Mardan-Dezfouli S, Reid OG, Fliss MD, Stevenson J, Harris D, Lyon MR, Koehle MS, Mitchell CJ. The Impact of Abdominal Body Contouring Surgery on Physical Function After Massive Weight Loss: A Pilot Prospective Matched Comparison.
Aesthet Surg J 2023;
43:NP28-NP37. [PMID:
35946751 DOI:
10.1093/asj/sjac220]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Many individuals develop excess skin (ES) following massive weight loss (MWL). Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate that abdominal ES negatively impacts perceived physical function which is improved by abdominal body contouring surgery (ABCS). However, the effect of ABCS on objective measures of physical function is unknown.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to examine the impact of ABCS on objective measures of physical function in individuals who have undergone MWL.
METHODS
Patients who have undergone MWL with abdominal ES (grade, ≥2) underwent the following physical function assessments: 9-item modified physical performance test (mPPT), chair stand, star excursion balance test (SEBT), timed up and go (TUG), modified agility T test, and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Perception of physical exertion and BODY-Q questionnaire scales were also collected. Nonsurgical controls (n = 21) and those who had undergone ABCS (n = 6) after the first visit performed a second physical function assessment 8 to 12 weeks later to allow for postoperative healing.
RESULTS
No ceiling or floor effect was detected for any physical function measure. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.44, 0.91) for the mPPT and >0.80 for all other measures. The effect sizes were 0.74 (75% CI, 0.19, 1.28) for the mPPT, 0.54 (75% CI, 0.00, 1.08) for the SEBT, -0.63 (75% CI, -1.17, -0.09) for the modified agility T test, and 0.79 (75% CI, 0.24, 0.13) for the 6-MWT.
CONCLUSIONS
The mPPT and tests involving dynamic balance, agility, and walking were reliable and showed medium to large effect sizes, suggesting that these tests may be sensitive to change following ABCS.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse