Neuroimaging Findings in Neurodevelopmental Copy Number Variants: Identifying Molecular Pathways to Convergent Phenotypes

Review of structural neuroimaging and genetic findings in autism spectrum disorder - a clinical perspective

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by deficits in social relationships and communication and restrictive, repetitive behaviors and interests. ASDs form a heterogeneous group from a clinical and genetic perspective. Currently, ASDs diagnosis is based on the clinical observation of the individual's behavior. The subjective nature of behavioral diagnoses, in the context of ASDs heterogeneity, contributes to significant variation in the age at ASD diagnosis. Early detection has been proved to be critical in ASDs, as early start of appropriate therapeutic interventions greatly improve the outcome for some children. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in the diagnostic work-up of neurodevelopmental conditions, including ASDs, mostly for brain malformations detection. Recently, the focus of brain imaging shifted towards quantitative MRI parameters, aiming to identify subtle changes that may establish early detection biomarkers. ASDs have a strong genetic component; deletions and duplications of several genomic loci have been strongly associated with ASDs risk. Consequently, a multitude of neuroimaging and genetic findings emerged in ASDs in the recent years. The association of gross or subtle changes in brain morphometry and volumes with different genetic defects has the potential to bring new insights regarding normal development and pathomechanisms of various disorders affecting the brain. Still, the clinical implications of these discoveries and the impact of genetic abnormalities on brain structure and function are unclear. Here we review the literature on brain imaging correlated with the most prevalent genomic imbalances in ASD, and discuss the potential clinical impact.

Schizophrenia genomics: genetic complexity and functional insights

Determining the causes of schizophrenia has been a notoriously intractable problem, resistant to a multitude of investigative approaches over centuries. In recent decades, genomic studies have delivered hundreds of robust findings that implicate nearly 300 common genetic variants (via genome-wide association studies) and more than 20 rare variants (via whole-exome sequencing and copy number variant studies) as risk factors for schizophrenia. In parallel, functional genomic and neurobiological studies have provided exceptionally detailed information about the cellular composition of the brain and its interconnections in neurotypical individuals and, increasingly, in those with schizophrenia. Taken together, these results suggest unexpected complexity in the mechanisms that drive schizophrenia, pointing to the involvement of ensembles of genes (polygenicity) rather than single-gene causation. In this Review, we describe what we now know about the genetics of schizophrenia and consider the neurobiological implications of this information.

Rare CNVs and phenome-wide profiling highlight brain structural divergence and phenotypical convergence

Copy number variations (CNVs) are rare genomic deletions and duplications that can affect brain and behaviour. Previous reports of CNV pleiotropy imply that they converge on shared mechanisms at some level of pathway cascades, from genes to large-scale neural circuits to the phenome. However, existing studies have primarily examined single CNV loci in small clinical cohorts. It remains unknown, for example, how distinct CNVs escalate vulnerability for the same developmental and psychiatric disorders. Here we quantitatively dissect the associations between brain organization and behavioural differentiation across 8 key CNVs. In 534 CNV carriers, we explored CNV-specific brain morphology patterns. CNVs were characteristic of disparate morphological changes involving multiple large-scale networks. We extensively annotated these CNV-associated patterns with ~1,000 lifestyle indicators through the UK Biobank resource. The resulting phenotypic profiles largely overlap and have body-wide implications, including the cardiovascular, endocrine, skeletal and nervous systems. Our population-level investigation established brain structural divergences and phenotypical convergences of CNVs, with direct relevance to major brain disorders.

A novel SETD2 variant causing global development delay without overgrowth in a Chinese 3-year-old boy

Background: Luscan-Lumish syndrome is characterized by macrocephaly, postnatal overgrowth, intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay (DD), which is caused by heterozygous SETD2 (SET domain containing 2) mutations. The incidence of Luscan-Lumish syndrome is unclear. The study was conducted to provide a novel pathogenic SETD2 variant causing atypical Luscan-Lumish syndrome and review all the published SETD2 mutations and corresponding symptoms, comprehensively understanding the phenotypes and genotypes of SETD2 mutations. Methods: Peripheral blood samples of the proband and his parents were collected for next-generation sequencing including whole-exome sequencing (WES), copy number variation (CNV) detection and mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Identified variant was verified by Sanger sequencing. Conservative analysis and structural analysis were performed to investigate the effect of mutation. Public databases such as PubMed, Clinvar and Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) were used to collect all cases with SETD2 mutations. Results: A novel pathogenic SETD2 variant (c.5835_c.5836insAGAA, p. A1946Rfs*2) was identified in a Chinese 3-year-old boy, who had speech and motor delay without overgrowth. Conservative analysis and structural analysis showed that the novel pathogenic variant would loss the conserved domains in the C-terminal region and result in loss of function of SETD2 protein. Frameshift mutations and non-sense mutations account for 68.5% of the total 51 SETD2 point mutations, suggesting that Luscan-Lumish syndrome is likely due to loss of function of SETD2. But we failed to find an association between genotype and phenotype of SETD2 mutations. Conclusion: Our findings expand the genotype-phenotype knowledge of SETD2-associated neurological disorder and provide new evidence for further genetic counselling.

Disruption of the gene regulatory programme in neurodevelopmental disorders

Cortical development consists of a series of synchronised events, including fate transition of cortical progenitors, neuronal migration, specification and connectivity. It is becoming clear that gene expression programs governing these events rely on the interplay between signalling molecules, transcription factors and epigenetic mechanisms. When genetic or environmental factors disrupt expression of genes involved in important brain development processes, neurodevelopmental disorders can occur. This review aims to highlight how recent advances in technologies have helped uncover and imitate the gene regulatory mechanisms commonly disrupted in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Heterogeneity thwarts autism explanatory power: A proposal for endophenotypes

Many researchers now believe that autism heterogeneity is likely to include many disorders, but most research is based on samples defined by the DSM-5 Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) criteria. However, individuals diagnosed with autism have complex and varied biological causes for their symptoms. Therefore, autism is not a unitary biological entity. And although autism is significantly different from typical development, autism is not a unitary clinical disorder because diagnosed individuals vary in symptom patterns, comorbidities, biomarkers, and gene variants. The DSM-5 ASD criteria were designed to reduce heterogeneity, and there have been many other efforts to reduce autism heterogeneity including using more stringent clinical criteria, dividing autism into low and high functioning groups, creating subgroups, and by studying larger samples. However, to date these efforts have not been successful. Heterogeneity is extensive and remains unexplained, and no autism pathophysiology has been discovered. Most importantly, heterogeneity has hindered the explanatory power of the autism diagnosis to discover drug regimens and effective behavioral treatments. The paper proposes that possible transdiagnostic endophenotypes may reduce autism heterogeneity. Searching for transdiagnostic endophenotypes requires exploring autism symptoms outside of the framework of the DSM-5 autism diagnosis. This paper proposes that researchers relax diagnostic criteria to increase the range of phenotypes to support the search for transdiagnostic endophenotypes. The paper proposes possible candidates for transdiagnostic endophenotypes. These candidates are taken from DSM-5 ASD criteria, from concepts that have resulted from researched theories, and from symptoms that are the result of subtyping. The paper then sketches a possible basis for a future transdiagnostic endophenotypes screening tool that includes symptoms of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.