Customised products for orbital wall reconstruction: a systematic review

Long-term enophthalmos after complex orbital bone loss successfully treated with patient-specific porous titanium implants: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Long-term enophthalmos and diplopia resulting from orbital bone loss pose significant challenges in reconstructive surgery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of patient-specific porous titanium implants (PSIs) for addressing these conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 12 patients treated at Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon, from April 2015 to April 2022 who underwent late reconstruction via PSI for unilateral complex orbital bone loss. These implants were customized via 3D mirroring techniques on the basis of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans of the patients' unaffected orbits.

RESULTS

All 12 patients presented with significant preoperative enophthalmos, with an average displacement of 3.24 mm, which was effectively corrected postoperatively to an average of 0.17 mm (p < 0.001). Orbital volume notably improved from a preoperative average of 3.38 mL to 0.37 mL postsurgery (p < 0.001). Functional improvements were evident as both enophthalmos and diplopia resolved completely. The Lancaster test revealed an improvement in the visual field, with 83.3 % of patients achieving normal results postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

By ensuring anatomical accuracy, patient-specific porous titanium implants, tailored from patient-specific imaging and fabricated via advanced 3D printing technology, provide a precise, effective, and reliable solution for reconstructing complex orbital defects and performing complicated revision surgeries.

A stepwise approach to chainsaw kickback injury of the nasoorbital complex: a case-based meta-narrative review

PURPOSE

This article outlines the management of a rare and severe nasoorbital injury resulting from a chainsaw kickback accident in a 60-year-old male. A meta-narrative review of English, French, and German literature indexed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 8, 2024, accompanies the case report.

METHODS

This was a case report combined with a comprehensive review based on the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's highest and most recent level of evidence (LoE) and highest recommendation grade (RG). Rigorous selection criteria were applied.

RESULTS

The patient had an open nasal fracture, complex lacerations, and avulsion of the left eyelid, lateral orbital wall and lateral rectus muscle. Staged surgical interventions comprised repositioning and fixation of the fractured nose, buccal mucosal grafting for nasal mucosa and conjunctiva repair, titanium mesh and polydioxanone sheet for lateral orbital wall reconstruction, and subsequent muscle and eyelid repair. The second intervention 3 months postsurgery addressed lateral ectropion, nasal dorsal hump, and nasolacrimal system issues. Despite the rarity of such injuries, evidence-based discussions were conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex nasoorbital trauma resulting from chainsaw kickback necessitates a meticulous, staged surgical approach. The inside-out technique proved effective in addressing various challenges. This article concludes with evidence-based recommendations, highlighting the importance of adapting established principles to unique nature of these injuries.

Comparison of Anatomical Preformed Titanium Implants and Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Implants in the Primary Reconstruction of Isolated Orbital Fractures-A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Reconstruction of the fractured orbit remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to compare anatomical preformed titanium orbital implants with patient-specific CAD/CAM implants for precision and intraoperative applicability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 75 orbital reconstructions from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively assessed for their precision of implant position and intra- and postoperative revision rates. For this purpose, the implant position after digital orbital reconstruction was checked for deviations by mirroring the healthy orbit at 5 defined points, and the medical records of the patients were checked for revisions.

RESULTS

The evaluation of the 45 anatomical preformed orbital implant cases showed significantly higher deviations and an implant inaccuracy of 66.6% than the 30 CAD/CAM cases with only 10% inaccuracy. In particular, the CAD/CAM implants were significantly more precise in medial and posterior positioning. In addition, the intraoperative revision rates of 26.6% vs. 11% after 3D intraoperative imaging and the postoperative revision rates of 13% vs. 0 for the anatomical preformed implants were significantly higher than for patient-specific implants.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that patient-specific CAD/CAM orbital implants are highly suitable for primary orbital reconstruction. These seem to be preferable to anatomical preformed implants in terms of precision and revision rates.

Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants

The purpose of this study is to execute an evidence-based review answering the following question (PICO): "Do patient-specific implants (PSI), manufactured or designed using computer-assisted technology, improve outcomes (orbital volume change, enophthalmos, diplopia, and operative duration) compared to conventional methods in orbital reconstruction following traumatic orbital injury in the adult patient population?" We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria included any comparative paper whereby computer-assisted technology was used in the prefabrication or design process of implants for use in post-traumatic orbital reconstruction. Paediatric patient populations were excluded. Eight databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed through the NOS and RoB2 tools. Random-effects models were used to identify differences in outcomes between groups where possible. Analysis was performed using R 4.0.0. Eleven of 4784 identified studies were included, comprising 628 adult patients, with 302 and 326 patients in the patient-specific and conventional groups, respectively. Weighted mean difference between unaffected and post-operative orbital volume was 0.32 ml (SD 0.75) and 0.95 ml (SD 1.03) for patient-specific and conventional groups, respectively. Significant improvement was identified in post-operative orbital volume reconstitution with the use of PSI, compared to conventional implants, in 3 of the 5 reporting studies. Equally, post-operative enophthalmos trended towards lower severity in the patient-specific group, with 11.2% of patients affected in the patient-specific group and 19.2% in the conventional group, and operative duration was significantly reduced with the use of PSI in 3 of the 6 reporting studies. Despite a tendency to favour PSI, no statistically significant differences in key outcomes were identified on meta-analysis. Although there is some encouraging data to support improved outcomes with the use of patient-specific orbital implants in post-traumatic reconstruction, there is, at present, no statistically significant evidence to objectively support their use over conventional implants based on the currently available comparative studies. Based on the results of this study, the choice of implant used should, thus, be left to the discretion of the surgeon.