A free scapular skin flap for penile reconstruction

Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life

The increase in practices related to enhancing penile size can be attributed to the belief that an improved genital appearance contributes to a man's virility, coupled with an altered self-perception of his body. It is crucial to tailor interventions to meet the genuine needs of patients by thoroughly assessing their history, psychological state, and potential surgical benefits, all while considering the associated risks of complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on outcomes, complications, and quality of life after penile augmentation surgery, examining both minimally invasive and more radical techniques. A search of the PubMed and Scopus databases, focusing on English-language papers published in the last 15 years, was performed in December 2023. Papers discussing surgery in animal models and case reports were excluded from the present study unless further evaluated in a follow-up case series. The primary outcomes were changes in penile dimensions, specifically in terms of length and girth, as well as the incidence of surgical complications and the impact on quality of life. A total of 1670 articles were retrieved from the search and 46 were included for analysis. Procedures for penile length perceived enhancements include lipoplasty, skin reconstruction plasty, V-Y and Z plasty, flap reconstruction, scrotoplasty, ventral phalloplasty, and suspensory ligament release; techniques for increasing corporal penile length include penile disassembly, total phalloplasty, and sliding elongation. Finally, penile girth enhancement may be performed using soft tissue fillers, grafting procedures, biodegradable scaffolds, and Penuma®. In conclusion, while penile augmentation surgeries offer potential solutions for individuals concerned about genital size, the risks and complexities need to be accounted for.

Phalloplasty With a Free Scapular Flap Improves Postoperative Sensation in Penile Reconstruction

Objective We aimed to evaluate both the long-term surgical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of free scapular flap (FSF) phalloplasty. Method The same surgical team performed phalloplasty in 66 patients using a FSF between March 2000 and September 2018. All patients had at least 24 months of follow-up. The surgical techniques used, complications observed, and surgical and patient-reported outcomes were retrospectively described. Results A total of 66 patients with indications of penile trauma (n = 19), micropenis (n = 42), and self-amputation (n = 5) underwent FSF phalloplasty. Two patients (3%) had total flap necrosis and 1 (1.5%) had partial flap necrosis. The urethral complication rate was 18.2% (12/66 patients). All patients were able to void while standing after revision procedures or urethroplasty. We found that an FSF is a reliable donor site for penile reconstruction. Conclusion The FSF phalloplasty creates an esthetically pleasing penis and allows voiding while standing. Most patients can engage in sexual activity. The main drawbacks of using this method are that patients experience different degrees of sensory recovery, and patients undergoing surgery with the "tube-in-tube" technique may find they are be limited by the thickness of the flap. However, by making full use of residual tissue, such as the micropenis glans or scrotal skin, patients can obtain good tactile and erogenous sensation. We believe that using an FSF complements the existing phalloplasty techniques.

[The tube in tube thoracodorsal perforator flap phalloplasty]

This article deals with a clinical case of a tube in a tube TDAP phalloplasty in a 38 years old trans-man. While penis reconstruction surgery aroused an efflorescence of different operative techniques, the resulting female to male surgery sees these procedures boil down to two or three flaps. If we usually discuss before surgery about the way to lengthen the urinary tract, as the way to implant later for intercourse; the choice of the donor site remains too systematized. Surgeons commonly focus on the reconstructed site prior to the donor site. In this case, laxity in the back and reliability of direct closure make us harvest the thoracodorsal perforator flap. Dissection of perforators saves muscular function and direct closure afford an aesthetic result less visible than a graft on the forearm. The thin flap we harvest allows tube in tube phalloplasty so that phallus and urethra are being built in the same time. One case has been reported in the literature of thoracodorsal perforator flap phalloplasty with grafted urethra, but no case of tube within a tube TDAP phalloplasty.

Significance and Surgical Options for Nontranssexual Phalloplasty: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of 166 Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of phalloplasty and explore the clinical significance and selection of methods for penile reconstruction.

METHODS

The same surgical team performed primary phalloplasty in 166 nontranssexual patients using different surgical approaches between September 2000 and September 2020. All patients had at least 6 months of follow-up. Surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes were retrospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients with indications such as penile trauma (n = 68 [41%]), amputation injury (n = 15 [9%]), iatrogenic (n = 13 [8%]), penile aplasia (n = 54 [32%]), genital ambiguity (n = 15 [9%]), and Peyronie disease (n = 1 [0.6%]) underwent different techniques of phalloplasty. Four patients (2.4%) had total flap necrosis, and 17 (10%) had partial flap necrosis. The total urethral complications rate was 32.5% (54 of 166); however, all the patients were able to void while standing after successful corrective surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized selection of appropriate penile reconstruction methods tailored to the cause of penile defect, patients' personal needs, thickness of donor site, and the blood supply of the flap are conducive to achieving satisfactory treatment results, reducing complications, and improving patient satisfaction. We believe that a scapular flap has certain advantages in nontranssexual patients, whereas other flaps also have their own indications.

[Scapular flap, an alternative to the radial forearm flap in phalloplasty: Advantages and limitations]

INTRODUCTION

Antebrachial phalloplasty is considered as the standard technique in total penile reconstruction. This technique allows the creation of a phallus and a neourethra in one step at the cost of significant sequelae of the donor site. Thus, this technique has been replaced in some centers by other techniques such as the MSLD flap or the ALT flap. However, in Western populations, these techniques require the addition of a technique dedicated to the urethroplasty. The scapular flap is a technique that is not widely described in the literature and, like the antebrachial flap, allows the creation of a phallus and a urethra in one step according to the "tube within tube" technique.

AIM

The aim of the study was to detail this technique, to study its vascularization and to adapt the measurements of the flap to a western population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six cadaveric dissections were performed in the laboratory. Intravascular injection of colored latex allowed easier identification of the vessels of interest and study of the subcutaneous vascular tree. Scapular flaps of variable size were raised to adapt the size to a Western population.

RESULTS

Six dissections were performed in Caucasian subjects. The scapular circumflex artery was constant and had a mean diameter of 3.5mm (3.3mm-3.8mm). The mean pedicle length was 7.3cm (6.8cm-8.1cm). The size of the flaps was adapted to the subcutaneous tissue and flaps of at least 14×16cm allowed the "tube within tube" technique to be performed.

CONCLUSION

The scapular flap has the advantage of allowing phalloplasty with urethroplasty to be performed at the same time. The pedicle is constant and of good diameter. In addition, the sequelae of the donor site are minimal. On the other hand, the pedicle used is short and the flap cannot be surgically reinnervated. Nevertheless, the restoration of a protective sensitivity allows the implantation of a penile prosthesis.

Reconstructive Surgery for High-voltage Injury of Genitoperineal Area and Upper Extremities: The Uromanual Trauma Concept

Reconstruction of tissue defects resulting from high-voltage injuries remains a serious issue in plastic surgery. For many years it has been solved by applying autologous reconstruction with rotated and revascularized flaps. We present a series outlining reconstructive practices in treatment of patients with high-voltage “uromanual” injuries. These types of injuries include a group of upper extremities and genitoperineal high-voltage trauma due to urination on an electrical source, which are rarely discussed in the literature. This study aimed to describe the algorithm of perioperative care and surgical treatment in patients with high-voltage uromanual trauma. Three male patients (mean age 26.3 years, range: 20–35 years) with traumatic injury of the genital area and the upper extremities due to high-voltage injury underwent reconstruction with a one-stage repair of defects. In one patient, the defect of the left upper extremity was eliminated by microsurgical autotransplantation of musculocutaneous thoracodorsal artery perforator flap. The genitoperineal region was repaired using rotated scrotal flaps. In two other cases, phalloplasty with a revascularized myocutaneous thoracodorsal artery perforator flap was followed by urethroplasty with a prefabricated radial forearm free flap. Hand deformities were eliminated using split-thickness skin autografts. All flaps survived. No complications were observed in the autograft harvesting areas. All cases showed good aesthetic and functional postoperative outcomes. Management of uromanual injuries should include one-stage reconstruction of upper extremities and genitoperineal defects for restoration of satisfying functional and aesthetic components crucial for patient’s quality of life and socialization.

Free Tissue Transfer Penile Reconstruction

Phalloplasty can be a challenging plastic surgery procedure associated with complications and unsatisfactory results. Phalloplasty has become an important procedure in the setting of trauma, partial or complete excision of the penis, and gender affirmation. Advances in microsurgery has expanded penile reconstruction through free tissue transfer techniques which include the radial forearm free flap, fibular osteocutaneous flap, anterolateral thigh flap, latissimus dorsi flap, scapular flap, and abdominal flaps. Each procedure has advantages and disadvantages; most of the procedures achieve adequate cosmetic results with high patient satisfaction. Most of the surgical complications are related to the reconstruction of the urethra or creating rigidity for intercourse. The main goals of reconstruction are to create a cosmetically appealing phallus with satisfactory sexual function.

Total penile reconstruction: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Phalloplasty poses a unique challenge to the plastic and reconstructive surgeon. The development of advanced microsurgical techniques has greatly augmented the range of surgical approaches available.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases was performed to identify clinical studies of total penile reconstruction published within the last 10 years using the search algorithm: "(phallus or penis or penile) and (reconstruction or phalloplasty or transplant)".

RESULTS

The primary literature search retrieved 1400 articles. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 studies were selected for review. The radial forearm free flap is the preferred technique for total phalloplasty; however, other techniques including the fibular osteocutaneous flap, anterolateral thigh flap, latissimus dorsi flap, scapular free flap, and abdominal flap are described. Background, indications, and preoperative and postoperative care are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Total penile reconstruction can provide functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial benefits to the patient. Use of the radial forearm free flap has been proposed as the gold standard; however, the wide range of potential complications associated with phalloplasty warrants an individualized approach to each patient.

Phalloplasty: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Acquired or congenital absence of the penis can lead to severe physical limitations and psychological outcomes. Phallic reconstruction can restore various functional aspects of the penis and reduce psychosocial sequelae. Moreover, some female-to-male transsexuals desire creation of a phallus as part of their gender transition. Because of the complexity of phalloplasty, there is not an ideal technique for every patient. This review sets out to identify and critically appraise the current literature on phalloplasty techniques and outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for studies published through July of 2015 with multiple search terms related to phalloplasty. Data on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 248 articles were selected and reviewed from the 790 identified. Articles covered a variety of techniques on phalloplasty. Three thousand two hundred thirty-eight patients underwent phalloplasty, with a total of 1753 complications reported, although many articles did not explicitly comment on complications. One hundred four patients underwent penile replantation and two underwent penile transplantation. Satisfaction was high, although most studies did not use validated or quantified approaches to address satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Phalloplasty techniques are evolving to include a number of different flaps, and most techniques have high reported satisfaction rates. Penile replantation and transplantation are also options for amputation or loss of phallus. Further studies are required to better compare different techniques to more robustly establish best practices. However, based on these studies, it appears that phalloplasty is highly efficacious and beneficial to patients.

Surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction with suprapubic phalloplasty

INTRODUCTION

Many techniques, specifically forearm free flap phalloplasty, are used in penile reconstructive surgery. Although satisfying, a major disadvantage is the large, stigmatizing scar on the donor site, which leads many patients to explore alternatives.

AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes and satisfaction of patients offered the choice between metaidioplasty, forearm free flap, and suprapubic phalloplasty.

METHODS

Medical outcomes from the three-stage surgery were collected from the hospital files of 24 patients, who were also interviewed to assess their satisfaction, sexual function, and psychosexual well-being.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Medical complications, anthropometric measures, and interviewing questionnaire on satisfaction with appearance, sexual function, and psychological variables.

RESULTS

Duration of surgery and of hospital stay was relatively short in the first (1 hour 30 minutes; 3 days) and last (1 hour 40 minutes; 3 days) stage of surgery involving tissue expansion and neophallus release. These two stages were associated with few complications (17% and 4% minor complications respectively, 12% additional complications with hospitalization for the first stage). The second stage involving tubing was associated with longer surgery and hospital stay (2 hour 15 minutes; 5 days) and had more complications (54% minor complications and 29% requiring hospitalization) although fewer than one-step surgery. No loss of neophallus was reported. Overall, 95% of patients were satisfied with their choice of phalloplasty, 95% with the appearance, 81% with the length (Mean = 12.83 cm), and 71% with the circumference (Mean = 10.83 cm) of their neophallus. Satisfactory appearance was significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with penile length (r = 0.69) and diameter (r = 0.77). Sexual satisfaction was significantly correlated with penile diameter (r = 0.758), frequency of orgasm (r = 0.71), perceived importance of voiding while standing (r = 0.56), presurgery satisfaction with sexuality (r = 0.58), current masculine-feminine scale (r = 0.58), attractive-unattractive scale (r = 0.69), and happy-depressed scale (r = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Suprapubic phalloplasty, despite the lack of urethroplasty, offers an interesting alternative for patients concerned with the stigmatizing scar on the donor site.

[Microsurgery and burn sequelae: what is practical use?]

The use of microsurgery in the management of burn sequelae is not a new idea and free flaps have been used in this context since the 1970s. New technologies like negative pressure treatment and skin substitute have certainly decreased the indication of free flaps. The authors with their experience combined to a review of the literature, try to clarify these indications for each anatomical location. From a technical point of view, they find that realizing a free flap for these patients is more complicated (venous damage, lack of donor site who has been burned…). Despite this, microsurgery must still belong in the decision tree and there are some irreplaceable indication specially for hand reconstruction.