Associative cortico-cortical plasticity may affect ipsilateral finger opposition movements

Can we manipulate brain connectivity? A systematic review of cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation effects

OBJECTIVE

Cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS) is a form of dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) entailing a series of single-TMS pulses paired at specific interstimulus intervals (ISI) delivered to distant cortical areas. The goal of this article is to systematically review its efficacy in inducing plasticity in humans focusing on stimulation parameters and hypotheses of underlying neurophysiology.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 2009-2023 was undertaken to identify all articles utilizing ccPAS to study brain plasticity and connectivity. Six electronic databases were searched and included.

RESULTS

32 studies were identified. The studies targeted connections within the same hemisphere or between hemispheres. 28 ccPAS studies were in healthy participants, 1 study in schizophrenia, and 1 in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. 2 additional studies used cortico-cortical repetitive paired associative stimulation (cc-rPAS) in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients. Outcome measures include electromyography (EMG), behavioral measures, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). ccPAS seems to be able to modulate brain connectivity depending on the ISI.

CONCLUSIONS

ccPAS can be used to modulate corticospinal excitability, brain activity, and behavior. Although the stimulation parameters used across studies reviewed in this paper are varied, ccPAS is a promising approach for basic research and potential clinical applications.

SIGNIFICANCE

Recent advances in neuroscience have caused a shift of interest from the study of single areas to a more complex approach focusing on networks of areas that orchestrate brain activity. Consequently, the TMS community is also witnessing a change, with a growing interest in targeting multiple brain areas rather than a single locus, as evidenced by an increasing number of papers using ccPAS. In light of this new enthusiasm for brain connectivity, this review summarizes existing literature and stimulation parameters that have proven effective in changing electrophysiological, behavioral, or neuroimaging-derived measures.

Neurophysiological Markers of Premotor-Motor Network Plasticity Predict Motor Performance in Young and Older Adults

Aging is commonly associated with a decline in motor control and neural plasticity. Tuning cortico-cortical interactions between premotor and motor areas is essential for controlling fine manual movements. However, whether plasticity in premotor-motor circuits predicts hand motor abilities in young and elderly humans remains unclear. Here, we administered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) and primary motor cortex (M1) using the cortico-cortical paired-associative stimulation (ccPAS) protocol to manipulate the strength of PMv-to-M1 connectivity in 14 young and 14 elderly healthy adults. We assessed changes in motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) during ccPAS as an index of PMv-M1 network plasticity. We tested whether the magnitude of MEP changes might predict interindividual differences in performance in two motor tasks that rely on premotor-motor circuits, i.e., the nine-hole pegboard test and a choice reaction task. Results show lower motor performance and decreased PMv-M1 network plasticity in elderly adults. Critically, the slope of MEP changes during ccPAS accurately predicted performance at the two tasks across age groups, with larger slopes (i.e., MEP increase) predicting better motor performance at baseline in both young and elderly participants. These findings suggest that physiological indices of PMv-M1 plasticity could provide a neurophysiological marker of fine motor control across age-groups.

Effects of cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation based on multisensory integration to brain network connectivity in stroke patients: study protocol for a randomized doubled blind clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Brain has a spontaneous recovery after stroke, reflecting the plasticity of the brain. Currently, TMS is used for studies of single-target brain region modulation, which lacks consideration of brain networks and functional connectivity. Cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS) promotes recovery of motor function. Multisensory effects in primary visual cortex(V1) directly influence behavior and perception, which facilitate motor functional recovery in stroke patients. Therefore, in this study, dual-targeted precise stimulation of V1 and primary motor cortex(M1) on the affected hemisphere of stroke patients will be used for cortical visuomotor multisensory integration to improve motor function.

METHOD

This study is a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial over a 14-week period. 69 stroke subjects will be enrolled and divided into sham stimulation group, ccPAS low frequency group, and ccPAS high frequency group. All groups will receive conventional rehabilitation. The intervention lasted for two weeks, five times a week. Assessments will be performed before the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and followed up at 6 and 14 weeks. The primary assessment indicator is the 'Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity ', secondary outcomes were 'The line bisection test', 'Modified Taylor Complex Figure', 'NIHSS' and neuroimaging assessments. All adverse events will be recorded.

DISCUSSION

Currently, ccPAS is used for the modulation of neural circuits. Based on spike-timing dependent plasticity theory, we can precisely intervene in the connections between different cortices to promote the recovery of functional connectivity on damaged brain networks after stroke. We hope to achieve the modulation of cortical visuomotor interaction by combining ccPAS with the concept of multisensory integration. We will further analyze the correlation between analyzing visual and motor circuits and explore the alteration of neuroplasticity by the interactions between different brain networks. This study will provide us with a new clinical treatment strategy to achieve precise rehabilitation for patient with motor dysfunction after stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with code ChiCTR2300067422 and was approved on January 16, 2023.

TMS and neocortical neurons: an integrative review on the micro-macro connection in neuroplasticity

Tian D, Izumi S. TMS and neocortical neurons: an integrative review on the micro-macro connection in neuroplasticity. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci 2023; 14: 1-9. Neuroplasticity plays a pivotal role in neuroscience and neurorehabilitation as it bridges the organization and reorganization properties of the brain. Among the numerous neuroplastic protocols, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a well-established non-invasive protocol to induce plastic changes in the brain. Here, we review the findings of four plasticity-inducing TMS protocols in the human motor cortex with relatively evident mechanisms: conventional repetitive TMS (rTMS), theta-burst stimulation (TBS), quadripulse stimulation (QPS) and paired associative stimulation (PAS). Based on the reviewed evidence and a preliminary TMS neurocytological model proposed in our previous report, we further integrate the neurophysiological evidence and plasticity rules of these protocols to present an updated micro-macro connection model between neocortical neurons and the neurophysiological evidence in TMS. This prototypical model will guide further efforts to understand the neural circuit of the motor cortex, the mechanisms of TMS, and the advance of neuroplasticity technologies and their outcomes.

Human perceptual and metacognitive decision-making rely on distinct brain networks

Perceptual decisions depend on the ability to exploit available sensory information in order to select the most adaptive option from a set of alternatives. Such decisions depend on the perceptual sensitivity of the organism, which is generally accompanied by a corresponding level of certainty about the choice made. Here, by use of corticocortical paired associative transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol (ccPAS) aimed at inducing plastic changes, we shaped perceptual sensitivity and metacognitive ability in a motion discrimination task depending on the targeted network, demonstrating their functional dissociation. Neurostimulation aimed at boosting V5/MT+-to-V1/V2 back-projections enhanced motion sensitivity without impacting metacognition, whereas boosting IPS/LIP-to-V1/V2 back-projections increased metacognitive efficiency without impacting motion sensitivity. This double-dissociation provides causal evidence of distinct networks for perceptual sensitivity and metacognitive ability in humans.

Hebbian activity-dependent plasticity in white matter

Synaptic plasticity is required for learning and follows Hebb's rule, the computational principle underpinning associative learning. In recent years, a complementary type of brain plasticity has been identified in myelinated axons, which make up the majority of brain's white matter. Like synaptic plasticity, myelin plasticity is required for learning, but it is unclear whether it is Hebbian or whether it follows different rules. Here, we provide evidence that white matter plasticity operates following Hebb's rule in humans. Across two experiments, we find that co-stimulating cortical areas to induce Hebbian plasticity leads to relative increases in cortical excitability and associated increases in a myelin marker within the stimulated fiber bundle. We conclude that Hebbian plasticity extends beyond synaptic changes and can be observed in human white matter fibers.

Paired associative stimulations: Novel tools for interacting with sensory and motor cortical plasticity

In the early 2000s, a novel non-invasive brain stimulation protocol, the paired associative stimulation (PAS), was introduced, allowing to induce and investigate Hebbian associative plasticity within the humans' motor system, with patterns resembling spike-timing-dependent plasticity properties found in cellular models. Since this evidence, PAS efficacy has been proved in healthy, and to a lesser extent, in clinical populations. Recently, novel 'modified' protocols targeting sensorimotor and crossmodal networks appeared in the literature. In the present work, we have reviewed recent advances using these 'modified' PAS protocols targeting sensory and motor cortical networks. To better categorize them, we propose a novel classification according to the nature of the peripheral and cortical stimulations (i.e., within-system, cross-systems, and cortico-cortical PAS). For each protocol of the categories mentioned above, we describe and discuss their main features, how they have been used to study and promote brain plasticity, and their advantages and disadvantages. Overall, current evidence suggests that these novel non-invasive brain stimulation protocols represent very promising tools to study the plastic properties of humans' sensorimotor and crossmodal networks, both in the healthy and in the damaged central nervous system.

Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

This article is based on a consensus conference, promoted and supported by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which took place in Siena (Italy) in October 2018. The meeting intended to update the ten-year-old safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings (Rossi et al., 2009). Therefore, only emerging and new issues are covered in detail, leaving still valid the 2009 recommendations regarding the description of conventional or patterned TMS protocols, the screening of subjects/patients, the need of neurophysiological monitoring for new protocols, the utilization of reference thresholds of stimulation, the managing of seizures and the list of minor side effects. New issues discussed in detail from the meeting up to April 2020 are safety issues of recently developed stimulation devices and pulse configurations; duties and responsibility of device makers; novel scenarios of TMS applications such as in the neuroimaging context or imaging-guided and robot-guided TMS; TMS interleaved with transcranial electrical stimulation; safety during paired associative stimulation interventions; and risks of using TMS to induce therapeutic seizures (magnetic seizure therapy). An update on the possible induction of seizures, theoretically the most serious risk of TMS, is provided. It has become apparent that such a risk is low, even in patients taking drugs acting on the central nervous system, at least with the use of traditional stimulation parameters and focal coils for which large data sets are available. Finally, new operational guidelines are provided for safety in planning future trials based on traditional and patterned TMS protocols, as well as a summary of the minimal training requirements for operators, and a note on ethics of neuroenhancement.

A Bayesian approach to analysing cortico-cortical associative stimulation induced increases in the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans

Repeated pairing of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over left and right primary motor cortex (M1), at intensities sufficient to generate descending volleys, produces sustained increases in corticospinal excitability. In other paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocols, in which peripheral afferent stimulation is the first element, changes in corticospinal excitability achieved when the second stimulus consists of brief bursts of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), are comparable to those obtained if TMS is used instead (McNickle and Carson 2015). The present aim was to determine whether associative effects are induced when the first stimulus of a cortico-cortical pair is tACS, or alternatively subthreshold TMS. Bursts of tACS (500 ms; 140 Hz; 1 mA) were associated (180 stimulus pairs) with single magnetic stimuli (120% resting motor threshold rMT) delivered over the opposite (left) M1. The tACS ended 6 ms prior to the TMS. In a separate condition, TMS (55% rMT) was delivered to right M1 6 ms before (120% rMT) TMS was applied over left M1. In a sham condition, TMS (120% rMT) was delivered to left M1 only. The limitations of null hypothesis significance testing are well documented. We therefore employed Bayes factors to assess evidence in support of experimental hypotheses—defined precisely in terms of predicted effect sizes, that these two novel variants of PAS increase corticospinal excitability. Although both interventions induced sustained (~ 20–30 min) increases in corticospinal excitability, the evidence in support of the experimental hypotheses (over specified alternatives) was generally greater for the paired TMS-TMS than the tACS-TMS conditions.

Dual-Site Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Abnormal oscillatory activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) may be relevant for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Apart from deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may be suitable for altering these oscillations. We speculated that TMS to different cortical areas (primary motor cortex, M1, and dorsal premotor cortex, PMd) may activate neuronal subpopulations within the STN via corticofugal neurons projecting directly to the nucleus. We hypothesized that PD symptoms can be ameliorated by a lasting decoupling of STN neurons by associative dual-site repetitive TMS (rTMS). Associative dual-site rTMS (1 Hz) directed to PMd and M1 ("ADS-rTMS") was employed in 20 PD patients treated in a blinded, placebo-controlled cross-over design. Results: No adverse events were noted. We found no significant improvement in clinical outcome parameters (videography of MDS-UPDRS-III, finger tapping, spectral tremor power). Variation of the premotor stimulation site did not induce beneficial effects either. A single session of ADS-rTMS was tolerated well, but did not produce a clinically meaningful benefit on Parkinsonian motor symptoms. Successful treatment using TMS targeting subcortical nuclei may require an intervention over several days or more detailed physiological information about the individual brain state and stimulation-induced subcortical effects.

Targeted Neuromodulation of Abnormal Interhemispheric Connectivity to Promote Neural Plasticity and Recovery of Arm Function after Stroke: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Study Protocol

Background

Despite intensive rehabilitation efforts, most stroke survivors have persistent functional disability of the paretic arm and hand. These motor impairments may be due in part to maladaptive changes in structural and functional connections between brain regions. The following early stage clinical trial study protocol describes a noninvasive brain stimulation approach to target transcallosally mediated interhemispheric connections between the ipsi- and contralesional motor cortices (iM1 and cM1) using corticocortical paired associative stimulation (ihPAS). This clinical trial aims to characterize ihPAS-induced modulation of interhemispheric connectivity and the effect on motor skill performance and learning in chronic stroke survivors.

Methods/Design

A repeated-measures, cross-over design study will recruit 20 individuals post-stroke with chronic mild–moderate paretic arm impairment. Each participant will complete an active ihPAS and control ihPAS session. Assessments of cortical excitability and motor skill performance will be conducted prior to and at four time points following the ihPAS intervention. The primary outcome measures will be: TMS-evoked interhemispheric motor connectivity, corticomotor excitability, and response time on a modified serial reaction time task.

Discussion/Conclusion

The findings from this single-site early stage clinical trial will provide foundational results to inform the design of larger-scale, multisite clinical trials to evaluate the therapeutic potential of ihPAS-based neuromodulation for upper limb recovery after stroke. This trial is registered with NCT02465034.

Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke

Purpose of review

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly used to enhance the recovery of function after stroke. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss some unresolved questions that need to be addressed to better understand and exploit the potential of NIBS as a therapeutic tool.

Recent findings

Recent meta-analyses showed that the treatment effects of NIBS in patients with stroke are rather inconsistent across studies and the evidence for therapeutic efficacy is still uncertain. This raises the question of how NIBS can be developed further to improve its therapeutic efficacy.

Summary

This review addressed six questions: How does NIBS facilitate the recovery of function after stroke? Which brain regions should be targeted by NIBS? Is there a particularly effective NIBS modality that should be used? Does the location of the stroke influence the therapeutic response? How often should NIBS be repeated? Is the functional state of the brain during or before NIBS relevant to therapeutic efficacy of NIBS? We argue that these questions need to be tackled to obtain sufficient mechanistic understanding of how NIBS facilitates the recovery of function. This knowledge will be critical to fully unfold the therapeutic effects of NIBS and will pave the way towards adaptive NIBS protocols, in which NIBS is tailored to the individual patient.

Hebbian and anti-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human cortico-cortical connections

Learning of new skills may occur through Hebbian associative changes in the synaptic strength of cortical connections [spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP)], but how the precise temporal relationship of the presynaptic and postsynaptic inputs determines the STDP effects in humans is poorly understood. We used a novel paired associative stimulation protocol to repeatedly activate the short-latency connection between the posterior parietal cortex and the primary motor cortex (M1) of the left-dominant hemisphere. In different experiments, we systematically varied the temporal relationships between the stimuli and the preferential activation of different M1 neuronal populations by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over M1 with different coil orientations and in different states of cortical excitability (rest vs muscular contraction). We found evidence for the existence of both Hebbian and anti-Hebbian STDP in human long-range connections. The induction of bidirectional long-term potentiation or depression in M1 depended not only on the relative timing between the stimuli but, crucially, on the stimulation of specific neuronal populations and the activity state of the cortex. Our findings demonstrate that these mechanisms are not fixed but susceptible to rapid adaptations. This sudden transition from anti-Hebbian to Hebbian plasticity likely involves local dynamics of interaction with different populations of postsynaptic neurons.

The spontaneous fluctuation of the excitability of a single node modulates the internodes connectivity: a TMS-EEG study

Brain effective connectivity can be tracked by cerebral recruitments evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as measured by simultaneous electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). When TMS is targeting the primary motor area, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) can be collected from the "target" muscles. The aim of this study was to measure whether or not effective brain connectivity changes with the excitability level of the corticospinal motor pathway (CSMP) as parameterized by MEP amplitude. After averaging two subgroups of EEG-evoked responses corresponding to high and low MEP amplitudes, we calculated the individual differences between them and submitted the grand average to sLORETA algorithm obtaining localized regions of interest (RoIs). Statistical differences of RoI recruitment strength between low and high CSMP excitation was assessed in single subjects. Preceding the feedback arrival, neural recruitment for stronger CSMP activation were weaker at 6-10 ms of homotopic sensorimotor areas BA3/4/5 of the right nonstimulated hemisphere (trend), weaker at 18-25 ms of left parietal BA2/3/40, and stronger at 26-32 ms of bilateral frontal motor areas BA6/8. The proposed method enables the tracking of brain network connectivity during stimulation of one node by measuring the strength of the connected recruited node activations. Spontaneous increases of the excitation of the node originating the transmission within the hand control network gave rise to dynamic recruitment patterns with opposite behaviors, weaker in homotopic and parietal circuits, stronger in frontal ones. The effective connectivity within bilateral circuits orchestrating hand control appeared dynamically modulated in time even in resting state as probed by TMS.

Use-dependent hemispheric balance

In the human brain, homologous regions of the primary motor cortices (M1s) are connected through transcallosal fibers. Interhemispheric communication between the two M1s plays a major role in the control of unimanual hand movements, and the strength of this connection seems to be dependent on arm activity. For instance, a lesion in the M1 can induce an increase in the excitability of the intact M1 and an abnormal high inhibitory influence onto the damaged M1. This can be attributable to either the disuse of the affected limb or the overuse of the unaffected one. Here, to directly investigate cortical modifications induced by an abnormal asymmetric use of the two limbs, we studied both the excitability of the two M1s and transcallosal interaction between them in healthy subjects whose right hand was immobilized for 10 h. The left "not-immobilized" arm was completely free to move in one group of participants (G1) and limited in the other one (G2). We found that the non-use reduced the excitability of the left M1 and decreased the inhibitory influence onto the right hemisphere in the two groups. However, an increase in the excitability of right M1 and a deeper inhibitory interaction onto the left hemisphere were evident only in G1. Thus, modifications in the right M1 were not directly produced by the non-use but would depend on the overuse of the "not-immobilized" arm. Our findings suggest that the balance between the two M1s is strongly use dependent.