A molecular modeling study of the interaction between SRP-receptor complex and peptide translocon

¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁵N resonance assignments and peptide binding site chemical shift perturbation mapping for the Escherichia coli redox enzyme chaperone DmsD

Herein are reported the mainchain (1)H, (13)C and (15)N chemical shift assignments and amide (15)N relaxation data for Escherichia coli DmsD, a 23.3 kDa protein responsible for the correct folding and translocation of the dimethyl sulfoxide reductase enzyme complex. In addition, the observed amide chemical shift perturbations resulting from complex formation with the reductase subunit DmsA leader peptide support a model in which the 44 residue peptide makes extensive contacts across the surface of the DmsD protein.

Component interactions, regulation and mechanisms of chloroplast signal recognition particle-dependent protein transport

The chloroplast proteome comprises nuclear- and plastome-encoded proteins. In order to function correctly these proteins must be transported, either cotranslationally or posttranslationally, to their final destination in the chloroplast. Here the chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) which is present in two different stromal pools plays an essential role. On the one hand, the conserved 54kDa subunit (cpSRP54) is associated with 70S ribosomes to function in the cotranslational transport of the plastid-encoded thylakoid membrane protein D1. On the other hand, the cpSRP consists of cpSRP54 and a unique 43kDa subunit (cpSRP43) and facilitates the transport of nuclear-encoded light-harvesting chlorophyll-binding proteins (LHCPs), the most abundant membrane proteins of the thylakoids. In addition to cpSRP, the cpSRP receptor cpFtsY and the thylakoid membrane protein Alb3 are required for posttranslational LHCP integration in a GTP-dependent manner. In contrast to the universally conserved cytosolic SRP, the chloroplast SRP of higher plants lacks an SRP-RNA component. Interestingly, cpSRP-RNA genes have been identified in the plastome of lower plants, indicating that their cpSRP structure resembles the cytosolic SRP.

Protein targeting by the signal recognition particle

Protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) is universally conserved and starts with the recognition of a signal sequence in the context of a translating ribosome. SRP54 and FtsY, two multidomain proteins with guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity, are the central elements of the SRP system. They have to coordinate the presence of a signal sequence with the presence of a vacant translocation channel in the membrane. For coordination the two GTPases form a unique, nearly symmetric heterodimeric complex in which the activation of GTP hydrolysis plays a key role for membrane insertion of substrate proteins. Recent results are integrated in an updated perception of the order of events in SRP-mediated protein targeting.

Two cooperating helices constitute the lipid-binding domain of the bacterial SRP receptor

Protein targeting by the bacterial signal recognition particle requires the specific interaction of the signal recognition particle (SRP)-ribosome-nascent chain complex with FtsY, the bacterial SRP receptor. Although FtsY in Escherichia coli lacks a transmembrane domain, the membrane-bound FtsY displays many features of an integral membrane protein. Our data reveal that it is the cooperative action of two lipid-binding helices that allows this unusually strong membrane contact. Helix I comprises the first 14 amino acids of FtsY and the second is located at the interface between the A- and the N-domain of FtsY. We show by site-directed cross-linking and binding assays that both helices bind to negatively charged phospholipids, with a preference for phosphatidyl glycerol. Despite the strong lipid binding, helix I does not seem to be completely inserted into the lipid phase, but appears to be oriented parallel with the membrane surface. The two helices together with the connecting linker constitute an independently folded domain, which maintains its lipid binding even in the absence of the conserved NG-core of FtsY. In summary, our data reveal that the two consecutive lipid-binding helices of FtsY can provide a membrane contact that does not differ significantly in stability from that provided by a transmembrane domain. This explains why the bacterial SRP receptor does not require an integral beta-subunit for membrane binding.