Computing the binding affinity of a ligand buried deep inside a protein with the hybrid steered molecular dynamics

Nonbonded Force Field Parameters from MBIS Partitioning of the Molecular Electron Density Improve Binding Affinity Predictions of the T4-Lysozyme Double Mutant

The use of computer simulation for binding affinity prediction is growing in drug discovery. However, its wider use is constrained by the accuracy of the free energy calculations. The key sources of error are the force fields used to depict molecular interactions and insufficient sampling of the configurational space. To improve the quality of the force field, we developed a Python-based computational workflow. The workflow described here uses the minimal basis iterative stockholder (MBIS) method to determine atomic charges and Lennard-Jones parameters from the polarized molecular density. This is done by performing electronic structure calculations on various configurations of the ligand when it is both bound and unbound. In addition, we validated a simulation procedure that accounts for the protein and ligand degrees of freedom to precisely calculate binding free energies. This was achieved by comparing the self-adjusted mixture sampling and nonequilibrium thermodynamic integration methods using various protein and ligand conformations. The accuracy of predicting binding affinity is improved by using MBIS-derived force field parameters and a validated simulation procedure. This improvement surpasses the chemical precision for the eight aromatic ligands, reaching a root-mean-square error of 0.7 kcal/mol.

Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Drug Discovery

Accurate prediction of ligand binding thermodynamics and kinetics is crucial in drug design. However, it remains challenging for conventional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations due to sampling issues. Gaussian accelerated MD (GaMD) is an enhanced sampling method that adds a harmonic boost to overcome energy barriers, which has demonstrated significant benefits in exploring protein-ligand interactions. Especially, the ligand GaMD (LiGaMD) applies a selective boost potential to the ligand nonbonded potential energy, significantly improving sampling for ligand binding and dissociation. Furthermore, a selective boost potential is applied to the potential of both ligand and protein residues around binding pocket in LiGaMD2 to further increase the sampling of protein-ligand interaction. LiGaMD and LiGaMD2 simulations could capture repetitive ligand binding and unbinding events within microsecond simulations, allowing to simultaneously characterize ligand binding thermodynamics and kinetics, which is expected to greatly facilitate drug design. In this chapter, we provide a brief review of the status of LiGaMD in drug discovery and outline its usage.

Meta-Analysis Reveals That Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations Approach Chemical Accuracy

Systematic and quantitative analysis of the reliability of formally exact methods that in silico calculate absolute protein-ligand binding free energies remains lacking. Here, we provide, for the first time, evidence-based information on the reliability of these methods by statistically studying 853 cases from 34 different research groups through meta-analysis. The results show that formally exact methods approach chemical accuracy (error = 1.58 kcal/mol), even if people are challenging difficult tasks such as blind drug screening in recent years. The geometrical-pathway-based methods prove to possess a better convergence ability than the alchemical ones, while the latter have a larger application range. We also reveal the importance of always using the latest force fields to guarantee reliability and discuss the pros and cons of turning to an implicit solvent model in absolute binding free-energy calculations. Moreover, based on the meta-analysis, an evidence-based guideline for in silico binding free-energy calculations is provided.

Improving the Potential of Mean Force and Nonequilibrium Pulling Simulations by Simultaneous Alchemical Modifications

We present an approach combining alchemical modifications and physical-pathway methods to calculate absolute binding free energies. The employed physical-pathway method is either a stratified umbrella sampling to calculate a potential of mean force or nonequilibrium pulling. We devised two basic approaches: the simultaneous approach (S-approach), where, along the physical unbinding pathway, an alchemical transformation of ligand-protein interactions is installed and deinstalled, and the prior-plus-simultaneous approach (PPS-approach), where, prior to the physical-pathway simulation, an alchemical transformation of ligand-protein interactions is installed in the binding site and deinstalled during the physical-pathway simulation. Using a mutant of T4 lysozyme with a benzene ligand as an example, we show that installation and deinstallation of soft-core interactions concurrent with physical ligand unbinding (S-approach) allow successful potential of mean force calculations and nonequilibrium pulling simulations despite the problems posed by the occluded nature of the lysozyme binding pocket. Good agreement between the potential of the mean-force-based S-approach and double decoupling simulations as well as a remarkable efficiency and accuracy of the nonequilibrium-pulling-based S-approach is found. The latter turned out to be more compute-efficient than the potential of mean force calculation by approximately 70%. Furthermore, we illustrate the merits of reducing ligand-protein interactions prior to potential of mean force calculations using the murine double minute homologue protein MDM2 with a p53-derived peptide ligand (PPS-approach). Here, the problem of breaking strong interactions in the binding pocket is transferred to a prior alchemical transformation that reduces the free-energy barrier between the bound and unbound state in the potential of mean force. Besides, disentangling physical ligand displacement from the deinstallation of ligand-protein interactions was seen to allow a more uniform sampling of distance histograms in the umbrella sampling. In the future, physical ligand unbinding combined with simultaneous alchemical modifications may prove useful in the calculation of protein-protein binding free energies, where sampling problems posed by multiple, possibly sticky interactions and potential steric clashes can thus be reduced.

Determination of Multidirectional Pathways for Ligand Release from the Receptor: A New Approach Based on Differential Evolution

Steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulation is a powerful method in computer-aided drug design as it can be used to access the relative binding affinity with high precision but with low computational cost. The success of SMD depends on the choice of the direction along which the ligand is pulled from the receptor-binding site. In most simulations, the unidirectional pathway was used, but in some cases, this choice resulted in the ligand colliding with the complex surface of the exit tunnel. To overcome this difficulty, several variants of SMD with multidirectional pulling have been proposed, but they are not completely devoid of disadvantages. Here, we have proposed to determine the direction of pulling with a simple scoring function that minimizes the receptor–ligand interaction, and an optimization algorithm called differential evolution is used for energy minimization. The effectiveness of our protocol was demonstrated by finding expulsion pathways of Huperzine A and camphor from the binding site of Torpedo California acetylcholinesterase and P450cam proteins, respectively, and comparing them with the previous results obtained using memetic sampling and random acceleration molecular dynamics. In addition, by applying this protocol to a set of ligands bound with LSD1 (lysine specific demethylase 1), we obtained a much higher correlation between the work of pulling force and experimental data on the inhibition constant IC50 compared to that obtained using the unidirectional approach based on minimal steric hindrance.

Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction

A quantitative thermodynamic understanding of the noncovalent association of (bio)molecules is of central importance in molecular life sciences. An important quantity characterizing (bio)molecular association is the binding affinity or absolute binding free energy. In recent years, the computational prediction of absolute binding free energies has evolved considerably in terms of accuracy, computational speed, and user-friendliness. In this chapter, we first give an overview of how absolute free energies are defined and how they can be determined with computational means. We proceed with an outline of the theoretical basis of the two most reliable methods, potential of mean force, and double decoupling calculations. In particular, we describe how the sampling problem can be alleviated by application of restraints. Finally, we provide step-by-step instructions of how to set up corresponding molecular simulations with a commonly employed molecular dynamics simulation engine.

Dependence of Work on the Pulling Speed in Mechanical Ligand Unbinding

In single-molecule force spectroscopy, the rupture force F_max required for mechanical unfolding of a biomolecule or for pulling a ligand out of a binding site depends on the pulling speed V and, in the linear Bell-Evans regime, F_max ∼ ln(V). Recently, it has been found that non-equilibrium work W is better than F_max in describing relative ligand binding affinity, but the dependence of W on V remains unknown. In this paper, we developed an analytical theory showing that in the linear regime, W ∼ c₁ ln(V) + c₂ ln²(V), where c₁ and c₂ are constants. This quadratic dependence was also confirmed by all-atom steered molecular dynamics simulations of protein-ligand complexes. Although our theory was developed for ligand unbinding, it is also applicable to other processes, such as mechanical unfolding of proteins and other biomolecules, due to its universality.

Charge-Changing Perturbations and Path Sampling via Classical Molecular Dynamic Simulations of Simple Guest-Host Systems

Currently, two different methods dominate the field of biomolecular free-energy calculations for the prediction of binding affinities. Pathway methods are frequently used for large ligands that bind on the surface of a host, such as protein-protein complexes. Alchemical methods, on the other hand, are preferably applied for small ligands that bind to deeply buried binding sites. The latter methods are also widely known to be heavily artifacted by the representation of electrostatic energies in periodic simulation boxes, in particular, when net-charge changes are involved. Different methods have been described to deal with these artifacts, including postsimulation correction schemes and instantaneous correction schemes (e.g., co-alchemical perturbation of ions). Here, we use very simple test systems to show that instantaneous correction schemes with no change in the system net charge lower the artifacts but do not eliminate them. Furthermore, we show that free energies from pathway methods suffer from the same artifacts.

Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics (LiGaMD): Characterization of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics

Calculations of ligand binding free energies and kinetic rates are important for drug design. However, such tasks have proven challenging in computational chemistry and biophysics. To address this challenge, we have developed a new computational method, ligand Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (LiGaMD), which selectively boosts the ligand nonbonded interaction potential energy based on the Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) enhanced sampling technique. Another boost potential could be applied to the remaining potential energy of the entire system in a dual-boost algorithm (LiGaMD_Dual) to facilitate ligand binding. LiGaMD has been demonstrated on host-guest and protein-ligand binding model systems. Repetitive guest binding and unbinding in the β-cyclodextrin host were observed in hundreds-of-nanosecond LiGaMD_Dual simulations. The calculated guest binding free energies agreed excellently with experimental data with <1.0 kcal/mol errors. Compared with converged microsecond-time scale conventional molecular dynamics simulations, the sampling errors of LiGaMD_Dual simulations were also <1.0 kcal/mol. Accelerations of ligand kinetic rate constants in LiGaMD simulations were properly estimated using Kramers' rate theory. Furthermore, LiGaMD allowed us to capture repetitive dissociation and binding of the benzamidine inhibitor in trypsin within 1 μs simulations. The calculated ligand binding free energy and kinetic rate constants compared well with the experimental data. In summary, LiGaMD provides a powerful enhanced sampling approach for characterizing ligand binding thermodynamics and kinetics simultaneously, which is expected to facilitate computer-aided drug design.

Accurate prediction of relative binding affinities of a series of HIV-1 protease inhibitors using semi-empirical quantum mechanical charge

A major challenge in computer-aided drug design is the accurate estimation of ligand binding affinity. Here, a new approach that combines the adaptive steered molecular dynamics (ASMD) and partial atomic charges calculated by semi-empirical quantum mechanics (SQMPC), namely ASMD-SQMPC, is suggested to predict the ligand binding affinities, with 24 HIV-1 protease inhibitors as testing examples. In the ASMD-SQMPC, the relative binding free energy (ΔG) is reflected by the average maximum potential of mean force (<PMF>_max ) between bound and unbound states. The correlation coefficient (R² ) between the <PMF>_max and experimentally determined ΔG is 0.86, showing a significant improvement compared with the conventional ASMD (R² = 0.52). Therefore, this study provides an efficient approach to predict the relative ΔG and reveals the significance of precise partial atomic charges in the theoretical simulations.

How Good is Jarzynski's Equality for Computer-Aided Drug Design?

Accurate determination of the binding affinity of the ligand to the receptor remains a difficult problem in computer-aided drug design. Here, we study and compare the efficiency of Jarzynski’s equality (JE) combined with steered molecular dynamics and the linear interaction energy (LIE) method by assessing the binding affinity of 23 small compounds to six receptors, including β-lactamase, thrombin, factor Xa, HIV-1 protease (HIV), myeloid cell leukemia-1, and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 proteins. It was shown that Jarzynski’s nonequilibrium binding free energy ΔG_neq^Jar correlates with the available experimental data with the correlation levels R = 0.89, 0.86, 0.83, 0.80, 0.83, and 0.81 for six data sets, while for the binding free energy ΔG_LIE obtained by the LIE method, we have R = 0.73, 0.80, 0.42, 0.23, 0.85, and 0.01. Therefore, JE is recommended to be used for ranking binding affinities as it provides accurate and robust results. In contrast, LIE is not as reliable as JE, and it should be used with caution, especially when it comes to new systems.

Advances in the calculation of binding free energies

In recent years, calculations of binding affinities from molecular simulations seem to have matured significantly. While the number of applications of such methods in drug design and biotechnology increases, the number of truly new methodological developments decreases. This review provides an overview of the current status of the field as reflected in recent publications. The focus is on the challenges that remain when using endstate, alchemical and pathway methods. For endstate methods this is the calculation of entropic contributions. For alchemical methods there are unsolved problems associated with the solvation of the active site, sampling slow degrees of freedom and when modifying the net charge. For pathway methods achieving sufficient sampling remains challenging. New trends are also highlighted, including the use of pathway methods for the quantification of protein-protein interactions.

Free-energy landscape of molecular interactions between endothelin 1 and human endothelin type B receptor: fly-casting mechanism

The free-energy landscape of interaction between a medium-sized peptide, endothelin 1 (ET1), and its receptor, human endothelin type B receptor (hETB), was computed using multidimensional virtual-system coupled molecular dynamics, which controls the system's motions by introducing multiple reaction coordinates. The hETB embedded in lipid bilayer was immersed in explicit solvent. All molecules were expressed as all-atom models. The resultant free-energy landscape had five ranges with decreasing ET1-hETB distance: completely dissociative, outside-gate, gate, binding pocket, and genuine-bound ranges. In the completely dissociative range, no ET1-hETB interaction appeared. In the outside-gate range, an ET1-hETB attractive interaction was the fly-casting mechanism. In the gate range, the ET1 orientational variety decreased rapidly. In the binding pocket range, ET1 was in a narrow pathway with a steep free-energy slope. In the genuine-bound range, ET1 was in a stable free-energy basin. A G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) might capture its ligand from a distant place.