Measuring inputs to a common function: The case of Dlx5 and Dlx6

Assessing candidate DLX-regulated genes in the first pharyngeal arch of chick embryos

BACKGROUND

Insights into the development and evolution of asymmetrical jaws will require an understanding of the gene regulatory networks that underpin the differential morphogenesis of the maxillary and mandibular domains of the first pharyngeal arch in a variety of gnathostomes. While a robust relationship has been demonstrated between jaw patterning and the Endothelin-Dlx gene axis, much less is known of the next level of genes in the jaw patterning hierarchy.

RESULTS

Several genes, whose expression depends on Dlx5 and/or Dlx6, have been identified in mice. Here, we examined the expression patterns of the chick orthologues of some of those genes, namely GSC, PITX1, HAND2, and GBX2, and tested their dependence on endothelin signaling to assess whether there is a conserved regulatory relationship between those genes in the chick embryo. To further validate these genes as direct DLX targets, we identified conserved non-coding sequences containing candidate DLX binding motifs and demonstrated DLX-responsiveness in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence presented in this study combines to support the hypothesis that these four genes are direct targets of DLX transcription factors in the lower jaw-forming tissue.

DLX gene expression in the developing chick pharyngeal arches and relationship to endothelin signaling and avian jaw patterning

BACKGROUND

A hinged jaw that articulates with the skull base is a striking feature of the vertebrate head and has been greatly modified between, and within, vertebrate classes. Genes belonging to the DLX homeobox family are conserved mediators of local signaling pathways that distinguish the dorsal and ventral aspects of the first pharyngeal arch. Specifically, a subset of DLX genes are expressed in the cranial neural crest-derived mandibular ectomesenchyme in response to ventral endothelin signaling, an important step that confers the first arch with maxillary and mandibular identities. Downstream targets of DLX genes then execute the morphogenetic processes that lead to functional jaws. Identifying lineage-specific variations in DLX gene expression and the regulatory networks downstream of DLX action is necessary to understand how different kinds of jaws evolved.

RESULTS

Here, we describe and compare the expression of all six DLX genes in the chick pharyngeal arches, focusing on the period of active patterning in the first arch. Disruption of endothelin signaling results in the down-regulation of ventral-specific DLX genes and confirms their functional role in avian jaw patterning.

CONCLUSIONS

This expression resource will be important for comparative embryology and for identifying synexpression groups of DLX-regulated genes in the chick.

Identification of differentially expressed genes associated with egg production in black-boned chicken

1. Muchuan black-bone chicken is well known in China for its meat quality and medicinal properties; however, its egg-laying performance is not ideal. To better understand the molecular mechanisms of black-boned chicken egg-laying, high-throughput RNA sequencing was performed to compare differences in the pituitary transcriptome between three high-rate (group H) and three low-rate (group L) egg production chickens. 2. In total, 171 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between the two groups, of which 113 were upregulated and 58 were downregulated in group L. Some of these genes are known to be related to hormone secretion or the regulation of reproductive processes; these include prolactin-releasing hormone (PRLH), distal-less homeobox 6 (DLX6), interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), and cilia and flagella associated protein 69 (CFAP69). Notably, expression pattern analysis indicated that both PRLH and DLX6 may influence egg-laying performance. 3. The dataset provided a foundation for discovering important genes and pathways involved in the chicken egg-laying process, and may help to improve understanding of the molecular mechanisms of chicken reproduction.

Dlx5 and Dlx6 can antagonize cell division at the G1/S checkpoint

Background

Dlx5 and Dlx6 stimulate differentiation of diverse progenitors during embryonic development. Their actions as pro-differentiation transcription factors includes the up-regulation of differentiation markers but the extent to which differentiation may also be stimulated by regulation of the cell cycle has not been addressed.

Results

We document that expression of Dlx5 and Dlx6 antagonizes cell proliferation in a variety of cell types without inducing apoptosis or promoting cell cycle exit. Rather, a variety of evidence indicates that elevated Dlx5 and Dlx6 expression reduces the proportion of cells in S phase and affects the length of the cell cycle.

Conclusions

Antagonism of S-phase entry by Dlx5 and Dlx6 proteins likely represents a lineage-independent function to effect Dlx-mediated differentiation in multiple progenitor cell types.