Hereditary pancreatic cancer

Biomarkers, omics and artificial intelligence for early detection of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently diagnosed in its late stages when treatment options are limited. Unlike other common cancers, there are no population-wide screening programmes for PDAC. Thus, early disease detection, although urgently needed, remains elusive. Individuals in certain high-risk groups are, however, offered screening or surveillance. Here we explore advances in understanding high-risk groups for PDAC and efforts to implement biomarker-driven detection of PDAC in these groups. We review current approaches to early detection biomarker development and the use of artificial intelligence as applied to electronic health records (EHRs) and social media. Finally, we address the cost-effectiveness of applying biomarker strategies for early detection of PDAC.

Molecular structure and mechanism of protein MSMB, TPPP3, SPI1: Construction of novel 4 pancreatic cancer-related protein signatures model based on machine learning

The high mortality rate of pancreatic cancer is closely related to its inconspicuous early symptoms and difficult diagnosis. In recent years, with the rapid development of proteomics and bioinformatics, the use of machine learning technology to analyze protein characteristics provides a new idea for the early diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. The main purpose of this study is to deeply analyze the molecular mechanism and action mechanism of MSMB, TPPP3 and SPI1, which are closely related to pancreatic cancer, by constructing a feature model based on machine learning. The study collected a large number of proteomic data from pancreatic cancer patients and screened out candidate proteins associated with pancreatic cancer. Then the molecular characteristics of MSMB, TPPP3 and SPI1 were analyzed by bioinformatics tools. On this basis, machine learning algorithms were used to model the expression patterns and functions of these proteins. The accuracy and generalization ability of the model were verified by cross-validation and independent test sets, and finally a feature model that effectively distinguished pancreatic cancer from normal tissue was determined. Through the construction and verification of the machine learning model, we found that the expression patterns of MSMB, TPPP3 and SPI1 proteins in pancreatic cancer tissues were significantly different. The expression of MSMB protein is down-regulated in pancreatic cancer tissue, while the expression of TPPP3 and SPI1 protein is up-regulated. Further functional analysis indicated that MSMB may be involved in the development of pancreatic cancer through regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis, TPPP3 may be related to cytoskeleton stability and cell migration ability, and SPI1 may play an important role in immune escape of pancreatic cancer. These findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic cancer.

The Landscape of PARP Inhibitors in Solid Cancers

PARP inhibitors are a class of agents that have shown significant preclinical activity in models defective in homologous recombination (HR). The identification of synthetic lethality between HR defects and PARP inhibition led to several clinical trials in tumors with known HR defects (initially mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and subsequently in other genes involved in HR). These studies demonstrated significant responses in breast and ovarian cancers, which are known to have a significant proportion of patients with HR defects. Since the approval of the first PARP inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib, several other inhibitors have been developed, expanding the armamentarium available to clinicians in this setting. The positive results obtained in breast and ovarian cancer have expanded the use of PARPi in other solid tumors with HR defects, including prostate and pancreatic cancer in which these defects have been identified. The clinical trials have demonstrated responses to PARPi which are now also available for the subset of patients with prostate and pancreatic cancer with HR defects. This review summarizes the results obtained in solid tumors with PARPi and their potential use when combined with other agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors that are likely to further increase the survival of these patients which still needs a dramatic improvement.

Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Genetic Testing, Early Detection Strategies, and Personalized Management

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a five-year survival rate of approximately 13% for advanced stages. While the majority of PDAC cases are sporadic, a significant subset is attributable to hereditary and familial predispositions, accounting for approximately 25% of cases. This article synthesizes recent advancements in the understanding, detection, and management of hereditary pancreatic cancer (PC). Results: Our review highlights the critical role of genetic testing (GT) in identifying high-risk individuals (HRIs), with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) found in up to 20% of hereditary PDAC cases. Since the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in 2014, detection capabilities have been significantly enhanced. HRIs can be included in screening programs that facilitate the early detection of PDAC. Early detection strategies, including the use of microribonucleic acid (miRNAs) signatures and novel imaging techniques like hyperpolarized 13C-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) have shown promising results. The identification of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) or mutations in homologous recombination (HR) genes plays a predictive role in the response to various treatments, prolonging patient survival. Discussion: Universal germline testing for PDAC, as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), is now a standard practice, facilitating the identification of at-risk individuals and enabling targeted surveillance and intervention. Multidisciplinary management, integrating genetic counseling, imaging, and gastrointestinal services, is essential for optimizing outcomes. Conclusions: Advances in genetic testing and biomarker research are transforming the landscape of hereditary PC management. Early detection and personalized treatment strategies are pivotal in improving survival rates. Ongoing multi-institutional research efforts are crucial for validating biomarkers and developing preventive measures, ultimately aiming to reduce the burden of this aggressive cancer.

Exploring the Common Mutational Landscape in Cutaneous Melanoma and Pancreatic Cancer

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) and pancreatic cancer are aggressive tumors whose incidences are rapidly increasing in the last years. This review aims to provide a complete and update description about mutational landscape in CM and pancreatic cancer, focusing on similarities of these two apparently so different tumors in terms of site, type of cell involved, and embryonic origin. The familial forms of CM and pancreatic cancers are often characterized by a common mutated gene, namely CDKN2A. In fact, a germline mutation in CDKN2A gene can be responsible for the development of the familial atypical multiple mole and melanoma syndrome (FAMMM), which is characterized by melanomas and pancreatic cancer development. Sporadic melanoma and pancreatic cancer showed different key-driven genes. The open-access resource cBioPortal has been explored to deepen and investigate the common mutational landscape of these two tumors. We investigated the common mutated genes found in both melanoma and pancreatic cancer with a frequency of at least 5% of tested patients and copy number alterations with a frequency of at least of 3%. Data showed that 18 mutated genes and 3 copy number alterations are present in both melanoma and pancreatic cancers types. Since we found two patients that developed both melanoma and pancreatic cancer, we compared mutation landscape between the two tumors and identified a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 gene. This review gives valuable insights into the genetic underpinnings of melanoma and pancreatic cancer, urging the continued exploration and research of new genetic biomarkers able to identify patients and families at high risk of developing both cancers and to address to screening and to an effective clinical management of the patient.

Diagnostics and Therapy for Malignant Tumors

Malignant tumors remain one of the most significant global health challenges and contribute to high mortality rates across various cancer types. The complex nature of these tumors requires multifaceted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This review explores current advancements in diagnostic methods, including molecular imaging, biomarkers, and liquid biopsies. It also delves into the evolution of therapeutic strategies, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and novel targeted therapies such as immunotherapy and gene therapy. Although significant progress has been made in the understanding of cancer biology, the future of oncology lies in the integration of precision medicine, improved diagnostic tools, and personalized therapeutic approaches that address tumor heterogeneity. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of cancer diagnostics and treatments while highlighting emerging trends and challenges that lie ahead.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

While pancreatic adenocarcinoma requires surgical resection definitive cure, treatment paradigms are shifting toward a neoadjuvant approach to systemic therapy. Rationale is twofold: micro-metastatic disease is likely present in a majority of patients, reinforcing the importance of systemic therapy regardless of resectability; moreover, systemic therapy is well-tolerated and improves surgical outcomes when delivered preoperatively. Second, a neoadjuvant approach allows for selection of biology and patients most likely to benefit from potentially morbid surgery. This review examines the increasing body of evidence in support of empiric neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Genetic Risk Factors in a Multi-Ethnic Population Sample

Background

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the highest mortality to incidence ratio of all cancers. Early identification of at-risk individuals should permit early diagnosis. Genome-wide association studies showed the association of several genetic variants with PC risk in multi-ethnic populations. Our objective was to examine the association of these genetic variants with PC in a population sample from Kuwait.

Methods

DNA samples from 103 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) specimens and 132 healthy controls were used for genotyping ABO rs505922, BCAR1 rs7190458, LINC-PINT rs6971499, HNF1B rs4795218, VDR rs2228570 rs731236, and PRSS1 rs111033565 rs111033568 rs387906698 and rs267606982 using TaqMan genotyping assays, and VDR expression was performed by immunocytochemistry.

Results

ABO rs505922C and VDR rs2228570A were associated with PDAC risk (odds ratio (OR): 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 - 2.24, P = 0.027; OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.09 - 2.48, P = 0.024; respectively). An unweighted polygenic risk score (ABO rs505922, BCAR1 rs7190458, LINC-PINT rs6971499, and HNF1B rs4795218) was significantly associated with PDAC risk (β: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.05, P < 0.001). VDR expression was downregulated or absent in most PDAC specimens regardless of VDR haplotype.

Conclusion

ABO rs505922C and VDR rs2228570A are PDAC genetic risk factors in our population. Ethnicity influences the association of reported genetic PDAC risk factors and should be adjusted for when performing PDAC genetic risk estimations. Investigation of these genetic risk factors in other ethnic populations is a necessity to evaluate their PDAC risk prediction potential.

Psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing surveillance for increased risk of melanoma and pancreatic cancer due to a germline CDKN2A variant: A focus group study

Individuals with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant (PV) are at high risk of developing melanoma and pancreatic cancer and are therefore offered surveillance. The potential advantages and disadvantages associated with genetic testing and surveillance are discussed during medical counseling, although little is known about the associated psychosocial factors that are relevant to this population. This study sought to provide a qualitative exploration of psychosocial factors related to genetic testing and participation in skin and pancreatic surveillance in (potential) carriers of a CDKN2A PV. Fifteen individuals-both at-risk individuals and confirmed variant carriers-participated in one of the three online focus groups. Pre-defined discussion topics, including genetic testing, cancer surveillance, influence on lifestyle and family planning, were discussed. Patients reported that important reasons to engage in genetic testing included the possibility to participate in surveillance to gain control over their cancer risk and to get clarification on the potential carrier status of their children. We observed considerable differences in risk perception and experienced burden of surveillance. Knowledge of the PV has had a positive influence on lifestyle factors and altered attitudes toward life in some. Most participants were not aware of preimplantation genetic testing. This focus group study provided insight into a variety of psychosocial themes related to (potential) carriership of a CDKN2A PV. Future efforts should focus on identifying those who may benefit from additional psychosocial support, development of a centralized source of information, and assessing the knowledge, needs, and timing of counseling for family planning.

lncRNAs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis-mediated cancer

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as crucial regulators in various cellular processes, including cancer progression and stress response. Recent studies have demonstrated that copper accumulation induces a unique form of cell death known as cuproptosis, with lncRNAs playing a key role in regulating cuproptosis-associated pathways. These lncRNAs may trigger cell-specific responses to copper stress, presenting new opportunities as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. This paper delves into the role of lncRNAs in cuproptosis-mediated cancer, underscoring their potential as biomarkers and targets for innovative therapeutic strategies. A thorough review of scientific literature was conducted, utilizing databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, with search terms like 'lncRNAs,' 'cuproptosis,' and 'cancer.' Studies were selected based on their relevance to lncRNA regulation of cuproptosis pathways and their implications for cancer prognosis and treatment. The review highlights the significant contribution of lncRNAs in regulating cuproptosis-related genes and pathways, impacting copper metabolism, mitochondrial stress responses, and apoptotic signaling. Specific lncRNAs are potential prognostic markers in breast, lung, liver, ovarian, pancreatic, and gastric cancers. The objective of this article is to explore the role of lncRNAs as potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cancers mediated by cuproptosis.

Temporal Trends in Body Composition and Metabolic Markers Prior to Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Changes in body composition and metabolic factors may serve as biomarkers for the early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study was to capture the longitudinal changes in body composition and metabolic factors before diagnosis of PDAC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in which all patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with PDAC from 2002 to 2021 were identified. We collected all abdominal computed tomography scans and 10 different blood-based biomarkers up to 36 months before diagnosis. We applied a fully automated abdominal segmentation algorithm previously developed by our group for 3-dimensional quantification of body composition on computed tomography scans. Longitudinal trends of body composition and blood-based biomarkers before PDAC diagnosis were estimated using linear mixed models, compared across different time windows, and visualized using spline regression.

RESULTS

We included 1690 patients in body composition analysis, of whom 516 (30.5%) had ≥2 prediagnostic computed tomography scans. For analysis of longitudinal trends of blood-based biomarkers, 3332 individuals were included. As an early manifestation of PDAC, we observed a significant decrease in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (β = -1.94 [95% confidence interval (CI), -2.39 to -1.48] and β = -2.59 [95% CI, -3.17 to -2.02]) in area (cm2)/height (m2) per 6 months closer to diagnosis, accompanied by a decrease in serum lipids (eg, low-density lipoprotein [β = -2.83; 95% CI, -3.31 to -2.34], total cholesterol [β = -2.69; 95% CI, -3.18 to -2.20], and triglycerides [β = -1.86; 95% CI, -2.61 to -1.11]), and an increase in blood glucose levels. Loss of muscle tissue and bone volume was predominantly observed in the last 6 months before diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified significant alterations in a variety of soft tissue and metabolic markers that occur in the development of PDAC. Early recognition of these metabolic changes may provide an opportunity for early detection.

Pancreatic incidentaloma: incidental findings from history towards the era of liquid biopsy

This report provides an overview of the most common diagnostic methods that bring to light incidental findings of pancreatic cancer. It reviews the impact of medical imaging and genetic assessment on the definitions of incidental findings and incidentaloma of the pancreas. For different diagnostic approaches (eg, MRI and CT) and for different affections (cysts/intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, solid lesions), specific guidelines have been proposed and some are established. Based on this, we summarise the differences between the traditional methods with those applied in the PANCAID project. Biomarkers, genetic predispositions, mutations and circulating tumour cells give rise to different levels of concern. The final part of the report discusses the risks and the opportunities associated with further diagnostic procedures and surgical interventions. From the ethical perspective, the most urging question is, can a screening based on liquid biopsy and blood samples open a gateway for the prevention of pancreatic cancer-even if morbidity and lethality of today's surgical interventions is still very high?

Precision Targeting Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer: The Role of Tumor Microenvironment

Pancreatic cancer demonstrates an ever-increasing incidence over the last years and represents one of the top causes of cancer-associated mortality. Cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME) interact with cancer cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors to preserve cancer cells' metabolism, inhibit drug delivery, enhance immune suppression mechanisms and finally develop resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. New strategies target TME genetic alterations and specific pathways in cell populations of the TME. Complex molecular interactions develop between PDAC cells and TME cell populations including cancer-associated fibroblasts, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, pancreatic stellate cells, tumor-associated macrophages, tumor-associated neutrophils, and regulatory T cells. In the present review, we aim to fully explore the molecular landscape of the pancreatic cancer TME cell populations and discuss current TME targeting strategies to provide thoughts for further research and preclinical testing.

Selective and effective suppression of pancreatic cancer through MNK inhibition

Objective: The study aimed to explore the role of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer progression and chemoresistance, with a focus on identifying specific factors that distinguish between normal and tumor cells, thereby offering potential therapeutic targets.

Materials and Methods: We analyzed levels of total and phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and β-catenin in pancreatic cancer and normal pancreatic tissues. Functional assays were used to assess the impact of eIF4E phosphorylation on β-catenin signaling, cell proliferation, and chemoresistance, with MNK kinase involvement determined through gene depletion studies. The MNK kinase inhibitor eFT508 was evaluated for its effects on eIF4E phosphorylation, β-catenin activation, and cell viability in both in vitro and in vivo models of pancreatic cancer.

Results: Both total and phosphorylated eIF4E, along with β-catenin, were significantly elevated in pancreatic cancer tissues compared to normal tissues. Phosphorylation of eIF4E at serine 209 was shown to activate β-catenin signaling, enhance cell proliferation, and contribute to chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Importantly, these effects were dependent on MNK kinase activity. Depletion of eIF4E reduced cell viability in both pancreatic cancer and normal cells, while depletion of MNK selectively decreased viability in pancreatic cancer cells. Treatment with eFT508 effectively inhibited eIF4E phosphorylation, suppressed β-catenin activation, and reduced pancreatic cancer cell growth and survival in vitro and in vivo, with minimal impact on normal cells.

Conclusions: The MNK-eIF4E-β-catenin axis plays a critical role in pancreatic cancer progression and chemoresistance, distinguishing pancreatic cancer cells from normal cells. Targeting MNK kinases with inhibitors like eFT508 presents a promising therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer, with potential for selective efficacy and reduced toxicity.

Can our experience with surveillance for inherited pancreatic cancer help to identify early pancreatic cancer in the general population?

Screening of the general population for cancer is a matter of primary prevention reducing the burden of disease. Whilst this is successful for several cancers including breast, colon and prostate, the situation to screen and hence prevent pancreatic cancer is different. The organ is not as accessible to simple physical exam or biological samples (fecal or blood test). Neither exists a blood test such as PSA that is cost-effective. Reviewing the evidence from screening risk groups for pancreatic cancer, one must conclude that there is no rational at present to screen the general population, for a lack of appropriate tests.

Utilization and Outcomes of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend germline genetic testing (GT) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of multigene panel GT in patients with PDAC.

METHODS

This retrospective, multisite study included patients with PDAC diagnosed between May 2018 and August 2020 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Discussion, uptake, and outcomes of GT were compared before (May 1, 2018-May 1, 2019) and after (August 1, 2019-August 1, 2020) the guideline update, accounting for a transition period.

RESULTS

The study identified 533 patients with PDAC, with 321 (60.2%) preguideline and 212 (39.8%) postguideline. Patient characteristics did not differ between the preguideline and postguideline periods. GT was discussed in 34.3% (110 of 321) of preguideline and 39.6% (84 of 212) of postguideline patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.80]) and subsequently performed in 80.9% (89 of 110) of preguideline and 75.0% (63 of 84) of postguideline patients (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.61]). Of 152 tested patients, 26 (17.1%) had a pathogenic variant (PV), of whom 17 (11.2%; 17 of 152) were PDAC-associated. Over the entire study period, GT was more likely in younger patients (65 v 70 years; P < .001), those seen by a medical oncologist (82.9% v 69.0%; P < .001), and those surviving more than 12 months from diagnosis (70.4% v 43.4%; P < .001). Demographics and personal/family cancer history were comparable between patients with and without a PDAC PV.

CONCLUSION

GT remains underutilized despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations. Given the poor prognosis of PDAC and potential implications of GT, efforts to increase utilization are needed to provide surveillance and support to both patients with PDAC and at-risk family members.

Aspects and outcomes of surveillance for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths and is associated with a poor prognosis. The majority of these cancers are detected at a late stage, contributing to the bad prognosis. This underscores the need for novel, enhanced early detection strategies to improve the outcomes. While population-based screening is not recommended due to the relatively low incidence of PDAC, surveillance is recommended for individuals at high risk for PDAC due to their increased incidence of the disease. However, the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals are not sorted out yet. In this review, we will address the identification of individuals at high risk for PDAC, discuss the objectives and targets of surveillance, outline how surveillance programs are organized, summarize the outcomes of high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer surveillance, and conclude with a future perspective on pancreatic cancer surveillance and novel developments.

Tetrastigma hemsleyanum (Sanyeqing) root extracts evoke S phase arrest while inhibiting the migration and invasion of human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells

BACKGROUND

Ethyl acetate extracts from Tetrastigma hemsleyanum (Sanyeqing) (EFT), a member of the Vitaceae plant family, have been shown to exhibit efficacy against a variety of cancers. In this light, our current study seeks to examine the mechanism of efficacy between EFT extracts and human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells.

METHODS

The chemical components of EFT were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The cytotoxicity of EFT on PANC-1 cells was measured using an MTT assay. In order to investigate EFT induction of cell cycle arrest, changes in cell-cycle distribution were monitored by flow cytometry. Wound healing and transwell assays were employed to investigate whether migration and invasion of PANC-1 cells were inhibited by EFT. Relative protein expression was detected using Western blot.

RESULTS

GC-MS analysis of the chemical composition of EFT revealed that the majority of constituents were organic acids and their corresponding esters. EFT exhibits measurable cytotoxicity and inhibition of PANC-1 invasion. Growth inhibition was primarily attributed to downregulation of CDK2 which induces cell cycle arrest in the S-phase. Inhibition of metastasis is achieved through downregulation of mesenchymal-associated genes/activators, including ZEB1, N-cadherin, Vimentin, and Fibronectin. Meanwhile, the expression of E-cadherin was significantly increased by EFT treatment. Furthermore, downregulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were observed.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of PANC-1 with EFT demonstrated measurable cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, EFT evoked S phase arrest while inhibiting the migration and invasion of PANC-1 cells. Additionally, EFT inhibited the epithelial to mesenchymal transition and MMPs expression in PANC-1 cells. This study serves to confirm the strong therapeutic potential of EFT while identifying the mechanisms of action.

Predictive Value and Therapeutic Significance of Somatic BRCA Mutation in Solid Tumors

Ten percent of patients with breast cancer, and probably somewhat more in patients with ovarian cancer, have inherited germline DNA mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. In the remaining cases, the disease is caused by acquired somatic genetic and epigenetic alterations. Targeted therapeutic agents, such as poly ADP-ribose polymerases (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi), have emerged in treating cancers associated with germline BRCA mutations since 2014. The first PARPi was FDA-approved initially for ovarian cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations. Deleterious variants in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes and homologous recombination deficiency status have been strong predictors of response to PARPi in a few solid tumors since then. However, the relevance of somatic BRCA mutations is less clear. Somatic BRCA-mutated tumors might also respond to this new class of therapeutics. Although the related literature is often controversial, recently published case reports and/or randomized studies demonstrated the effectiveness of PARPi in treating patients with somatic BRCA mutations. The aim of this review is to summarize the predictive role of somatic BRCA mutations and to provide further assistance for clinicians with the identification of patients who could potentially benefit from PARPi.

Targeting BRCA and PALB2 in Pancreatic Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

An important subgroup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) harbor pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. These tumors are exquisitely sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and patients may experience deep and durable responses to this treatment. PARP inhibitors offer potential respite from the cumulative toxicities of chemotherapy as they significantly extend progression-free survival compared to a chemotherapy holiday. Given the lack of proven survival benefit, the decision to use a maintenance PARP inhibitor rather than continue chemotherapy should be individualized. Interestingly, in both published clinical trials of maintenance PARP inhibitors, there is a striking range of interpatient benefit: Even in the platinum-sensitive setting, roughly 25% of tumors appear to be PARP inhibitor refractory (progressive disease within 2 months of starting treatment), 50% sustain moderate benefit (up to 2 years), and 25% are hyper-responsive (more than 2 years of benefit). This finding highlights the need to refine our understanding of which patients will respond to maintenance PARP inhibitors, both by being able to identify biallelic loss and by deepening our knowledge of resistance mechanisms and who develops them. Recent data supports that reversion mutations are common in PARP inhibitor refractory patients, but we have little understanding of the mechanisms that drive delayed resistance and long-term responses. Identifying which patients are more prone to certain mechanisms of resistance and tackling them with specific treatment strategies are areas of active investigation. Additionally, given that PARP inhibitors have limited overall efficacy for most patients, upfront combination strategies are an important future strategy.

Understanding the Genetic Landscape of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Support Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. While population-wide screening recommendations for PDAC in asymptomatic individuals are not achievable due to its relatively low incidence, pancreatic cancer surveillance programs are recommended for patients with germline causative variants in PDAC susceptibility genes or a strong family history. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence and significance of germline alterations in major genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, TP53) involved in PDAC susceptibility. We performed a systematic review of PubMed publications reporting germline variants identified in these genes in PDAC patients. Overall, the retrieved articles included 1493 PDAC patients. A high proportion of these patients (n = 1225/1493, 82%) were found to harbor alterations in genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Specifically, the remaining PDAC patients were reported to carry alterations in genes playing a role in other cancer pathways (CDKN2A, STK11, TP53; n = 181/1493, 12.1%) or in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2; n = 87/1493, 5.8%). Our findings highlight the importance of germline genetic characterization in PDAC patients for better personalized targeted therapies, clinical management, and surveillance.

SDR16C5 promotes proliferation and migration and inhibits apoptosis in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PAAD) is usually found when it is already in its advanced stage, which has limited options available for treatment and poor overall survival. The SDR16C5 gene is necessary for embryonic and adult tissue differentiation, development, and apoptosis, and it also participates in immune response and regulates energy metabolism. However, the role of SDR16C5 in PAAD remains unclear. In this study, we find that SDR16C5 was highly expressed in multiple tumors including PAAD. Furthermore, higher expression of SDR16C5 was significantly associated with poorer survival. We also find that the knockdown of SDR16C5 can inhibit PAAD cell proliferation and promote cell apoptosis by repressing Bcl-2, cleaved caspase 3, and cleaved caspase 9 protein expression. Moreover, silencing SDR16C5 inhibits the migration of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells by interrupting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. KEGG pathway analysis and immunofluorescence staining indicate that SDR16C5 is associated with immunity and may also participate in the development of PAAD through the IL-17 signaling pathway. Collectively, our findings provide evidence that SDR16C5 is overexpressed in PAAD patients and promotes its proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis-inhibition of PAAD cells. Thus, SDR16C5 may be a potential prognostic and therapeutic target.

The Link between Diabetes, Pancreatic Tumors, and miRNAs-New Players for Diagnosis and Therapy?

Despite significant progress in medicine, pancreatic cancer is one of the most tardily diagnosed cancer and is consequently associated with a poor prognosis and a low survival rate. The asymptomatic clinical picture and the lack of relevant diagnostic markers for the early stages of pancreatic cancer are believed to be the major constraints behind an accurate diagnosis of this disease. Furthermore, underlying mechanisms of pancreatic cancer development are still poorly recognized. It is well accepted that diabetes increases the risk of pancreatic cancer development, however the precise mechanisms are weakly investigated. Recent studies are focused on microRNAs as a causative factor of pancreatic cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge of pancreatic cancer and diabetes-associated microRNAs, and their potential in diagnosis and therapy. miR-96, miR-124, miR-21, and miR-10a were identified as promising biomarkers for early pancreatic cancer prediction. miR-26a, miR-101, and miR-200b carry therapeutic potential, as they not only regulate significant biological pathways, including the TGF-β and PI3K/AKT, but their re-expression contributes to the improvement of the prognosis by reducing invasiveness or chemoresistance. In diabetes, there are also changes in the expression of microRNAs, such as in miR-145, miR-29c, and miR-143. These microRNAs are involved, among others, in insulin signaling, including IRS-1 and AKT (miR-145), glucose homeostasis (hsa-miR-21), and glucose reuptake and gluconeogenesis (miR-29c). Although, changes in the expression of the same microRNAs are observed in both pancreatic cancer and diabetes, they exert different molecular effects. For example, miR-181a is upregulated in both pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus, but in diabetes it contributes to insulin resistance, whereas in pancreatic cancer it promotes tumor cell migration, respectively. To conclude, dysregulated microRNAs in diabetes affect crucial cellular processes that are involved in pancreatic cancer development and progression.

Acinar-to-Ductal Metaplasia (ADM): On the Road to Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PanIN) and Pancreatic Cancer

Adult pancreatic acinar cells show high plasticity allowing them to change in their differentiation commitment. Pancreatic acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) is a cellular process in which the differentiated pancreatic acinar cells transform into duct-like cells. This process can occur as a result of cellular injury or inflammation in the pancreas. While ADM is a reversible process allowing pancreatic acinar regeneration, persistent inflammation or injury can lead to the development of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), which is a common precancerous lesion that precedes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Several factors can contribute to the development of ADM and PanIN, including environmental factors such as obesity, chronic inflammation and genetic mutations. ADM is driven by extrinsic and intrinsic signaling. Here, we review the current knowledge on the cellular and molecular biology of ADM. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying ADM is critical for the development of new therapeutic strategies for pancreatitis and PDAC. Identifying the intermediate states and key molecules that regulate ADM initiation, maintenance and progression may help the development of novel preventive strategies for PDAC.

Genetics, Genomics and Emerging Molecular Therapies of Pancreatic Cancer

The number of cases of pancreatic cancers in 2019 in Poland was 3852 (approx. 2% of all cancers). The course of the disease is very fast, and the average survival time from the diagnosis is 6 months. Only <2% of patients live for 5 years from the diagnosis, 8% live for 2 years, and almost half live for only about 3 months. A family predisposition to pancreatic cancer occurs in about 10% of cases. Several oncogenes in which somatic changes lead to the development of tumours, including genes BRCA1/2 and PALB2, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, MLL3, TGFBR2, ARID1A and SF3B1, are involved in pancreatic cancer. Between 4% and 10% of individuals with pancreatic cancer will have a mutation in one of these genes. Six percent of patients with pancreatic cancer have NTRK pathogenic fusion. The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer can in many cases be characterised by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-cell inability to effectively repair DNA. It is estimated that from 24% to as many as 44% of pancreatic cancers show HRD. The most common cause of HRD are inactivating mutations in the genes regulating this DNA repair system, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, but also PALB2, RAD51C and several dozen others.

Chemical Constituents of Callistemon subulatus and Their Anti-Pancreatic Cancer Activity against Human PANC-1 Cell Line

An n-hexane extract of Callistemon subulatus was found to exhibit potent cytotoxicity against PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells, preferentially under nutrition starvation conditions, with a PC₅₀ value of 6.2 µg/mL. Phytochemical investigation of this bioactive extract resulted in the isolation of fifteen compounds (1–15), including a new compound, subulatone A (–). The structure of compound 1 was elucidated using HRFABMS and NMR spectroscopic analyses. The isolated compounds were tested for their preferential cytotoxicity against the PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cell line, using an anti-austerity strategy. Among these, myrtucommulone A (2) showed highly potent preferential cytotoxicity, with a PC₅₀ value of 0.28 µM. Myrtucommulone A (2) was found to alter PANC-1 cell morphology, inhibit cell migration, and downregulate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and autophagy signaling pathways in nutrient-deprived media, leading to cancer cell death. Therefore, myrtucommulone A (2) is a lead compound for anticancer drug development based on an anti-austerity strategy.