Effectiveness of caudal septal extension graft application in endonasal septoplasty

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Including Nasal Breathing Improvement After Functional Rhinoplasty Using Endonasal Septal Extension Grafting

Objective: To measure the change perceived by patients after endonasal rhinoplasty using a, septal extension graft (SEG), as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A retrospective review of patients with nasal obstruction underwent septoplasty, turbinoplasty, and SEG. PROMs were assessed to compare operative outcomes for breathing (Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation [NOSE], Sinonasal Outcome Test [SNOT]-22, Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey [SCHNOS]), and sleep quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) Results: Of the 34 patients undergoing rhinoplasty with Endonasal SEG, the median patient age was 38.3 years (range 17-58) and mostly male (n = 18, 52.9%). Additional procedures performed on the patients included septoplasty (n = 34, 100%) and turbinate reduction (n = 34, 100%). Average follow-up was 126.6 days (range 28-573) for a majority of PROMs. There were no complications. The average change in NOSE score was 71.5 and -49.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 19.0, p < 0.001). SNOT-22 change was 35.4 and -24.2 (SD = 14.5, p < 0.001), and ESS scores averaged 6.7 and -3.4 (SD = 4.3, p < 0.001). The average SCHNOS total, functional, and cosmetic scores were 40.6, 67.9, and 22.4, respectively, and -28.0 (SD = 19.8), -44.5 (SD = 22.9), and 17.1 (SD = 24.6) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this pilot study, patients reported improvement in nasal breathing after correcting a deviated caudal septum and applying an Endonasal SEG.

Does being a healthcare professional affect satisfaction after septorhinoplasty?

This study aims to determine the differences in satisfaction levels after septorhinoplasty between patients who are healthcare workers and those who are not. The study includes patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty surgery, divided into two groups: healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire was administered to the patients at the 6th postoperative month. Among the 37 patients, 18 were healthcare workers, and 19 were non-healthcare workers. The mean Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score for healthcare workers at the 6th postoperative month was 75.69 ± 16.06, while in the non-healthcare worker group, the ROE scores were 60.31 ± 27.69. The findings from our study indicated that individuals in the healthcare profession exhibited significantly greater satisfaction rates following septorhinoplasty in comparison to those in the non-healthcare worker group, with a statistically significant difference noted (p: 0.046). Having more knowledge about septorhinoplasty surgery and its complications among healthcare workers may allow for more realistic expectations regarding the surgical intervention. Simultaneously, it may facilitate better communication with the surgeon and the expression of expectations. Clinicians should pay attention not only to the patient's intellectual level but also to their health literacy in communication with the patient.

Evaluation of the Results of Septum Extension Batten Graft in Patients Referred for Septorhinoplasty

Introduction  Correction of caudal septal deviations has always been a challenging subject in septorhinoplasty. The septum batten extension graft (SBEG) is a new graft that has potential properties in rhinoplasty. However, few reports have evaluated the surgical outcomes of this technique. Objective  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SBEG in correcting caudal septal deviation. Methods  This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with caudal septal deviation undergoing septorhinoplasty using SBEG at 2 different hospitals in 2019. We then retrospectively reviewed medical records and photographs of 50 patients at the preoperative period, as well as at 1-month, and 12-month postoperatively. Gross changes in nasolabial angle, columellar show, nasal tip projection, and dorsal nasal deviation were evaluated by a photographic analysis method, and nasal obstruction was assessed by patient satisfaction with breathing. Results  There was a significant difference between the mean nasolabial angle and columellar show at 1 and 12-months postoperatively, compared with the previous values ( p  < 0.0001). The nasolabial angles were in a favorable position with an increase of 12 to 15 degrees compared with the preoperative state. The columellar show also improved by an average of 1.2 mm and was in good condition. The postoperative dorsal nasal deviation was significantly reduced, and projection was significantly increased (3.521 ± 0.087 mm vs. 0.719 ± 0.028; p  < 0.0001; p  < 0.001). Moreover, this method had a significant favorable effect on nasal obstruction ( p  = 0.049). Conclusion  Our results showed that septorhinoplasty using SBEG is useful for correcting caudal septal deviation, with favorable surgical outcomes, and it has responded well to all five aforementioned criteria.

Evolution of the Septal Extension Graft in Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Long-term Efficacy and Reliability

BACKGROUND

Proper nasal tip projection and rotation have a strong impact on nasal aesthetics. Septal extension graft (SEG) is one of the tools employed to improve tip projection and rotation when performing rhinoplasty. This graft typically overlaps the existing caudal septum in the midline position, lengthening it and facilitating the repositioning of the tip.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to describe the technical evolution of the SEG in endonasal rhinoplasty and evaluate the reliability and long-term efficacy of the current technique.

METHODS

The authors evaluated presurgical and postsurgical photographs of the nasolabial angle and nasal proportions in 60 patients who underwent endonasal rhinoplasty with SEG.

RESULTS

The study demonstrated a clear improvement in tip projection and rotation at the 1-year follow-up. The mean preoperative nasolabial angle was 93.75° ± 9.45° compared with 101.1° ± 5.3° following surgery. Although both were normally distributed, the range of the postoperative nasolabial angle was narrower than 1-year preoperatively (standard deviation = 5.3° vs 9.45°, respectively). The Crumley ratio, utilized to describe nasal proportions, presented significant changes in nasal proportions: 3.84 preoperatively and 4.04 postoperatively (95% confidence interval = -0.24 to -0.149; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of SEG in endonasal rhinoplasty has significantly changed since first described in 2006. The adaptations made to this technique render it more reliable, and our study demonstrates its efficacy in improving tip projection and rotation over the long-term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Endonasal Septoplasty Using a Septal Cartilaginous Batten Graft for Managing Caudal Septal Deviation

Caudal nasal septal deviation is an important condition altering nasal obstruction and cosmetic appearance and many surgical techniques have been published on how to correct caudal septal deviation, as successful management of caudal septal deviation is challenging. The goal of our study was to explore the effect of endonasal septoplasty using a septal cartilaginous batten graft for managing caudal septal deviation. We tested 26 participants with caudal septal deviation who received endonasal septoplasty using a septal cartilaginous batten graft from 1 April 2019 to 29 June 2022, and followed up for at least 6 months. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale and visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Valid samples were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and paired sample t-test. Average participant age was 36.15 ± 11.02 years old. The preoperative, 1-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative NOSE scale decreased significantly (75.38 ± 15.62, 13.85 ± 7.79, and 14.04 ± 9.90; p < 0.001), while preoperative, 1-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative VAS (convex/concave side) also improved (7.50 ± 0.81/3.38 ± 0.94, 2.27 ± 0.53/1.54 ± 0.58, and 2.31 ± 0.55/1.58 ± 0.58; p < 0.001). Our results showed that endonasal septoplasty using a septal cartilaginous batten graft had good surgical outcomes without an open scar or severe complications.

Septal Extension Graft in Increasing Nasal Tip Projection

To study the use of septal extension graft for increasing nasal tip projection in cases of an under-projected nasal tip and to evaluate post-operative aesthetic and functional outcomes associated with it. 28 patients of underprojected tip underwent rhinoplasty with use of Direct caudal type of Septal extension graft with a minimum follow up of 12 months, operated between January 2018 to January 2020. ROE questionnaire and photographic evaluation were used for the assessment of post-operative functional and aesthetic outcomes. Significant improvement was seen in both aesthetic and functional outcomes with a mean ROE questionnaire score of 30.5 pre-operatively to 79.5 post-operatively. Pre-operative and post-operative photographic evaluation showed significant improvement in aesthetic outcome. None of the patients reported any postoperative complication. Septal extension graft can be used in patients with nasal tip deformity, Binder's syndrome, caudal septal dislocation, drooping tip,/ retracted columella and short nose with good post-operative aesthetic and functional outcomes and hence is an important technique for grafting. Owing to its rigid fixation with nasal septum, anterior nasal spine and lower alar cartilage, long term results for the control of nasal tip projection and rotation are remarkable.

Functional Outcomes of Septal Extension Grafting in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Cohort Analysis

Background: Septal extension grafts (SEGs) are used widely in rhinoplasty as a means of controlling tip position. Grafts positioned in a side-to-side configuration may cause nasal airway obstruction. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing cosmetic rhinoplasty. Patients undergoing SEG placement were grouped according to completion of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) or Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS). The latter has a cosmetic (C) and functional (O) domain. Each group was matched to a cohort that did not undergo SEG placement using criteria: preoperative NOSE or SCHNOS-O score, age, and gender. Patient demographics and outcomes, including NOSE, SCHNOS, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, were compared between SEG and no-SEG groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. If patients underwent placement of an SEG and complained of obstruction, the laterality of the graft in relation to the complaint was examined. Results: SEGs were placed in 79 patients, of whom 77 completed the NOSE survey and 37 completed the SCHNOS-O both pre- and postoperatively. These patients were matched to patients without SEGs. For both the SCHNOS and NOSE-matched cohorts, functional outcomes (NOSE, SCHNOS-O, and VAS-F) did not significantly differ between SEG and no-SEG groups. These findings were also observed when patients were stratified by cosmetic surgery alone versus combined functional and cosmetic surgery. On multivariate linear regression analysis, when accounting for intraoperative techniques, there was no difference in postoperative NOSE or SCHNOS-O outcomes between the SEG and no-SEG cohorts. Side of postoperative nasal obstruction did not correlate with side of SEG placement. Conclusion: SEGs, when used in a unilateral side-to-side configuration, yield excellent aesthetic results without compromising functional outcomes.

North American survey and systematic review on caudal Septoplasty

Background

Surgical correction of caudal septal deviation is a technically challenging step of functional rhinoplasty. Multiple surgical techniques have been described in the literature but comparing the efficacy of each in relieving obstruction presents a challenge. Outcome measures are necessary to adequately compare techniques. This study aims to describe the current caudal septoplasty techniques of Otolaryngologists and Facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons (FPRS), as well as their use of outcome measures, and to compare these practices with surgical trends described in the literature.

Methods

An online survey was sent to three Otolaryngology and FPRS associations in Canada and the United States. A systematic review was conducted on SCOPUS and PubMed to classify the caudal septoplasty techniques described in the literature and the outcome measurement tools used.

Results

Our survey identified that caudal septoplasty is more commonly performed by surgeons with an FPRS training background. The most common techniques were the swinging door technique (69.5%), extracorporeal septoplasy (46.7%), cartilage scoring (45.3%), and splinting with bone (25.4%). Despite using a vast array of surgical techniques, North American physicians rarely rely on standardized outcome assessment tools. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used almost twice as frequently in the literature as they are by surgeons in their clinical practice.

Conclusion

We recommend that future studies of caudal septoplasty include an assessment of both form and function using a validated PROM such as the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.

Control of Nasal Tip Position: Quantitative Assessment of Columellar Strut versus Caudal Septal Extension Graft

BACKGROUND

Control and maintenance of nasal tip position are critical in rhinoplasty. Two frequent methods of exerting tip control are columellar strut and caudal septal extension graft. However, no quantitative data exist comparing the two methods over time. The purpose of this study was to analyze maintenance of tip projection and rotation following either columellar strut or septal extension graft.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing rhinoplasty was reviewed. Three-dimensional photogrammetric evaluation of patients with either columellar strut or septal extension graft to increase tip projection was performed. Anthropometric points were analyzed in a blinded fashion. Outcome variables were tip projection, nasal length, the Goode ratio, and tip rotation. Results were stratified based on technique and compared statistically.

RESULTS

One hundred six patients were included. Overall, 66 percent were female, with an average age of 34.5 years. A columellar strut was used in 42 percent of cases (n = 45), and a septal extension graft was used in 57 percent (n = 61). Analysis showed greater maintenance of tip rotation over time with the septal extension graft compared with the columellar strut [-1.01 percent change (p = not significant versus -5.08 percent change (p = 0.009)]. Tip projection, nasal length, and the Goode ratio decreased over time for both groups, but the differences were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal tip projection and rotation appear to decrease from the immediate postoperative position. In this study, both septal extension graft and columellar strut exhibit similar changes in tip projection with time; however, septal extension graft is better able to preserve tip rotation compared with the columellar strut.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.