THRIVE: five years on and into the COVID-19 era

Oxygenation during Endobronchial Ultrasound: Where do we stand?

NONE

Apnoeic oxygenation in morbid obesity: a randomised controlled trial comparing facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen delivery

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a risk factor for airway-related incidents during anaesthesia. High-flow nasal oxygen has been advocated to improve safety in high-risk groups, but its effectiveness in the obese population is uncertain. This study compared the effect of high-flow nasal oxygen and low-flow facemask oxygen delivery on duration of apnoea in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

Morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery were randomly allocated to receive either high-flow nasal (70 L min^-1) or facemask (15 L min^-1) oxygen. After induction of anaesthesia, the patients were apnoeic for 18 min or until peripheral oxygen saturation decreased to 92%.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were studied (41 High-Flow Nasal Oxygen, 39 Facemask). The median apnoea time was 18 min in both the High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (IQR 18-18 min) and the Facemask (inter-quartile range [IQR], 4.1-18 min) groups. Five patients in the High-Flow Nasal Oxygen group and 14 patients in the Facemask group desaturated to 92% within 18 min. The risk of desaturation was significantly lower in the High-Flow Nasal Oxygen group (hazard ratio=0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.65; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In experienced hands, apnoeic oxygenation is possible in morbidly obese patients, and oxygen desaturation did not occur for 18 min in the majority of patients, whether oxygen delivery was high-flow nasal or low-flow facemask. High-flow nasal oxygen may reduce desaturation risk compared with facemask oxygen. Desaturation risk is a more clinically relevant outcome than duration of apnoea. Individual physiological factors are likely to be the primary determinant of risk rather than method of oxygen delivery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03428256.

Recent advances in the use of high flow nasal oxygen therapies

High flow nasal oxygen is a relatively new option for treating patients with respiratory failure, which decreases work of breathing, improves tidal volume, and modestly increases positive end expiratory pressure. Despite well-described physiologic benefits, the clinical impact of high flow nasal oxygen is still under investigation. In this article, we review the most recent findings on the clinical efficacy of high flow nasal oxygen in Type I, II, III, and IV respiratory failure within adult and pediatric patients. Additionally, we discuss studies across clinical settings, including emergency departments, intensive care units, outpatient, and procedural settings.

The effect of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) versus nasal prongs on safe apnoea time in paralysed obese patients: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence is lacking regarding the efficacy of Optiflow transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE™) in obese patients. We compared the impact of this technique at 70 L min^-1 with 4 L min^-1 oxygen via nasal prongs on safe apnoea times of paralysed obese patients.

METHODS

We randomised adults with a BMI >35 kg m^-2 undergoing elective bariatric surgery. While apnoeic and paralysed, Group T received 70 L min^-1 oxygen via Optiflow THRIVE™. Group N received nasal prong oxygen at 4 L min^-1. The primary outcome was time to SpO₂ ≤95% while apnoeic, with a 360 s cut-off. This was analysed by applying a time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were included. The median (inter-quartile range) BMI was 44.8 kg m^-2 (40.0-50.0) in Group T and 42.0 kg m^-2 (39.3-45.1) in Group N. Median (inter-quartile range) time to SpO₂ ≤95% in Group T was 356 (165 to ≥360) s and in Group N, 210 (160-270) s. Using a survival analysis framework, median time-to-event in Group T was 356 s (95% confidence interval 165 s-upper limit not defined) and 210 s (95% confidence interval 160-242 s) (P=0.049) in Group N.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with oxygen delivered via nasal prongs at 4 L min^-1, oxygen delivery via Optiflow THRIVE™ at a flow rate of 70 L min^-1 can prolong safe apnoea time, however, the results are statistically inconclusive. Optiflow THRIVE™ did decrease the rate of reduction in Pa_o2 during apnoea.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR 12618000445279.

Global lessons learned from COVID-19 mass casualty incidents

With healthcare systems rapidly becoming overwhelmed and occupied by patients during a pandemic, effective and safe care for patients is easily compromised. During the course of the current pandemic, numerous treatment guidelines have been developed and published that have improved care for patients with COVID-19. Certain lessons have only been learned during the course of the outbreak, from which we can learn for future pandemics. This editorial aims to raise awareness about the importance of timely stockpiling of sufficient amounts of personal protection equipment and medications, adequate oxygen supplies, uninterrupted electricity, and fair locally adapted triage strategies.