1
|
Mo W, Vaiana CA, Myers CJ. The need for adaptability in detection, characterization, and attribution of biosecurity threats. Nat Commun 2024; 15:10699. [PMID: 39702312 PMCID: PMC11659417 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55436-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Modern biotechnology necessitates robust biosecurity protocols to address the risk of engineered biological threats. Current efforts focus on screening DNA and rejecting the synthesis of dangerous elements but face technical and logistical barriers. Screening should integrate into a broader strategy that addresses threats at multiple stages of development and deployment. The success of this approach hinges upon reliable detection, characterization, and attribution of engineered DNA. Recent advances notably aid the potential to both develop threats and analyze them. However, further work is needed to translate developments into biosecurity applications. This work reviews cutting-edge methods for DNA analysis and recommends avenues to improve biosecurity in an adaptable manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Mo
- Draper Scholar, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., 555 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Dr, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Christopher A Vaiana
- The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., 555 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Chris J Myers
- Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Dr, Boulder, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leikas J, Johri A, Latvanen M, Wessberg N, Hahto A. Governing Ethical AI Transformation: A Case Study of AuroraAI. Front Artif Intell 2022; 5:836557. [PMID: 35224480 PMCID: PMC8867034 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.836557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
How can the public sector use AI ethically and responsibly for the benefit of people? The sustainable development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector requires dialogue and deliberation between developers, decision makers, deployers, end users, and the public. This paper contributes to the debate on how to develop persuasive government approaches for steering the development and use of AI. We examine the ethical issues and the role of the public in the debate on developing public sector governance of socially and democratically sustainable and technology-intensive societies. To concretize this discussion, we study the co-development of a Finnish national AI program AuroraAI, which aims to provide citizens with tailored and timely services for different life situations, utilizing AI. With the help of this case study, we investigate the challenges posed by the development and use of AI in the service of public administration. We draw particular attention to the efforts made by the AuroraAI Ethics Board in deliberating the AuroraAI solution options and working toward a sustainable and inclusive AI society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaana Leikas
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
- *Correspondence: Jaana Leikas
| | - Aditya Johri
- Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Information Sciences & Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States
| | - Marko Latvanen
- Digital and Population Data Services Agency, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nina Wessberg
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar P, Sinha R, Shukla P. Artificial intelligence and synthetic biology approaches for human gut microbiome. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2020; 62:2103-2121. [PMID: 33249867 DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1850415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The gut microbiome comprises a variety of microorganisms whose genes encode proteins to carry out crucial metabolic functions that are responsible for the majority of health-related issues in human beings. The advent of the technological revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) assisted synthetic biology (SB) approaches will play a vital role in the modulating the therapeutic and nutritive potential of probiotics. This can turn human gut as a reservoir of beneficial bacterial colonies having an immense role in immunity, digestion, brain function, and other health benefits. Hence, in the present review, we have discussed the role of several gene editing tools and approaches in synthetic biology that have equipped us with novel tools like Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR-Cas) systems to precisely engineer probiotics for diagnostic, therapeutic and nutritive value. A brief discussion over the AI techniques to understand the metagenomic data from the healthy and diseased gut microbiome is also presented. Further, the role of AI in potentially impacting the pace of developments in SB and its current challenges is also discussed. The review also describes the health benefits conferred by engineered microbes through the production of biochemicals, nutraceuticals, drugs or biotherapeutics molecules etc. Finally, the review concludes with the challenges and regulatory concerns in adopting synthetic biology engineered microbes for clinical applications. Thus, the review presents a synergistic approach of AI and SB toward human gut microbiome for better health which will provide interesting clues to researchers working in the area of rapidly evolving food and nutrition science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasoon Kumar
- Department of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India.,Department of Medical Devices, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Pratyoosh Shukla
- School of Biotechnology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.,Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meyer A, Saaem I, Silverman A, Varaljay VA, Mickol R, Blum S, Tobias AV, Schwalm ND, Mojadedi W, Onderko E, Bristol C, Liu S, Pratt K, Casini A, Eluere R, Moser F, Drake C, Gupta M, Kelley-Loughnane N, Lucks JP, Akingbade KL, Lux MP, Glaven S, Crookes-Goodson W, Jewett MC, Gordon DB, Voigt CA. Organism Engineering for the Bioproduction of the Triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB) Precursor Phloroglucinol (PG). ACS Synth Biol 2019; 8:2746-2755. [PMID: 31750651 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Organism engineering requires the selection of an appropriate chassis, editing its genome, combining traits from different source species, and controlling genes with synthetic circuits. When a strain is needed for a new target objective, for example, to produce a chemical-of-need, the best strains, genes, techniques, software, and expertise may be distributed across laboratories. Here, we report a project where we were assigned phloroglucinol (PG) as a target, and then combined unique capabilities across the United States Army, Navy, and Air Force service laboratories with the shared goal of designing an organism to produce this molecule. In addition to the laboratory strain Escherichia coli, organisms were screened from soil and seawater. Putative PG-producing enzymes were mined from a strain bank of bacteria isolated from aircraft and fuel depots. The best enzyme was introduced into the ocean strain Marinobacter atlanticus CP1 with its genome edited to redirect carbon flux from natural fatty acid ester (FAE) production. PG production was also attempted in Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium acetobutylicum. A genetic circuit was constructed in E. coli that responds to PG accumulation, which was then ported to an in vitro paper-based system that could serve as a platform for future low-cost strain screening or for in-field sensing. Collectively, these efforts show how distributed biotechnology laboratories with domain-specific expertise can be marshalled to quickly provide a solution for a targeted organism engineering project, and highlights data and material sharing protocols needed to accelerate future efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Meyer
- Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
| | - Ishtiaq Saaem
- Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Adam Silverman
- Center for Synthetic Biology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| | - Vanessa A. Varaljay
- Soft Matter Materials Branch, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
| | - Rebecca Mickol
- American Society for Engineering Education, 1818 N Street NW Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20036, United States
| | - Steven Blum
- U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, 8198 Blackhawk Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010, United States
| | - Alexander V. Tobias
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, FCDD-RLS-EB, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, Maryland 20783, United States
| | - Nathan D. Schwalm
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, FCDD-RLS-EB, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, Maryland 20783, United States
| | - Wais Mojadedi
- Oak Ridge Associate Universities, P.O.
Box 117, MS-29, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
| | - Elizabeth Onderko
- National Research Council, 500 5th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20001, United States
| | - Cassandra Bristol
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Shangtao Liu
- Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Katelin Pratt
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Arturo Casini
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Raissa Eluere
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Felix Moser
- Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
| | - Carrie Drake
- UES, Inc., 4401 Dayton-Xenia Road, Dayton, Ohio 45432, United States
| | - Maneesh Gupta
- Soft Matter Materials Branch, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
| | - Nancy Kelley-Loughnane
- Soft Matter Materials Branch, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
| | - Julius P. Lucks
- Center for Synthetic Biology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| | - Katherine L. Akingbade
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory, FCDD-RLS-EB, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, Maryland 20783, United States
| | - Matthew P. Lux
- U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, 8198 Blackhawk Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010, United States
| | - Sarah Glaven
- Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States
| | - Wendy Crookes-Goodson
- Soft Matter Materials Branch, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
| | - Michael C. Jewett
- Center for Synthetic Biology, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
| | - D. Benjamin Gordon
- Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States
| | - Christopher A. Voigt
- Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
- The Foundry, 75 Ames Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02142, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Whitehead E, Rudolf F, Kaltenbach HM, Stelling J. Automated Planning Enables Complex Protocols on Liquid-Handling Robots. ACS Synth Biol 2018; 7:922-932. [PMID: 29486123 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Robotic automation in synthetic biology is especially relevant for liquid handling to facilitate complex experiments. However, research tasks that are not highly standardized are still rarely automated in practice. Two main reasons for this are the substantial investments required to translate molecular biological protocols into robot programs, and the fact that the resulting programs are often too specific to be easily reused and shared. Recent developments of standardized protocols and dedicated programming languages for liquid-handling operations addressed some aspects of ease-of-use and portability of protocols. However, either they focus on simplicity, at the expense of enabling complex protocols, or they entail detailed programming, with corresponding skills and efforts required from the users. To reconcile these trade-offs, we developed Roboliq, a software system that uses artificial intelligence (AI) methods to integrate (i) generic formal, yet intuitive, protocol descriptions, (ii) complete, but usually hidden, programming capabilities, and (iii) user-system interactions to automatically generate executable, optimized robot programs. Roboliq also enables high-level specifications of complex tasks with conditional execution. To demonstrate the system's benefits for experiments that are difficult to perform manually because of their complexity, duration, or time-critical nature, we present three proof-of-principle applications for the reproducible, quantitative characterization of GFP variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellis Whitehead
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Rudolf
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Michael Kaltenbach
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Stelling
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|