Determination of reference ranges for the ClotPro® thromboelastometry device in paediatric patients

Point-of-care testing for tranexamic acid efficacy: a proof-of-concept study in cardiac surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Low-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) has been recently recommended for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to reduce associated complications. Although point-of-care laboratory tests for TXA concentrations are unavailable, a novel TPA-test on the ClotPro® system can measure TXA-induced inhibition of fibrinolysis. We evaluated the performance of the TPA-test in vitro and in patients undergoing surgery requiring CPB.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from six volunteers for in vitro evaluation of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-triggered fibrinolysis and the effects of TXA. This was followed by an observational study in 20 cardiac surgery patients to assess clinical effects of TXA on the TPA-test.

RESULTS

Hyperfibrinolysis induced by tPA was inhibited by TXA ≥2 mg L-1 in a concentration-dependent manner, and was completely inhibited at TXA ≥10 mg L-1. In patients undergoing CPB, antifibrinolytic effect was detectable on TPA-test parameters after a 0.1 g bolus of TXA at the end of CPB, and complete inhibition of fibrinolysis was obtained with TXA ≥0.5 g. The antifibrinolytic effects of 1 g TXA on TPA-test parameters were gradually attenuated over 18 h after surgery. However, the fibrinolytic inhibition continued in four patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤30 ml min-1 1.73 m-2. The eGFR had strong correlations with TPA-test parameters at 18 h after surgery (r=0.86-0.92; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The TPA-test is sensitive to low concentrations of TXA and serves as a practical monitoring tool for postoperative fibrinolytic activity in cardiac surgery patients. This test might be particularly useful in patients with severe renal impairment.

[Update on point-of-care-based coagulation treatment : Systems, reagents, device-specific treatment algorithms]

Viscoelastic test (VET) procedures suitable for point-of-care (POC) testing are in widespread clinical use. Due to the expanded range of available devices and in particular due to the development of new test approaches and methods, the authors believe that an update of the current treatment algorithms is necessary. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the currently available VET devices and the associated reagents. In addition, two treatment algorithms for the VET devices most commonly used in German-speaking countries are presented.

Comparison of Two Viscoelastic Testing Devices in a Parturient Population

Background: Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs) have become an integral diagnostic tool in guiding hemostatic therapy, offering new opportunities in personalized hemostatic resuscitation. This study aims to assess the interchangeability of ClotPro® and ROTEM® delta in the unique context of parturient women. Methods: Blood samples from 217 parturient women were collected at three timepoints. A total of 631 data sets were eligible for our final analysis. The clotting times were analyzed via extrinsic and intrinsic assays, and the clot firmness parameters A5, A10, and MCF were analyzed via extrinsic, intrinsic, and fibrin polymerization assays. In parallel, the standard laboratory coagulation statuses were obtained. Device comparison was assessed using regression and Bland-Altman plots. The best cutoff calculations were used to determine the VHA values corresponding to the established standard laboratory cutoffs. Results: The clotting times in the extrinsic and intrinsic assays showed notable differences between the devices, while the extrinsic and intrinsic clot firmness results demonstrated interchangeability. The fibrinogen assays revealed higher values in ClotPro® compared to ROTEM®. An ROC analysis identified VHA parameters with high predictive values for coagulopathy exclusion and yet low specificity. Conclusions: In the obstetric setting, the ROTEM® and ClotPro® parameters demonstrate a significant variability. Device- and indication-specific transfusion algorithms are essential for the accurate interpretation of measurements and adequate hemostatic therapy.