Improvement of bone and mineral parameters related to adynamic bone disease by diminishing dialysate calcium

Same therapy, same calcium mobilization? Exploring calcium exchange across body compartments using a patient-specific predictive model

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive, patient-specific models are essential to study calcium deposition and mobilization during dialysis. We aim to develop tools to support clinical prescriptions with a more accurate approach for the prediction of calcium mobilization while also considering major electrolytes and catabolites.

METHODS

We modified a multi-solute model predicting patient-specific dialysis response by incorporating a calcium buffer to represent bone exchanges. Data from four centers, involving 127 patients with six sessions each, were utilized. For each patient, three sessions were allocated for model training (ID123), while the remaining sessions were for validation (PRED456). The normalized root mean square error (nRMSE%) was used to evaluate both descriptive and predictive accuracy. Correlations between initial data and calcium exchanges were also assessed.

RESULTS

The overall nRMSE% for ID123 was 3.92%. For PRED456, it was 3.46% (ranging from a minimum of 1.17% for [Na+] to a maximum of 6.62% for [urea]). The median nRMSE% for plasma calcium varied between 1.13 and 8.32 for SHD sessions, depending on whether Ca_dialysis fluid (Cad) was ≥ or <1.50 mmol/L, respectively. For HDF sessions, the range was between 2.90 and 5.89. A significant and moderate correlation was found between overall calcium removal and the buffer balance. The most robust correlation observed was between the amount of calcium administered via post-dilution fluid and the overall calcium removal in the dialysis filter.

CONCLUSIONS

Identical therapy settings do not uniformly affect calcium mobilization, and our approach offers insight into calcium distribution across body compartments. This understanding will enhance clinical prescription practices.

The impact of low and high dialysate calcium concentrations on cardiovascular disease and death in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal dialysate calcium (Ca) concentration for patients undergoing hemodialysis remains inconclusive, particularly concerning cardiovascular protection.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a meta-analysis of eight RCTs to determine the optimal dialysate Ca concentration for cardiovascular protection. We compared outcomes in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis treated with either a low-Ca dialysate (LCD) (1.125 or 1.25 mmol/L) or a high-Ca dialysate (HCD) (1.5 or 1.75 mmol/L). The outcomes were coronary artery calcification score (CACS), all-cause and cardiovascular death, cardiovascular function and structure, and serum biochemical parameters.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between LCD and HCD concerning CACS (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-0.38, 0.07]), the risk of all-cause death, and cardiovascular death in patients treated with chronic maintenance hemodialysis. Conversely, LCD was associated with a significantly lower intima-media thickness (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.94, -0.05]) and pulse wave velocity than HCD (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.21, -0.51]). Furthermore, LCD significantly decreased serum Ca levels (mean difference [MD] = 0.52 mg/dL, 95% CI [0.19, 0.85]) and increased serum parathyroid hormone levels (MD = 44.8 pg/mL, 95% CI [16.2, 73.3]) compared with HCD. Notably, most RCTs examined in our analysis did not include patients receiving calcimimetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed no significant differences in cardiovascular calcification and death between LCD and HCD and revealed a paucity of RCTs on dialysate Ca concentrations, including those involving patients on calcimimetics, indicating the urgent need for further studies.

Study on the Effect of Low Calcium Dialysate on Biochemical Profile of Adynamic Bone Disease in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis

In recent years, adynamic bone disease (ABD) has become a common skeletal lesion in adult patients with chronic kidney disease. We aimed to compare the effects of low calcium dialysate (LCD) and standard calcium dialysate of our facility [high calcium dialysate (HCD)] on the evolution of bone and mineral parameter related to ABD in dialysis patients. Forty patients with predialysis intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) <100 pg/mL and/or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) <27 U/L were included in this study and were equally distributed over LCD (1.25 mmol/L) or HCD (1.75 mmol/L) treatment. The duration of the study was 6 months. There was no significant difference in baseline characters and biochemical parameters related to chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder in both the groups. The groups did not differ in the mean tCa before dialysis, but this parameter was significantly lower in the LCD group versus HCD at the end of the study. The mean serum levels of iPTH, total alkaline phosphatase, and BAP in the LCD group were increased at 3 months and at the end of the study compared with the baseline levels. The bone markers in the HCD group did not change significantly. At the end of the study, all bone parameters in the LCD group were significantly higher than in the HCD group. Development of measures indicating increased bone turnover in patients receiving 1.25 mmol/L of dialysate calcium, most likely as a result of inhibiting a positive calcium balance and allowing for long-term PTH secretion stimulation. Hence, LCD might be considered a valuable therapeutic option for ABD patients.

Is Adynamic Bone Always a Disease? Lessons from Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) is a common complication of end-stage kidney disease that often starts early with loss of kidney function, and it is considered an integral part in management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Adynamic bone (ADB) is characterized by suppressed bone formation, low cellularity, and thin osteoid seams. There is accumulating evidence supporting increasing prevalence of ADB, particularly in early CKD. Contemporarily, it is not very clear whether it represents a true disease, an adaptive mechanism to prevent bone resorption, or just a transitional stage. Several co-players are incriminated in its pathogenesis, such as age, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, uremic milieu, and iatrogenic factors. In the present review, we will discuss the up-to-date knowledge of the ADB and focus on its impact on bone health, fracture risk, vascular calcification, and long-term survival. Moreover, we will emphasize the proper preventive and management strategies of ADB that are pivotal issues in managing patients with CKD. It is still unclear whether ADB is always a pathologic condition or whether it can represent an adaptive process to suppress bone resorption and further bone loss. In this article, we tried to discuss this hard topic based on the available limited information in patients with CKD. More studies are needed to be able to clearly address this frequent ROD finding.

Adynamic bone disease: Revisited

The bone and mineral disorders form an integral part of the management of a chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient. Amongst various types of bone pathologies in chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD), the prevalence of adynamic bone disease (ABD) is increasing. The present review discusses the updated pathophysiology, risk factors, and management of this disorder.

Adynamic bone disease: Revisited

The bone and mineral disorders form an integral part of the management of a chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient. Amongst various types of bone pathologies in chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD), the prevalence of adynamic bone disease (ABD) is increasing. The present review discusses the updated pathophysiology, risk factors, and management of this disorder.

Controversies in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Chronic Kidney Disease

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease that begins early in the course of renal insufficiency as an adaptive response to maintain mineral homeostasis. This complex disorder affects the bone, leading to an increase in fracture risk and is associated with increased risks of vascular calcification and mortality. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we examine the different strategies available to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism. Particularly, we focus on the adequate control of serum phosphorus by restricting intake and the use of phosphate binders, correction of hypocalcemia while minimizing calcium burden, and reduction in PTH levels through the use of vitamin D sterols and calcimimetics. RECENT FINDINGS: It was observed that although numerous agents directed at the correction of these abnormalities have demonstrated effectiveness on biochemical markers, there is still a relative scarcity of studies demonstrating treatment effectiveness as measured by hard clinical outcomes. In addition, most agents have side effects that may limit their use, even in patients in which the treatment has demonstrated efficacy in controlling these parameters. There is still controversy as to what therapeutic regimens to choose for a particular patient and what parameter should be used to follow their effects, including outcomes, side effects, pill burden, and costs, among others. In the present article, we analyze controversial aspects of the different therapeutic agents available. Although many tools and regimens are available, no one by itself is enough for an adequate management of the patient. But rather, combined therapy and individualization of approaches are recommended for better results. We suggest that new studies analyzing the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches to the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism should be directed not only to controlling parathyroid hormone levels but also to the evaluation of long-term outcomes, based on modification of morbidity, mortality, and end organ impact, while reducing side effects and controlling costs, among others.

Renal association commentary on the KDIGO (2017) clinical practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of CKD-MBD

This report comments on the relevance and utility of the recently published (2017) KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention and treatment of mineral bone disease in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD-MBD) with respect to UK clinical practice. This document replaces all previously published Renal Association guidelines on the topic.

Overview of the 2017 KDIGO CKD-MBD Update: Practice Implications for Adult Hemodialysis Patients

Renal dietitians play a pivotal role in the ongoing management of chronic kidney disease in patients on hemodialysis. Awareness of changes to clinical practice guidelines that may impact laboratory parameters associated with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is important for optimal patient care. In this article, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update recommendations related to the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in adults on hemodialysis are reviewed and treatment implications for renal dietitians discussed. Specific attention is given to the integration of updated recommendations such as the use of calcimimetics as part of a combination approach to the existing treatment paradigm. Renal dietitians can directly apply the updated clinical recommendations in the evaluation of diet composition; food additives; medication adherence challenges with phosphate binder type and use and serial monitoring of phosphorus, calcium, and parathyroid hormone levels to inform clinical decisions on treatment options for patients.

A prospective study of the influence of the skeleton on calcium mass transfer during hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Calcium gradient, the difference between serum calcium and dialysate calcium d[Ca], is the main contributor factor influencing calcium transfer during hemodialysis. The impact, however, of bone turnover, on calcium mass transfer during hemodialysis is still uncertain.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study included 10 patients on hemodialysis for a 57.6±16.8 months, with severe hyperparathyroidism. Patients were submitted to 3 hemodialysis sessions using d[Ca] of 1.25, 1.5 and 1.75 mmol/l in three situations: pre-parathyroidectomy (pre-PTX), during hungry bone (early post-PTX), and after stabilization of clinical status (late post-PTX). Biochemical analysis and calcium mass transfer were evaluated and serum bone-related proteins were quantified.

RESULTS

Calcium mass transfer varied widely among patients in each study phase with a median of -89.5, -76.8 and -3 mmol using d[Ca] 1.25 mmol/L, -106, -26.8 and 29.7 mmol using d[Ca] 1.50 mmol/L, and 12.8, -14.5 and 38 mmol using d[Ca] 1.75 mmol/L during pre-PTX, early post-PTX and late post-PTX, respectively, which was significantly different among d[Ca] (p = 0.0001) and among phases (p = 0.040). Ca gradient and delta of Ca also differed among d[Ca] and phases (p<0.05 for all comparisons), whether ultrafiltration was similar. Serum Osteocalcin decreased significantly in late post-PTX, whereas Sclerostin increased earlier, in early post-PTX.

CONCLUSIONS

The skeleton plays a key role in Ca mass transfer during dialysis, either by determining pre-dialysis serum Ca or by controlling the exchangeable Ca pool. Knowing that could help us to decide which d[Ca] should be chosen in a given patient.

Long-term effects of low calcium dialysates on the serum calcium levels during maintenance hemodialysis treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) can cause the progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and mineral bone disorders (MBD). The KDIGO recommends the dialysates with a calcium (Ca) concentration of 1.25–1.5 mmol/L for MHD treatments, but the optimal concentration remains controversial. Here, we conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials examining a total of 622 patients to investigate the optimal concentration for MHD for 6 months or longer. The dialysates with a low Ca concentration (1.125 or 1.25 mmol/L) significantly lowered the serum Ca and raised the intact parathyroid hormone levels by 0.52 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.85) and 39.59 pg/mL (14.80–64.38), respectively, compared with a high Ca concentration (1.50 or 1.75 mmol/L). Three studies showed that a low concentration was preferred for lowering arterial calcifications or atherosclerosis in different arteries, but one study showed that coronary arterial calcifications increased with a low concentration. Two studies showed contradictory outcomes in terms of MBD. Our meta-analysis showed that a dialysate with a low Ca concentration lowered the serum Ca levels in patients receiving long-term MHD, but further studies are needed to determine the optimal Ca concentration in terms of CVD and MBD.

Dialysate Composition for Hemodialysis: Changes and Changing Risk

Dialysate composition is a critical aspect of the hemodialysis prescription. Despite this, trial data are almost entirely lacking to help guide the optimal dialysate composition. Often, the concentrations of key components are chosen intuitively, and dialysate composition may be determined by default based on dialysate manufacturer specifications or hemodialysis facility practices. In this review, we examine the current epidemiological evidence guiding selection of dialysate bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, and potassium, and identify unresolved issues for which pragmatic clinical trials are needed.

Changing bone patterns with progression of chronic kidney disease

It is commonly held that osteitis fibrosa and mixed uremic osteodystrophy are the predominant forms of renal osteodystrophy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Osteitis fibrosa is a high-turnover bone disease resulting mainly from secondary hyperparathyroidism, and mixed uremic osteodystrophy is in addition characterized by a mineralization defect most often attributed to vitamin D deficiency. However, there is ancient and more recent evidence that in early chronic kidney disease stages adynamic bone disease characterized by low bone turnover occurs first, at least in a significant proportion of patients. This could be due to the initial predominance of bone turnover-inhibitory conditions such as resistance to the action of parathyroid hormone (PTH), reduced calcitriol levels, sex hormone deficiency, diabetes, and, last but not least, uremic toxins leading to repression of osteocyte Wnt/β-catenin signaling and increased expression of Wnt antagonists such as sclerostin, Dickkopf-1, and sFRP4. The development of high-turnover bone disease would occur only later on, when serum PTH levels are able to overcome peripheral PTH resistance and the other inhibitory factors of bone formation. Whether FGF23 and Klotho play a direct role in the transition from low- to high-turnover bone disease or participate only indirectly via regulating PTH secretion remains to be seen.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorders (CKD-MBDs): What the Endocrinologist Needs to Know

OBJECTIVE

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBDs) are a spectrum of abnormalities involving skeletal hormones, minerals, and bone turnover and mineralization. This paper focuses on what the endocrinologist should know about the assessment and management of skeletal and metabolic disorders in CKD-MBDs.

METHODS

Relevant literature was reviewed to (1) define disturbances of minerals and hormones in the course of CKD; (2) identify the variable radiographic and histomorphometric changes of CKD-MBDs; (3) review the association among CKD-MBDs, vascular calcification, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and mortality; and (4) clarify issues in CKD-MBDs therapy.

RESULTS

Assessment and treatment of CKD-MBDs is complicated by progressive changes in bone minerals and skeletal regulatory hormones as kidney function declines. CKD-MBDs are associated with fracture risk, and studies demonstrate that bone mineral density can be used to assess bone loss and fracture risk in these patients. Treatment of CKD-MBDs continues to evolve. Use of calcium, phosphate binders, vitamin D, vitamin D-receptor analogs, and drugs for osteoporosis and CKD-MBDs treatment are discussed in the context of safety and efficacy for patients with CKD.

CONCLUSION

The association of CKD with bone disease, vascular calcification, CVD, and mortality mandates earlier recognition and treatment of CKD-MBDs. Osteoporosis as a distinct entity can be diagnosed and managed in CKD, although assessment of osteoporosis becomes challenging in late (stage 4 to 5) CKD. Diabetes is common in early (stage 1 to 3) CKD. In addition, 96% of all individuals identified as having CKD have early CKD. The endocrinologist is uniquely positioned to address and treat both diabetes and many of the metabolic and skeletal disorders associated with early CKD-MBDs, including osteoporosis.

The Study of Low Calcium Dialysate on Elderly Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hypoparathyroidism

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to study the safety and efficacy of 1.25 mmol/l calcium dialysate on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in elderly patients who suffered from secondary hypoparathyroidism.

METHODS

Eighty-two elderly patients (ages ≥65) who had been in MHD with dialysate calcium at 1.5 mmol/l over 6 months and had 2 consecutive serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) measurements at level below 100 pg/ml were selected and randomized into 2 groups: treatment group (41 patients, with dialysate calcium at 1.25 mmol/l) and control group (41 patients, still with dialysate calcium at 1.5 mmol/l). Both groups were studied for the duration of 12 months. The changes of serum iPTH, calcium, phosphorus, calcium and phosphorus product and other indicators as well as related adverse reactions were recorded at the following time points: before the study and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months into the study. In addition, the intimal media thickness (IMT) of carotid artery and abdominal aorta calcification score (AACS) were measured in the 0, 6 and 12 months during the study.

RESULTS

(1) In the treatment group, the levels of serum corrected calcium, phosphorus and calcium-phosphate product began to decline after 1 month and exhibited further decrease 3 months later. Serum iPTH level increased significantly after 1 month into the study and the trend continued. The above markers stabilized after month 6. Compared with pre-study markers, the changes of the above markers were significant after study (p < 0.05). (2) The average IMT and AACS were evidently decreased during the 6 and 12 months of study in the treatment group. There was statistical significance (p < 0.05) when compared with the above indexes of the pre-study and the control group. (3) In the control group, there were no significant differences in above laboratory markers over the 12-month study period. (4) There was no significant difference in the adverse events observed between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Safety of low calcium dialysate (dialysate calcium 1.25 mmol/l) in elderly MHD patients with iPTH <100 pg/ml is good, as well as improving carotid IMT, resistance index and AACS as indexes of vascular calcification in the small study group and warrants further investigation.

Individualizing the dialysate calcium concentration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal dialysate calcium concentration (DCC) in hemodialysis patients is still debated. Strategies have varied over time due to developments in the treatments available for mineral metabolism disorders and our increasing knowledge of bone and vascular diseases. International recommendations [Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDIGO) and European Best Practice Guidelines] urge for DCC individualization in order to meet the patient's specific needs whenever possible. In this review, we aim to discuss the pros and cons of individualizing the DCC in hemodialysis patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different regions of the world have various strategies with respect to DCCs. Decreasing the DCC slightly reduces calcemia, but mainly stimulates parathyroid hormone secretion and bone turnover. Conversely, increasing the DCC increases calcemia slightly and reduces parathyroid hormone secretion and bone turnover markedly. Furthermore, higher DCCs favor hemodynamic stability and can prevent ventricular arrhythmias. The impact of DCC individualization on survival rate or cardiovascular calcification progression has not been evaluated.

SUMMARY

Individualizing DCC appears to be useful but requires time, a clear defined strategy, and close biological monitoring. Even though some studies have shown that using individualized DCCs of 1.25 or 1.75 mmol/l is not harmful, the real benefits of this strategy need to be assessed in a large, multicentric trial.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for hyperphosphatemia in renal disease

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is considered as an independent risk factor for surrogate clinical end points like vascular calcification (VC) and bone disease, or hard clinical outcomes like cardiovascular events. Various treatment options are available for phosphate removal or reduction. Calcium-based phosphate binders (CBB) with their possible positive calcium balance became culprits for progressive VC and increased mortality risk. Non-calcium-based binders (NCBB) treatment allowed a comparable control of hyperphosphatemia with a lower risk of hypercalcemia and a slower progression of VC. Recent data have shown a 22% risk reduction in all-cause mortality with NCBB compared to CBB treatment. The appropriate timing of phosphate binder initiation in CKD patients is still unclear. Recent reports in patients with CKD stages 3b-4 showed increased VC progression when actively treated compared to placebo and a positive calcium, but no negative phosphate balance.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the pharmacological options to treat hyperphosphatemia.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of phosphate binders is essential in preventing morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. The choice of phosphate binder takes into account CKD stage, the presence of other components of CKD-mineral and bone disorders, concomitant therapies and drug side-effect profile.

Optimizing haemodialysate composition

Survival and quality of life of dialysis patients are strictly dependent on the quality of the haemodialysis (HD) treatment. In this respect, dialysate composition, including water purity, plays a crucial role. A major aim of HD is to normalize predialysis plasma electrolyte and mineral concentrations, while minimizing wide swings in the patient's intradialytic plasma concentrations. Adequate sodium (Na) and water removal is critical for preventing intra- and interdialytic hypotension and pulmonary edema. Avoiding both hyper- and hypokalaemia prevents life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Optimal calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) dialysate concentrations may protect the cardiovascular system and the bones, preventing extraskeletal calcifications, severe secondary hyperparathyroidism and adynamic bone disease. Adequate bicarbonate concentration [HCO₃⁻] maintains a stable pH in the body fluids for appropriate protein and membrane functioning and also protects the bones. An adequate dialysate glucose concentration prevents severe hyperglycaemia and life-threating hypoglycaemia, which can lead to severe cardiovascular complications and a worsening of diabetic comorbidities.

Adynamic bone disease: from bone to vessels in chronic kidney disease

Adynamic bone disease (ABD) is a well-recognized clinical entity in the complex chronic kidney disease (CKD)-mineral and bone disorder. Although the combination of low intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and low bone alkaline phosphatase levels may be suggestive of ABD, the gold standard for precise diagnosis is histomorphometric analysis of tetracycline double-labeled bone biopsies. ABD essentially is characterized by low bone turnover, low bone volume, normal mineralization, and markedly decreased cellularity with minimal or no fibrosis. ABD is increasing in prevalence relative to other forms of renal osteodystrophy, and is becoming the most frequent type of bone lesion in some series. ABD develops in situations with reduced osteoanabolic stimulation caused by oversuppression of PTH, multifactorial skeletal resistance to PTH actions in uremia, and/or dysregulation of Wnt signaling. All may contribute not only to bone disease but also to the early vascular calcification processes observed in CKD. Various risk factors have been linked to ABD, including calcium loading, ageing, diabetes, hypogonadism, parathyroidectomy, peritoneal dialysis, and antiresorptive therapies, among others. The relationship between low PTH level, ABD, increased risk fracture, and vascular calcifications may at least partially explain the association of ABD with increased mortality rates. To achieve optimal bone and cardiovascular health, attention should be focused not only on classic control of secondary hyperparathyroidism but also on prevention of ABD, especially in the steadily growing proportions of diabetic, white, and elderly patients. Overcoming the insufficient osteoanabolic stimulation in ABD is the ultimate treatment goal.

Treatment of adynamic bone disease in a haemodialysis patient with teriparatide

Prevalence of adynamic bone disease (ABD), characterized by low bone turnover and absence or a reduced number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, is increasing steadily over the last years. We present a dialysis patient, with recurrent bone fractures and biopsy-proven ABD, who was treated with teriparatide. Nine months after initiation of treatment, iPTH plasma levels increased to 520 pg/mL and a second bone biopsy revealed high bone turnover, normal mineralization and normal bone volume. Two years later, iPTH was 250-350 pg/dL and bone metabolism parameters within normal range. The probable utility of teriparatide in the treatment of ABD in dialysis patients is discussed.

Calcium profiling in hemodiafiltration: a new way to reduce the calcium overload risk without compromising cardiovascular stability

BACKGROUND

Low and high dialysate calcium (Ca²⁺) content may have positive and harmful effects depending on the considered pathological aspect: hemodynamic instability, cardiac arrhythmias, parathormone release, adynamic bone disease, cardio-vascular calcifications. We hypothesized that a time-profiled Ca²⁺ concentration would keep the cardiovascular advantages of high Ca²⁺ but would reduce the risk of calcium overload.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter study using a particular hemodiafiltration technique that allows the profiling of electrolytes was designed. Patients (n = 22) underwent randomly a 3-week dialysis session with low and high constant dialysate Ca²⁺ (Ld(Ca,), 1.25 mM and Hd(Ca,), 2 mM) and profiled Ca²⁺ (Pd(Ca)), respectively. Plasma and spent dialysate Ca²⁺, systolic and diastolic arterial pressure (SAP, DAP) and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Plasma Ca²⁺ concentration decreased in Ld(Ca), whereas it increased in Hd(Ca) and to a lesser extent, in Pd(Ca). Total amount of Ca²⁺ given to the patient in Pd(Ca) (15.5 ± 1.0 mmol) was higher than in Ld(Ca) (4.3 ± 1.6 mmol) but lower than in Hd(Ca) (21.9 ± 3.3 mmol). SAP and DAP decreased in Ld(Ca), whereas it was almost constant in both Hd(Ca) and Pd(Ca·). QTc significantly increased, up to critical values (>460 msec), only during Ld(Ca·).

CONCLUSIONS

Pd(Ca) seems to retain the advantages of high Ca²⁺ in terms of hemodynamic stability and modification of QTc while reducing the excessive positive calcium balance typical of dialysis with high Ca²⁺ content.

Is the dialysate calcium concentration of 1.75 mmol/L suitable for Chinese patients on maintenance hemodialysis?

We studied the effects of increasing the dialysate calcium concentration (DCa) to 1.75 mmol/L on controlling chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder in Chinese patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). We reviewed the data of MHD patients in one center (cohort 1) during prior 10 years and analyzed the risk factors of mortality and transference calcification (TC) in120 MHD patients surviving in 2003 (cohort 2). A multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, controlled trial (cohort 3) was also conducted from January 2011 to December 2012. The DCa at one center was increased from 1.5 to 1.75 mmol/L but was not changed at the other two centers. The clinical outcomes, biochemical parameters, medicine treatments, and TC markers [aortic arch calcification score (AoACS)] were compared between groups. In cohort 1, the annual mean serum iPTH increased significantly over 10 years. In cohort 1, 72 patients survived for 10 years, whose doses of calcium salts and active vitamin D3 and AoACs increased progressively. In cohort 2, the main cause of death was cardiocerebrovascular disease (CCVD) (n = 18, 48.6 %). Male sex and lower serum calcium concentrations were independent risk factors for CCVD mortality. In cohort 3, serum phosphorus, iPTH, and 25(OH)D decreased and serum calcium increased significantly; also, the doses of calcium and vitamin D3 decreased from 2011 to 2012 in the DCa 1.75 group. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes either between groups or between the two calendar years. Our results indicate that increasing DCa to 1.75 mmol/L can decrease the elevated levels of serum iPTH and phosphorus, reduce the doses of calcium and vitamin D3, and be safe for short periods of time.

Acetate free citrate-containing dialysate increase intact-PTH and BAP levels in the patients with low intact-PTH

BACKGROUND

Recently, acetate-free citrate containing dialysate (A(-)D) was developed. We have already reported about the significant effect of A(-)D on metabolic acidosis, anemia, and malnutrition in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. In this study, we compared the effect of A(-)D and acetate containing dialysate (A(+)D) on serum calcium and intact-parathyroid hormone (int-PTH) levels.

METHOD

Single session study: Seventeen patients were treated with A(+)D in one session and also treated with A(-)D in another session. Serum levels of pH, HCO3-, total (t)-calcium, ionized (i)-calcium, and int-PTH were evaluated at the beginning and the end of each session. Cross over study: A total of 29 patients with MHD were treated with A(+)D for 4 months, switched to A(-)D for next 4 months, and returned to A(+)D for the final 4 months.

RESULTS

In single session study, serum i-calcium and t-calcium levels significantly increased, and int-PTH levels decreased after HD with A(+)D, whereas HD with A(-)D did not affect iCa and int-PTH. In cross over study, if all patients were analyzed, there was no significant difference in serum int-PTH or bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) levels during each study period. In contrast, in the patients with low int-PTH (<60 pg/mL), serum levels of int-PTH and BAP were significantly increased during the A(-)D, without significant changes in serum t-calcium or i-calcium levels.

CONCLUSION

A(-)D containing citrate could affect calcium and PTH levels, and, in 4 month period of crossover study, increased int-PTH levels pararelled with increasing BAP levels, exclusively in MHD patients with low int-PTH levels.

Achievements in CKD-MBD guidelines targets: is there a progress in the implementation practice?

BACKGROUND

Guidelines should help the practicing nephrologists to reduce the variability in diagnostic and treatment strategies, and achieve the best possible patients' outcomes. The aim of our study was to look at the treatment strategies and the shortcomings in the implementation of the chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) KDOQI guidelines in dialysis units across the Republic of Macedonia in 2009, and to analyze trends with regard to our previous analysis from 2005.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent in 2009 to all dialysis units in our country for data concerning CKD-MBD in dialysis patients. This study included 742 patients, comparable with the reply we got on the same our 2005 survey, with a total of 588 patients. We collected the last 6 months mean values of biochemical parameters [calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH)], as well as treatment data including dialysate Ca concentration, phosphate binding agents, and vitamin D doses.

RESULTS

The majority of patients in both surveys had values within the target ranges for all parameters, except for iPTH, which was <150 pg/ml in most patients, in both reports. Compared to the 2005 study, in 2009 we found a significantly improved control of all four biochemical parameters, but a greater proportion of patients within guidelines targets was found only for serum Ca (79 vs. 67.4%, P<0.05). Treatment with low Ca dialysate concentration of 1.25 mmol/L continued to be an underused option (3.7 vs. 6.1%), while the 1.75 mmol/L was still the standard dialysate in the majority of patients (57.7 vs. 64.2%). The dose of calcium carbonate was significantly reduced (2.77±1.71 vs. 3.06±1.54, P<0.01) in 2009 compared to 2005. The mean of the achieved targets increased significantly in 2009 (2.33±1.05 vs. 2.13±1.03, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

There was an improved control of all bone and mineral parameters in our dialysis units, following the publication of the CKD-MBD KDOQI guidelines. In order to improve the iPTH values, a more frequent use of low Ca dialysate (1.25 mmol/L) and of non-calcium-based phosphate binders in this small subset of patients should be implemented, as recommended by the guidelines. Individualization of the CKD-MBD management may be successful, even when newer treatment options are not available. Finally, the guidelines implementation process should be a continuous and self-monitored process, with the help of periodic surveys.

Effect of dialysate calcium concentrations on parathyroid hormone and calcium balance during a single dialysis session using bicarbonate hemodialysis: a crossover clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In bicarbonate-based hemodialysis, dialysate total calcium (tCa) concentration may have effects on mineral metabolism.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized crossover trial of 3 dialysate tCa concentrations (2.5, 2.75, and 3.0 mEq/L).

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

22 stable anuric uremic patients underwent three 4-hour bicarbonate hemodialysis sessions with the 3 different dialysate tCa concentrations using a single-pass batch dialysis system.

OUTCOMES

Hourly measurements of plasma water ionized calcium (iCa) and plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. tCa mass balances were measured from the dialysate side.

RESULTS

Hourly plasma water iCa concentrations were higher with a dialysate tCa concentration of 3.0 compared with 2.75 and 2.5 mEq/L (P < 0.05), as were iCa concentrations at the end of dialysis sessions (2.66 ± 0.1, 2.56 ± 0.12, and 2.4 ± 0.08 mEq/L, respectively; P < 0.001). Mean tCa mass balance values (diffusion gradient from the dialysate to the patient) were positive with all dialysate tCa concentrations and increased progressively with dialysate tCa concentration (75 ± 122, 182 ± 125, and 293 ± 228 mg, respectively; P < 0.001). Plasma PTH levels increased during dialysis using dialysate tCa concentration of 2.5 mEq/L (mean increase, 225 ± 312 pg/mL) and decreased with dialysate tCa concentrations of 2.75 and 3.0 mEq/L (mean decreases, 68 ± 325 and 99 ± 432 pg/mL, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and lack of measurement of total-body calcium mass balances.

CONCLUSIONS

A dialysate tCa concentration of 2.75 mEq/L might be preferable to 2.5 or 3.0 mEq/L because it is associated with mildly positive tCa mass balance values, plasma water iCa levels in the reference range, and stable PTH levels during dialysis.

Mumijo traditional medicine: fossil deposits from antarctica (chemical composition and beneficial bioactivity)

Mumijo is a widely used traditional medicine, especially in Russia, Altai Mountains, Mongolia, Iran Kasachstan and in Kirgistan. Mumijo preparations have been successfully used for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases; they display immune-stimulating and antiallergic activity as well. In the present study, we investigate the chemical composition and the biomedical potential of a Mumijo(-related) product collected from the Antarctica. The yellow material originates from the snow petrels, Pagodroma nivea. Extensive purification and chemical analysis revealed that the fossil samples are a mixture of glycerol derivatives. In vitro experiments showed that the Mumijo extract caused in cortical neurons a strong neuroprotective effect against the apoptosis-inducing amyloid peptide fragment β-fragment 25-35 (Aβ25-35). In addition, the fraction rich in glycerol ethers/wax esters displayed a significant growth-promoting activity in permanent neuronal PC12 cells. It is concluded that this new Mumijo preparation has distinct and marked neuroprotective activity, very likely due to the content of glycerol ether derivatives.

Kidney bone disease and mortality in CKD: revisiting the role of vitamin D, calcimimetics, alkaline phosphatase, and minerals

Recent evidence suggests that the traditional syndromes known as renal osteodystrophy, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and vitamin D deficiency are related to mortality in persons with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). The so-called 'kidney bone disease', also known as 'mineral and bone disorders', is defined to include bone disorders, mineral disarrays, and vascular calcification. We have identified 14 common and clinically relevant conditions of contemporary nature that are related to the kidney bone disease, including calcitriol (active vitamin D) deficiency, 25(OH)-vitamin D deficiency, biochemical hyperparathyroidism, relatively low parathyroid hormone (PTH) level, increased serum alkaline phosphatase (hyperphosphatasemia), elevated fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23, high turnover bone disease, adynamic bone disease, uremic osteoporosis, vascular calcification, hyper- and hypophosphatemia, and hyper- and hypocalcemia. We present a critical review of these 14 conditions with emphasis on patient survival and other pertinent clinical outcomes. We also review unresolved controversies surrounding the management of these conditions by administration of nutritional vitamin D (ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol), vitamin D receptor activators (calcitriol, alphacalcidiol, doxercalciferol), D-mimetics (paricalcitol, maxacalcitol), calcimimetics (cinacalcet), recombinant PTH (teriparatide), and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand modulators (denosumab); compare mortality predictability of PTH and alkaline phosphatase; and examine potential risks of bone disorders and mineral disarrays in CKD patients.

Sevelamer and the bone-vascular axis in chronic kidney disease: bone turnover, inflammation, and calcification regulation

Hyperphosphatemia is a central characteristic feature of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Phosphorus excess is an independent cardiovascular risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced CKD. Over the past 40 years, hyperphosphatemia has been a central therapeutic issue in advanced CKD. Mainstays of hyperphosphatemia treatment are reduction of dietary phosphorus, use of phosphate binders, and optimized phosphorus removal via dialysis. Currently, several phosphate binders are approved for use (aluminum, calcium, lanthanum, sevelamer); all share a common functionality in that they bind phosphorus and reduce the amount absorbed in the gastrointestinal lumen. Over the last decade, nephrologists have debated the relative tolerability and efficacy of these agents, especially the potential for vascular calcification and cardiovascular risk reduction. Recent research has focused on the question of whether a metal-free, calcium-free, and non-absorbed binder, such as sevelamer, offers advantages over other binder types. Most notable may be the potential benefit of reducing calcium load. In addition, sevelamer has several additional pleiotropic effects that may extend its basic indication, some of which may help attenuate vascular calcification. These include effects on bone turnover and the link between abnormal vascular processes and bone metabolism (the so-called 'bone-vascular axis'), as well as lipid metabolism, and systemic inflammatory mediators such as fetuin-A. We review the evidence for these pleiotropic effects, and suggest these may help in some way to improve the substantial disease burden in the CKD-MBD population.

The role of bone biopsy in patients with chronic renal failure

Renal bone disease is a heterogeneous group of metabolic bone diseases that requires quantitative bone histomorphometry to make the correct differential diagnosis. Included in this group is osteoporosis. However, osteoporosis in stage 4 to 5 chronic kidney disease cannot be diagnosed on the basis of bone mineral density criteria established by the World Health Organization or the presence of fragility fractures because patients with all forms of renal bone disease can demonstrate low bone mineral density and fragility fractures. Clinical cases in patients with either low bone mineral density and/or low-trauma fractures will be used to demonstrate the value of bone biopsy and quantitative histomorphometry in making a diagnosis of the specific renal bone disease and assisting with subsequent management decisions.

Bone health and vascular calcification relationships in chronic kidney disease

Abnormal bone in chronic kidney disease (CKD) may adversely affect vascular calcification via disordered calcium and phosphate metabolism. In this context, bone health should be viewed as a prerequisite for the successful prevention/treatment of vascular calcification (VC) along with controlled parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion, the use of calcium-based phosphate binders and vitamin D therapy. In CKD patients, VC occurs more frequently and progresses more rapidly than in the general population, and is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. A number of therapies aimed at reducing PTH concentration are associated with an increase of calcaemia and Ca x P product, e.g. calcium-containing phosphate binders or active vitamin D. The introduction of calcium-free phosphate binders has reduced calcium load, attenuating VC and improving trabecular bone content. In addition, a major breakthrough has been achieved through the use of calcimimetics, as first agents which lower PTH without increasing the concentrations of serum calcium and phosphate. Nowadays, it is becoming evident that even early stage CKD is recognised as an independent CVD risk factor. Moreover, the excess of CVD among dialysis patients cannot be explained entirely on the basis of abnormal mineral and bone metabolism. Hence, much controversy has surrounded the cost-effectiveness of treatment with the new phosphate-binding drugs as well as new vitamin D analogs and calcimimetics. Thus, it seems prudent and reasonable that maintaining bone health and mineral homeostasis should rely on some modifications of standard phosphate binding and calcitriol therapy. Hypophosphataemia and hypercalcaemia in adynamic bone disease (ABD) might be treated by reducing the number of calcium carbonate/acetate tablets in order to increase serum phosphate and decrease serum calcium, which, in turn, might positively stimulate PTH secretion. The same rationale is assumed for the use of a low calcium dialysate. On the other hand, secondary hyperparathyroidism with hyperphosphataemia and hypocalcaemia should be treated with a substantial number of calcium carbonate/acetate tablets in combination with calcitriol and low calcium dialysate in order to decrease serum phosphate and maintain the Ca x P product within K/DOQI guidelines (<4.4 mmol l(-1)). Finally, it becomes apparent that prevention, with judicious use of calcium-based binders, vitamin D and a low calcium dialysate without adverse effects on Ca x P or oversuppression of PTH, provides the best management of VC and mineral and bone disorder in CKD patients.