼3% of the variance (p = 0.006). Adding physical function explained an additional 33% of the variance (p = <0.001). Social support and coping strategies explained 11% of the variance (p = <0.001). The final model explained 47% of the variance; better physical function, more social support, and active coping were associated with lower cancer-related health burden, while female sex, venting, and distraction were associated with higher cancer-related health burden. Conclusion: Supporting physical function and fostering social support and active coping may help mitigate cancer-related health burden in this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00799461.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey A. Walsh
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jean C. Yi
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Wendy M. Leisenring
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Karen L. Syrjala
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Geest S, Valenta S, Ribaut J, Gerull S, Mielke J, Simon M, Bartakova J, Kaier K, Eckstein J, Leppla L, Teynor A. The SMILe integrated care model in allogeneic SteM cell TransplantatIon faciLitated by eHealth: a protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1067. [PMID: 35987671 PMCID: PMC9392360 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08293-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While effectiveness outcomes of eHealth-facilitated integrated care models (eICMs) in transplant and oncological populations are promising, implementing and sustaining them in real-world settings remain challenging. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) patients could benefit from an eICM to enhance health outcomes. To combat health deterioration, integrating chronic illness management, including continuous symptom and health behaviour monitoring, can shorten reaction times. We will test the 1st-year post-alloSCT effectiveness and evaluate bundled implementation strategies to support the implementation of a newly developed and adapted eICM in allogeneic stem cell transplantation facilitated by eHealth (SMILe–ICM). SMILe-ICM has been designed by combining implementation, behavioural, and computer science methods. Adaptions were guided by FRAME and FRAME-IS. It consists of four modules: 1) monitoring & follow-up; 2) infection prevention; 3) physical activity; and 4) medication adherence, delivered via eHealth and a care coordinator (an Advanced Practice Nurse). The implementation was supported by contextually adapted implementation strategies (e.g., creating new clinical teams, informing local opinion leaders). Methods Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial, we will include a consecutive sample of 80 adult alloSCT patients who were transplanted and followed by University Hospital Basel (Switzerland). Inclusion criteria are basic German proficiency; elementary computer literacy; internet access; and written informed consent. Patients will be excluded if their condition prevents the use of technology, or if they are followed up only at external centres. Patient-level (1:1) stratified randomisation into a usual care group and a SMILe-ICM group will take place 10 days pre-transplantation. To gauge the SMILe–ICM’s effectiveness primary outcome (re-hospitalisation rate), secondary outcomes (healthcare utilization costs; length of inpatient re-hospitalizations, medication adherence; treatment and self-management burden; HRQoL; Graft-versus-Host Disease rate; survival; overall survival rate) and implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity), we will use multi-method, multi-informant assessment (via questionnaires, interviews, electronic health record data, cost capture methods). Discussion The SMILe–ICM has major innovative potential for reengineering alloSCT follow-up care, particularly regarding short- and medium-term outcomes. Our dual focus on implementation and effectiveness will both inform optimization of the SMILe-ICM and provide insights regarding implementation strategies and pathway, understudied in eHealth-facilitated ICMs in chronically ill populations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT04789863. Registered April 01, 2021.
Collapse
|
8
|
Buchbinder D, Khera N. Psychosocial and financial issues after hematopoietic cell transplantation. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2021; 2021:570-577. [PMID: 34889432 PMCID: PMC8791170 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2021000292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
With improvement in survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), it has become important to focus on survivors' psychosocial issues in order to provide patient-centered care across the transplant continuum. The goals of this article are to describe updates in the literature on certain psychosocial domains (emotional/mental health and social/financial) in HCT survivors, offer a brief overview of the status of the screening and management of these complications, and identify opportunities for future practice and research. An evidence-based approach to psychosocial care can be broken down as primary (promoting health, raising awareness, and addressing risk factors), secondary (screening and directing early pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions), and tertiary (rehabilitating, limiting disability, and improving quality of life) prevention. Implementing such an approach requires close coordination between multiple stakeholders, including transplant center staff, referring hematologist/oncologists, and other subspecialists in areas such as palliative medicine or psychiatry. Innovative models of care that leverage technology can bring these stakeholders together to fulfill unmet needs in this area by addressing barriers in the delivery of psychosocial care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nandita Khera
- College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nørskov KH, Yi JC, Crouch ML, Fiscalini AS, Flowers MED, Syrjala KL. Social support as a moderator of healthcare adherence and distress in long-term hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 15:866-875. [PMID: 33420905 PMCID: PMC8267051 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00979-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has potentially severe effects on physical and psychosocial functioning. Poor social support has been linked with physical morbidity and mortality as well as psychological distress in HCT survivors. This study tested a theory-driven hypothesis that social support buffers adverse effects of health stressors of comorbidities and graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) on distress and adherence to recommended healthcare among long-term HCT survivors. METHODS This cross-sectional study analyzed baseline data from a randomized controlled trial in adult survivors 3-18 years post-HCT. Data included medical records and patient-reported outcomes including cancer and treatment distress (CTXD), healthcare adherence (HCA), comorbidity index, cGVHD, ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI), Social Activity Log, and Health Self-Efficacy. We tested hypothesized models for HCA and CTXD using blocked hierarchical linear regressions. RESULTS Among the 781 HCT survivors completing baseline assessment, 38% had > 3 comorbidities, 8% had moderate-severe cGVHD, 30% reported low social support, 30% reported elevated distress, and 49% reported low healthcare adherence. Social support and self-efficacy were directly related to both adherence and distress. Regression models supported the hypothesized moderated relationships for distress but not for healthcare adherence. CONCLUSIONS The two tested models confirm that the health stressors of comorbidities and cGVHD are moderated by better social support and self-efficacy in their associations with lower distress but without moderating effects for healthcare adherence. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Social support and self-efficacy confer protective benefits on healthcare adherence and psychological distress. Interventions are needed that focus on maintaining social networks or finding new networks if necessary. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00799461.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Holmegaard Nørskov
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - Jean C Yi
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marie-Laure Crouch
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Mary E D Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen L Syrjala
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mikles SP, Griffin AC, Chung AE. Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2277-2286. [PMID: 34333588 PMCID: PMC8449616 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study sought to conduct a systematic review to explore the functions utilized by electronic cancer survivorship care planning interventions and assess their effects on patient and provider outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines, studies published from January 2000 to January 2020 were identified in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library . The search combined terms for cancer, survivorship, care planning, and health information technology (HIT). Eligible studies evaluated the effects of a HIT intervention on usability, knowledge, process, or health-related outcomes. A total of 578 abstracts were reviewed, resulting in 60 manuscripts describing 40 studies. Thematic analyses were used to define meta-themes of system functions, and Fisher's exact tests were used to examine associations between functions and outcomes. RESULTS Patients were the target end users for 18 interventions, while 12 targeted providers and 10 targeted both groups. Interventions used patient-reported outcomes collection (60%), automated content generation (58%), electronic sharing (40%), persistent engagement (28%), and communication features (20%). Overall, interventions decreased the time to create survivorship care plans (SCPs) and supported care planning knowledge and abilities, but results were mixed for effects on healthcare utilization, SCP sharing, and provoking anxiety. Persistent engagement features were associated with improvements in health or quality-of-life outcomes (17 studies, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Features that engaged users persistently over time were associated with better health and quality-of-life outcomes. Most systems have not capitalized on the potential of HIT to share SCPs across a care team and support care coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P Mikles
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Outcomes Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley C Griffin
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Arlene E Chung
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Outcomes Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Program on Health and Clinical Informatics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kitko CL, Pidala J, Schoemans HM, Lawitschka A, Flowers ME, Cowen EW, Tkaczyk E, Farhadfar N, Jain S, Steven P, Luo ZK, Ogawa Y, Stern M, Yanik GA, Cuvelier GDE, Cheng GS, Holtan SG, Schultz KR, Martin PJ, Lee SJ, Pavletic SZ, Wolff D, Paczesny S, Blazar BR, Sarantopoulos S, Socie G, Greinix H, Cutler C. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IIa. The 2020 Clinical Implementation and Early Diagnosis Working Group Report. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:545-557. [PMID: 33839317 PMCID: PMC8803210 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Recognition of the earliest signs and symptoms of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) that lead to severe manifestations remains a challenge. The standardization provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2005 and 2014 consensus projects has helped improve diagnostic accuracy and severity scoring for clinical trials, but utilization of these tools in routine clinical practice is variable. Additionally, when patients meet the NIH diagnostic criteria, many already have significant morbidity and possibly irreversible organ damage. The goals of this early diagnosis project are 2-fold. First, we provide consensus recommendations regarding implementation of the current NIH diagnostic guidelines into routine transplant care, outside of clinical trials, aiming to enhance early clinical recognition of chronic GVHD. Second, we propose directions for future research efforts to enable discovery of new, early laboratory as well as clinical indicators of chronic GVHD, both globally and for highly morbid organ-specific manifestations. Identification of early features of chronic GVHD that have high positive predictive value for progression to more severe manifestations of the disease could potentially allow for future pre-emptive clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie L Kitko
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Hélène M Schoemans
- Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anita Lawitschka
- St. Anna Children's Hospital, Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mary E Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Eric Tkaczyk
- Research & Dermatology Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt Dermatology Translational Research Clinic, Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Nosha Farhadfar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Sandeep Jain
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Philipp Steven
- Division for Dry-Eye Disease and Ocular GVHD, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Zhonghui K Luo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yoko Ogawa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael Stern
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; ImmunEyez LLC, Irvine, California
| | - Greg A Yanik
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Geoffrey D E Cuvelier
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatric Oncology-Hematology-BMT, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Guang-Shing Cheng
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shernan G Holtan
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Kirk R Schultz
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Steven Z Pavletic
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Daniel Wolff
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sophie Paczesny
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Bruce R Blazar
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Blood & Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Stephanie Sarantopoulos
- Division of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gerard Socie
- Hematology Transplantation, AP-HP Saint Louis Hospital & University of Paris, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Hildegard Greinix
- Clinical Division of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Corey Cutler
- Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Online interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress in cancer patients: evidence update and suggestions for future directions. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2020; 14:27-39. [PMID: 31895066 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A great proportion of people affected by cancer experience psychological distress. To reduce pressure on limited health-management resources available, evidence-based eHealth or online interventions can fill an important gap by making psychosocial care more easily accessible. However, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. This present review provides an update on the effectiveness of online interventions in reducing psychological distress in patients with cancer by including studies published from January 2018 to September 2019. RECENT FINDINGS Thirty-three publications describing online interventions were included in the review, including web-based, blended care, telehealth, mHealth, and other online interventions. There was great heterogeneity across studies. The evidence of online interventions' effectiveness in reducing distress was mixed; there was partial support for reduction in psychological distress and depression, but limited evidence for reducing anxiety. Some important limitations should be taken into account when interpreting the results. SUMMARY Online interventions for people affected by cancer, in general, are well received and seem to be a necessary component of comprehensive cancer care. However, these interventions should be more rigorously tested to provide more conclusive evidence about their effectiveness.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chih MY, McCowan A, Whittaker S, Krakow M, Ahern DK, Aronoff-Spencer E, Hesse BW, Mullett TW, Vanderpool RC. The Landscape of Connected Cancer Symptom Management in Rural America: A Narrative Review of Opportunities for Launching Connected Health Interventions. JOURNAL OF APPALACHIAN HEALTH 2020; 2:64-81. [PMID: 35769642 PMCID: PMC9159365 DOI: 10.13023/jah.0204.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background The 2016 President's Cancer Panel called for projects focusing on improving cancer symptom management using connected health technologies (broadband and telecommunications). However, rural communities, like those in Appalachia, may experience a "double burden" of high cancer rates and lower rates of broadband access and adoption necessary for connected health solutions. Purpose To better understand the current landscape of connected health in the management of cancer symptoms in rural America. Methods A literature search was conducted using four academic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) to locate articles published from 2010 to 2019 relevant to connected cancer symptom management in rural America. Text screening was conducted to identify relevant publications. Results Among 17 reviewed studies, four were conducted using a randomized controlled trial; the remainder were formative in design or small pilot projects. Five studies engaged stakeholders from rural communities in designing solutions. Most commonly studied symptoms were psychological/emotional symptoms, followed by physical symptoms, particularly pain. Technologies used were primarily telephone-based; few were Internet-enabled video conferencing or web-based. Advanced mobile and Internet-based approaches were generally in the development phase. Overall, both rural patients and healthcare providers reported high acceptance, usage, and satisfaction of connected health technologies. Ten of the 17 studies reported improved symptom management outcomes. Methodological challenges that limited the interpretation of the findings were summarized. Implications The review identified a need to engage rural stakeholders to develop and test connected cancer symptom management solutions that are based on advanced mobile and broadband Internet technologies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jones SMW, Yi JC, Jim HSL, Loren AW, Majhail NS, Uberti J, Whalen V, Leisenring WM, Flowers MED, Lee SJ, Syrjala KL. Age and gender differences in financial distress among hematopoietic cell transplant survivors. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4361-4371. [PMID: 31916007 PMCID: PMC7340568 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05291-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer has long-term financial consequences. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) and middle-aged cancer survivors may experience more financial toxicity than older adults. This study examined age differences in financial distress in hematopoietic cell transplant survivors and whether these differences result from measurement bias, more financial barriers to care, or an overall higher level of distress. METHODS Hematologic malignancy survivors (n = 1135, 2-10 years post-transplant) completed the Cancer and Treatment Distress Scale (CTXD) and demographics as part of the baseline assessment for a randomized clinical trial. The CTXD has seven subscales, but for this study, we examined the financial distress subscale and the overall score. Item response theory analyses tested for bias by age and gender. Multivariate linear regression tested the association of age and gender with the CTXD scores while controlling for financial barriers to care. RESULTS No bias was found on the CTXD. AYA (p < 0.01) and middle-aged adults (p < 0.001) reported more financial and overall distress than older (age 65+) adults. The same association of age and financial distress was observed in women (p < 0.01). However, only middle-aged men (p < 0.01) reported more financial and overall distress than older men; AYA men did not (p > 0.18). Financial barriers to care were not associated with financial or overall distress. CONCLUSIONS Part of the increase in financial distress with younger age may be due to a higher risk of general distress. Policy initiatives to control cancer costs should consider life stage and the unique financial challenges at different ages for men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jean C Yi
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Joseph Uberti
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Mary E D Flowers
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, 1100 Fairview Ave N, D5-220, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington School of Medicine, 1100 Fairview Ave N, D5-220, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Karen L Syrjala
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
- University of Washington School of Medicine, 1100 Fairview Ave N, D5-220, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walsh CA, Yi JC, Rosenberg AR, Crouch MLV, Leisenring WM, Syrjala KL. Factors associated with social functioning among long-term cancer survivors treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as adolescents or young adults. Psychooncology 2020; 29:1579-1586. [PMID: 32628342 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can compromise long-term health and social functioning. We examined the impact of physical and social-emotional factors on the social functioning of long-term adolescent and young adult (AYA) HSCT survivors. METHODS This cross-sectional analysis included HSCT recipients from the INSPIRE trial [NCT00799461] who received their first transplant between ages 15-39. Patient-reported outcome measures included the Short Form-36v2, Fatigue Symptom Inventory, Cancer and Treatment Distress, and the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory. We used hierarchical multiple linear regression to identify physical and social-emotional factors associated with social functioning at the baseline assessment, with the first block including sociodemographic and clinical factors significant at P = <0.10 in univariate testing, the second block including fatigue and physical function, and the third block including social support and distress. RESULTS Participants (N = 279) were 52% male and 93.5% white, non-Hispanic, with a mean age of 30.3 (SD 6.6) at first transplant. Social Functioning mean was 48.5 (SD 10.5), below age-adjusted norms (t = -13.6, P = <0.001). In the first block, current chronic graft-vs-host disease accounted for 5.5% of the variance (P = <0.001). Adding fatigue and physical function explained an additional 46.6% of the variance (P = <0.001). Adding distress and social support explained an additional 7.7% of the variance (P = <0.001). The final model explained 59.8% of the variance; distress, fatigue, and physical function were significantly associated with social functioning. CONCLUSIONS Distress, fatigue, and physical function are associated with social functioning and interventions targeting these symptoms may help to improve SF among long-term cancer survivors treated with HSCT as AYAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey A Walsh
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jean C Yi
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Abby R Rosenberg
- Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Palliative Care and Resilience Research Program, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.,University of Washington, Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Marie-Laure V Crouch
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Wendy M Leisenring
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Karen L Syrjala
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Preussler JM, Denzen EM, Majhail NS, Baker KS, McCann M, Burns LJ, Yi J, Syrjala KL. Engaging hematopoietic cell transplantation patients and caregivers in the design of print and mobile application individualized survivorship care plan tools. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:2805-2816. [PMID: 31729567 PMCID: PMC7189809 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05114-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE INSPIRE (INteractive Survivorship Program with Information and REsources) is an online health program that includes a mobile app, website, health action plan, and individualized survivorship care plans for adult hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivors. The INSPIRE program integrates two previously effective randomized control trials that tested an internet-based program and patient-centered survivorship care plans for HCT survivors. METHODS Three focus groups were conducted with a total of 22 participants (20 patients, 2 caregivers/patient advocates) to explore patient and caregiver preferences and to optimize the patient-centered emphasis of INSPIRE. Adult (age > 18 years at the time of study entry) HCT recipients had to be at least 1-year post-HCT to participate; caregivers/patient advocates were also eligible. Participants had to be able to communicate in English, could have any diagnosis, transplant type, or donor source, and could have had multiple transplants. RESULTS All patient participants received an allogeneic HCT; average time since HCT was 8 years (range 2-22 years). The majority of participants were female (77.3%). Overall, the tools were well received by participants in this study, particularly the personalized features of all the tools. Major themes included interest in having the ability to tailor features to individual needs, and an interest in tracking information over time. DISCUSSION Engaging patients and caregivers is invaluable to optimize tools designed to improve HCT survivorship care. Print, online, and mobile-based tools, tailored to individual patients' treatment history and requisite follow-up care, can provide otherwise unavailable expertise and guidelines for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime M Preussler
- National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN, 55401, USA.
| | - Ellen M Denzen
- National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN, 55401, USA
| | - Navneet S Majhail
- Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - K Scott Baker
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Meggan McCann
- National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Linda J Burns
- National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN, 55401, USA
| | - Jean Yi
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|