Ambulatory gynaecology: What can we do?

Complications and feasibility analysis of ambulatory surgery for gynecological diseases in China

The Chinese government is attaching great importance to the development of ambulatory surgery in order to optimize the healthcare system in China. The study aims to examine the complications and quality indicators of patients who underwent gynecological ambulatory surgery at a tertiary hospital in China.This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent ambulatory surgery between July and September 2019 at the Department of Gynecology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. The patients were followed by phone at 30 days after discharge. The postoperative complications, mortality, unplanned re-operation, delayed discharge, unplanned re-hospitalization, and patient satisfaction were collected. The patients who underwent conventional hysteroscopic resection of uterine lesions during the same period were collected as controls for the economics analysis.A total of 392 patients who underwent ambulatory gynecological surgery were included. Fifteen patients had postoperative complications, and the total complication rate was 3.8% (15/392). Eight (8/392, 2.0%) patients had delayed discharge. There were no unplanned re-operations and deaths. There were two (2/392, 0.5%) cases of unplanned re-hospitalization. At 30 days after discharge, two patients were dissatisfied, and 390 cases were satisfied, for an overall satisfaction rate of 99.5%. Compared with conventional hysteroscopic resection of uterine lesions, ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery had a shorter hospital stay and lower total costs (P < .05) but similar surgery-related costs.Ambulatory gynecological surgery is feasible in China, with an acceptable complication profile and obvious economic and social benefits. Nevertheless, hospital management shall be reinforced.

LLETZ make it simple: Anxiety, pain and treatment outcomes with outpatient large loop excision of the transformation zone under local anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is the preferred treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia due to its effectiveness and ability to be performed in an outpatient setting under local anaesthesia (LA). Although current guidelines recommend that most LLETZ can be performed under LA, there is paucity in clinical data of patients' perspectives of outpatient LLETZ.

AIM

Determining patient acceptability of outpatient LLETZ through assessment of anxiety and pain scores, and comparing treatment outcomes with current standards in terms of margins status, negative histology, short-term morbidity rates and follow-up attendance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital over two years (2014-2016). Patients undergoing outpatient LLETZ completed a three-part questionnaire (before, immediately after and 4-6 weeks post-procedure).

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients underwent outpatient LLETZ. Mean pain score was 2 (range 0-8). Pre-procedure anxiety was common but most resolved post-procedure. Women who did not have a prior LLETZ discussion were more likely to report moderate-severe anxiety levels pre-procedure, compared with women who did (odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.11-8.09, P = 0.030). There were no differences found in pain scores when comparing pre-procedure anxiety levels, prior discussion of LLETZ or mode of anaesthesia. Specimen margins were involved in 42.9%. No association was found between positive cervical margin status and age, pre-procedure anxiety or post-procedure pain scores. Most patients were satisfied and attended follow-up appointments.

CONCLUSION

Large loop excision of the transformation zone under LA is a well-tolerated procedure with high satisfaction and follow-up rates. Clinicians need to initiate early discussions regarding treatment to minimise procedure-related anxiety.