Associations between trabecular bone score and biochemistry in surgically vs conservatively treated outpatients with primary hyperparathyroidism: A retrospective cohort study

Trabecular bone score as a possible new surgical recommendation in patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism

PURPOSE

TBS usefulness in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) management is uncertain. The primary aim was to evaluate the significance of performing Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in addition to classical PHPT surgical recommendations. The explorative objective was to characterize bone quality in a cohort of patients with asymptomatic PHPT.

METHODS

From 1/1/2021 to 5/31/2024, of 265 consecutively evaluated PHPT patients, 125 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients underwent complete biochemical evaluation in the same laboratory, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at three sites, TBS with the same densitometer, and renal ultrasound. We retrospectively applied to each patient all the criteria to recommend parathyroidectomy as per the Fifth International Workshop, adding also TBS ≤ 1.2.

RESULTS

Almost one-third of patients presented degraded TBS (≤ 1.2), 36.0% partially degraded TBS, and 31.2% preserved TBS (≥ 1.35). Mean TBS was partially degraded (1.286 ± 0.134). Osteoporotic patients had lower TBS than osteopenic patients (1.207 ± 0.101 vs. 1.27 9 ± 0.110; p <.001). Patients with degraded TBS had a greater number of fragility fractures than those with TBS > 1.2 (34.2% vs. 8.3%; p <.001). In the group of osteopenic patients (34.4%), 10/43 (23.3%) showed degraded TBS. 13 patients (10.4%) did not meet any surgical criteria, and of these, 3/13 (23.1%) had degraded TBS and were osteopenic.

CONCLUSION

More than one-fifth of patients who did not meet the current surgical recommendations presented degraded TBS and osteopenia. The combination of degraded TBS and osteopenia as a possible new surgical recommendation could increase the number of patients who might benefit from curative parathyroidectomy, with potential reduction of fracture risk.

Bone properties in persons with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls - A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The risk of fractures is increased in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assessment of bone health has been included in the 2024 updated Standards of Care by The American Diabetes Association (ADA). Previous studies have found that in T1D bone metabolism, mineral content, microstructure, and strength diverge from that of persons without diabetes. However, a clear description of a T1D bone phenotype has not yet been established. We investigated bone mechanical properties and microstructure in T1D compared with healthy controls. For the potential future introduction of additional bone measures in the clinical fracture risk assessment, we aimed to assess any potential associations between various measures related to bone indices in subjects with T1D.

METHODS

We studied human bone indices in a clinical cross-sectional setup including 111 persons with early-onset T1D and 37 sex- and age-matched control persons. Participants underwent hip and spine DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS), and TBS evaluation, microindentation of the tibial shaft for Bone Material Strength index (BMSi), and high-resolution periphery quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) of the distal radius and tibia for volumetric BMD (vBMD) and structural measures of trabecular and cortical bone. Results are reported as means with (standard deviation) or (95 % confidence intervals (CI)), medians with [interquartile range], and differences are reported with (95 % CI).

RESULTS

The study included 148 persons aged 20 to 75 years with a median age of 43.2 years. The T1D group who had all been diagnosed with T1D before the age of 18 years demonstrated values of HbA1c ranging from 39 to 107 mmol/mol and a median HbA1c of 57 mmol/mol. The BMD did not differ between groups (the mean difference in FN-BMD was 0.026 g/cm2 (-0.026; 0.079), p = 0.319) and the median BMSi was comparable in the two groups (79.2 [73.6; 83.8] in the T1D group compared with 77.9 [70.5, 86.1] in the control group). Total and trabecular vBMD (Tb.vBMD), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) of both radius and tibia were lower in participants with T1D. The mean Tb.vBMD at the radius was 143.6 (38.5) mg/cm3 in the T1D group and 171.5 (37.7) mg/cm3 in the control group, p < 0.001. The mean Ct. Thd of the radius was 0.739 mm (0.172) in the T1D group and 0.813 (0.188) in the control group, p = 0.044. Crude linear regressions revealed limited agreement between BMSi and Tb.vBMD (p = 0.010, r2 = 0.040 at the radius and p = 0.008, r2 = 0.040 at the tibia and between BMSi and the estimated failure load (FL) at the tibia (p < 0.001, r2 = 0.090). There were no significant correlations between BMSi and Ct.Th. TBS correlated with Tb.vBMD at the radius (p = 0.008, r2 = 0.044) and the tibia (p = 0.001, r2 = 0.069), and with the estimated FL at the distal tibia (p = 0.038, r2 = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we examined the bones of persons with well-controlled, early-onset T1D. Compared with sex- and age-matched healthy control persons, we found reduced total and trabecular vBMD, as well as decreased trabecular and cortical thickness. These results suggest that a debut of T1D before reaching peak bone mass negatively impacts bone microarchitecture. No differences in areal BMD or BMSi were observed. Although the variations in total hip BMD reflect some variation in the vBMD, the reduction in trabecular bone mineral density was not captured by the DXA scan. Consequently, fracture risk may be underestimated when relying on DXA, and further research into fracture risk assessment in T1D is warranted.

Classical and Nonclassical Manifestations of Primary Hyperparathyroidism

This narrative review summarizes data on classical and nonclassical manifestations of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). It is based on a rigorous literature search, inclusive of a Medline search for systematic reviews from 1940 to December 2020, coupled with a targeted search for original publications, covering four databases, from January 2013-December 2020, and relevant articles from authors' libraries. We present the most recent information, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest a research agenda. The shift in the presentation of PHPT from a predominantly symptomatic to an asymptomatic disease, with its varied manifestations, has presented several challenges. Subclinical nephrolithiasis and vertebral fractures are common in patients with asymptomatic disease. The natural history of asymptomatic PHPT with no end organ damage at diagnosis is unclear. Some observational and cross-sectional studies continue to show associations between PHPT and cardiovascular and neuropsychological abnormalities, among the different disease phenotypes. Their causal relationship is uncertain. Limited new data are available on the natural history of skeletal, renal, cardiovascular, neuropsychological, and neuromuscular manifestations and quality of life. Normocalcemic PHPT (NPHPT) is often diagnosed without the fulfillment of rigorous criteria. Randomized clinical trials have not demonstrated a consistent long-term benefit of parathyroidectomy (PTX) versus observation on nonclassical manifestations. We propose further refining the definition of asymptomatic disease, into two phenotypes: one without and one with evidence of target organ involvement, upon the standard evaluation detailed in our recommendations. Each of these phenotypes can present with or without non-classical manifestations. We propose multiple albumin-adjusted serum calcium determinations (albumin-adjusted and ionized) and exclusion of all secondary causes of high parathyroid hormone (PTH) when establishing the diagnosis of NPHPT. Refining the definition of asymptomatic disease into the phenotypes proposed will afford insights into their natural history and response to interventions. This would also pave the way for the development of evidence-based guidance and recommendations. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Trabecular bone score in people with cystic fibrosis

People with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at increased risk of fractures. Our study found that low trabecular bone score (TBS) (a measure of bone strength) may help identify people with CF at risk of fractures especially when combined with bone density measured by DXA, age, hemoglobin A1c, and transplant status.

INTRODUCTION

People with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at increased risk of fractures. This study aims to evaluate the association of trabecular bone score (TBS) with fractures in CF.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of adults with CF who completed bone density between 2009 and 2019. TBS was applied to lumbar spine studies.

RESULTS

A total of 202 people with CF were included. A history of fracture was present in 36 (17.8%) subjects. Patients with history of fractures had higher hemoglobin A1c (A1C) (7.8 ± 2.7% vs. 6.7 ± 1.7%, p = 0.024), lower femoral neck (FN) Z/T-score (- 1.05 ± 1.08 vs. - 0.44 ± 1.08, p = 0.012), and lower TBS (1.36 ± 0.13 vs. 1.40 ± 0.11, p = 0.05) compared to those without. Lung transplant recipients had a higher prevalence of fractures (50% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001). The odds ratio (95%CI) of having a fracture for subjects with TBS (≤ 1.2 vs. > 1.2) stratified by FN Z/T-score (≤ - 2.0 or >  - 2.0) was 3.88 (0.92, 16.35), p = 0.07. ROC analysis showed TBS was significantly associated with fractures (p < 0.05); however, FN BMD was superior. A model combining FN BMD, age, A1c, transplant, and TBS improved ROC compared to FN BMD + age (0.837 vs. 0.779, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

TBS ≤ 1.2 may identify people with CF at high risk of fractures. A model combining FN BMD, age, A1c, transplant, and TBS was significantly associated with fractures compared to FN BMD + age. Future studies are needed to evaluate the prediction of fractures in people with CF using clinical and bone parameters.

Body Composition as a Modulator of Bone Health Changes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Bone impairment of multifactorial etiology is a common feature in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Body composition parameters, which might be selectively modified in these patients, are important determinants of bone strength. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between components of body composition and bone parameters in IBD patients. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study including 80 IBD patients (43 women, 37 men). Lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and whole body DXA scans were performed to analyze regional bone mineral density (BMD), as well as body composition, including appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), total and visceral fat mass (VAT). Trabecular bone score (TBS) was assessed using iNsight Software. Results: Twenty (25%) IBD patients had inadequate LS-BMD z scores (<=−2DS). Lean mass (LM) was a significant determinant of LS-BMD, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI and fat mass (p < 0.01), while fat mass% remained associated with FN-BMD (p < 0.01). TBS correlated positively with BMI (r = 0.24, p < 0.05), LS-BMD (r = 0.56, p < 0.001), ASMI (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) and negatively with VAT/total fat% (r = −0.27, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that ASMI, LS-BMD (positively) and VAT/total fat% (negatively) were independently associated with TBS. Conclusions: In IBD patients, skeletal muscle mass and fat percentage and distribution are important factors associated with bone health.

Skeletal abnormalities in Hypoparathyroidism and in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Both hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT), as well as its pathological counterpart, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), can lead to skeletal abnormalities. Chronic deficiency of PTH in patients with HypoPT is associated with a profound reduction in bone remodeling, with consequent increases in bone density, and abnormalities in microarchitecture and bone strength. It is still not clear whether there is an increase in fracture risk in HypoPT. While standard therapy with calcium supplements and active vitamin D does not restore bone homeostasis, treatment of HypoPT with PTH appears to correct some of those abnormalities. In PHPT, the continuous exposure to high levels of PTH causes an increase in bone remodeling, in which bone resorption prevails. In the symptomatic form of PHPT, patients can present with fragility fractures, and/or the classical radiological features of osteitis fibrosa cystica. However, even in mild PHPT, catabolic skeletal actions of PTH are evident through reduced BMD, deterioration of bone microarchitecture and increased risk of fragility fractures. Successful parathyroidectomy improves skeletal abnormalities. Medical treatment, such as bisphosphonates and denosumab, can also increase bone density in patients with PHPT who do not undergo surgery. This article reviews skeletal involvement in HypoPT and in PHPT, as assessed by bone remodeling, DXA, trabecular bone score, and quantitative computed tomography, as well as data on bone strength and fracture risk. The effects of PTH replacement on the skeleton in subjects with HypoPT, and the outcome of parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT, are also reviewed here.

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in Primary Hyperparathyroidism (PHPT): A Useful Tool?

Primary Hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) often leads to bone loss, even in its asymptomatic presentations. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) is a method to assess the trabecular bone structure of the spine. This study aimed to evaluate TBS measurements combined with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) values in the search for more accurate bone fragility risk assessment among PHPT patients. From 2017 to 2019, patients diagnosed with PHPT (n = 64), before surgery, were invited to participate in this study. Bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, distal third radius, and TBS were determined in patients and controls (n = 63). The vertebral fracture was defined using the Genant method in vertebral images by DXA and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). Patients and controls did not differ in age, sex, menopausal status, or body mass index (BMI). The PHPT patients presented significantly lower BMD values than the controls in all sites evaluated. The TBS measurements were also statistically lower in PHPT patients than controls (mean TBS PHPT = 1.233 vs TBS controls = 1.280, p = 0.044). Osteoporosis was observed in 50% of PHPT patients and 26.6% of controls (p = 0.02). However, lumbar spine T-Score < -2.5 was observed only in 21.8% of PHPT patients. Vertebral fractures were detected in nine individuals (14%) from the PHPT group and four (6.3%) in the controls (p = 0.24). The TBS area under the curve (AUC) was higher than DXA AUC in all sites, for vertebral fracture assessment. The TBS AUC was significant in the PHPT group (0.75, 95% CI 0.62 - 0.88, p = 0.02) and not significant in the DXA analysis. The ROC curve showed that TBS values < 1.187 are associated with a significantly higher risk of vertebral fracture among PHPT patients (p = 0.02). The TBS used as a complement to DXA measurements is a useful tool which may better assess fragility risk among PHPT patients.

Assessment of Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk in Mastocytosis Within a North American Cohort

BACKGROUND

Systemic mastocytosis (SM), a clonal expansion of mast cells affecting multiple organs including the skeletal system, puts patients at risk for osteoporosis and fractures. Various aspects of skeletal disease in SM have been reported among European cohorts.

OBJECTIVE

To determine fracture prevalence and risk predictors in SM in a North American (NA) cohort and compare findings with studies of other populations.

METHODS

Fifty patients, aged 25-74 years, were grouped based on fracture type and history. Data collected included laboratory findings and radiographic markers such as serum tryptase, bone turnover markers, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images, and trabecular bone scores. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of these findings.

RESULTS

Fracture history was found in 74% of patients. Significantly different median age, body mass index, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scores, and alkaline phosphatase levels were observed between fracture groups, consistent with French and Dutch studies. Significant findings included the difference in trabecular bone scores among fracture groups, the association between alkaline phosphatase and fracture type and occurrence, and the model for predicting fracture risk based on DXA spine T-scores, alkaline phosphatase, and age (81.3% accuracy and 77.1% sensitivity).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings in an NA cohort are in overall agreement with those reported in European studies of skeletal disease and fracture risk for individuals with SM. We include an interactive calculator designed from a predictive model based on the NA cohort, which may be used for improved screening for fracture risk.

DXA-Based Bone Strain Index: A New Tool to Evaluate Bone Quality in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

CONTEXT

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is associated with impaired bone quality and increased fracture risk. Reliable tools for the evaluation of bone quality parameters are not yet clinically available. Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new metric for bone strength based on Finite Element Analysis from lumbar spine and femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BSI in PHPT patients compared with controls and to investigate the association of BSI with vertebral fractures (VFs) in PHPT.

METHODS

This case-control study enrolled 50 PHPT patients and 100 age- and sex-matched control subjects from an outpatient clinic. The main outcome measures were LS-BSI, FN-BSI, and TH-BSI.

RESULTS

FN bone mineral density (BMD) and one-third distal radius BMD were lower in the PHPT group than in controls (FN 0.633 ± 0.112 vs 0.666 ± 0.081, P = 0.042; radius 0.566 ± 0.07 vs 0.625 ± 0.06, P < 0.001). PHPT group has significant lower TBS score compared with controls (1.24 ± 0.09 vs 1.30 ± 0.10, P < 0.001). BSI was significantly higher at LS (2.28 ± 0.59 vs 2.02 ± 0.43, P = 0.009), FN (1.72 ± 0.41 vs 1.49 ± 0.35, P = 0.001), and TH (1.51 ± 0.33 vs 1.36 ± 0.25, P = 0.002) in PHPT. LS-BSI showed moderate accuracy for discriminating VFs (AUC 0.667; 95% CI, 0.513-0.820). LS-BSI ≥ 2.2 and was a statistically significant independent predictor of VFs, with an adjusted odds ratio ranging from 5.7 to 15.1.

CONCLUSION

BSI, a DXA-derived bone quality index, is impaired in PHPT and may help to identify PHPT subjects at high risk of fractures.

Bone Quality as Measured by Trabecular Bone Score in Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism

OBJECTIVE

The impact of normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) on bone quality remains largely unexplored. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of trabecular bone score (TBS) assessment in NHPT and the accuracy of TBS in predicting vertebral fractures (VFs) in NHPT.

METHODS

In this multicentric cross-sectional study, we assessed the TBS in 47 subjects with NHPT, 41 with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), and 39 age- and sex-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

TBS values did not differ among the 3 groups. The prevalence of low TBS (TBS < 1.2) was 23.4% in NHPT, 26.8% in PHPT, and 15.4% in controls, without statistically significant differences between groups. However, we found a lower lumbar spine Z-score adjusted for TBS (LS Z-score∗TBS) in PHPT participants when compared with controls (-0.48 ± 1.06 vs 0.07 ± 0.93, P = .017). In NHPT group, LS Z-score∗TBS did not detect patients with overall VFs (threshold, -0.15; area under the curve, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.253-0.648; accuracy, 55.3%). Instead, it was useful for moderate-severe VFs (threshold, 0.55; area under the curve, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-0.996; accuracy, 83%). In PHPT subjects also, TBS did not predict VFs.

CONCLUSION

In NHPT, TBS is not reduced. When adjusted for TBS, the LS Z-score might predict moderate-to-severe VFs.

Effects of PTH and PTH Hypersecretion on Bone: a Clinical Perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hyperparathyroidism may be due to an autonomous hypersecretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH) or occurs in response to a number of physiological stimuli. A number of recent findings have provided new insights into the importance of the calcium-parathyroid-vitamin D axis to bone in normal physiology and pathological conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

PTH is known to affect bone microarchitecture with different effects on cortical and trabecular bone compartments. In trabecular bone, PTH may exert anabolic effects, whereas PTH promotes bone resorption in cortical bone. Vertebral fractures are prevalent in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), and patients seem to fracture at higher values of bone mineral density (BMD) than patients with osteoporosis. This may be explained by changes in bone microarchitecture, which cannot be detected by measuring BMD. Even in mild PHPT, bone seems to benefit from parathyroidectomy. In secondary hyperparathyroidism, bone seems much more susceptible to fracture with insufficient levels of vitamin D compared with a replete vitamin status. If elevated PTH levels cannot be explained by conditions known to cause secondary hyperparathyroidism, the condition is termed normocalcemic PHPT, which also has been associated with an increased risk of fractures. Hyperparathyroidism is harmful to bone, which is why it is of importance to normalize PTH levels either by parathyroidectomy in PHPT or by counteracting conditions known to increase PTH in secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Mild primary hyperparathyroidism-to treat or not to treat?

INTRODUCTION

The presentation of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has shifted from a disease characterized by renal and skeletal complications to a mild or asymptomatic condition. Modern imaging allows localization of a surgical target in the majority of cases.

SOURCES OF DATA

Data were collected from literature searches of online databases including PUBMED, MEDLINE and Cochrane. A narrative review was performed.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Parathyroidectomy is the only therapy with curative potential with good outcomes and low risk of complications in experienced hands. Current guidelines advocate that surgery is offered in all symptomatic cases and in those who meet criteria depending on age, serum calcium concentration, skeletal and renal parameters. A structured monitoring approach should be offered to those who do not undergo surgery.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Thresholds for intervention to improve skeletal and renal outcomes are debatable. In addition, controversy persists over the benefit of surgery for non-skeletal/renal outcomes.

GROWING POINTS

The role of medical management of PHPT using agents such as bisphosphonates, denosumab and cinacalcet are discussed.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

In summary, further data on the natural history and effects of treatment of mild and asymptomatic PHPT are required to determine thresholds for surgery. In particular, further investigations of non-skeletal and non-renal parameters, such as neurocognitive quality of life and cardiovascular disease are required. Data on normocalcaemic PHPT are lacking. Large-scale randomized controlled trials would be welcome in these areas, however in view of the cost implications a more pragmatic approach may be to develop collaborative multi-centre registries.