Comparison of clinical risk factors for incident fracture in obese and non-obese community-dwelling older men

Exercise and dietary recommendations to preserve musculoskeletal health during weight loss in adults with obesity: A practical guide

Obesity adversely impacts musculoskeletal health, contributing to functional limitations and an increased risk for falls, fractures and disability. Weight loss can mitigate these effects, but strategies that neglect to incorporate evidence-based dietary and/or exercise approaches can exacerbate musculoskeletal and functional declines. Sustainable weight loss requires a personalised approach that prioritises adequate protein intake and essential nutrients to preserve musculoskeletal health. To enhance adherence and long-term success, dietary strategies should be practical, nutritionally balanced and cost-effective. Similarly, exercise programmes should be individually tailored and progressive, with resistance training central to any program prescribed in the context of weight loss, due to its critical role in maintaining muscle and bone mass and strength. When prescribing weight loss strategies involving lifestyle behaviour changes, clinicians must consider their patient's readiness to change. We have used the transtheoretical model of change framework as an example to identify a patient's level of readiness and provided associated motivational interviewing-based strategies to enhance adherence and engagement. This review outlines evidence-based, practical diet and exercise recommendations and behavioural strategies that can facilitate effective and sustainable weight loss, which is particularly important for at-risk populations such as older adults.

Bone health in adults with obesity before and after interventions to promote weight loss

Obesity and its associated comorbidities constitute a serious and growing public health burden. Fractures affect a substantial proportion of people with obesity and result from reduced bone strength relative to increased mechanical loading, together with an increased risk of falls. Factors contributing to fractures in people with obesity include adverse effects of adipose tissue on bone and muscle and, in many people, the coexistence of type 2 diabetes. Strategies to reduce weight include calorie-restricted diets, exercise, bariatric surgery, and pharmacological interventions with GLP-1 receptor agonists. However, although weight loss in people with obesity has many health benefits, it can also have adverse skeletal effects, with increased bone loss and fracture risk. Priorities for future research include the development of effective approaches to reduce fracture risk in people with obesity and the investigation of the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on bone loss resulting from weight reduction.

Structural equation model analysis of the effect of visceral fat on osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a considerable public health challenge in Moyu County, Xinjiang. Here, we evaluated the influencing factors of osteoporosis in this region.

METHODS

We recruited 7,761 participants and randomized them into normal and osteoporotic populations based on T-score. The effects of general conditions, body composition, calcium sources and exercise, respiratory exposure, and daily diet on osteoporosis were analyzed. Furthermore, a structural equation model was constructed to uncover the direct and indirect influencing factors of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 1,803 (23.23%) had normal bone mass while 1,496 (19.28%) had osteoporosis. The univariate analysis showed significant differences in the general conditions, body composition, calcium sources and exercise, respiratory exposure, and daily diet. Stratification based on age (45 years) and body mass index (BMI) (18.5 kg/m2) showed variations in the body composition between the two groups; however, the visceral fat differed significantly. Logistic regression analysis affirmed the association of visceral fat index as it was included in all equations, except for age and female menopause. The structural equation exhibited that the general conditions, body composition, and, calcium sources, and exercise were direct factors of osteoporosis, while respiratory exposure and daily diet were indirect factors. The standardized path coefficient was highest in general conditions, followed by body composition, and lastly, calcium sources and exercise.

CONCLUSION

Obesity, besides age and female menopause, is also an influencing factor of osteoporosis. The visceral fat index plays a vital role in osteoporosis. Our findings may provide experimental evidence for early prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Associations between body composition and the risk of fracture according to bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a population-based database cohort study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the associations of body composition and the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women, stratified based on bone mineral density.

METHODS

A population-based cohort study using the database of the National Screening Program for Transitional Ages with women aged 66 years was performed. Bone mineral density was categorized as normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis. The following body mass index (BMI) categories for general obesity were used: underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5-22.9), overweight (23-24.9), obese (25-29.9), and severely obese (≥30 kg/m2). Waist circumference (WC) used for central obesity assessment was categorized into 5 groups. Newly diagnosed fracture during the follow-up period defined based on ICD-10 codes was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

During 7.7 ± 1.4 years of follow-up, 41 672 (17.9%) participants experienced any fracture, 20 326 (8.7%) experienced vertebral fractures (VFs), and 2883 (1.2%) experienced hip fractures (HFs). The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for any fracture showed a progressive increase with higher BMI and WC categories in individual with osteopenia and osteoporosis. Regarding VF, aHR was highest in severely obese individuals with osteoporosis (aHR [95% CI], 3.45 [2.99-3.97]) and in individuals with WC ≥ 95 cm with osteoporosis (4.79 [4.09-5.60]). The aHR [95% CI] for HF was highest in the underweight group with osteopenia (1.94 [1.16-3.27]) and osteoporosis (2.96 [2.15-4.10]). In central obesity individuals with WC ≥ 95 cm, aHR [95% CI] for HF was 2.80 [1.91-4.91].

CONCLUSIONS

General obesity and central obesity are not protective against any fracture, VF and HF in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Obesity and Bone Health: A Complex Relationship

Recent scientific evidence has shown an increased risk of fractures in patients with obesity, especially in those with a higher visceral adipose tissue content. This contradicts the old paradigm that obese patients were more protected than those with normal weight. Specifically, in older subjects in whom there is a redistribution of fat from subcutaneous adipose tissue to visceral adipose tissue and an infiltration of other tissues such as muscle with the consequent sarcopenia, obesity can accentuate the changes characteristic of this age group that predisposes to a greater risk of falls and fractures. Other factors that determine a greater risk in older subjects with obesity are chronic proinflammatory status, altered adipokine secretion, vitamin D deficiency, insulin resistance and reduced mobility. On the other hand, diagnostic tests may be influenced by obesity and its comorbidities as well as by body composition, and risk scales may underestimate the risk of fractures in these patients. Weight loss with physical activity programs and cessation of high-fat diets may reduce the risk. Finally, more research is needed on the efficacy of anti-osteoporotic treatments in obese patients.

Falls, fractures, and areal bone mineral density in older adults with sarcopenic obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sarcopenia and obesity are common conditions in older adults that may have differing effects on falls and fracture risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether older adults with sarcopenic obesity have increased risk of falls and fractures or lower bone mass compared with older adults with sarcopenia, obesity, or neither condition. Twenty-six studies (n = 37,124) were included in the systematic review and 17 (n = 31,540) were included in the meta-analysis. Older adults with sarcopenic obesity had lower femoral neck areal bone mineral density (aBMD) compared with those with obesity alone but had higher femoral neck aBMD compared with counterparts with sarcopenia alone (both P < 0.05). Older adults with sarcopenic obesity had higher nonvertebral fracture rates (incidence rate ratio: 1.88; 95% confidence intervals: 1.09, 3.23; based on two studies), compared with those with sarcopenia alone, and also had higher falls risk compared with controls (risk ratio: 1.30; 95% confidence intervals: 1.10, 1.54) and obesity alone (risk ratio: 1.17; 95% confidence intervals: 1.01, 1.36). In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis has demonstrated that older adults with sarcopenic obesity are at increased risk of adverse musculoskeletal outcomes compared with individuals with obesity, sarcopenia, or neither condition. These data support the need for developing interventions to improve bone health and physical function in this population.

Incidence and predictors of fractures in older adults with and without obesity defined by body mass index versus body fat percentage

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine and compare risk factors associated with incident fractures in older adults with and without obesity, defined by both body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage.

METHODS

1,099 older adults (mean ± standard deviation age = 63.0 ± 7.5) years, participated in this prospective cohort study. Obesity status at baseline was defined by BMI (≥30 kg/m²) obtained by anthropometry and body fat percentage (≥30% for men and ≥40% for women) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Total hip and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) were assessed by DXA up to five years. Incident fractures were self-reported up to 10 years.

RESULTS

Prevalence of obesity was 28% according to BMI and 43% according to body fat percentage. Obese older adults by BMI, but not body fat percentage, had significantly higher aBMD at the total hip and spine compared with non-obese (both p-value<0.05). Obese older adults by body fat percentage had significantly higher likelihood of all incident fractures (OR: 1.71; CI:1.08, 2.71) and non-vertebral fractures (OR: 1.88; CI:1.16, 3.04) compared with non-obese after adjusting for confounders. Conversely, obese older adults by BMI had a significantly lower likelihood (OR: 0.54; CI:0.31, 0.94) of non-vertebral fractures although this was no longer significant after adjustment for total hip aBMD (all p-value > 0.05). Mediation analysis confirmed that aBMD meditated the effects of BMI, but not body fat percentage, on all incident fractures. Higher baseline falls risk score was the only consistent predictor of increased likelihood of incident fracture in obese individuals only, according to both BMI and body fat percentage (both p-value<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity defined by body fat percentage is associated with increased likelihood of incident fractures in community-dwelling older adults, whereas those who are obese according to BMI have reduced likelihood of incident fracture which appears to be explained by higher aBMD. Falls risk assessment may improve identification of obese older adults at increased risk of incident fractures.