Reconstruction of intraoral defects after resection of cancer with two types of submental artery perforator flaps

Submental Artery Perforator Flap Drained Solely With the Vena Comitans of Facial Artery

BACKGROUND

The submental artery perforator flap (SMAPF) is an alternative to reconstruct oral and maxillofacial defects secondary to oral cancers. However, vascular anomalies or surgical damage often lead to vascular crises or harvest failure. Our clinical findings suggest that the vena comitans of the facial artery (cFA) very commonly exist. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of the cFA as a sole venous reflux route for the SMAPF.

METHOD

The patients were from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University. All patients were treated for oral cancer between January 2016 and September 2022. Seventeen SMAPFs were successfully raised to reconstruct the postoperative defects, of which 7 had cFA as the sole reflux route.

RESULTS

The size of the flaps varied from 4.0×3.0 cm to 12.0×3.0 cm. All flaps survived. Patients were followed from 1 month to 5 years. Satisfactory restoration of contour and functional outcomes were achieved at the recipient sites. The scars were well camouflaged in the submental region. No local or regional recurrence was detected during follow-up. Patients had an overall 2-year survival rate of 100% with no suspected flaps-related recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The cFA as the sole venous reflux route for SMAPF is reliable for flap harvesting and is applicable for immediate defect reconstruction secondary to cancer resection.

The submental island flap - should we be worried about lymph node transfer? An anatomical and histological study

The submental island flap has been increasing in popularity for both oncological and non-oncological reconstruction of the head and neck. However, the original description of this flap left it with the unfortunate designation as a lymph node flap. There has thus been significant debate on the oncological safety of the flap. In this cadaveric study the perforator system suppling the skin island is delineated and the lymph node yield of the skeletonised flap is analysed histologically. A safe and consistent approach to raising the perforator flap modification is described and the pertinent anatomy, and an oncological discussion with regards to the submental island perforator flap histological lymph node yield discussed. Ethical approval was received from Hull York Medical School for the anatomical dissection of 15 sides of cadavers. 6 x 4cm submental island flaps were raised following a vascular infusion of a 50/50 mix of acrylic paint. The flap size mimics the T1/T2 tumour defects these flaps would usually be used to reconstruct.The submental vascular anatomy, including length, diameter, venous drainage patterns, and the skin perforator system was documented. The dissected submental flaps were then histologically examined for the presence of lymph nodes by a head and neck pathologist at Hull University Hospitals Trust department of histology. The total length of the submental island arterial system, the distance from where the facial artery branches off from the carotid to the submental artery perforator entering the anterior belly of digastric or skin, averaged 91.1mm with anaverage facial artery length of 33.1mm and submental artery of 58mm. Vessel diameter for microvascular reconstruction was 1.63mm for the submental artery and 3mm for the facial artery. The most common venous anatomy drainage pattern was the submental island venaecomitantes draining to the retromandibular system then to the internal jugular vein. Almost half the specimens had a dominant superficial submental perforator allowing the ability to raise this as a skin only system. There were generally 2-4 perforators passing through the anterior belly of digastric to supply the skin paddle.73.3% (11/15) of the skeletonised flaps contained no lymph nodes on histological examination. The perforator version of the submental island flap can be safely and consistently raised with inclusion of the anterior belly of digastric. In approximately half the cases a dominant superficial branch allows for a skin only paddle. Due to the vessel diameter, free tissue transfer is predictable.Venous anatomy is variable and care needs to be taken when raising this flap. The skeletonised version of the perforator flap is largely devoid of nodal yield and on oncological review a 16.3% recurrence rate is equivalent to current standard treatment.

Sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap or free flap: Long-term follow-up of soft tissue defect repair in oral cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and long-term efficacy of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) flap in reconstructing and repairing soft tissue defects after oral cancer surgeries.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 102 patients who underwent soft tissue defect reconstruction with the SCM flap after oral cancer surgery (from 2012 to 2019) were assessed. Relevant clinical indicators were analyzed. They were also grouped according to pathologic cervical lymph node staging. Postoperative recurrence and metastases were compared with radial forearm free flap (RFFF).

RESULTS

The flap healing rate was 100% in SCM flap, compared with a success rate of 94% in RFFF. SCM flaps would not increase the risk of dysfunction or paresthesia in the neck dissection area. Prognostically, the rate of cervical lymph node metastasis was similar in patients with pathologic cervical lymph node staging N0 and N1 for both flap types, whereas the rate of cervical lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in patients with SCM flaps compared with RFFF in N2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCM flap is a reliable, cost-effective flap with minimal adverse effects. It is ideal for soft tissue reconstruction of oral cancers if the patients are selected judiciously. N2 cases are not an indication for SCM flaps.

Assessment of surgical outcomes and oncological safety for submental artery perforator flap reconstruction after ablation of oral cancer

The submental artery perforator flap (SAPF) has been a new option for the intraoral reconstruction of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients in recent years, but its surgical outcomes have not been well assessed. We compared the surgical outcomes and oncological safety of SAPF reconstruction for medium-sized soft-tissue defects after the ablation of primary oral cancer with traditional submental island flaps (SIF) and anterolateral thigh perforator flaps (ALTPF). Fifty-one SAPFs, 30 SIF, and 74 ALTPF were reviewed for the intraoral medium-sized reconstructions after the ablation of oral cancer from our institutional clinical oncological databases. We performed comparative assessments on the variables of surgical outcome and oncological safety among the 3 cohorts. A Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival for each flap was calculated. Operating time was significantly reduced in the SIF and SAPF groups than ALTPF (p = 0.021 and 0.014, respectively). Flap thickness of SAPF was the significantly thinnest (mean 0.5 cm) among three groups. The common complications of donor site for both SAPF and SIF group were incision dehiscence and orocutaneous fistula. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) among the 3 groups. However, several OSCC patients with the SIF reconstruction were found to have recurrences with a metastatic lymph node under the flap after the first operation. SAPF could be a versatile choice of the intraoral reconstruction for the medium-sized soft-tissue defects after the ablation of oral cancer.

Are contralateral submental artery perforator flaps feasible for the reconstruction of postoperative defects of oral cancer?

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical applications of the reconstruction of postoperative defects of the oral cavity using contralateral submental artery flaps.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 18 patients with postoperative intraoral cancer defects reconstructed with contralateral submental artery perforator flaps between October 2018 and October 2019 in our department was conducted. The defect area, flap size, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients were diagnosed based on pathological examinations: 2 with adenoid cystic carcinoma and 16 with squamous cell carcinoma. The submental artery perforator flap used for simultaneous repair was 8 to 15 cm in length and 4 to 6.5 cm in width. The survival rate of flap reconstruction was 100% with no donor site complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral submental artery flap reconstruction is a suitable alternative for moderate to large intraoral defects, postoperative mouth floor defects, and oral cavity composite defects of oral malignant tumors without contralateral lymph node metastases.

Complicated intraoral defects: reconstruction using a three-paddle perforator free flap. A case report

A 34-year-old woman presented with a progressive oral ulcer, and redness and swelling of the skin over the mandible. Radiological and histological examination showed adenoid cystic carcinoma of the mandible and floor of the mouth with extensive invasion. We radically resected the tumour with sufficient margins, and cut off segments of fibula, reshaped them and fixed them into the mandibular angles bilaterally. We used three perforator flaps, (the soleus muscle, the third, and fourth perforator flaps) to reconstruct the defects of the tongue, mentum, and oral floor, respectively. Recovery was good postoperatively, and there was no infection or any other complications.

A comparative study between submandibular-facial artery island flaps (including perforator flap) and submental artery perforator flap: A novel flap in oral cavity reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to introduce submandibular-facial artery island flaps (S-FAIF), including the perforator flap, and to evaluate their application for intraoral reconstruction in comparison with submental artery perforator flaps (SMAPF).

METHODS

Ninety-six patients who underwent intraoral reconstruction using an S-FAIF (n = 34) or SMAPF (n = 62) after cancer resection were recruited in this study. The flap characteristics (viz., pedicle length, flap size, venous drainage pattern, and harvest time), short-term outcomes (viz., flap partial loss, intraoral wound dehiscence, fistula, and wound infection), and long-term morbidity (viz., facial nerve palsy, neck motion restriction, and hair growth) were compared.

RESULTS

Nine S-FAIFs were authentic perforator flaps pedicled by level Ⅰ facial artery perforators, while the rest were island flaps based on level Ⅱ facial artery perforators. The survival rates of S-FAIF and SMAPF were both 100 percent. Flap partial loss occurred in two patients in each group. The pedicle length of S-FAIF was shorter than that of SMAPF (p < 0.001). Statistics analysis revealed no significant difference regarding flap size, venous drainage pattern, short-term outcomes, neck motion restriction, or facial nerve palsy between the groups. S-FAIF required less harvest time (p < 0.001) and experienced less hair growth when compared to SMAPF (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The S-FAIF is a robust and reliable novel flap and on par with SMAPF for reconstruction of small and medium-sized intraoral defects. It is preferred to SMAPF when technical requirements for flap harvest and hair problems are considered. It should be supplemented to the armamentarium for intraoral reconstruction.

Submental Island Flap: A Technical Update

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, the submental island flap has demonstrated decreased cost and morbidity as compared with free tissue transfer and has been widely applied to a range of head and neck defects. Several studies, however, continue to report a high rate of submental flap complications including partial necrosis and venous congestion. The object of this report is to describe a technical modification to the submental flap harvest which increases efficiency and reliability.

METHODS

Single institutional case series with chart review. The essential technical details and technique modifications of the submental flap harvest are described, and a case example is discussed.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 through January 2019, 24 submental island flaps were performed. All flaps included the mylohyoid muscle which was delineated with manual blunt dissection. Reconstructive indications included oral cavity and oropharyngeal wounds as well as facial cutaneous and lateral skullbase defects. There were no flap-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual blunt dissection of the mylohyoid muscle and its inclusion in the submental island flap increases efficiency and reliability.