1
|
Chen J, Lian Y, Zhao B, Han J, Li X, Wu J, Hou M, Yue M, Zhang K, Liu G, Tu M, Ruan W, Ji S, An Y. Deciphering the Prognostic and Therapeutic Significance of Cell Cycle Regulator CENPF: A Potential Biomarker of Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment for Patients with Liposarcoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24087010. [PMID: 37108172 PMCID: PMC10139200 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Liposarcoma (LPS) is one of the most common subtypes of sarcoma with a high recurrence rate. CENPF is a regulator of cell cycle, differential expression of which has been shown to be related with various cancers. However, the prognostic value of CENPF in LPS has not been deciphered yet. Using data from TCGA and GEO datasets, the expression difference of CENPF and its effects on the prognosis or immune infiltration of LPS patients were analyzed. As results show, CENPF was significantly upregulated in LPS compared to normal tissues. Survival curves illustrated that high CENPF expression was significantly associated with adverse prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis suggested that CENPF expression could be an independent risk factor for LPS. CENPF was closely related to chromosome segregation, microtubule binding and cell cycle. Immune infiltration analysis elucidated a negative correlation between CENPF expression and immune score. In conclusion, CENPF not only could be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker but also a potential malignant indicator of immune infiltration-related survival for LPS. The elevated expression of CENPF reveals an unfavorable prognostic outcome and worse immune score. Thus, therapeutically targeting CENPF combined with immunotherapy might be an attractive strategy for the treatment of LPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahao Chen
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Yingying Lian
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Binbin Zhao
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Jiayang Han
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Xinyu Li
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Jialin Wu
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Mengwen Hou
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Man Yue
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Kaifeng Zhang
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Guangchao Liu
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Mengjie Tu
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Weimin Ruan
- Henan Key Laboratory of Brain Targeted Bio-Nanomedicine, School of Life Sciences & School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Henan-Macquarie University Joint Centre for Biomedical Innovation, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Shaoping Ji
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Yang An
- Cell Signal Transduction Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Bioinformatics Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
- Kaifeng Key Laboratory of Cell Signal Transduction, Henan Provincial Engineering Center for Tumor Molecular Medicine, Kaifeng 475004, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Systematic Review of the Role of Alpha-Protein Kinase 1 in Cancer and Cancer-Related Inflammatory Diseases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184390. [PMID: 36139553 PMCID: PMC9497133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Aside from the basic phosphorylation function of alpha-kinase 1 (ALPK1), little is known about its major functions. Researchers have used various forms of biotechnology and human, animal, and cellular models to better understand the relationship of ALPK1 with cancer and cancer-related inflammatory diseases. ALPK1 is involved in the progression of breast, lung, colorectal, oral, and skin cancer as well as lymphoblastic leukemia. ALPK1 has also been implicated in gout, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, which are thought to be associated with breast, lung, colorectal, urinary tract, pancreatic, and endometrial cancers and lymphoblastic leukemia. ALPK1 upregulates inflammatory cytokines and chemokines during carcinogenesis. The major cytokine involved in carcinogenesis is TNF-α, which activates the NF-κB pathway, and similar inflammatory responses exist in gout, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. ALPK1 regulates downstream inflammatory mechanisms that lead to cancer development through certain pathways and plays a key role in cancer initiation and metastasis. Abstract Background: Deregulation of conventional protein kinases is associated with the growth and development of cancer cells. Alpha-kinase 1 (ALPK1) belongs to a newly discovered family of serine/threonine protein kinases with no sequence homology to conventional protein kinases, and its function in cancer is poorly understood. Methods: In this systematic review, we searched for and analyzed studies linking ALPK1 to cancer development and progression. Results: Based on the current evidence obtained using human, animal, cellular, and tissue models, ALPK1 is located upstream and triggers cancer cell development and metastasis by regulating the inflammatory response through phosphorylation. Its mRNA and protein levels were found to correlate with advanced tumor size and lymph node metastasis, which occur from the cellular cytoplasm into the nucleus. ALPK1 is also strongly associated with gout, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes, which are considered as inflammatory diseases and associated with cancer. Conclusion: ALPK1 is an oncogene involved in carcinogenesis. Chronic inflammation is the common regulatory mechanism between cancer and these diseases. Future research should focus on identifying inhibitors of serine/threonine and ALPK1 at their phosphorylation sites, which would block various signal transductions and potentially offer kinase-targeted therapeutic agents for patients with cancer and inflammatory diseases.
Collapse
|
3
|
García-Weber D, Arrieumerlou C. ADP-heptose: a bacterial PAMP detected by the host sensor ALPK1. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021; 78:17-29. [PMID: 32591860 PMCID: PMC11072087 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-020-03577-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The innate immune response constitutes the first line of defense against pathogens. It involves the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), the production of inflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of immune cells to infection sites. Recently, ADP-heptose, a soluble intermediate of the lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic pathway in Gram-negative bacteria, has been identified by several research groups as a PAMP. Here, we recapitulate the evidence that led to this identification and discuss the controversy over the immunogenic properties of heptose 1,7-bisphosphate (HBP), another bacterial heptose previously defined as an activator of innate immunity. Then, we describe the mechanism of ADP-heptose sensing by alpha-protein kinase 1 (ALPK1) and its downstream signaling pathway that involves the proteins TIFA and TRAF6 and induces the activation of NF-κB and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Finally, we discuss possible delivery mechanisms of ADP-heptose in cells during infection, and propose new lines of thinking to further explore the roles of the ADP-heptose/ALPK1/TIFA axis in infections and its potential implication in the control of intestinal homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego García-Weber
- INSERM, U1016, Institut Cochin, CNRS, UMR8104, Université de Paris, 22 rue Méchain, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Arrieumerlou
- INSERM, U1016, Institut Cochin, CNRS, UMR8104, Université de Paris, 22 rue Méchain, 75014, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Simple Summary Cell migration is an essential process from embryogenesis to cell death. This is tightly regulated by numerous proteins that help in proper functioning of the cell. In diseases like cancer, this process is deregulated and helps in the dissemination of tumor cells from the primary site to secondary sites initiating the process of metastasis. For metastasis to be efficient, cytoskeletal components like actin, myosin, and intermediate filaments and their associated proteins should co-ordinate in an orderly fashion leading to the formation of many cellular protrusions-like lamellipodia and filopodia and invadopodia. Knowledge of this process is the key to control metastasis of cancer cells that leads to death in 90% of the patients. The focus of this review is giving an overall understanding of these process, concentrating on the changes in protein association and regulation and how the tumor cells use it to their advantage. Since the expression of cytoskeletal proteins can be directly related to the degree of malignancy, knowledge about these proteins will provide powerful tools to improve both cancer prognosis and treatment. Abstract Successful metastasis depends on cell invasion, migration, host immune escape, extravasation, and angiogenesis. The process of cell invasion and migration relies on the dynamic changes taking place in the cytoskeletal components; actin, tubulin and intermediate filaments. This is possible due to the plasticity of the cytoskeleton and coordinated action of all the three, is crucial for the process of metastasis from the primary site. Changes in cellular architecture by internal clues will affect the cell functions leading to the formation of different protrusions like lamellipodia, filopodia, and invadopodia that help in cell migration eventually leading to metastasis, which is life threatening than the formation of neoplasms. Understanding the signaling mechanisms involved, will give a better insight of the changes during metastasis, which will eventually help targeting proteins for treatment resulting in reduced mortality and longer survival.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou X, Xiao C, Han T, Qiu S, Wang M, Chu J, Sun W, Li L, Lin L. Prognostic biomarkers related to breast cancer recurrence identified based on Logit model analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:254. [PMID: 32977823 PMCID: PMC7519567 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02026-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study intended to determine important genes related to the prognosis and recurrence of breast cancer. METHODS Gene expression data of breast cancer patients were downloaded from TCGA database. Breast cancer samples with recurrence and death were defined as poor disease-free survival (DFS) group, while samples without recurrence and survival beyond 5 years were defined as better DFS group. Another gene expression profile dataset (GSE45725) of breast cancer was downloaded as the validation data. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between better and poor DFS groups, which were then performed function enrichment analysis. The DEGs that were enriched in the GO function and KEGG signaling pathway were selected for cox regression analysis and Logit regression (LR) model analysis. Finally, correlation analysis between LR model classification and survival prognosis was analyzed. RESULTS Based on the breast cancer gene expression profile data in TCGA, 540 DEGs were screened between better DFS and poor DFS groups, including 177 downregulated and 363 upregulated DEGs. A total of 283 DEGs were involved in all GO functions and KEGG signaling pathways. Through LR model screening, 10 important feature DEGs were identified and validated, among which, ABCA3, CCL22, FOXJ1, IL1RN, KCNIP3, MAP2K6, and MRPL13, were significantly expressed in both groups in the two data sets. ABCA3, CCL22, FOXJ1, IL1RN, and MAP2K6 were good prognostic factors, while KCNIP3 and MRPL13 were poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSION ABCA3, CCL22, FOXJ1, IL1RN, and MAP2K6 may serve as good prognostic factors, while KCNIP3 and MRPL13 may be poor prognostic factors for the prognosis of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Zhou
- Department of Nursing, Wuxi Higher Health Vocational Technology School, Wuxi, 2140128, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chuanguang Xiao
- Department of Breast Thyroid Surgery, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo, 255036, Shandong, China
| | - Tong Han
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453000, Henan, China
| | - Shusheng Qiu
- Department of Breast Thyroid Surgery, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo, 255036, Shandong, China
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Nursing, Wuxi Higher Health Vocational Technology School, Wuxi, 2140128, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun Chu
- Department of Nursing, Wuxi Higher Health Vocational Technology School, Wuxi, 2140128, Jiangsu, China
| | - Weike Sun
- Department of Breast Thyroid Surgery, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo, 255036, Shandong, China
| | - Liang Li
- Department of Breast Thyroid Surgery, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo, 255036, Shandong, China
| | - Lili Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, Wuxi Higher Health Vocational Technology School, No. 305, Xinguang Road, Wuxi, 214028, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|