Is there justification for 4 cycles of consolidation therapy in AML?

Oncology stewardship in acute myeloid leukemia

In recent years, an explosion of novel agents has shifted the treatment paradigm for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The optimal place in therapy for many of these novel agents remains unknown due to limited guidance from national guidelines and the way these agents were studied prior to entering the market. A critical evaluation of the literature and incorporation of oncology stewardship principles can be helpful in determining an optimal place for these agents while being mindful of the overall cost that is associated with therapies. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety data for five controversial agents and provide examples of the use of stewardship practices in determining their place in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Impact of high dose cytarabine dosing strategies in obese patients with acute myeloid leukemia

High dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The increasing prevalence of obesity and the toxicity risk with this therapy renders important the quantification of potential risks with weight-based dosing in this patient population. The American Society of Clinical Oncology published recommendations on chemotherapy dosing in obese patients, but patients with leukemia were excluded from analysis. This was a retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy outcomes in obese and non-obese patients with AML who received HIDAC consolidation. Thirty-nine (41.9 %) patients received dose adjusted HIDAC in cycle 1. Nine of the 40 patients in the obese group received HIDAC dose-adjusted for obesity. The combined incidence of cycle delays, febrile neutropenia, or documented infection was 41.5 % in non-obese patients compared to 57.5 % in obese patients (p = 0.127). The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were not reached in both cohorts. The estimated 36-month overall survival was 76.4 % (95 % CI 0.623-0.905) in non-obese patients, compared to 66.1 % (95 % CI 0.472-0.85) in obese patients. There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes for obese versus non-obese patients who received HIDAC consolidation. For class III obesity, baseline dose-adjustments were more common.

Model-Based Optimal AML Consolidation Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Neutropenia is an adverse event commonly arising during intensive chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is often associated with infectious complications. Mathematical modeling, simulation, and optimization of the treatment process would be a valuable tool to support clinical decision making, potentially resulting in less severe side effects and deeper remissions. However, until now, there has been no validated mathematical model available to simulate the effect of chemotherapy treatment on white blood cell (WBC) counts and leukemic cells simultaneously.

METHODS

We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model combining a myelosuppression model considering endogenous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a PK model for cytarabine (Ara-C), a subcutaneous absorption model for exogenous G-CSF, and a two-compartment model for leukemic blasts. This model was fitted to data of 44 AML patients during consolidation therapy with a novel Ara-C plus G-CSF schedule from a phase II controlled clinical trial. Additionally, we were able to optimize treatment schedules with respect to disease progression, WBC nadirs, and the amount of Ara-C and G-CSF.

RESULTS

The developed PK/PD model provided good prediction accuracies and an interpretation of the interaction between WBCs, G-CSF, and blasts. For 14 patients (those with available bone marrow blast counts), we achieved a median 4.2-fold higher WBC count at nadir, which is the most critical time during consolidation therapy. The simulation results showed that relative bone marrow blast counts remained below the clinically important threshold of 5%, with a median of 60% reduction in Ara-C.

CONCLUSION

These in silico findings demonstrate the benefits of optimized treatment schedules for AML patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

Until 2017, no new drug had been approved for the treatment of AML, fostering the optimal use of currently available drugs.

Is There Still a Role for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

After intensive induction chemotherapy and complete remission achievement, patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are candidates to receive either high-dose cytarabine-based regimens, or autologous (ASCT) or allogeneic (allo-SCT) hematopoietic stem cell transplantations as consolidation treatment. Pretreatment risk classification represents a determinant key of type and intensity of post-remission therapy. Current evidence indicates that allo-SCT represents the treatment of choice for high and intermediate risk patients if clinically eligible, and its use is favored by increasing availability of unrelated or haploidentical donors. On the contrary, the adoption of ASCT is progressively declining, although numerous studies indicate that in favorable risk AML the relapse rate is lower after ASCT than chemotherapy. In addition, the burden of supportive therapy and hospitalization favors ASCT. In this review, we summarize current indications (if any) to ASCT on the basis of molecular genetics at diagnosis and minimal residual disease evaluation after induction/consolidation phase. Finally, we critically discuss the role of ASCT in older patients with AML and acute promyelocytic leukemia.

MRD in AML: The Role of New Techniques

In the context of precision medicine, assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to direct individual treatment programs, including allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients at high-risk of relapse. One of the limits of this approach has been in the past the paucity of AML markers suitable for MRD assessment. Recently, the number of biomarkers has increased, due to the identification of highly specific leukemia-associated immunophenotypes by multicolor flow-cytometry, and of rare mutated gene sequences by digital droplet PCR, or next-generation sequencing (NGS). In addition, NGS allowed unraveling of clonal heterogeneity, present in AML at initial diagnosis or developing during treatment, which influences reliability of specific biomarkers, that may be unstable during the disease course. The technological advances have increased the application of MRD-based strategies to a significantly higher number of AML patients, and the information deriving from MRD assessment has been used to design individual post-remission protocols and pre-emptive treatments in patients with sub-clinical relapse. This led to the definition of MRD-negative complete remission as outcome definition in the recently published European Leukemianet MRD guidelines. In this review, we summarized the principles of modern technologies and their clinical applications for MRD detection in AML patients, according to the specific leukemic markers.

Condensed versus standard schedule of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy with pegfilgrastim growth factor support in acute myeloid leukemia

The aim of this cohort study was to compare a condensed schedule of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine on days 1, 2 and 3 (HDAC-123) with the HDAC schedule given on days 1, 3 and 5 (HDAC-135) as well as to evaluate the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. One hundred and seventy-six patients were treated with HDAC-135 and 392 patients with HDAC-123 with prophylactic pegfilgrastim at days 10 and 8, respectively, in the AMLSG 07-04 and the German AML Intergroup protocol. Time from start to chemotherapy until hematologic recovery with white blood cells >1.0 G/l and neutrophils >0.5 G/l was in median 4 days shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123 compared with HDAC-135 (P<0.0001, each), and further reduced by 2 days (P<0.0001) by pegfilgrastim. Rates of infections were reduced by HDAC-123 (P<0.0001) and pegfilgrastim (P=0.002). Days in hospital and platelet transfusions were significantly reduced by HDAC-123 compared with HDAC-135. Survival was neither affected by HDAC-123 versus HDAC-135 nor by pegfilgrastim. In conclusion, consolidation therapy with HDAC-123 leads to faster hematologic recovery and less infections, platelet transfusions as well as days in hospital without affecting survival.