Neurosensory recovery after trauma to the orbital floor: a prospective trial with dexamethasone

Complications and complaints in craniofacial fractures - Finnish national data for 20 years

OBJECTIVE

Research on reasons for malpractice claims in oral and maxillofacial surgery is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and prevalence of permanent harm among craniofacial fracture related malpractice claims.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective register study was designed and implemented. All patients with a complaint and a diagnosis of facial or cranial fracture were included. The main outcome was the presence of permanent harm, and the predictor variable was the cause of complaint. Chi-square test was used for estimation of statistical significance.

RESULTS

Delay in correct diagnosis was the leading cause of malpractice claims (63.2%), and permanent harm was found in 23.1% of the population. 82.4% of injuries were facial fractures in total population. 65.3% (n = 98) of facial trauma were related with delayed diagnostics (p < 0.001). Permanent harm was more frequent in patients with delayed diagnosis (71.4%) than those without (60.7%, p = 0.299).

CONCLUSIONS

Claims of craniofacial trauma are related with under-diagnostics, and un-diagnosed facial fracture can lead to a high rate of permanent harm. Systematic clinical evaluation and facial trauma specialist consultation is recommended to set early correct diagnosis for and improve treatment of craniofacial trauma patients.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Eye Injuries and Illnesses in the Wilderness: 2024 Update

A panel convened to develop an evidence-based set of guidelines for the recognition and treatment of eye injuries and illnesses that may occur in the wilderness. These guidelines are meant to serve as a tool to help wilderness providers accurately identify and subsequently treat or evacuate for a variety of ophthalmologic complaints. Recommendations are graded based on the quality of their supporting evidence and the balance between risks and benefits according to criteria developed by the American College of Chest Physicians.

The relationship between orbital floor fracture patterns around the infraorbital groove and development of infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia: a computed tomographic study

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between patterns of orbital floor fracture around the infraorbital groove and development of infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 200 patients (200 sides) of pure orbital floor fracture with or without medial orbital wall fracture. Data on the presence or absence of infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia were collected from medical records. Based on coronal computed tomographic images, patients were classified into 3 groups: a fracture extending medially to (medial group), into (in-groove group), and laterally to the infraorbital groove (lateral group).

RESULTS

Infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia was found in 72 patients (36.0%). A fracture extended into or laterally to the infraorbital groove in 86.2% of patients with infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, while a fracture was limited to the portion medial to the infraorbital groove in 77.3% of patients without infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia (P < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients in the lateral and in-groove groups were highly associated with development of infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, with an odds ratio of 134.788 in the lateral group (95% confidence interval, 30.496-595.735; P < 0.001) and that of 20.323 in the in-groove group (95% confidence interval, 6.942-59.499; P < 0.001) with the medial group as the reference.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that patients with orbital floor fracture extending into or laterally to the infraorbital groove have a high risk of infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, compared to those with orbital floor fracture limited to the portion medial to the infraorbital groove.

Fifteen-Year Review of the American Board of Plastic Surgery Maintenance of Certification Tracer Data: Clinical Practice Patterns and Evidence-Based Medicine in Zygomatico-Orbital Fractures

BACKGROUND

From 2005 to 2020, the American Board of Plastic Surgery collected data on 20 common plastic surgery operations as part of the Maintenance of Certification process. These data allow the authors to examine national trends in zygomatico-orbital fracture repair over a 15-year period.

METHODS

Tracer data for zygomatico-orbital fracture repair were reviewed in cohorts from 2005 to 2013 and 2014 to 2020. Results were categorized based on their presence in evidence-based medicine articles published during this period. Differences between years were assessed using the t test or chi-square test as appropriate.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty patients were included as of March of 2020. Average age was 37 years (range, 6 to 85 years), and 76 percent were male. Operations took place on average 10 days from injury. There were significant decreases in the use of subciliary (31.9 percent versus 10.0 percent; p < 0.001), gingival buccal (84.3 percent versus 56.4 percent; p < 0.001), and lateral brow (45.2 percent versus 22.3 percent; p < 0.001) incisions, with an increase in lower lid external incisions (15.2 percent versus 30.9 percent; p < 0.001); 2.7 percent of patients had a complication requiring readmission and 4.5 percent required reoperation. The incidence of postoperative diplopia was 7.7 percent, and the infection rate was 1.7 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

This article reviews the American Board of Plastic Surgery tracer data for zygomatico-orbital fracture repair. The Maintenance of Certification tracer data provide a national database with longer follow-up and more specific information than comparable databases. Analysis of these data over time enables the authors to describe practice trends and gives surgeons the opportunity to compare their outcomes to national norms.

Do the Benefits of Systemic Corticosteroids Outweigh Adverse Effects During Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Perioperative systemic corticosteroids are widely used in maxillofacial trauma surgery to prevent postoperative complications, but potentially perceived benefits are speculative rather than evidence-based. The purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effects of perioperative systemic corticosteroids on clinically significant outcomes in patients undergoing maxillofacial trauma surgery.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Clinical trial registry, and grey literature as well as references of included trials. Our primary outcomes were facial edema and pain after the surgery. Our secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting, neurosensory disturbance, functional recovery, wound infections, and other adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 94 trials retrieved, 13 were included (n = 652). Perioperative steroid use was associated with reduced pain and facial edema. We observed a decrease in postoperative nausea and vomiting with the use of systemic corticosteroids (n = 184, OR = 0.53, [0.28, 1.02], I² = 0%). Four trials reported infections and impaired wound healing associated with steroids (n = 160. OR = 3.37, [1.43. 7.94], I² = 2%). The 13 trials had an unclear risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic corticosteroids reduced facial edema and postoperative pain, but impaired wound healing was also reported. The use of systemic steroids in maxillofacial trauma surgery is thus supported only by weak evidence and further research is advocated.