Has the time really come for universal videolaryngoscopy?

Strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a survey of Difficult Airway Society members

Background

Despite multiple initiatives and consensus guidelines, preventable deaths from unrecognised oesophageal intubation continue worldwide. We aimed to establish what different organisations are doing to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey of Difficult Airway Society (DAS) members using an internet-based survey platform. Members were invited to participate via e-mail over a period of 10 weeks (28 March to 07 June 2023). Results were reported according to the CROSS checklist.

Results

The response rate was 39% (819/2125). About 50% (402/799) of respondents were providing training to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation and 9% (69/799) were planning to. Most of the training (69%; 310/449) is multidisciplinary. However, almost one-third of respondents (31%; 246/799) were from departments that were not planning any training. Non-training-related strategies (including but not limited to increased use of videolaryngoscopy, increased use or improving the interpretability of waveform capnography) were implemented in 39% (297/765) of respondents' departments and planned in 8% (60/765). Nearly one-third (31%; 237/765) were not planning any non-training interventions to reduce risk. Of those who responded, 17% (130/765) were from departments not planning any strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation. Two-person verbal confirmation of capnography was considered 'extremely' or 'very' helpful by 59% (411/702) of respondents.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that uptake of preventative strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation remains inadequate. The authors suggest it is now time for the Royal College of Anaesthetists, DAS, and the General Medical Council to mandate strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation.

Video laryngoscopy may improve the intubation outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The role of video laryngoscopy in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether video laryngoscopy could improve the clinical outcomes of emergency tracheal intubation.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases up to 5 September 2024. Randomised controlled trials comparing video laryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy for emergency tracheal intubation were analysed. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, while secondary outcomes included intubation time, glottic visualisation, in-hospital mortality and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies (6 in prehospital settings and 20 in hospital settings) involving 5952 patients were analysed in this study. Fifteen studies had low risk of bias. Overall, there was no significant difference in first-attempt success rate between two groups (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13, p=0.24, I2=89%). However, video laryngoscopy was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate in hospital settings (emergency department: RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.23, p=0.007, I2=85%; intensive care unit: RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.29, p=0.003, I2=68%) and among inexperienced operators (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.28, p=0.01, I2=72%). Conversely, the first-attempt success rate with video laryngoscopy was lower in prehospital settings (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99, p=0.04, I2=95%). There were no differences for other outcomes except for better glottic visualisation (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.20, p=0.005, I2=91%) and a lower incidence of oesophageal intubation (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71, p=0.001, I2=0%) when using video laryngoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospital settings, video laryngoscopy improved first-attempt success rate of emergency intubation, provided superior glottic visualisation and reduced incidence of oesophageal intubation in critically ill patients. Our findings support the routine use of video laryngoscopy in the emergency department and intensive care units.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD 42023461887.

Current airway management practice among Swiss anesthesiologists : Results of a national survey

BACKGROUND

While limited data on the impact of implementing guidelines in airway management on outcomes exist, there is a consensus that the implementation and the adherence to guidelines enhance patient safety. Recently, the Swiss Society for Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine (SSAPM) endorsed the guidelines of The Fondation Latine des Voies Aériennes (FLAVA) as the official guidelines for airway management in Switzerland. This study aimed to determine current practice of airway management in Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the available equipment, the differences between institutions and between specialists and residents in dealing with airway management.

METHODS

In collaboration with the SSAPM, a covering letter with a survey link to the questionnaire used in the online airway management survey among German anesthesiologists was sent to all heads of departments of anesthesia and members of the SSAPM in August 2023. The participants (residents and specialists) were asked about their personal and institutional backgrounds, access to airway management devices, awareness of recognized airway management guidelines and the importance and application of airway management techniques.

RESULTS

Overall, 555 anesthesiologists participated in the survey (response rate 21%). The main findings were: in general, Swiss anesthesia departments are well-equipped and adhere to airway management guidelines. The guidelines of FLAVA are only known by just over 50%. The vast majority used the traditional screening tests to identify an airway that might be potentially difficult to manage. Of the respondents, 25% still adhere to the myth that a mask ventilation check is necessary before the administration of a muscle relaxant and 14% said that their institution used video laryngoscopy as the primary intubation device. More than 80% think that the expertise to perform awake fiberoptic intubation is important for their daily practice; however, 31% consider their expertise in this technique to be insufficient. In other words, there is a big safety gap.

CONCLUSION

Swiss anesthesia departments are well-equipped and adhere to airway management guidelines. The need for regular training to gain and maintain expertise in managing difficult airways, especially to future specialists, still prevails. Thus, developing and establishing a nationwide educational program in airway management and its continuous evaluation would be a milestone for patient safety.

Impact of universal use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first option for all intubations in the operating room: The multicentre prospective before-after VIDEOLAR-SURGERY study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Standard tracheal intubation performed in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Several authors recommend the universal use of a video laryngoscope as the first option for all intubations, regardless of whether the patient has predictors of a difficult airway or not. We hypothesize that using the McGrath video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the frequency of patients with easy intubation, and decreases intubation-related complications.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The VIDEOLAR-SURGERY trial is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, interventional, before-after study. In the pre-implementation period (non-interventional phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), 35 anaesthesiologists from 8 hospitals perform all tracheal intubations for an elective or urgent surgical procedure using the standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope as the first intubation option. During the implementation period (2 months), each anaesthesiologist is given a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope and trained in its use. During the post-implementation period (interventional-phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), the 35 anaesthesiologists perform all tracheal intubations using a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the percentage of patients with easy intubation compared with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved on 2 May 2023 by the Ethics Committee of Galicia, Spain (CEI-SL, code No. 2023-177), and was registered on the Clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry under No. NCT NCT05850260. Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. If video laryngoscopy improves easy intubation compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in all operating room intubations, its use may well become standard practice, thereby decreasing the risks of intubation-related complications.

Tracheal tube introducer-associated airway trauma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Tracheal tube introducers are recommended in airway management guidelines and are used increasingly as videolaryngoscopy becomes more widespread. This systematic review aimed to summarise the published literature concerning tracheal tube introducer-associated airway trauma.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched using pre-determined criteria. Two authors independently assessed search results and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessments.

RESULTS

We included 16 randomised controlled trials and five observational studies involving 10,797 patients. There was heterogeneity in patient characteristics, airway manipulation, and airway trauma definition and measurement. One study investigated hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy. The standard stylet was the most commonly reported introducer, followed by bougie and stylets with additional features such as video or lighted tip. Airway trauma resulted in low harm and most frequently involved injuries to the upper airway, followed by laryngeal and tracheobronchial injuries. Eighteen studies were comparative and reported a reduction in airway trauma incidence when an introducer was used, with the exception of the standard stylet. Median (IQR [range]) pooled incidence of airway trauma associated with standard stylets was 13.1% (4.2-31.4 [0.5-79.2])% and with bougies was 5.4% (0.4-49.9 [0.0-68.0])%. The risk of bias of included studies was variable and many randomised trials were found to be at high risk due to non-robust measurement of the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Stylets might be associated with an increased risk of airway trauma compared with other devices or when no stylet was used, though the quality of evidence is modest. However, other introducers appear to be safe and reduce the risk of airway trauma.

Routine Use of Videolaryngoscopy in Airway Management

Tracheal intubation is a fundamental facet of airway management, for which the importance of achieving success at the first attempt is well recognized. Failure to do so can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if there is inadequate patient oxygenation by alternate means. The evidence supporting the benefits of a videolaryngoscope in attaining this objective is now overwhelming (in adults). This has led to its increasing recognition in international airway management guidelines and its promotion from an occasional airway rescue tool to the first-choice device during routine airway management. However, usage in clinical practice does not currently reflect the increased worldwide availability that followed the upsurge in videolaryngoscope purchasing during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There are a number of obstacles to widespread adoption, including lack of adequate training, fears over de-skilling at direct laryngoscopy, equipment and cleaning costs, and concerns over the environmental impact, among others. It is now clear that in order for patients to benefit maximally from the technology and for airway managers to fully appreciate its role in everyday practice, proper training and education are necessary. Recent research evidence has addressed some existing barriers to default usage, and the emergence of techniques such as awake videolaryngoscopy and video-assisted flexible (bronchoscopic) intubation has also increased the scope of clinical application. Future studies will likely further confirm the superiority of videolaryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy, therefore, it is incumbent upon all airway managers (and their teams) to gain expertise in videolaryngoscopy and to use it routinely in their everyday practice..

Universal C-MAC® videolaryngoscope use in adult patients: a single-centre experience

Universal use of Storz C-MAC® videolaryngoscopes was implemented for adult tracheal intubations in the operating theatres, intensive care unit and emergency department at Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust in 2017. We report data from 1099 intubations from March 2020 to March 2022, collected contemporaneously and anonymously using a smartphone app, representing an estimated 18% of intubations in operating theatres and 30% of intubations in other locations during this period. Intubation success was 100%. The first-pass success rate was 87.3% overall: 87% with a Macintosh videolaryngoscope, 92% with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope and 81% for users with ≤ 20 previous uses. First-pass success without complications was 87% overall: 87% in operating theatres (836/962), 93% in the emergency department (38/41) and 83% in the intensive care unit (73/88). Complications occurred during 0.6% of intubations: 0/962 in operating theatres and 7/137 in non-theatre locations. The rate of complications was unaltered by blade type (Macintosh 5/994 vs. hyperangulated 2/105, p = 0.14); intubator experience with the device (≤ 20 previous clinical uses 2/260 vs. > 20 previous uses 5/832, p = 0.67) and use of airborne personal protective equipment (PPE 6/683 vs. no-PPE 1/410, p = 0.27). Complication rates increased outside theatres (theatres 0/963 vs. non-theatre 7/136, p < 0.001) and during rapid sequence induction (RSI 6/379 (1.6%) vs. non-RSI 1/720 (0.1%), p = 0.008).

Impact of Universal Use of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope as a Device for All Intubations in the Cardiac Operating Room. A Prospective Before-After VIDEOLAR-CAR Study

OBJECTIVE

Tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery patients has a higher incidence of difficult laryngoscopic views compared with patients undergoing other types of surgery. The authors hypothesized that using the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for cardiac surgery patients improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation" compared with using a direct Macintosh laryngoscope.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational, before-after study.

SETTING

At a tertiary-care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand one hundred nine patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTION

Consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery were intubated using, as the first option, a Macintosh laryngoscope (preinterventional phase) or a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope (interventional phase).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The main objective was to assess whether the use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope, as the first intubation option, improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation," defined as successful intubation on the first attempt, modified Cormack-Lehane grades of I or IIa, and the absence of the need for adjuvant airway devices. A total of 1,109 patients were included, 801 in the noninterventional phase and 308 in the interventional phase. The incidence of "easy intubation" was 93% in the interventional phase versus 78% in the noninterventional phase (p < 0.001). First-success-rate intubation was higher in the interventional phase (304/308; 98.7%) compared with the noninterventional phase (754/801, 94.1%; p = 0.005). Intubation in the interventional phase showed decreases in the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (12/308 [3.9%] v 157/801 [19.6%]; p < 0.001), as well as moderate or difficult intubation (5/308 [1.6%] v 57/801 [7.1%]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery improves the percentage of patients with "easy" intubation," increasing glottic view and first-success-rate intubation and decreasing the incidence of moderate or difficult intubation.

Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope, King Vision®, VividTrac®, AirAngel Blade®, and a Custom-Made 3D-Printed Video Laryngoscope for Difficult and Normal Airways in Mannequins by Novices-A Non-Inferiority Trial

Background: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a cornerstone of airway management. The gold standard device for ETI is still the direct laryngoscope (DL). However, video laryngoscopes (VLs) are now also widely available and have several proven advantages. The VL technique has been included in the major airway management guidelines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption has raised demand for 3D-printed medical equipment, including 3D-printed VLs. However, studies on performance are only sparsely available; thus, we aimed to compare 3D-printed VLs to the DL and other VLs made with conventional manufacturing technology. Methods: Forty-eight medical students were recruited to serve as novice users. Following brief, standardized training, students executed ETI with the DL, the King Vision® (KV), the VividTrac® (VT), the AirAngel Blade® (AAB), and a custom-made 3D-printed VL (3DVL) on the Laerdal® airway management trainer in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We evaluated the time to and proportion of successful intubation, the best view of the glottis, esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and user satisfaction. Results: The KV and VT are proved to be superior (p < 0.05) to the DL in both scenarios. The 3DVL's performance was similar (p > 0.05) or significantly better than that of the DL and mainly non-inferior (p > 0.05) compared to the KV and VT in both scenarios. Regardless of the scenario, the AAB proved to be inferior (p < 0.05) even to the DL in the majority of the variables. The differences between the devices were more pronounced in the difficult airway scenario. The user satisfaction scores were in concordance with the aforementioned performance of the scopes. Conclusions: Based upon our results, we cannot recommend the AAB over the DL, KV, or VT. However, as the 3DVL showed, 3D printing indeed can provide useful or even superior VLs, but prior to clinical use, meticulous evaluation might be recommended.

Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope use for tracheal intubation in elective surgical patients revisited: a sub-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane review data

The Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2022 that compared videolaryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for facilitating tracheal intubation in adults found that all three types of VL device (Macintosh-style, hyper-angulated and channeled) reduced the risk of failed intubation and increased the likelihood of first-pass success. We report the findings of a subgroup re-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane meta-analysis data focusing on the Macintosh-style VL group. This was undertaken to establish whether sufficient evidence exists to guide airway managers in making purchasing decisions for their local institutions based upon individual device-specific performance. This re-analysis confirmed the superiority of Macintosh-style VL over Macintosh DL in elective surgical patients, with similar efficacy demonstrated between the Macintosh-style VL devices examined. Thus, when selecting which VL device(s) to purchase for their hospital, airway managers decisions are likely to remain focused upon issues such as financial costs, portability, cleaning schedules and previous device experience.

Videolaryngoscopy use before and after the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: The report of the VL-iCUE survey with responses from 96 countries

BACKGROUND

The potential benefit of videolaryngoscopy use in facilitating tracheal intubation has already been established, however its use was actively encouraged during the COVID-19 pandemic as it was likely to improve intubation success and increase the patient-operator distance.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to establish videolaryngoscopy use before and after the early phases of the pandemic, whether institutions had acquired new devices during the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether there had been teaching on the devices acquired.

DESIGN

We designed a survey with 27 questions made available via the Joint Information Scientific Committee JISC online survey platform in English, French, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese and Portuguese. This was distributed through 18 anaesthetic and airway management societies.

SETTING

The survey was open for 54 to 90 days in various countries. The first responses were logged on the databases on 28 October 2021, with all databases closed on 26 January 2022. Reminders to participate were sent at the discretion of the administering organisations.

PARTICIPANTS

All anaesthetists and airway managers who received the study were eligible to participate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Videolaryngoscopy use before the COVID-19 pandemic and at the time of the survey.

RESULTS

We received 4392 responses from 96 countries: 944/4336 (21.7%) were from trainees. Of the 3394 consultants, 70.8% (2402/3394) indicated no change in videolaryngoscopy use, 19.9% (675/3394) increased use and 9.3% (315/3393) reduced use. Among trainees 65.5% (618/943) reported no change in videolaryngoscopy use, 27.7% (261/943) increased use and 6.8% (64/943) reduced use. Overall, videolaryngoscope use increased by 10 absolute percentage points following the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Videolaryngoscopy use increased following the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic but this was less than might have been expected.

Fibreoptic intubation: a commitment to an indispensable technique

Recent evidence has shown that fibreoptic intubation is still an indispensable technique for safe management of predicted difficult airways, despite the implementation of new technologies such as videolaryngoscopy. It is therefore our obligation as anaesthesia societies and as practicing anaesthetists to offer this technique to our patients in clearly designated situations.

Efficacy and adverse events profile of videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients: subanalysis of the INTUBE study

BACKGROUND

Tracheal intubation is a high-risk procedure in the critically ill, with increased intubation failure rates and a high risk of other adverse events. Videolaryngoscopy might improve intubation outcomes in this population, but evidence remains conflicting, and its impact on adverse event rates is debated.

METHODS

This is a subanalysis of a large international prospective cohort of critically ill patients (INTUBE Study) performed from 1 October 2018 to 31 July 2019 and involving 197 sites from 29 countries across five continents. Our primary aim was to determine the first-pass intubation success rates of videolaryngoscopy. Secondary aims were characterising (a) videolaryngoscopy use in the critically ill patient population and (b) the incidence of severe adverse effects compared with direct laryngoscopy.

RESULTS

Of 2916 patients, videolaryngoscopy was used in 500 patients (17.2%) and direct laryngoscopy in 2416 (82.8%). First-pass intubation success was higher with videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy (84% vs 79%, P=0.02). Patients undergoing videolaryngoscopy had a higher frequency of difficult airway predictors (60% vs 40%, P<0.001). In adjusted analyses, videolaryngoscopy increased the probability of first-pass intubation success, with an OR of 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.87). Videolaryngoscopy was not significantly associated with risk of major adverse events (odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 0.95-1.62) or cardiovascular events (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, videolaryngoscopy was associated with higher first-pass intubation success rates, despite being used in a population at higher risk of difficult airway management. Videolaryngoscopy was not associated with overall risk of major adverse events.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03616054.

Airway Management: The Current Role of Videolaryngoscopy

Airway management is usually an uncomplicated and safe intervention; however, when problems arise with the primary airway technique, the clinical situation can rapidly deteriorate, resulting in significant patient harm. Videolaryngoscopy has been shown to improve patient outcomes when compared with direct laryngoscopy, including improved first-pass success at tracheal intubation, reduced difficult laryngeal views, reduced oxygen desaturation, reduced airway trauma, and improved recognition of oesophageal intubation. The shared view that videolaryngoscopy affords may also facilitate superior teaching, training, and multidisciplinary team performance. As such, its recommended role in airway management has evolved from occasional use as a rescue device (when direct laryngoscopy fails) to a first-intention technique that should be incorporated into routine clinical practice, and this is reflected in recently updated guidelines from a number of international airway societies. However, currently, overall videolaryngoscopy usage is not commensurate with its now widespread availability. A number of factors exist that may be preventing its full adoption, including perceived financial costs, inadequacy of education and training, challenges in achieving deliverable decontamination processes, concerns over sustainability, fears over "de-skilling" at direct laryngoscopy, and perceived limitations of videolaryngoscopes. This article reviews the most up-to-date evidence supporting videolaryngoscopy, explores its current scope of utilisation (including specialist techniques), the potential barriers preventing its full adoption, and areas for future advancement and research.