Severe odontogenic infections: focus on more effective early treatment

Antimicrobial therapy in the management of odontogenic infections: the penicillin-allergic patient

This retrospective analysis was performed to investigate whether clindamycin remains the preferred antibiotic for penicillin-allergic patients with odontogenic infections. The medical records of 311 patients admitted to the study department with odontogenic infections between 2018 and 2022 and treated with either intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Augmentin) or intravenous clindamycin were analyzed. The Augmentin-treated group included 268 patients (86.2%) and the clindamycin-treated group included 43 patients (13.8%). Severity parameters did not differ significantly between the two groups, except for a higher prevalence of abscesses in the clindamycin-treated group (58.1% vs 41.0% in the Augmentin-treated group; P = 0.035). The clindamycin-treated group required a longer duration of intravenous antibiotics (P = 0.001) and had a higher rate of treatment failure (14.0% vs 2.2%; P = 0.002) when compared to the Augmentin-treated group, with a seven-fold increased risk of treatment failure. Moreover, significantly more isolated organisms in the clindamycin-treated group were resistant to clindamycin (P = 0.015); these were all Streptococcus anginosus group. Given the higher risk of treatment failure with clindamycin, it is necessary to choose the antibiotic treatment for penicillin-allergic patients carefully. A detailed history and allergy testing followed by combination therapy is recommended, especially in severe cases.

The association of travel distance and severity of odontogenic infections

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic infections (OI) are a preventable disease commonly managed in a tertiary hospital setting. Prevention of severe infections and hospitalisation relies on timely access to primary dental care. This study outlines the pre-hospital treatment of patients presenting to hospital with OIs and the association between travel distance from the patients' residence to a tertiary hospital oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMS) unit.

METHODS

This study analysed patients who initially presented hospital with an OI. Patient demographics, pre-hospital treatment, and clinical markers of severity were recorded. The travel distance from the patient's residence to the hospital was recorded in kilometers, along with any inter-hospital transfer via road/air ambulance.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven patients were included in this study, 17.2% required an inter-hospital transfer. Of these patients, 70.3% had prior treatment before hospitalisation, and antibiotics without source control was the most frequent treatment (83.1%). The mean travel distance for patients with more severe markers of infection significantly greater than patients with minor infections (p = < .001). Patients who required an inter-hospital transfer accounted for most cases with airway compromise requiring ICU admission.

CONCLUSION

This study found that most patients presenting to hospital with an OI had received antibiotics alone as treatment before hospitalisation. The travel distance from a tertiary hospital with OMS services had a significant correlation to more severe infections. This has important public health implications for the allocation of preventative dental services, and patient access to OMS services.

Ludwig's Angina: Higher Incidence and Worse Outcomes Associated With the Onset of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Background: Ludwig's angina (LA) is a diffuse cellulitis of the submandibular space and adjacent tissues. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, odontogenic treatments were often delayed because of the implementation of safety measures to avoid the spread of the virus. We hypothesized that delayed odontogenic treatments associated with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic would be associated with an increase in the incidence of LA and worse outcomes related to these infections. Patients and Methods: Patients from June 2018 to June 2022 with computed tomography images suggestive of LA and confirmed by ear, nose, throat (ENT) consult were included. We abstracted demographics, outcomes, clinical management, and microbiology. Patients were stratified into pre-COVID and COVID-onset. Our primary outcome, incidence of LA, was defined as: (new LA cases) ÷ (ED evaluations of oral or dental infections × 1.5 years). Results: In the pre-COVID group, we identified 32 of 1,301 patients with LA for an incidence of 0.02 per year. The COVID-onset group consisted of 41 of 641 patients, with an incidence of 0.04 per year. In the COVID-onset group, progression to necrotizing fasciitis was more likely (0% vs. 15%; p < 0.024), and they returned to the operating room for repeated debridement (3% vs. 22%; p < 0.020). Likewise, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ventilator days were higher (4.3 ± 3.5 vs. 9.5 ± 11.3; 1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 9.5 ± 7.1; 0.3 ± 1 vs. 3.6 ± 7.1; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the prognosis for dental infections diagnosed early is generally favorable, we observed a notable increase in the incidence of LA after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, complications stemming from these infections became more severe in the COVID-onset era. Specifically, the likelihood of necrotizing fasciitis showed a substantial increase, accompanied by an increased risk of respiratory failure and mediastinitis.

Does Preoperative Surgical Delay Lead to Increased Postsurgical Length of Stay or Reoperation in Patients With Severe Odontogenic Infections?

BACKGROUND

While severe odontogenic infections can be life-threatening and emergent surgery can be required more often, surgical management in the operating room (OR) is completed as soon as feasible. However, provider schedules and OR availability can occasionally lead to longer delays before surgery, but their effect on outcomes is unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the association of preoperative surgical delay with postsurgical length of stay (LOS) and reoperation in patients with severe odontogenic infections.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of all adult patients treated in the OR with incision and drainage for odontogenic infections from 1/1/2015 to 7/30/2021 at a large, urban academic hospital.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The primary predictor variable was the length of presurgical delay-the number of hours between arrival in the emergency department and the start of surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variable was the postsurgical LOS and the secondary outcome variable was the rate of reoperation.

COVARIATES

Demographics, medical history, exam findings, diagnosis, and treatment-related variables were also analyzed.

ANALYSES

Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed along with multivariable linear and logistic regression. A P value of < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 401 patients included in the study with 50.9% men and a mean age of 39.1 years. Increased length of presurgical delay (hours) was associated with a decreased postsurgical LOS (β = -0.05 days, P = .01) and length of presurgical delay was not associated with reoperation (P = .51) in the unadjusted analyses. However, length of presurgical delay was not found to be associated with either LOS (β = -0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05 to 0.01, P = .12) or reoperation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.0, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.02, P = .67) in the adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The association of decreased length of presurgical delay with increased postsurgical LOS in the unadjusted analysis could reflect the practice of rapid intervention for the most ill patients. After adjusting for number of spaces, a primary indicator of infection severity, length of presurgical delay was not associated with either LOS or return to the operating room.

Prussian blue nanozymes: progress, challenges, and opportunities

Prussian Blue Nanozymes (PBNZs) have emerged as highly efficient agents for reactive oxygen species (ROS) elimination, owing to their multiple enzyme-like properties encompassing catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities. As a functional nanomaterial mimicking enzyme, PBNZs not only surmount the limitations of natural enzymes, such as instability and high manufacturing costs, but also exhibit superior stability, tunable activity, low storage expenses, and remarkable reusability. Consequently, PBNZs have gained significant attention in diverse biomedical applications, including disease diagnosis and therapy. Over the past decade, propelled by advancements in catalysis science, biotechnology, computational science, and nanotechnology, PBNZs have witnessed remarkable progress in the exploration of their enzymatic activities, elucidation of catalytic mechanisms, and wide-ranging applications. This comprehensive review aims to provide a systematic overview of the discovery and catalytic mechanisms of PBNZ, along with the strategies employed to modulate their multiple enzyme-like activities. Furthermore, we extensively survey the recent advancements in utilizing PBNZs for scavenging ROS in various biomedical applications. Lastly, we analyze the existing challenges of translating PBNZs into therapeutic agents for clinical use and outline future research directions in this field. By presenting a comprehensive synopsis of the current state of knowledge, this review seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of the immense potential of PBNZs as an innovative therapeutic agent in biomedicine.

Streptococcus anginosus: a stealthy villain in deep odontogenic abscesses

Odontogenic infections (OIs) occasionally spread to deep facial and neck tissues. Our study aimed to explore the role of Streptococcus anginous group (SAG) in these severe OIs. A retrospective study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who required hospital care for acute OI was conducted. We analysed data of OI microbial samples and recorded findings of SAG and other pathogens. These findings were compared with data regarding patients' prehospital status and variables of infection severity. In total, 290 patients were included in the analyses. The most common (49%) bacterial finding was SAG. Other common findings were Streptococcus viridans and Prevotella species, Parvimonas micra, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Infection severity variables were strongly associated with SAG occurrence. Treatment in an intensive care unit was significantly more common in patients with SAG than in patients without SAG (p < 0.001). In addition, SAG patients expressed higher levels of C-reactive protein (p = 0.001) and white blood cell counts (p < 0.001), and their hospital stays were longer than those of non-SAG patients (p = 0.001). SAG is a typical finding in severe OIs. Clinical features of SAG-related OIs are more challenging than in other OIs. Early detection of SAG, followed by comprehensive infection care with prompt and careful surgical treatment, is necessary due to the aggressive behaviour of this dangerous pathogen.

Differences in characteristics and infection severity between odontogenic and other bacterial oro-naso-pharyngeal infections

BACKGROUND

Different bacterial infections of the oro-naso-pharyngeal (ONP) region may progress and require hospital care. The present study clarified differences in infection characteristics between hospitalized patients with odontogenic infections (OIs) and other bacterial ONP infections. The specific aim was to evaluate clinical infection variables and infection severity according to infection aetiology, particularly regarding features of OIs compared with other ONPs.

METHODS

Records of patients aged ≥16 years requiring hospital care for an acute bacterial ONP infection in the emergency units of Otorhinolaryngology or Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Helsinki University Hospital (Helsinki, Finland) during 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The main outcome variables were need for intensive care unit (ICU) treatment and length of hospital stay. The primary predictor variable was infection category, defined as OI or other ONP. The secondary predictor variable was specific ONP infection group. Additional predictor variables were primary clinical infection signs, infection parameters at hospital admission, and delay from beginning of symptoms to hospitalization. Explanatory variables were sex, age, current smoking, heavy alcohol use or substance abuse, and immunosuppressive disease, immunosuppressive medication, or both. Comparison of study groups was performed using Fisher's exact test, student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U.

RESULTS

A total of 415 patients with bacterial ONPs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most common infections were oropharyngeal (including peritonsillar, tonsillar, and parapharyngeal infections; 51%) followed by infections from the odontogenic origin (24%). Clinical features of OIs differed from other ONPs. Restricted mouth opening, skin redness, or facial or neck swelling (or both) were found significantly more often in OIs (p < 0.001). OIs required ICU care significantly more often than other ONPs (p < 0.001) and their hospital stay was longer (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Infections originating from the tonsillary and dental origin had the greatest need for hospitalization. Clinical features of OIs differed; the need for ICU treatment was more common and hospital stay was longer compared with other ONPs. Preventive care should be emphasized regarding OIs, and typical infection characteristics of ONP infection subgroups should be highlighted to achieve early and prompt diagnosis and treatment and to reduce hospitalization time.

Evolution of the treatment of severe odontogenic infections over 50 years: A comprehensive review

Objectives

Severe odontogenic infections remain a challenge for maxillofacial surgeons. The aim of this work is to review the literature to provide an update of knowledge on the topic.

Methods

A comprehensive review of articles in PubMed, Web of Science and Africa Journals Online was performed through searching for "severe odontogenic infections." No language restrictions were applied. Only articles pertaining to treatment options were retrieved. Articles from the past 50 years were included.

Results

A total of 84 articles from 39 countries worldwide were included. Severe odontogenic infections are not unique to low- and middle-income countries but also pose challenges in developed countries. Surgical management and antibiotic therapy for this type of infection is discussed. Some immunocompromised patients have high risks of complications and mortality rates. A world map of publications on the topic is provided.

Conclusions

Several important aspects of managing severe odontogenic infections are discussed. Predictors of severity in addition to recommended antibiotic choice have been debated. Diabetes mellitus is a poor predictor of the prognosis of odontogenic infections.

Triage and urgent dental care for COVID-19 patients in the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes and reports the patient-specific characteristics of an urgent dental care clinic for COVID-19 infected, suspected, exposed or quarantined patients from March to December 2020 in the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Finland.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The triage and the treatment protocol were established based on the scientific data. Patient files were evaluated from the hospital district's electronic medical record system. IBM SPSS software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 1114 consultations and 257 visits at the clinic. Most of the patients were generally healthy with mean age of 35, had toothache and were suspected to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Seventeen of the patients received positive tests for COVID-19 infection. The main treatment was tooth extraction, mostly due to caries. Statistically significant differences between COVID-19 infected and other patients occurred in age (45 vs 34 years-of-age, p = .009) and number of teeth (25 vs 28, p = .031). No SARS-CoV-2 infection transmission chains were traced to the clinic.

CONCLUSION

During the challenging pandemic time, patients were carefully screened by specialists in clinical dentistry and treated safely and effectively. Patient-specific characteristics revealed no differences between COVID-19 infected and other patients in terms of symptoms or treatment needs.

Health status in patients hospitalised for severe odontogenic infections

OBJECTIVE

Previous findings refer to certain predisposing medical conditions that compound the risk of developing severe and potentially lethal acute odontogenic infections (OI). The objective of this study was to clarify this rationale and infection severity in general.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of patients aged ≥18 years requiring hospital care for deep OI were retrospectively investigated. The main outcome variable was need for intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Additional outcome variable was occurrence of infection complications and/or distant infections. Several parameters describing patients' prior health and recent dental treatment were set as independent variables.

RESULTS

Of the 303 acute OI patients included, 71 patients (23%) required treatment in the ICU, with no significant difference between previously healthy and patients with disease history. OIs originating from teeth in the mandible compared with maxilla had 7.8-fold risk (p = .007) for ICU treatment in binary logistic regression analyses. Elevated levels of infection parameters at hospital admission predicted further ICU stay. Infection complications and/or distant infections occurred in 7.6% of patients, of which septicaemia and pneumonia were the most common. The mortality rate was 0.3%. Infection complications and/or distant infections occurred significantly more often in smokers (p = .001) and in patients with excessive consumption of alcohol or drugs (p = .025), however smoking showed 3.5-folded independent risk for infection complications and/or distant infections (p = .008) in logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe OIs often occur in previously healthy patients. Smokers in particular are prone to the most serious OIs.

Significant rise in neck infections progressing to descending necrotizing mediastinitis during the COVID-19 pandemic quarantine

To present five patients with DNM, who were treated during the first quarantine for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Five patients with DNM were treated in our department during the first lockdown. The mean age of the patients was 42,2 years and four were male. Two patients were immunocompromised. Repeated surgical drainage was performed in all patients, whereas four were also subjected to elective tracheostomy during their first operation. The mean hospitalization duration was 55,4 days and mortality was 40%. During the first lockdown for the Covid-19, a rise in the ratio of DNM cases to the overall incidence of cervicofacial infections was observed in our department. All patients with DNM were operated on an emergency basis and were subsequently admitted to the ICU. We consider the effect of the quarantine as a decisive factor for this escalation, because according to the department archives, there had not been any cases of DNM originating from a dental infection, for the past 5 years. Additionally, past studies from the same department reported no more than 6 cases over a 10 year period.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on oral and maxillofacial surgery in Japan: A report from a questionnaire survey during the different phases of the pandemic

COVID-19 pandemic has provided a new challenge to healthcare systems and medical care providers. In the current study, we describe the challenges faced and actions taken to provide optimum healthcare in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic based on the results of a questionnaire survey that was conducted by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. A total of 24 Japanese institutions participated in the study. The first survey was conducted between June 22, 2020 and June 26, 2020, and the second survey was conducted between October 23, 2020 and November 8, 2020. The questionnaire focused on the practical situation in the respondent's hospital, personal protective equipment (PPE) availability, and what alterations had occurred compared to the situation before the COVID-19 pandemic. The commonest reported duration of restrictions to the outpatient clinic was 1–2 months. All of the institutions had lifted their restrictions on outpatient services by September 2020. Surgical procedures in the operating room were restricted in 74% of hospitals in the first wave of the pandemic; however, 88% lifted their restrictions and restarted their regular surgical services by November 2020. Although, non-urgent or elective procedures were delayed, surgeries for malignant tumors, maxillofacial infections, and trauma were performed at almost all hospitals during the pandemic. Health care institutions will require a new approach to maintain patient volume and recover from the pandemic. Going forward, it is also necessary to minimize the risk of exposure and transmission to health care personnel as well as patients.

Impacts of lockdown during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on patients presenting with cervicofacial infection of odontogenic origin: a comparative study

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic caused unprecedented disruption to primary and secondary healthcare services. Our aim was to explore whether the pandemic had had any impact on patients presenting with cervicofacial infections (CFI) of odontogenic origin to secondary care and management. Comparative analysis was carried out evaluating prospective and retrospective consecutively admitted patients with a diagnosis of CFI of odontogenic origin in the COVID-19 lockdown period from 15 March to 15 June 2020 and pre-COVID-19 during the same period of the previous year. Data included patients' demographics, comorbidities, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) status on admission, clinical features, prior treatment in primary care, source of referral, SARS-COV-2 antigen status, treatment received in secondary care, intraoperative findings, and whether escalation of the level of care was required. Across both cohorts there were one hundred and twenty-five (125) patients admitted with CFI of odontogenic origin, with a 33% reduction (n=75 (2019) vs n=50 (2020)) in number of patients admitted during COVID-19 lockdown. There was no difference between the cohorts in terms of age (p=0.192), gender (p=0.609) or major comorbidities (p=0.654). Proportionally more patients in the COVID-19 group presented with SIRS (p=0.004). This group of patients persisted with symptoms for longer before presenting to secondary care (p=0.003), more delay from hospital admission to surgical intervention (p<0.005) and had longer hospital stays (p=0.001). More patients required extraoral surgical drainage during COVID-19 (p=0.056). This study suggests that the COVID-19 lockdown has had adverse effects on the presentation of CFI of odontogenic origin and its management within a Regional Acute Maxillofacial Service. Commissioners and clinicians should endeavour to plan for adequate primary and secondary care provision during any future local lockdowns to ensure that patient care is optimised.