In-situ biogas upgrading by bio-methanation with an innovative membrane bioreactor combining sludge filtration and H2 injection

Mechanisms and Enhancement of Hydrogen Evolution for Membrane Anti-fouling and Methane Upgrading by Sacrificed Anode in a Novel Electro-AnMBR

Severe membrane fouling and low CH4 content in the produced biogas have restricted the applicability and energy recovery profit of the anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). Herein, a novel AnMBR was constructed with an electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (electro-HER) by double anodes and a titanium membrane-cathode (eHAnMBR). The electro-HER was controlled and enhanced by sacrificed iron anode under low voltage, to mitigate membrane fouling and upgrade biogas simultaneously. The critical factors in electro-HER were investigated to influence the AnMBR system, including hydrogen, applied voltage, and Fe ions. The voltage and hydrogen enhanced the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis process and enriched hydrophilic Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina, thereby improving biogas purity by up to 28% and increasing total CH₄ production by 46%. Furthermore, the electro-HER on the membrane-cathode decreased the transmembrane pressure by 30%. Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (TOF-SIMs) was innovatively applied to visualize the organic foulants in membrane pores. The electro-HER not only produced H2 to optimize cake layer structure but also produced local alkalinity on the membrane surface, to remove extracellular polymeric substances in membrane pores. Additionally, Fe2+/Fe3+ released from the sacrificial iron anode, facilitated phosphate precipitation and removal from 15.7% to 37.9%. This study presents a novel and sustainable wastewater treatment solution by integrating the electro-HER process with AnMBR, enabling both energy recovery and membrane antifouling.

Microalgae-based membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment, biogas production, and sustainable energy: A review

Managing wastewater and using renewable energy sources are challenges in achieving sustainable development goals. This study provides an overview of the factors influencing the performance of algae-based membrane bioreactors (AMBRs) for contaminant removal from wastewater and biogas production. This review highlights that the performance of AMBRs in removing total phosphorus (TP) and nitrogen (N) from wastewater can reach up to 93% and 97%, respectively, depending on parameters such as pH, hydraulic retention time (HRT), and algae concentration. Moreover, the removal of H2S from biogas substantially depends on the type of bioreactor used. Furthermore, algal biomass has proven to be a viable option for biogas production and CO2 sequestration, contributing to carbon neutrality. This review also underscores that microalgae are a valuable feedstock, either alone or in combination with other raw materials, for biogas production. In conclusion, this review outlines that maximizing the performance of bioreactors and the efficiency of microalgae used for biogas production and wastewater treatment requires careful control of parameters, such as HRT, solid retention time, pH, and temperature. Additionally, pH and the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C:N) are factors influencing CH4 yield during microalgae anaerobic digestion (AD). Further research is needed to evaluate the operational costs of AMBRs used for wastewater treatment and to compare the biogas yield from different types of bioreactors under similar conditions, including the use of the same feedstock.

A Comprehensive Review on Biomethane Production from Biogas Separation and its Techno-Economic Assessments

Biogas offers significant benefits as a renewable energy source, contributing to decarbonization, waste management, and economic development. This comprehensive review examines the historical, technological, economic, and global aspects of biomethane production, focusing on the key players such as China, the European Union, and North America, and associated opportunities and challenges as well as future prospects from an Australia perspective. The review begins with an introduction to biogas, detailing its composition, feedstock sources, historical development, and anaerobic digestion (AD) process. Subsequently, it delves into major biomethane production technologies, including physicochemical absorption, high-pressure water scrubbing (HPWS), amine scrubbing (AS), pressure swing adsorption (PSA), membrane permeation/separation (MP), and other technologies including organic solvent scrubbing and cryogenic separation. The study also discusses general guidelines of techno-economic assessments (TEAs) regarding biomethane production, outlining the methodologies, inventory analysis, environmental life cycle assessment (LCA), and estimated production costs. Challenges and opportunities of biogas utilization in Australia are explored, highlighting and referencing global projections, polarization in production approaches, circularity in waste management, and specific considerations for Australia. The review concludes discussing future perspectives for biomethane, emphasizing the importance of technological advancements, policy support, and investment in realizing its full potential for sustainable energy and waste management solutions.

Synergetic anaerobic digestion of food waste for enhanced production of biogas and value-added products: strategies, challenges, and techno-economic analysis

The generation of food waste (FW) is increasing at an alarming rate, contributing to a total of 32% of all the waste produced globally. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an effective method for dealing with organic wastes of various compositions, like FW. Waste valorization into value-added products has increased due to the conversion of FW into biogas using AD technology. A variety of pathways are adopted by microbes to avoid unfavorable conditions in AD, including competition between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methane (CH4)-forming bacteria. Anaerobic bacteria decompose organic matter to produce biogas, a digester gas. The composition depends on the type of raw material and the method by which the digestion process is conducted. Studies have shown that the biogas produced by AD contains 65-75% CH4 and 35-45% carbon dioxide (CO2). Methanothrix soehngenii and Methanosaeta concilii are examples of species that convert acetate to CH4 and CO2. Methanobacterium bryantii, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, and Methanobrevibacter arboriphilus are examples of species that produce CH4 from hydrogen and CO2. Methanobacterium formicicum, Methanobrevibacter smithii, and Methanococcus voltae are examples of species that consume formate, hydrogen, and CO2 and produce CH4. The popularity of AD has increased for the development of biorefinery because it is seen as a more environmentally acceptable alternative in comparison to physico-chemical techniques for resource and energy recovery. The review examines the possibility of using accessible FW to produce important value-added products such as organic acids (acetate/butyrate), biopolymers, and other essential value-added products.

External ceramic membrane contactor for in-situ H2 assisted biogas upgrading

Biological H2-assisted biogas upgrading has gained significant attention as an environmentally friendly substitute to common physico-chemical upgrading techniques, but is largely limited by the low solubility of H2. This study evaluated the design of a ceramic membrane contactor module for H2 injection. H2 dissolution was maintained at high efficiency by controlling gas supply and sludge recirculation rate, achieving a biogas quality of average 98.8% CH4 during the stable operation phase with a 108% increase in the CH4 production rate. This also outperforms conventional H2 injection using diffuser sparging which could only achieve a biogas quality of 84% CH4 content. Microbial community analysis found high Methanobacterium spp. abundance within the archaea at 95.2% at the end of the operation, allowing the dominance of the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis pathway for high upgrading efficiencies. The system is a high-performance external membrane connector module coupled to common anaerobic digestion systems for biogas upgrading.

Comparison of anaerobic digestion of starch- and petro-based bioplastic under hydrogen-rich conditions

To identify an economically viable waste management system for bioplastics, thermoplastic starch (TPS) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) were anaerobically digested under hydrogen (H2)/carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen (N2) gas-purged conditions to compare methane (CH4) production and biodegradation. Regardless of the type of bioplastics, CH4 production was consistently higher with H2/CO2 than with N2. The highest amount of CH4 was produced at 307.74 mL CH4/g volatile solids when TPS digested with H2/CO2. A stepwise increased in CH4 yield was observed, with a nominal initial increment followed by accelerated methanogenesis conversion as H2 was depleted. This may be attributed to a substantial shift in the microbial structure from hydrogenotrophic methanogen (Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales) to heterotrophs (Spirochaetia). In contrast, no significant change was observed with PBAT, regardless of the type of purged gas. TPS was broken down into numerous derivatives, including volatile fatty acids. TPS produced more byproducts with H2/CO2 (i.e., 430) than with N2 (i.e., 320). In contrast, differential scanning calorimetry analysis on PBAT revealed an increase in crystallinity from 10.20 % to 12.31 % and 11.36 % in the H2/CO2- and N2-purged conditions, respectively, after 65 days of testing. PBAT surface modifications were characterized via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The results suggest that the addition of H2/CO2 can enhance the CH4 yield and increase the breakdown rate of TPS more than that of PBAT. This study provides novel insights into the CH4 production potential of two bioplastics with different biodegradabilities in H2/CO2-mediated anaerobic digestion systems.

Biological upgrading of biogas assisted with membrane supplied hydrogen gas in a three-phase upflow reactor

Biogas upgrading via CO2 conversion to CH4 is an emerging technology for renewable natural gas production and carbon management, but its development is limited by the low H2 gas to liquid phase transfer. Herein, an innovative biogas upgrading system employing a three-phase design was studied for CO2 conversion with H2 supply via gas-permeable membrane. The system produced biogas consisted of 74.1 ± 7.1 % CH4 and 25.9 ± 7.1 % CO2 with intermittent injection of H2. When H2 supply was continuous, the CH4 content increased to 91.6 ± 2.2 % at a H2:CO2 ratio of 4.4. Although a higher ratio of 5.5 could result in a higher CH4 percentage of 95.2 ± 2.5 %, biogas production rate started to decrease. The removal efficiency of organic contents remained above 90 % throughout the experiment. Microbial community analysis corroborated the findings, showing that hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriaceae was more prevalent in the biofilm (71.9 %) compared to that in anaerobic digestion (15.8 %) and effluent (14.1 %).

Comparison of in-situ and ex-situ electrolytic H2 supply for microbial methane production from CO2

Both in-situ and ex-situ electrolytic H2 supply have been used for biomethane production from CO2. However, the pros and cons of them have not been systematically compared. The present study makes this comparison using a 20 L continuous stirred-tank reactor equipped with external and internal electrolyzers. Compared to the ex-situ H2 supply, the in-situ electrolytic H2 bubbles were one order of magnitude smaller, which resulted in improved H2 mass transfer and biomass growth. Consequently, the methane production rate and the coulombic efficiency of the in-situ H2 supply (0.51 L·L-1·d-1, 96%) were higher than those of the ex-situ H2 supply (0.30 L·L-1·d-1, 56%). However, due to high internal resistance, the energy consumption for the in-situ electrolysis was 2.54 times higher than the ex-situ electrolysis. Therefore, the in-situ electrolytic H2 supply appears to be more promising, but reducing energy consumption is the key to the success of this technology.

Advancing the bioconversion process of food waste into methane: A systematic review

With the continuous rise of food waste (FW) throughout the world, a research effort to reveal its potential for bioenergy production is surging. There is a lack of harmonized information and publications available that evaluate the state-of-advance for FW-derived methane production process, particularly from an engineering and sustainability point of view. Anaerobic digestion (AD) has shown remarkable efficiency in the bioconversion of FW to methane. This paper reviews the current research progress, gaps, and prospects in pre-AD, AD, and post-AD processes of FW-derived methane production. Briefly, the review highlights innovative FW collection and optimization routes such as AI that enable efficient FW valorization processes. As weather changes and the FW sources may affect the AD efficiency, it is important to assess the spatio-seasonal variations and microphysical properties of the FW to be valorized. In that case, developing weather-resistant bioreactors and cost-effective mechanisms to modify the raw substrate morphology is necessary. An AI-guided reactor could have high performance when the internal environment of the centralized operation is monitored in real-time and not susceptible to changes in FW variety. Monitoring solvent degradation and fugitive gases during biogas purification is a challenging task, especially for large-scale plants. Furthermore, this review links scientific evidence in the field with full-scale case studies from different countries. It also highlights the potential contribution of ADFW to carbon neutrality efforts. Regarding future research needs, in addition to the smart collection scheme, attention should be paid to the management and utilization of FW impurities, to ensure sustainable AD operations.

Evaluation of Gas-to-Liquid Transfer with Ceramic Membrane Sparger for H2 and CO2 Fermentation

Hydrogen and carbon dioxide fermentation to methane, called bio-methanation, is a promising way to provide renewable and easy-to-store energy. The main challenge of bio-methanation is the low gas-to-liquid transfer of hydrogen. Gas injection through a porous membrane can be used to obtain microbubbles and high gas-to-liquid transfer. However, the understanding of bubble formation using a membrane in the fermentation broth is still missing. This study focused on the impact of liquid pressure and flow rate in the membrane, gas flow rate, membrane hydrophobicity, surface, and pore size on the overall gas-to-liquid mass transfer coefficient (K_La) for hydrogen with gas injection through a porous membrane in real fermentation conditions. It has been shown that K_La increased by 13% with an increase in liquid pressure from 0.5 bar to 1.5 bar. The use of a hydrophilic membrane increased the K_La by 17% compared to the hydrophobic membrane. The membrane with a pore size of 0.1 µm produced a higher K_La value compared to 50 and 300 kDa. The liquid crossflow velocity did not impact the K_La in the studied range.

Overview of recent progress in exogenous hydrogen supply biogas upgrading and future perspective

With the rapid development of renewable and sustainable energy, biogas upgrading for producing high-quality biomethane as an alternative to natural gas has attracted worldwide attention. This paper comprehensively reviews the current state of biogas upgrading technologies. The advances in physicochemical, photosynthetic autotrophic, and chemical autotrophic biogas upgrading technologies are briefly described with particular attention to the key challenges. New chemical autotrophic biogas upgrading strategies, such as direct and indirect exogenous hydrogen supply, for overcoming barriers to biogas upgrading and realizing highly efficient bioconversion of carbon dioxide are summarized. For each approach to exogenous hydrogen supply for biogas upgrading, the key findings and technical limitations are summarized and critically analyzed. Finally, future developments are also discussed to provide a reference for the development of biogas upgrading technology that can address the global energy crisis and climate change issues related to the application of biogas.

In-situ biogas upgrading with H2 addition in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) digesting waste activated sludge

Biological in-situ biogas upgrading is a promising approach for sustainable energy-powered technologies. This method increases the CH₄ content in biogas via hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis with an external H₂ supply. In this study, an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) was employed for in-situ biogas upgrading. The AnMBR was operated in semi-batch mode using waste activated sludge as the substrate. Pulsed H₂ addition into the reactor and biogas recirculation effectively increased the CH₄ content in the biogas. The addition of 4 equivalents of H₂ relative to CO₂ did not lead to appreciable biogas upgrading, although the acetate concentration increased significantly. When 11 equivalents of H₂ were introduced, the biogas was successfully upgraded, and the CH₄ content increased to 92%. The CH₄ yield and CH₄ production rate were 0.31 L/g-VS_input and 0.086 L/L/d, respectively. In this phase of the process, H₂ addition increased the acetate concentration and the pH because of CO₂ depletion. Compared with a continuously-stirred tank reactor, the AnMBR system attained higher CH₄ content, even without the addition of H₂. The longer solid retention time (100 d) in the AnMBR led to greater degradation of volatile solids. Severe membrane fouling was not observed, and the transmembrane pressure remained stable under 10 kPa for 117 d of continuous filtration without cleaning of the membrane. The AnMBR could be a promising reactor configuration to achieve in-situ biogas upgrading during sludge digestion.

Potential for Biomethanisation of CO2 from Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Wastes in the United Kingdom

The United Kingdom (UK) has a decarbonisation strategy that includes energy from both hydrogen and biomethane. The latter comes from the growing anaerobic digestion (AD) market, which in 2020 produced 23.3 TWh of energy in the form of biogas. According to the strategy, this must be upgraded to biomethane by removal of carbon dioxide (CO2): a goal that could also be fulfilled through CO2 biomethanisation, alleviating the need for carbon capture and storage. Results are presented from a survey of publicly available datasets coupled with modelling to identify potential scale and knowledge gaps. Literature data were used to estimate maximum biomethane concentrations by feedstock type: these ranged from 79% for food wastes to 93% for livestock manures. Data from various government sources were used to estimate the overall potential for CO2 biomethanisation with current AD infrastructure. Values for the uplift in biomethane production ranged from 57% to 61%, but the need for more consistent data collection methodologies was highlighted. On average, however, if CO2 biomethanisation was applied in all currently operating UK AD plants an energy production uplift of 12,954 GWh could be achieved based on 2020 figures. This is sufficient to justify the inclusion of CO2 biomethanisation in decarbonisation strategies, in the UK and worldwide.

A review on biogas upgrading in anaerobic digestion systems treating organic solids and wastewaters via biogas recirculation

Biogas upgrading is an essential process for efficient and safe utilization of biogas produced from anaerobic digestion (AD), a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technology for bioenergy recovery from organic wastes. Biogas recirculation in AD reactors has been recently reported as a cost-effective and promising method to enhance methane content in biogas. This review aimed to summarize the state-of-the-art of biogas recirculation-based AD systems to better understand the possible mechanisms and main factors relating to in-situ biogas upgrading. It shows that biogas recirculation in the AD reactor can not only enhance methane content via both physicochemical and biological effects, but also help establish a robust AD system with high buffering capacity for highly efficient treatment of various organic wastes. More research works are demanding for a better understanding of the mechanisms and the optimization of the whole AD system, targeting its further development for high-calorie bioenergy production.