Elasticity control of entangled chromosomes: Crosstalk between condensin complexes and nucleosomes

Biophysical Aspect of Assembly and Regulation of Nuclear Bodies Scaffolded by Architectural RNA

A growing body of evidence suggests that nuclear bodies, condensates of RNAs and proteins within the nucleus, are assembled through liquid-liquid phase separation. Some nuclear bodies, such as paraspeckles, are scaffolded by a class of RNAs known as architectural RNAs. From a materials science perspective, RNAs are categorized as polymers, which have been extensively studied in soft matter physics. While soft matter physics has the potential to provide significant insights, it is not directly applicable because transcription and other biochemical processes differentiate RNAs from other polymers studied in this field. Therefore, an interdisciplinary research fusing molecular biology and soft matter physics offers a powerful approach to studying nuclear bodies. This review introduces the biophysical insights provided by such interdisciplinary research in the assembly and regulation of nuclear bodies.

SMC-mediated chromosome organization: Does loop extrusion explain it all?

In recent years, loop extrusion has attracted much attention as a general mechanism of chromosome organization mediated by structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes, such as condensin and cohesin. Despite accumulating evidence in support of this mechanism, it is not fully established whether or how loop extrusion operates under physiological conditions, or whether any alternative or additional SMC-mediated mechanisms operate in the cell. In this review, we summarize non-loop extrusion mechanisms proposed in the literature and clarify unresolved issues to further enrich our understanding of how SMC protein complexes work.

Regulation of condensin II by self-suppression and release mechanisms

In vertebrates, two distinct condensin complexes, condensin I and condensin II, cooperate to drive mitotic chromosome assembly. It remains largely unknown how the two complexes differentially contribute to this process at a mechanistic level. We have previously dissected the role of individual subunits of condensin II by introducing recombinant complexes into Xenopus egg extracts. Here we extend these efforts by introducing a modified functional assay using extracts depleted of topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα), which allows us to further elucidate the functional similarities and differences between condensin I and condensin II. The intrinsically disordered C-terminal region of the CAP-D3 subunit (the D3 C-tail) is a major target of Cdk1 phosphorylation, and phosphorylation-deficient mutations in this region impair condensin II functions. We also identify a unique helical structure in CAP-D3 (the D3 HEAT docker) that is predicted to directly interact with CAP-G2. Deletion of the D3 HEAT docker, along with the D3 C-tail, enhances the ability of condensin II to assemble mitotic chromosomes. Taken together, we propose a self-suppression mechanism unique to condensin II that is released by mitotic phosphorylation. Evolutionary implications of our findings are also discussed.

Polymer Modeling Reveals Interplay between Physical Properties of Chromosomal DNA and the Size and Distribution of Condensin-Based Chromatin Loops

Transient DNA loops occur throughout the genome due to thermal fluctuations of DNA and the function of SMC complex proteins such as condensin and cohesin. Transient crosslinking within and between chromosomes and loop extrusion by SMCs have profound effects on high-order chromatin organization and exhibit specificity in cell type, cell cycle stage, and cellular environment. SMC complexes anchor one end to DNA with the other extending some distance and retracting to form a loop. How cells regulate loop sizes and how loops distribute along chromatin are emerging questions. To understand loop size regulation, we employed bead-spring polymer chain models of chromatin and the activity of an SMC complex on chromatin. Our study shows that (1) the stiffness of the chromatin polymer chain, (2) the tensile stiffness of chromatin crosslinking complexes such as condensin, and (3) the strength of the internal or external tethering of chromatin chains cooperatively dictate the loop size distribution and compaction volume of induced chromatin domains. When strong DNA tethers are invoked, loop size distributions are tuned by condensin stiffness. When DNA tethers are released, loop size distributions are tuned by chromatin stiffness. In this three-way interaction, the presence and strength of tethering unexpectedly dictates chromatin conformation within a topological domain.