1
|
Shin SH, Chae HD, Suprana A, Jerban S, Chang EY, Shi L, Sah RL, Pettus JH, Woods GN, Du J. UTE MRI technical developments and applications in osteoporosis: a review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2025; 16:1510010. [PMID: 39980853 PMCID: PMC11839439 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1510010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a metabolic bone disease that affects more than 10 million people in the USA and leads to over two million fractures every year. The disease results in serious long-term disability and death in a large number of patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is the current standard in assessing fracture risk; however, the majority of fractures cannot be explained by BMD alone. Bone is a composite material of mineral, organic matrix, and water. While bone mineral provides stiffness and strength, collagen provides ductility and the ability to absorb energy before fracturing, and water provides viscoelasticity and poroelasticity. These bone components are arranged in a complex hierarchical structure. Both material composition and physical structure contribute to the unique strength of bone. The contribution of mineral to bone's mechanical properties has dominated scientific thinking for decades, partly because collagen and water are inaccessible using X-ray based techniques. Accurate evaluation of bone requires information about its components (mineral, collagen, water) and structure (cortical porosity, trabecular microstructure), which are all important in maintaining the mechanical integrity of bone. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used to diagnose soft tissue diseases, but bone is "invisible" with clinical MRI due to its short transverse relaxation time. This review article discusses using ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences to evaluate bone composition and structure. Both morphological and quantitative UTE MRI techniques are introduced. Their applications in osteoporosis are also briefly discussed. These UTE-MRI advancements hold great potential for improving the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases by providing a more comprehensive assessment of bone quantity and quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Hyun Shin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Hee Dong Chae
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Arya Suprana
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Saeed Jerban
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Eric Y. Chang
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Lingyan Shi
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Robert L. Sah
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Jeremy H. Pettus
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Gina N. Woods
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Jiang Du
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Surowiec RK, Does MD, Nyman JS. In Vivo Assessment of Bone Quality Without X-rays. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2024; 22:56-68. [PMID: 38227178 PMCID: PMC11050740 DOI: 10.1007/s11914-023-00856-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes recent advances in the assessment of bone quality using non-X-ray techniques. RECENT FINDINGS Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) provides multiple measurements of bone characteristics based on the propagation of sound through bone, the attenuation of that sound, and different processing techniques. QUS parameters and model predictions based on backscattered signals can discriminate non-fracture from fracture cases with accuracy comparable to standard bone mineral density (BMD). With advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bound water and pore water, or a porosity index, can be quantified in several long bones in vivo. Since such imaging-derived measurements correlate with the fracture resistance of bone, they potentially provide new BMD-independent predictors of fracture risk. While numerous measurements of mineral, organic matrix, and bound water by Raman spectroscopy correlate with the strength and toughness of cortical bone, the clinical assessment of person's bone quality using spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS) requires advanced spectral processing techniques that minimize contaminating signals from fat, skin, and blood. Limiting exposure of patients to ionizing radiation, QUS, MRI, and SORS has the potential to improve the assessment of fracture risk and track changes of new therapies that target bone matrix and micro-structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Surowiec
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S. Martin Jischke Dr., West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N. University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Mark D Does
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 5824 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
- Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. S., Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. S., Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave. S., Nashville, TN, 37212, USA
| | - Jeffry S Nyman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 5824 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Ave. S., Suite 4200, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
- Vanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr., Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|