Genetics of rare mesenchymal tumors: implications for targeted treatment in DFSP, ASPS, CCS, GCTB and PEComa

Management Strategies for Adults with Locally Advanced, Unresectable or Metastatic Malignant Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor (PEComa): Challenges and Solutions

PEComa (PEC tumor; perivascular epithelioid cell tumors) is a rare group of tumors of mesenchymal origin composed of perivascular epithelioid cells (PEC) with features of melanotic and smooth muscle differentiation. In this article, we would like to present the current treatment options for this group of tumors. PEComas are classified as tumors of uncertain malignant potential because recurrences occur after radical treatment. The primary treatment is surgical resection with negative margins. Due to the different locations of the tumors, often the cooperation of multispecialty surgeons is required during the operations. In locally advanced cases, cytoreduction and HIPEC may be effective but still are an experimental treatment. For nonresectable PEComa chemotherapy, mTOR inhibitors and VEGFR inhibitors are used.

Efficacy of Sirolimus Treatment in PEComa-10 Years of Practice Perspective

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) represent a family of rare mesenchymal tumors resultant from deregulation in mTOR pathway activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of targeted PEComa treatment. We reviewed all consecutive patients with PEComa who started systemic treatment with sirolimus in our reference sarcoma center between January 2011 and August 2020. Histopathology of PEComa was reviewed and confirmed in all cases by a designated sarcoma pathologist. Any surviving progression-free patients were censored at the last follow-up (31 March 2021). Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test or a Cox proportional hazard model. Fifteen (12 females and 3 males) consecutive PEComa patients were treated. The median age of patients treated systemically was 50 years. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.8-NA) for first-line chemotherapy and was not reached (95% CI: 42.0-NA) for sirolimus as first-line therapy. There was one objective response (OR) in the chemotherapy group. The OR rate reached 73% (11/15 cases) for sirolimus regardless of the treatment line. All patients archived disease control. Three patients died due to disease progression after 55, 32, and 32 months since metastatic disease diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 55.7 (range: 3.2-220) months, the 5 yr OS was 65% (CI 95% 39-100). Our study is the largest single-institution report on PEComa systemic targeted therapy and fills the gap in the field of advanced PEComa care since the FDA/EMEA approval of sirolimus.

The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery over the traditional wide local excision surgery in the cure of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Usually most patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) may present rather late when the tumor is in protuberant phase due to its rarity and indolent onset. It has a high propensity for local recurrence and destructive nature. Management of DFSP requires a biopsychosocial and Multidisplinary approach regardless of the clinical or immunohistochemical variant. Surgery is the Gold standard management of localized disease. DFSP rarely exhibits any lymphatic or hematogenous dissemination. It is because of its high recurrence rate associated with Wide Local Excision (WLE), the introduction of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has really helped in reducing the rates of recurrence of DFSP. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis and systemic review is to advocate for MMS over WLE for DFSP and other cutaneous malignancies using DFSP as a prototype. The objective of this study were to conduct a meta-analysis on comparative surgical methods used in the cure of DFSP with regards to WLE verses MMS, to evaluate the cure rates with relation to recurrence rates, offer a recommendation on the various treatment modalities based on the location of lesion, and use of adjuvant therapy in different clinical-medical setups. A comprehensive retrospective analysis search in EMBASE, Google Scholar and Medline (PubMed) for studies published from 2008 to 2018 containing the surgical management of DFSP with WLE verses MMS were reviewed. Five studies of moderate-quality evidence (level B) with a pooled patient load of 684 was analyzed and found for recurrence of DFSP after WLE and MMS to be 9.10% and 2.72% respectively after an average follow-up time for both groups of 5.32 years with a female predominance of 1.58. The trunk is the commonest site for the DFSP lesion which was at 52.80% then the upper and lower extremities zones and the head and neck zones at 31.75% and 15.45% respectively. The pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) analysis indicated that there was a direct relationship with regards the reduced recurrence rate of DFSP in the MMS group compared to the WLE group (OR:0.31;95%; CI :0.17-0.56). Furthermore, there was significant association between the reduced recurrence rate with the MMS in DFSP patients with a statistical P-value of 0.0001 at 95% CI. The expected increased recurrence rate by zones was in WLE head and neck zone at 38.19% then trunk and extremities zone at 13.34%. In the MMS group it was at of 23.4% as compared to 16.0% in the head and neck zone. Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is more efficacious in the cure rate and recurrence reduction of DFSP and should be advocated for as first line therapy especially in high recurrence prone zones.

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

OPINION STATEMENT

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a slow growing tumor with a very low metastatic potential but with significant subclinical extension and great capacity for local destruction. Thus, the first surgeon approached with such challenging tumor must attempt to cure the patient with a method that spares healthy tissue and ensures an optimal oncological, functional, and esthetic result. The treatment of DFSP often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Depending on location, dermatologic surgeons, surgical oncologists, head and neck surgeons, neurosurgeons, plastic surgeons, and occasionally medical oncologists may be involved with the management. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the preferred method when available. In our institution, most of the DFSP cases are often advanced cases; thus, dermatologic surgeons obtain clear margins peripherally and other surgical specialties assist with resection of the fascia and any critical deeper structures. When MMS is not available, wide local excision (at least 2- to 3-cm margins of resection) with exhaustive pathologic assessment of margin status is recommended, and it is best to confirm tumor extirpation prior to any reconstruction. Subclinical extension of the tumor could be related to the size; how long it has been growing or histological markers that are unknown right now. No clinical trials comparing MMS vs WLE are available, and further research should be focused on these subjects as well as the use of imatinib and other targeted therapies for recurrent and metastatic tumors and for neoadjuvant treatment.

Molecular diagnostics in soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant heterogenous tumors of mesenchymal origin with over fifty subtypes. The use of hematoxylin and eosin stained sections (and immunohistochemistry) in the morphologic assessment of these tumors has been the bane of clinical diagnosis until recently. The last decade has witnessed considerable progress in the understanding and application of molecular techniques in refining the current understanding of soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors beyond the limits of traditional approaches. Indeed, the identification of reciprocal chromosomal translocations and fusion genes in some subsets of sarcomas with potential implications in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment has been revolutionary. The era of molecular targeted therapy presents a platform that continues to drive biomarker discovery and personalized medicine in soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In this review, we highlight how the different molecular techniques have enhanced the diagnosis of these tumors with prognostic and therapeutic implications.