Safety of limb-salvaging surgery for sarcomas compromising major vessels: A 15-year single-centre outcomes study

'Thou shalt not throw away a living thing': A single-centre 10-year experience using the spare parts principle for complex sarcoma reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

For aggressive limb sarcomas beyond reconstructive reach, an amputation may be the only alternative to achieve a complete tumour resection. However, very proximal amputations result in greater loss of function and quality-of-life impact. The spare parts principle advocates utilising tissues distal to the amputation site, for reconstructing complex defects and preserving the function. We aim to present our 10-year experience utilising this principle in complex sarcoma surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our prospective sarcoma database was conducted for sarcoma patients treated with an amputation between 2012 and 2022. Cases in which distal segments were used for the reconstruction were identified. Demographic data, tumour characteristics, and surgical and non-surgical treatment, along with oncological outcomes and complications, were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were eligible for inclusion. The median age was 54 years at presentation (8-80 years) with 43% being females. Nine had a primary sarcoma resection, two were treated for recurrent tumours, two presented intractable osteomyelitis following sarcoma treatment and one had an amputation as a palliative procedure. The latter was the only oncological case in which tumour clearance was not achieved. Three patients developed metastasis and subsequently died during follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Careful balancing of oncological goals and preservation of function is required for proximal limb-threatening sarcomas. When an amputation is required, tissues distal to the cancer site provide a safe reconstructive alternative, optimising patient recovery and preserving function. Our experience is limited by the small number of cases presenting with these rare and aggressive tumours.

The role of oncovascular surgery in gynecologic oncology surgery

Oncovascular surgery is a new term used to define tumor resection with simultaneous reconstruction of the great vessels when the tumor infiltrates or firmly adheres to such vessels. The benefit of oncovascular surgery has been widely described in patients with hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancers, retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, and in other areas of gynecologic oncology, such as the lateral compartment of the pelvis, retroperitoneum, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic region, with an increase in complete resections and without increasing the morbidity and mortality rates. In the latter decades of the past century, several advances and accumulating scientific evidence led gynecologic oncologists to perform more thorough cytoreductive surgeries that included multivisceral resections. But to our knowledge, published studies on the frequency and relevance of vascular surgery in gynecological oncology are scarce. Gynecologic oncologists still do not receive formal training in vascular surgery and additionally, with the current reduction in experience with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, as well as other types of radical abdominal and pelvic surgeries, trainees will encounter fewer vascular injuries and the opportunity to deal with a variety of management types required. Well-organized collaboration between each subspecialty with a multidisciplinary approach and adequate pre-operative planning are pivotal. The aim of this review is to pave the way towards the understanding that patients with suspicion of great vessels' infiltration or encasement by tumor require personalized and specialized treatment with the need to form an oncovascular surgery team, and that it is necessary for gynecologic oncology surgeons to take a step forward in surgical training.