The effect of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on QT, corrected QT (Qtc), and P wave dispersions in cesarean section

Comparison Between the Effects of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia on QT Dispersion

BACKGROUND

Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine are frequently used local anesthetic drugs in spinal anesthesia practice. Both agents have arrhythmic effects on the heart. However, there is no clear information about which agent is more arrhythmogenic.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to investigate the effects of bupivacaine and its S (-)-enantiomer, levobupivacaine, on cardiac arrhythmias in patients.

METHODS

The study included 40 patients scheduled for inguinal hernia surgery. Patients were randomly divided into the following two groups using a sealed envelope method: Group I, the bupivacaine group (n = 20); and Group II, the levobupivacaine group (n = 20). The QT values were taken preoperatively and during the 10th of the spinal block, the 10th of the surgical incision, and the 10th postoperative minute. Additionally, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SO₂), and heart rate (HR) values, in addition to motor block (Bromage scale) levels and durations, were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

HR values measured at 10 min after spinal block were significantly higher than the baseline values in the levobupivacaine group (p < 0.05). The corrected QT interval (QTc) values increased significantly at 10 minutes after spinal block and at 10 min postoperatively in the bupivacaine group (p < 0.05). QTd and QTcd measurements were taken at the 10th minute of spinal anesthesia, the 10th minute of the incision, and the 10th minute postoperatively. When compared to the levobupivacaine group, a statistically significant increase was found in the bupivacaine group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Levobupivacaine allows greater hemodynamic stability, while bupivacaine affects QTc and QTd measurement times more. As such, we believe that levobupivacaine may be a better alternative to bupivacaine during clinical practice, particularly in patients with cardiac problems.

Open kidney cancer surgery and perioperative cardiac arrhythmias

Introduction

Although cardiac arrhythmias during anesthesia are often observed, the literature focuses mainly on cardio-thoracic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of arrhythmias appearing in the perioperative period in patients undergoing urological surgery and furthermore to define whether combining general with epidural anesthesia prevents them.

Material and methods

The study included 50 adults, without a prior cardiac or arrhythmia history, undergoing an open kidney cancer surgery, who were randomly allocated to receive either general or combined epidural/general anesthesia. A Holter monitor was applied the evening before the surgery, tracing continuously for a period of 24 hours (7PM–7PM). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02988219

Results

There was no statistical difference in the arrhythmia occurrence between the randomization groups. Among 65.21% the following arrhythmias were observed: 27 – bradycardia, 4 – sinus pause, 6 – ventricular extrasystoles (>1000/24 hours), 3 – supraventricular extrasystoles (>200/24 hours). The patients with arrhythmia were older and often with hypertension (p <0.01). A longer surgery duration predisposed to arrhythmia appearance (122.5 vs. 99 minutes), (p <0.01). The temperature measured at the beginning and at the end of the surgery was significantly lower among the participants with arrhythmia (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). The gender, body mass index (BMI), laboratory tests and the intake of intravenous fluids did not influence the occurrence of arrhythmia.

Conclusions

Perioperative cardiac arrhythmias (usually sinus arrhythmias) are common during an open kidney surgery and occur regardless of the anesthetic technique and usually do not require any treatment. Age, hypertension, long operation time or low body temperature predispose the patient to perioperative cardiac arrhythmias during surgery.

Successful anesthetic management for total mastectomy in a pregnant woman using general anesthesia combined with continuous erector spinae plane block: a case report

Background

Anesthetic considerations for surgery during pregnancy include the safety of both mother and fetus. We successfully administered anesthesia for total mastectomy to a pregnant woman using general anesthesia combined with continuous erector spinae plane block.

Case presentation

A 41-year-old woman was scheduled to undergo total mastectomy at 18 weeks’ gestation. Hence, we decided to administer general anesthesia combined with continuous erector spinae plane block to minimize physiological stress on both mother and fetus. Continuous erector spinae plane block provided sufficient postoperative analgesia for our patient, completely eliminating the need for additional rescue analgesia during the entire postoperative period.

Conclusions

General anesthesia combined with continuous erector spinae plane block provided adequate analgesia without maternal hypotension in a pregnant woman undergoing total mastectomy.