Letermovir Prophylaxis Decreases Burden of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Patients at High Risk for CMV Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Heterogeneity of Survival Benefit Conferred by Letermovir

BACKGROUND

Variation in treatment effects based on individual patient characteristics-known as treatment effect heterogeneity or effect modification-has recently gained significant attention. A previous clinical trial and its post hoc analysis suggested that letermovir (LTV) may reduce mortality more in some patients than in others. We hypothesized that the survival benefit of LTV differs according to each patient's specific characteristics.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify patient characteristics that are associated with significant survival benefits from LTV.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent transplantation between 2018 and 2022 were randomly divided into training (n=5779) and validation groups (n=2865). We developed two models: one using a proportional hazards model with interaction terms (PI), and another using a modern machine learning (ML) approach to detect heterogeneity in the survival benefit-specifically, to identify patient characteristics associated with greater benefit from LTV.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 60% of patients received LTV as prophylaxis. In the training cohort, the final PI model, using additive interactions, identified advanced age (≥60), high comorbidities (HCT-CI ≥3), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical HCT with post cyclophosphamide as highly beneficial factors. Meanwhile, the ML model, using a causal forest algorithm, classified the top 60% of patients based on the estimated individual treatment effect as the high benefit group. In the validation group, 67.1% and 59.9% of patients were considered to be high benefit by the PI and ML models, respectively. The absolute difference in 6-month NRM (LTV vs. no LTV) in the high benefit group (PI model: 9.8% vs. 16.3%; ML model: 11.3% vs. 16.3%) was greater than that in the low benefit group (PI model: 4.3% vs. 6.9%; ML model: 4.1% vs. 6.2%). Most patients (>80%) with advanced age, high comorbidities, or UCB were classified as high benefit by the ML model, supporting the robustness of the PI model.

CONCLUSION

Our models successfully identified patients who could be expected to experience lower NRM with LTV prophylaxis, underscoring the importance of personalized medicine.

Effectiveness of letermovir in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after cord blood transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is associated with a high risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Letermovir (LTV) is a prophylactic agent against CMV reactivation after CBT, but data on its effectiveness and the incidence of late CMV reactivation after LTV discontinuation are limited.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted in 79 adult CMV-seropositive CBT recipients who received their first transplant for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome from February 2016 to September 2022. Outcomes were compared between 45 patients who received LTV prophylaxis and 34 patients who did not.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was significantly lower in patients who received LTV prophylaxis at both day 100 (11.1 % vs. 82.4 %, p < 0.001) and 1 year (45.3 % vs. 82.4 %, p < 0.001). The incidence of late CMV reactivation after LTV discontinuation was 34.2 %. The cumulative incidence of CMV disease was comparable between patients who received and those who did not (0 % vs. 8.8 % at day 100, 2.3 % vs. 8.8 % at 1 year; p = 0.181). Multivariate analysis showed that LTV prophylaxis reduced the cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation (hazard ratio 0.20, 95 % confidence interval 0.09 to 0.42, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LTV prophylaxis is strongly associated with prevention of CMV reactivation after CBT. Due to the high incidence of late CMV reactivation, close monitoring is required after LTV discontinuation and extension of LTV prophylaxis beyond day 100 should be considered.

Viral and Fungal Infections Early After HLA-Mismatched Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Low-Dose Antithymocyte Globulin in High-Risk Patients With Hematological Malignancies Not in Remission

BACKGROUND

In vivo T-cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (ATG), especially at high-doses has been shown to be associated with increased incidence of infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, it remains unclear whether ATG, even at low-doses increases the risk of posttransplant infections in the high-risk HSCT setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of viral and fungal infections early after transplantation, using the data from 82 patients with hematological malignancies. Among them, 42 underwent HLA-mismatched HSCT using low-dose (2.5 mg/kg n = 41, 2.0 mg/kg n = 1) thymoglobulin (ATG patients), and 40 control patients received HSCT without ATG (non-ATG patients) during the same period. Cord blood transplantation patients were excluded. All ATG patients had hematological malignancies not in remission at the time of transplantation, and were considered to be at high-risk for posttransplant infections.

RESULTS

There were no appreciable between-group differences in the incidence of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi), late-onset CMV reactivation after discontinuation of letermovir, invasive fungal diseases or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Peak values of CMV antigenemia were almost equal in ATG and non-ATG patients. The prevention of csCMVi with letermovir was constant in the 2 groups. However, ATG patients showed earlier reactivation of CMV and higher incidence of EBV viremia than non-ATG patients. Among their underlying diseases, mature T-cell neoplasm was a significant risk factor for CMV/EBV reactivation.

CONCLUSION

The use of low-dose thymoglobulin in HLA-mismatched HSCT for nonremission hematological malignancies is a reasonable strategy under careful monitoring for viral reactivation.

Efficacy of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Following Alemtuzumab T-Cell Depleted Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

In vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) using alemtuzumab decreases the risk of Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). However, this approach increases the risk of infections post-allo-HSCT, including Cytomegalovirus (CMV). Letermovir is approved for the use in CMV prophylaxis post-allo-HSCT. Few studies have investigated the efficacy of letermovir in patients receiving alemtuzumab. This is a single-center retrospective study describing our institutional experience using letermovir in recipients of alemtuzumab TCD allo-HSCT from unrelated donors (URD). The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of significant CMV infection (defined as viremia leading to preemptive antiviral therapy or CMV disease) within 100 days post-transplant. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (grade ≥ 2), the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GvHD, and overall survival. A total of 84 alemtuzumab TCD URD allo-HSCT recipients were included in the analysis, 30 of whom received letermovir (letermovir group) and 54 who did not receive letermovir (control group). The median age was 59 years (range: 26-75 years) and 55.5 years (range: 20-73 years) in the letermovir and control group, respectively. Most recipients (66.7%) in both groups received unrelated matched allografts, and myeloid neoplasms were the most common indication for allo-HSCT. A significantly lower cumulative incidence of significant CMV infection within 100 days was seen in the letermovir group compared to the control group (10.0% [95% CI: 2.5-23.9%] versus 55.6% [95% CI: 41.2-67.8%], P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of acute GvHD (grade ≥ 2) or overall survival between the 2 groups. However, lower rates of extensive chronic GvHD were noted in the letermovir group (10.5% [95% CI: 2.6-24.9%] versus. 36.5% [95% CI: 23.6-49.5%], P = .0126). These results demonstrate the efficacy of letermovir in decreasing the rates of clinically significant CMV infection in patients undergoing alemtuzumab T-cell depleted allo-HSCT.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Letermovir in Patients Undergoing Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Final Results of Post-Marketing Surveillance in Japan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Letermovir, an inhibitor of CMV DNA terminase, is approved for CMV prophylaxis in allo-HSCT patients. We report the final results of post-marketing surveillance of letermovir in Japan.

METHODS

The case report forms were drafted in part by the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation using data elements in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program and sent to individual HSCT centers to decrease the burden of reporting. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients who received letermovir between May 2018 and May 2022 were registered. Data collected included physician-assessed adverse events/adverse drug reactions and clinical effectiveness (development of CMV disease, CMV antigen status, and use of preemptive therapy).

RESULTS

A total of 821 HSCT patients were included in the safety analyses. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 11.33% of patients, with serious adverse drug reactions in 3.05%. The five most common adverse drug reactions were nausea (1.58%), renal impairment (1.46%), and acute graft versus host disease, CMV test positive, and hepatic function abnormal (0.61% each). A total of 670 patients were eligible for effectiveness analyses. Among these patients, 16.57% and 28.66% required preemptive therapy through week 14 and week 48, respectively. In addition, relatively few patients developed CMV disease throughout the follow-up period (1.34% at week 14 and 3.85% at week 48).

CONCLUSIONS

This final analysis of post-marketing surveillance with up to 48 weeks follow-up period in Japan provides further evidence supporting the safety profile and effectiveness of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in patients undergoing allo-HSCT in real-world settings.

Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Threshold to Guide Preemptive Therapy in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Correlation With Cytomegalovirus Disease

A systematic review of randomized and observational studies from 2013 to 2023 demonstrated that antiviral preemptive therapy started at cytomegalovirus viral load thresholds between 2 and 3 log10 IU/mL was associated with similar cytomegalovirus disease rates. Thus, viral thresholds in this range appear to effectively protect patients not receiving prophylaxis.

Letermovir Primary Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Real-Life Data from a University Hospital in Argentina

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.

Objectives

The present study was designed to describe and compare the incidence of untreated CMV reactivation (uCMVr), clinically significant infection (cs-CMVi) and disease (CMVd), as well as CMV-related hospitalization and outcome of allo-HCT patients, either treated with letermovir (LET) primary prophylaxis or managed with preemptive therapy (PET).

Methods

This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult CMV seropositive allo-HCT patients who either received primary prophylaxis with LET within the first 100 days after HCT or were managed with PET.

Results

The study population comprised 105 patients (28 in the LET group and 77 in the PET group). Compared to the PET group, patients in the LET group received more allo-HCT from alternative donors (54.5% vs. 82.14%, P=0.012). More than half of the patients in both groups were classified as high risk for CMVd. In the LET vs. PET group, cs-CMVi and CMVd developed respectively in 0 vs. 50 (64.94%), P=<0.0001, and 0 vs. 6 (7.79%), P=0.18. In the LET group, uCMVr occurred in 5 (17.8%) and were all considered blips. Hospital admissions related to cs-CMVi or CMVd in the PET group vs. LET group were 47 (61.04%) vs. 0, respectively, P=<0.0001. No differences were observed in 100-day mortality.

Conclusions

LET primary prophylaxis proved effective in preventing cs-CMVi and CMVd and reducing hospitalizations in allo-HCT adults. Blips can occur during prophylaxis and do not require LET discontinuation.

Efficacy and safety of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Letermovir is a specific inhibitor of cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase complex. Several studies have reported that letermovir can effectively prevent CMV activation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aimed to identify the efficacy and safety of letermovir prophylaxis for CMV infection after allo-HSCT with a systemic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. PubMed and Embase databases were searched. A total of 28 studies were included. The incidence of CMV activation at 14 weeks after HSCT was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.18), which was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.21) and 0% in adult and children (2 studies were included and both of them were 0%). In addition, the incidence of CMV activation at 14 weeks after allo-HSCT was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.21) and 0.07 (only 1 study included), respectively, in retrospective and prospective studies. The incidence of CMV activation at 100 and 200 days after HSCT was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.16-0.33) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67), respectively. The incidence of CMV disease at 14 weeks and at 6 months after HSCT was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.01-0.02) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.09), respectively. Thus, our systemic review and meta-analysis suggested that letermovir prophylaxis was safe and effective for CMV activation after allo-HSCT.

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation under letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major infectious complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis dramatically reduces the incidence of early clinically significant CMV (csCMV) infection, it remains unclear whether it has a beneficial effect on nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we evaluated the impact of LMV prophylaxis on posttransplant outcomes using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Adult patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed (n = 6004). LMV prophylaxis was administered to 1640 patients (LMV group) and it significantly reduced the incidence of csCMV infection compared with those not administered LMV prophylaxis (15.4% vs 54.1%; p < 0.01). However, it did not improve the 1-year NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.40) and OS (HR, 0.96; p = 0.49). In the LMV group, 74 patients had breakthrough csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 3.44; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.93; p = 0.02) compared with those without infection. After completing LMV prophylaxis, 252 patients had late csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 1.83; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.58; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that managing breakthrough and late csCMV infections is important for improving long-term outcomes.

A new direction for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis among transplant recipients: Benefits and nonviral outcomes of letermovir use as primary CMV prophylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Letermovir has changed the game of primary prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and more recently, solid organ transplant recipients. This is largely due to letermovir's similar efficacy in protecting against CMV reactivation and disease, along with its superior safety profile, notably reduced myelotoxicity, and lack of renal dose adjustment compared to standard agents like valganciclovir. This review will describe the potential benefits and clinical considerations of letermovir as prophylaxis among transplant recipients, with a focus on recent evidence describing nonviral outcomes of CMV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence has demonstrated improved safety (e.g., less myelosuppression) and tolerability with no difference in rates of CMV infection or disease in kidney transplant recipients given letermovir compared to valganciclovir. Real-world studies and meta-analyses in HSCT populations have explored various nonviral outcomes with letermovir use. Letermovir prophylaxis was associated with reduced mortality, lower rates of graft versus host disease, delayed CMV immune reconstitution, improved tolerability with extended durations, and decreased healthcare utilization.

SUMMARY

Letermovir is an effective antiviral agent for CMV prevention and has demonstrated enhanced safety, which may allow for extended durations of primary prophylaxis among transplant recipients along with other improved clinical outcomes by mitigating the indirect effects of CMV.

Extended duration letermovir in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

OBJECTIVES

Despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT), cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common clinically significant infection and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Based on current approval, letermovir is initiated within 28 days following allogeneic HCT for CMV seropositive recipients and continued through 100 days post-transplant. However, it is unknown whether patients who receive extended duration CMV prophylaxis with letermovir would result in less CMV reactivation and reactivation compared to those who do not. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of letermovir prophylaxis in CMV seropositive patients when continued for greater than 100 days post-allogeneic stem cell transplant.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on recipients of allogeneic HCT from November 2017 to July 2021. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were at least 18 years of age, received an allogeneic HCT, CMV seropositive, and initiated letermovir between days 0-28 post-transplant. The primary endpoint of this study is to compare rates of CMV reactivation in patients who stopped letermovir prophylaxis at 100 days post-transplant (standard duration group) versus those who continued letermovir prophylaxis past day 100 (extended duration group).

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. The median duration of letermovir prophylaxis was 78 days in the standard duration group versus and 132 days in the extended duration group. There were more CMV reactivations in the standard duration group versus the extended duration group, 28% versus 19% respectively. CMV pneumonitis was observed in one of the patients in the standard duration group. All-cause mortality at day 200 post-transplant was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that extended duration letermovir prophylaxis may be associated with less CMV reactivation compared to the standard duration of prophylaxis.

Effectiveness of letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A global systematic review

OBJECTIVE(S)

Letermovir (LET), a novel antiviral, has largely supplanted more traditional preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) patients. Use of LET demonstrated efficacy against placebo in phase III randomized controlled trials, but is considerably more expensive than PET. This review aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of LET in preventing clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) for allo-HCT recipients and related outcomes.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review was performed using an a priori protocol using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2010 to October 2021.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: LET compared with PET, CMV-related outcomes, patients aged 18 years or older, and English language-only articles. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics and outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASURES

CMV viremia, csCMVi, CMV end-organ disease, graft-versus-host-disease, all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 233 abstracts were screened, with 30 included in this review. Randomized trials demonstrated efficacy of LET prophylaxis in preventing csCMVi. Observational studies demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness of LET prophylaxis compared with use of PET alone. All studies with a comparator group resulted in lower rates of csCMVi for patients using LET. Included studies varied widely by CMV viral load threshold cutoff and CMV test units, limiting synthesis of results owing to high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

LET reduces risk of csCMVi, but lack of standardized clinical definitions on how to evaluate csCMVi and related outcomes largely prevent synthesis of results. Clinicians must consider this limitation in the context of evaluating the effectiveness of LET to other antiviral therapies, especially for patients at risk of late-onset CMV. Future studies should focus on prospective data collection through registries and concordance of diagnostic definitions to mitigate study heterogeneity.

Features of cytomegalovirus DNAemia and virus-specific T-cell responses in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients during prophylaxis with letermovir

BACKGROUND

There is scarce information on the natural kinetics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and dynamics of CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution in allogeneic hematopoietic transplant recipients (allo-HSCT) undergoing letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis.

METHODS

Twelve adult CMV-seropositive high-risk recipients (median age, 53 years; 9 males/3 females) undergoing LMV prophylaxis and 13 non-LMV allo-HSCT controls (median age, 58 years; 7 males/6 females) were included. CMV DNAemia in plasma was monitored by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Preemptive antiviral therapy (PET) was administered upon detection of ≥1500 IU/ml. CMV-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-producing CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells were enumerated by flow cytometry around days +30, +60, and +90 after allo-HSCT. Ex vivo experiments assessing of the potential effect of LMV on CMV-specific T-cell expansion in a single CMV-seropositive donor were also conducted.

RESULTS

Five LMV patients (41.6%) developed CMV DNAemia that cleared spontaneously. Four patients (33.3%) developed CMV DNAemia after LMV cessation, of which two required PET. Nine non-LMV patients (69.2%) developed CMV DNAemia (five required PET). The percentage of LMV and non-LMV patients exhibiting detectable CMV-specific T-cell responses was comparable (7/10 vs. 10/13; p = .71). Nevertheless, median CMV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell counts were lower in LMV patients by days +60 (p = .006 and .02, respectively) and +90 (p = .08 and .02). Ex vivo, CMV-specific CD8⁺ T cells expanded to the same level either in the presence (19.8%) or in the absence of LMV (20.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, episodes of CMV DNAemia in LMV patients cleared spontaneously. A diminished degree of CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution in LMV patients compared to non-LMV patients was observed.

Cytomegalovirus Therapy: Role of Letermovir in Prophylaxis and Treatment in Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen in the transplant population and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CMV prevention is paramount; however, selecting the best preventive strategy depends on many factors including donor-recipient CMV serostatus, transplant-specific risks, antiviral toxicities and cost. Novel CMV therapeutics such as letermovir (LTV) are desperately needed to optimize CMV management. Uniquely among CMV antiviral therapies, LTV inhibits the viral terminase complex in the CMV DNA synthesis pathway and disrupts viral genome packaging. Further, it lacks side effects frequently associated with other CMV antiviral therapies and evades common mechanisms of resistance. LTV is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for CMV prevention in adult CMV-seropositive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is increasingly applied off-label for prophylaxis and treatment. This review summarizes important concepts of CMV management in transplantation, with a specific focus on LTV pharmacology and clinical experience to date alongside future prospects for its application.

Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: newly approved additions to our armamentarium

BACKGROUND

The burden that cytomegalovirus (CMV) portends for haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients cannot be understated. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir have successfully been used for prevention and treatment of CMV infections, although with serious side effects such as leucopenia and some development of resistance. Until recently, available therapies for ganciclovir-resistant CMV have significant toxicities. Although advances have been made in the field, the unmet medical needs for effective and well-tolerated therapies are significant.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarise the current and emerging CMV antiviral drugs and discusses future perspectives in the field.

SOURCES

We searched for relevant articles with pertinent keywords: "Cytomegalovirus OR CMV", "Transplant" and "Antiviral". Articles published after 2019 were given preference. Articles were reviewed by the authors for relevance and impact to the subject of interest.

CONTENT

We outline in this review current advances in prophylaxis of CMV infection with letermovir, breakthrough CMV infections while on or after prophylaxis, the development of resistant and refractory CMV infections, and the newly approved anti-CMV agent, maribavir, in haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients.

IMPLICATIONS

Prevention of CMV infections after transplant has improved greatly over the past few years. Despite major advancements, breakthrough CMV infections and development of refractory and resistant CMV infections remain major complications post transplantation. We highlight emerging therapeutics that tolerably and effectively prevent and treat CMV infections, especially refractory and resistant cases.

Real-World Outcomes Associated With Letermovir Use for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Background

A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world observational studies was conducted to summarize the impact of letermovir cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis (PP) among adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients.

Methods

Systematic searches in Medline/PubMed, Embase, and conferences (from database inception to October 2021) were conducted to identify studies for inclusion. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates on the relative effectiveness of letermovir PP compared to controls.

Results

Forty-eight unique studies (N = 7104 patients) were included, most of which were comparative, single-center, and conducted in the United States. Letermovir PP was associated with statistically significant reduction in odds of CMV reactivation (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 0.13 and 0.24; P < .05), clinically significant CMV infection (pOR, 0.09 and 0.19; P < .05), and CMV disease (pOR, 0.31 and 0.35; P < .05) by day +100 and day +200 after allo-HCT, respectively. Letermovir PP was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause (pOR, 0.73; P < .01) and nonrelapse mortality (pOR, 0.65; P = .01) beyond day 200 after allo-HCT.

Conclusions

Letermovir for CMV PP was effective in reducing the risk of CMV-related complications overall and mortality beyond day 200 among adult allo-HCT recipients.

High dose valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common and clinically significant viral infections following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Currently available options for CMV prophylaxis and treatment present challenges related to side effects and cost.

METHODS

In this retrospective medical record review, the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or reactivation requiring preemptive treatment) following allogeneic HCT was compared in patients receiving valacyclovir 1 g three times daily versus acyclovir 400 mg every 12 h for viral prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients who received valacyclovir were matched based on propensity scoring to 35 patients who received acyclovir. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens containing anti-thymocyte globulin. Clinically significant CMV infection by day + 180 was lower in the valacyclovir group compared to the acyclovir group (18% vs. 57%, p = 0.0004). Patients receiving valacyclovir prophylaxis also had less severe infection evidenced by a reduction in CMV disease, lower peak CMV titers, delayed CMV reactivation, and less secondary neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Prospective evaluation of valacyclovir 1 g three times daily for viral prophylaxis following allogeneic HCT is warranted. Due to valacyclovir's favorable toxicity profile and affordable cost, it has the potential to benefit patients on a broad scale as an option for CMV prophylaxis.

Extended-duration letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after cord blood transplantation in adults

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) can be complicated by a high incidence of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi). We have investigated the efficacy of extended letermovir prophylaxis in seropositive adult CBT recipients. The aim was to continue prophylaxis for ≥6 months (insurance permitting). By day 100, the incidence of csCMVi was 0% in 28 patients who received letermovir prophylaxis. Moreover, of 24 patients alive at day 100, none had csCMVi by day 180, having continued prophylaxis for all (n = 20) or part (n = 4) of that period. Overall, 20 patients stopped letermovir at a median of 354 days (range, 119-455 days) posttransplant, with only 5 requiring 1 (n = 4) or 2 (n = 1) courses of valganciclovir (median total duration, 58 days; range, 12-67 days) for postprophylaxis viremia, with no subsequent csCMVi. There were no toxicities attributable to letermovir. Of the 62 historic control subjects who received acyclovir only, 51 developed csCMVi (median onset, 34 days; range, 5-74 days), for a day 100 incidence of 82% (95% confidence interval, 73-92). Seven patients developed proven/probable CMV disease, and 6 died before day 100 (3 with proven/probable CMV pneumonia). Forty-five patients required extended therapy during the first 6 months for 1 (n = 10), 2 (n = 14), or 3/persistent (n = 21) csCMVi, with 43 (84%) of 51 developing significant treatment toxicities. Letermovir is a highly effective, well-tolerated prophylaxis that mitigates CMV infection, CMV-related mortality, and antiviral therapy toxicities in CBT recipients. Our data support prophylaxis duration of at least 6 months after CBT.

The Potential Association of Delayed T Lymphocyte Reconstitution Within Six Months Post-Transplantation With the Risk of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis in Severe Aplastic Anemia Recipients

Background

Delayed immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is significantly associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The aim of this study was to observe the recovery trend of peripheral lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulins in HSCT recipients who developed CMV retinitis (CMVR).

Methods

We identified 37 CMVR cases and 303 non-CMVR controls in this case-control study from a database of 404 consecutive severe aplastic anemia patients who received allogeneic HSCT at a single center between 2015 and 2020. We analyzed the transplant outcomes and immune reconstitution principles with a focus on lymphocyte CD series and immunoglobulin series within the first year post-HSCT.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (55 eyes) were diagnosed with CMVR, with a mean onset time of 155 days post-HSCT. Among the 37 patients, one never had CMV detected in his blood but had a high CMV load in his intraocular fluid at the time of CMVR diagnosis. In the controls, 195 had CMV viremia and 108 did not. Compared with controls, CMVR cases had a longer duration of CMV viremia and a higher peak number of CMV load. T lymphocyte subsets including CD3, CD4 and CD8 were significantly lower in CMVR cases within six months after HSCT (all p < 0.05). Immunoglobulins also showed a slower recovery trend in CMVR cases. The recovery of B lymphocytes and natural killer cells exhibited no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

It is not enough to develop fundus screening strategies by merely relying on the CMV serostatus of recipients. Dynamic and continuous monitoring of T lymphocyte subsets, especially within six months post-HSCT, as well as serum immunoglobulin levels, can provide assistance with screening program of CMVR in HSCT recipients with severe aplastic anemia.

The changing impact of cytomegalovirus among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients during the past decade: A single institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

With advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the need for cytomegalovirus (CMV) surveillance persists.

METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis on the impact of CMV with preemptive therapy in 1,065 alloHCT patients with donor and/or recipient CMV seropositivity from 2009-2019.

RESULTS

51% developed clinically significant CMV infection (CMV-CSI); 6.5% had CMV disease. In multivariate analysis stratified by serostatus and preparative regimen the use of ATG (HR 2.97, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.42, P < 0.001) was associated with development of CMV-CSI. Median length of stay for index hospitalization was longer in patients with CMV-CSI (27 d vs 25 d, respectively; P = .002), as were rates (32.9% vs 17.7%; P < .001) and duration (9 d vs 6 d; P < .001) of rehospitalization, and median total inpatient days (28 d vs 26 d; P < .001). Patients with CMV-CSI had higher rates of neutropenia (47% vs 20%; P < .001) and transfusion support (PRBC, median 5 vs 3; P < .001; platelets, median 3 vs 3; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive therapy does not negate the impact of CMV-CSI on peri-engraftment toxicity and healthcare utilization. This cohort represents a large single center study on the impact of CMV in the pre-letermovir era and serves as a real-world comparator for assessing the impact of future prophylaxis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Letermovir vs. high-dose valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following haploidentical or mismatched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide

Patients undergoing haploidentical or mismatched unrelated donor (haplo/MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are at high risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Experience with letermovir (LET) in this population is limited. This single center retrospective cohort study compared CMV and transplant outcomes between LET and a historical control with high-dose valacyclovir (HDV) prophylaxis in adults undergoing haplo/MMUD alloHCT. Thirty-eight CMV seropositive patients were included, 19 in each arm. LET reduced the incidence of CMV infection (5% vs. 53%, RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.014-0.71, p = .001) and need for CMV treatment by day +100 (5% vs. 37%, RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.18-0.99, p = .017) compared to HDV. Median CMV event-free-survival was improved with LET (not reached vs. 80 days, HR 0.114, 95% CI 0.07-0.61, p = .004). These data support the efficacy of LET in alternative donor transplants.

Cytomegalovirus gastroenteritis in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease

A pre-emptive strategy has successfully decreased cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, some recipients still develop CMV gastroenteritis, especially after acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and its incidence, risk factors, and prognostic impact remain to be elucidated. We retrospectively analyzed 3759 consecutive adult patients who developed grade II-IV aGVHD using a Japanese registry database. The cumulative incidence of CMV gastroenteritis was 5.7% by day 365 from the development of grade II-IV aGVHD. Advanced age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.22; P = 0.004), GVHD prophylaxis with mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.08-2.77; P = 0.024), lower-gut aGVHD (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.58-2.98; P < 0.001), and the use of systemic steroids (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.74; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for CMV gastroenteritis. Development of CMV gastroenteritis was associated with an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.50-2.39; P < 0.001). Moreover, letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced both the incidence of CMV gastroenteritis (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99; P = 0.047) and the risk of nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; P = 0.043). In summary, CMV gastroenteritis is a life-threatening complication that sets the need for preventive strategies with letermovir and targeted surveillance.

Safety and Effectiveness of Letermovir in Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: Interim Report of Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Since May 2018, a 6-year post‑marketing surveillance (PMS) has been underway to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of letermovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in Japanese patients with allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The interim PMS data for 461 patients collected as of March 2021 are reported in this publication.

METHODS

The case report forms (CRFs) were drafted in part by the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JDCHCT) using data elements in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP) and sent to individual HSCT centers to decrease burden of reporting. These CRFs were completed by physicians in the respective HSCT centers and sent to MSD K.K., Tokyo, Japan.

RESULTS

Allo-HSCT recipients prescribed with letermovir for CMV prophylaxis were included across 136 centers in Japan between May 2018 and March 2021. Safety and effectiveness were assessed for 460 and 373 patients, respectively. Of the patients in the safety analysis, 13.9 % experienced adverse drug reactions, the most frequent of which were renal impairment (2.2 %) and nausea (1.7 %). Among patients in the effectiveness analysis, the overall CMV antigen positivity rate was 21.2 % at Week 14 and 37.5 % at Week 24 after allo-HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim data from this largest of real-world studies confirm the safety and effectiveness of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in Japanese allo-HSCT recipients. Given the limited data on Asian patients for letermovir use, this survey will provide valuable information for medical decision-making in routine clinical practice, serving as a vital supplement to the results obtained from clinical trials.

American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series: #3-Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy partnered with its Transplant Infectious Disease Special Interest Group to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious diseases guidelines for the care of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. A new approach was taken with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious disease series as a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQ), tables, and figures. Adult and pediatric infectious disease and HCT content experts developed and answered FAQs. Topics were finalized with harmonized recommendations that were made by assigning an A through E strength of recommendation paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I through III. The third topic in the series focuses on the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in HCT recipients by reviewing prophylaxis and preemptive therapy approaches; key definitions, relevant risk factors, and diagnostic monitoring considerations are also reviewed.

Delayed-onset cytomegalovirus infection is frequent after discontinuing letermovir in cord blood transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) recipients have a high incidence of CMV-associated complications. There are limited data regarding the efficacy of letermovir for preventing clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi), and the impact of letermovir prophylaxis on delayed-onset CMV reactivation after letermovir discontinuation, in CBT recipients. We compared the cumulative incidence of CS-CMVi and CMV detection in 21 CMV-seropositive CBT recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis with a historical cohort of 40 CBT recipients receiving high-dose valacyclovir prophylaxis. Letermovir was administered on day +1 up to day +98. The cumulative incidence of CS-CMVi was significantly lower by day 98 in the letermovir cohort (19% vs 65%). This difference was lost by 1 year due to a higher incidence of delayed-onset CMV reactivation in the letermovir cohort. No patients developed CMV disease in the letermovir cohort within the first 98 days compared with 2 cases (2.4%) in the high-dose valacyclovir cohort; 2 patients developed CMV enteritis after discontinuing letermovir. Median viral loads were similar in both cohorts. Thus, letermovir is effective at preventing CS-CMVi after CBT, but frequent delayed-onset infections after letermovir discontinuation mandate close monitoring and consideration for extended prophylaxis.

Infection-Related Mortality in Adults and Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Australian Registry Report

Infection-related mortality (IRM) is the most common non-relapse-related cause of death reported after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Information on the incidence and timing of specific infective organisms and the risk factors for IRM is essential to developing prevention strategies. This report provides the first account of IRM in adults and children undergoing HCT in Australia. Between 2013 and 2018, 2705 adult and 689 pediatric first HCTs were identified from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry database, associated with 1075 (39.7%) total overall deaths in adults and 134 (19.4%) in children. Demographics and causes of death, including infectious etiology and causative organisms, were extracted from the database for adults and children for analysis. At day +100 and 1 year post-HCT, IRM was the leading cause of early post-HCT mortality in adults, accounting for 6.2% and 9.8%, respectively; in children, IRM was the leading cause of post-HCT mortality at day +100 at 2.5% and the second highest cause of post-HCT mortality at 1 year post-HCT at 4.9%, following relapse at 5.8%. In adults, older age, transplantation not in a first complete remission (non-CR1), the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab, donor-positive/recipient-negative cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, and acute graft-versus-host disease were significant risk factors for IRM. However, in children, age >5 years, acute lymphocytic leukemia as the primary disease, and mismatched unrelated or haploidentical donor source were predictive of IRM. Of the deaths in which an infectious etiology was reported in adults (52.4%), 49.3% were attributed to bacteria, 25.3% to fungus, 21.7% to viruses, and 3.6% to post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The most common organisms were Pseudomonas spp, Enterococcus spp, Candida spp, Aspergillus spp, and CMV. In children where an infectious etiology was reported (64%), 13% were attributed to bacteria, 26% to fungus, 45% to viruses, and 16% to PTLD. This report highlights that IRM was the leading cause of death early post-HCT in Australia. Strategies to reduce IRM, such as individualized pre-transplantation infection risk assessment, rapid diagnostics, and prevention management strategies should be explored to determine whether these outcomes can be improved. In addition, improving the completeness and accuracy of reported data, particularly for infectious pathogens, could assist in directing management strategies to reduce IRM in HCT.

Refractory and Resistant Cytomegalovirus after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis Era

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most common infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Primary prophylaxis with letermovir demonstrated a reduction in clinically significant CMV infections (CS-CMVi) in clinical trials of CMV-seropositive HCT recipients. This study aims at exploring the effect of primary letermovir prophylaxis in this population on the incidence and outcomes of refractory or resistant CMV infections.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 537 consecutive CMV-seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients cared for during March 2016 to October 2018. Baseline demographics, HCT characteristics, CMV infections, treatment and mortality data were collected from the electronic medical record. CMV outcomes were defined according to the recently standardized definitions for clinical trials. Characteristics and outcomes were assessed according to receipt of primary letermovir prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of 537 patients identified, 123 received letermovir for primary prophylaxis during the first 100 days after HCT, and 414 did not. In a multivariate analysis, primary prophylaxis with letermovir was associated with reductions in CS-CMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26, 95% CI 0.16-0.41), CMV end-organ disease (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.52), refractory or resistant CMV infection (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.52), and non-relapse mortality at week 48 (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.93). There was neither resistant CMV nor CMV-related mortality in the primary letermovir prophylaxis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary letermovir prophylaxis effectively prevents refractory or resistant CMV infections and decreases non-relapse mortality at week 48, as well as CS-CMVi and CMV disease after allogeneic HCT.

Cytomegalovirus-Specific Immunity Recovers More Slowly after Cord Blood Transplantation Compared with Matched Sibling Donor Allogeneic Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Rapid quantitative recovery of NK cells but slower recovery of T-cell subsets along with frequent viral infections are reported after umbilical cord blood (UCB) compared with matched sibling donor (MSD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, it remains unclear whether increased propensity for viral infections is also a result of slower recovery of virus-specific immunity after UCB as compared to MSD HCT.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the differences in the function of virus-specific peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after UCB (N=17) vs. MSD (N=9) using previously collected patient blood samples at various time points after HCT.

METHODS

Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot) assay was used to quantify the PBMC frequencies that secrete IFN-γ in response to 11 immunopeptides from 5 common viruses. We included the patients who received the same reduced intensity conditioning regimen without ATG, no systemic glucocorticoids and had no relapse or acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease within 1 year after HCT.

RESULTS

The CMV-reactive PBMC frequencies were higher in CMV seropositive vs. seronegative patients after HCT. Among CMV seropositive patients, the frequency of CMV-reactive PBMC was lower after UCB compared to MSD throughout one year of HCT. We observed no differences in virus-specific PBMC responses towards HHV6, EBV, BK, and adenovirus antigens between UCB and MSD.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that the reconstitution of CMV-specific immunity is slower in CMV seropositive recipients of UCB vs. MSD HCT in contrast to other viruses which had similar recoveries. These study findings support implementation of more potent prophylactic strategies for preventing CMV reactivation in CMV seropositive patients receiving UCB HCT.

Advances in CMV Management: A Single Center Real-Life Experience

CMV infection is a major challenge in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The changing landscape in CMV management includes the introduction of letermovir in prophylaxis of high-risk patients and the source of CMV DNA monitoring (plasma—PL vs. whole blood—WB), for pre-emptive therapy (PET) initiation. We report here how our real-life experience in CMV management evolved, following letermovir registration. We focus on: (i) the effects of systematic use of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk patients, (ii) the results of a longitudinal comparison of CMV DNAemia monitoring in PL and WB. From December 2018 to April 2020, 60 allo-SCTs have been performed in our center (LET ERA), of whom 45 received letermovir in prophylaxis from day 0 to day + 100, because of recipient positivity of anti CMV IgG. These patients were compared with a cohort of 41 allo-SCTs performed between November 2017 and November 2018 (NO LET ERA). Firstly, the incidence of CMV clinically significant infections, CMV disease, bacterial infections, proven/probable fungal infections, hospital re-admissions after allo-SCT by day + 100 in the two ERA were 8 vs. 44% (p = 0.0006), 2 vs. 12% (p = 0.02), 37 vs. 56% (p = 0.05), 8 vs. 19% (p = 0.09), and 23 vs. 39% (p = 0.09), respectively. By day + 180 these differences were 17 vs. 68% (p < 0.00001), 2 vs. 12% (p = 0.02), 45 vs. 78% (p = 0.09), 8 vs. 22% (p = 0.05), and 40 vs. 66% (p = 0.01), respectively. Secondly, from February to May 2019, we comparatively measured CMV DNA from WB and PL and we confirmed that there is a linear correlation between CMV DNA level in WB and PL (Spearman’s test r = 0.86). Moreover, CMV DNAemia at the time of PET in the 12 patients with a clinically significant CMV infection was higher in WB vs. PL (5.202 vs. 4.981 copies/ml, p = 0.1). Our real-life experience confirms that: (i) letermovir is highly effective, leading to a significant drop in CMV clinically significant infections and CMV-related complications by day + 100 and + 180 after allo-SCT; (ii) WB may be an effective alternative to PL as a source for CMV DNA monitoring, as a linear correlation of DNAemia was confirmed between WB and PL, even if the CMV DNAemia at PET initiation was comparable in the two sources.

Letermovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Haploidentical and Mismatched Adult Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is serious viral infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients. November 2017, the novel CMV DNA terminase complex inhibitor letermovir was approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection in CMV-seropositive allo-HCT recipients. Here we sought to determine the effectiveness of letermovir in preventing CMV infection in CMV-seropositive patients undergoing haploidentical or mismatched adult unrelated donor allo-HCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus host-disease prophylaxis. Sixty-four patients underwent transplantation between 2014 and 2019, of whom 32 received letermovir and 32 did not receive letermovir. The day 180 cumulative incidence of CMV infection requiring therapy was 45.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.7% to 57.1%) in the entire cohort, 68.8% (95% CI, 48.9% to 82.2%) in the patients who did not receive letermovir, and 21.9% (95% CI, 9.5% to 37.6%; P < .001) in patients who received letermovir. Adjusting for regimen intensity, disease histology, and age, the hazard ratio for CMV infection was .19 (95% CI, .08 to .47; P < .001) in patients who received primary prophylaxis with letermovir. The 1-year cumulative incidence of treatment- related mortality was similar between patients with and without letermovir treatment (16.9% versus 18.9%), as was overall survival (64.0% versus 49.0%). Persistent CMV infection requiring >28 days of therapy was more common in patients who did not receive letermovir (31.2% versus 6.2%; P = .02). In summary, letermovir was effective in preventing CMV infection in this high-risk population of HLA-mismatched allo-HCT recipients.