Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery

Rotational Forceps: Which technique is superior for blade insertion? A simulation study comparing direct, first posterior, and wandering maneuvers

OBJECTIVE

The Kielland's forceps is the most used forceps for assisting rotational operative births. There are various maneuvers described for blade insertion. Among these, the most used ones are the direct, first posterior, and wandering maneuver. The objective of this study was to compare these three maneuvers using a simulator.

STUDY DESIGN

In this experimental study, 144 rotational forceps-assisted births were conducted using a simulation model, with 72 starting in a right occiput-transverse position and 72 in a left occiput-transverse position. Each of the three maneuvers (direct, first posterior, or wandering) for blade insertion was performed 48 times by a total of 6 operators, comprising 3 obstetricians with over 10 years of experience and 3 trainees. The assessment of forceps application included evaluating the placement of the blades in terms of asymmetry and the distance from the lock to the posterior fontanelle. Additionally, the study evaluated the number of reinsertions and relocations required, the perceived difficulty of the procedure, and the operator's level of experience.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in terms of asymmetry with the three maneuvers. Regarding the distance from the lock to the posterior fontanelle, the best results were obtained with the direct maneuver. There were no differences in the number of reinsertions, relocations, and the perceived difficulty by the operators among the three maneuvers. Experienced obstetricians had better outcomes in terms of the need for reinsertions.

CONCLUSION

The direct maneuver offer advantages in the insertion of blades for rotational forceps.

Which type of forceps is better for nonrotational operative births? A simulation study comparing Thierry spatulas and Simpson-Braun and Kielland forceps

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric forceps play an important role in safe childbirth, yet there is a lack of distinction between various forceps types in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate and compare perineal pressure and forces on the baby during nonrotational forceps-assisted births using Simpson-Braun forceps, Kielland forceps, and Thierry spatulas on a simulation model.

METHODS

This experimental study involved six obstetricians conducting 108 forceps-assisted births on a simulation model. Instruments were assessed for their impact on perineal pressure, traction force, and operator-assessed difficulty.

RESULTS

Thierry's spatulas exerted the lowest force on the baby, while Kielland forceps exhibited the lowest perineal pressure, though not statistically significant. An experienced obstetrician demonstrated less perineal pressure with Simpson forceps. Notably, no significant differences in difficulty were observed between instruments.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights distinctions in forceps performance, with Thierry spatulas applying the least force on the fetal head, while an experienced obstetrician fared better with Simpson forceps in terms of perineal pressure. Kielland forceps remain a viable alternative for nonrotational forceps births, showing comparable outcomes.

Precision of vacuum cup placement and its association with subgaleal hemorrhage and associated morbidity in term neonates

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the precision of vacuum cup placement is associated with failed vacuum extraction(VE), neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage(SGH) and other VE-related birth trauma.

METHODS

All women with singleton term cephalic fetuses with attempted VE were recruited over a period of 30 months. Neonates were examined immediately after birth and the position of the chignon documented to decide whether the cup position was flexing median or suboptimal. Vigilant neonatal surveillance was performed to look for VE-related trauma, including subgaleal/subdural hemorrhages, skull fractures, scalp lacerations. CT scans of the brain were ordered liberally as clinically indicated.

RESULTS

The VE rate was 5.89% in the study period. There were 17(4.9%) failures among 345 attempted VEs. Thirty babies suffered from subgaleal/subdural hemorrhages, skull fractures, scalp lacerations or a combination of these, giving an incidence of VE-related birth trauma of 8.7%. Suboptimal cup positions occurred in 31.6%. Logistic regression analysis showed that failed VE was associated with a non-occipital anterior fetal head position (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.22-10.2), suboptimal vacuum cup placement (OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.38-12.2) and a longer duration of traction (OR 8.79, 95% CI 2.13-36.2); while, VE-related birth trauma was associated with failed VE (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.08-14.3) and more pulls (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.98-8.36).

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal vacuum cup positions were related to failed VE but not to SGH and other vacuum-related birth trauma. While optimal flexed median cup positions should be most desirable mechanically to effect delivery, such a position does not guarantee prevention of SGH.

Tafoxiparin, a novel drug candidate for cervical ripening and labor augmentation: results from 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies

BACKGROUND

Slow progression of labor is a common obstetrical problem with multiple associated complications. Tafoxiparin is a depolymerized form of heparin with a molecular structure that eliminates the anticoagulant effects of heparin. We report on 2 phase II clinical studies of tafoxiparin in primiparas. Study 1 was an exploratory, first-in-pregnant-women study and study 2 was a dose-finding study.

OBJECTIVE

Study 1 was performed to explore the effects on labor time of subcutaneous administration of tafoxiparin before onset of labor. Study 2 was performed to test the hypothesis that intravenous treatment with tafoxiparin reduces the risk for prolonged labor after spontaneous labor onset in situations requiring oxytocin stimulation because of dystocia.

STUDY DESIGN

Both studies were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Participants were healthy, nulliparous females aged 18 to 45 years with a normal singleton pregnancy and gestational age confirmed by ultrasound. The primary endpoints were time from onset of established labor (cervical dilation of 4 cm) until delivery (study 1) and time from start of study treatment infusion until delivery (study 2). In study 1, patients at 38 to 40 weeks of gestation received 60 mg tafoxiparin or placebo daily as 0.4 mL subcutaneous injections until labor onset (maximum 28 days). In study 2, patients experiencing slow progression of labor, a prolonged latent phase, or labor arrest received a placebo or 1 of 3 short-term tafoxiparin regimens (initial bolus 7, 21, or 35 mg followed by continuous infusion at 5, 15, or 25 mg/hour until delivery; maximum duration, 36 hours) in conjunction with oxytocin.

RESULTS

The number of participants randomized in study 1 was 263, and 361 were randomized in study 2. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints between those receiving tafoxiparin and those receiving the placebo in both studies. However, in study 1, the risk for having a labor time exceeding 12 hours was significantly reduced by tafoxiparin (tafoxiparin 6/114 [5%] vs placebo 18/101 [18%]; P=.0045). Post hoc analyses showed that women who underwent labor induction had a median (range) labor time of 4.44 (1.2-8.5) hours with tafoxiparin and 7.03 (1.5-14.3) hours with the placebo (P=.0041) and that co-administration of tafoxiparin potentiates the effect of oxytocin and facilitates a shorter labor time among women with a labor time exceeding 6 to 8 hours (P=.016). Among women induced into labor, tafoxiparin had a positive effect on cervical ripening in 11 of 13 cases (85%) compared with 3 of 13 participants (23%) who received the placebo (P=.004). For women requiring oxytocin because of slow progression of labor, the corresponding results were 34 of 51 participants (66%) vs 16 of 40 participants (40%) (P=.004). In study 2, tafoxiparin had no positive effects on the secondary endpoints when compared with the placebo. Except for injection-site reactions in study 1, adverse events were no more common for tafoxiparin than for the placebo among either mothers or infants. There were few serious or treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous treatment with tafoxiparin before labor onset (study 1) may be effective in reducing the labor time among women undergoing labor induction and among those requiring oxytocin for slow progression of labor. Moreover, tafoxiparin may have a positive effect on cervical ripening. Short-term, intravenous treatment with tafoxiparin as an adjunct to oxytocin in patients with labor arrest (study 2) did not affect labor time or other endpoints. Both studies suggest that tafoxiparin has a favorable safety profile in mothers and their infants.

A prospective study on neonatal ophthalmic injuries associated with forceps delivery

BACKGROUND

Assisted delivery by forceps is needed to expedite vaginal delivery in certain maternal and fetal conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the extent of ophthalmological injuries in neonates after forceps delivery.

METHODS

Women with cephalic fetuses delivered vaginally by forceps from July 2020 to June 2022 were recruited prospectively. Ophthalmologists would be consulted when there were signs of external ophthalmic injuries, such as periorbital forceps marks or facial bruising. Demographic data, pregnancy characteristics, delivery details, and perinatal outcomes were evaluated to identify any associated risk factors for neonatal ophthalmological injuries.

RESULTS

A total of 77 forceps deliveries were performed in the study period, in which 20 cases (26%) required ophthalmological consultations. There were more right or left occipital fetal head positions in the group requiring ophthalmological assessment than those that did not require assessment (35% vs 12.3% [P = 0.023]). The degree of moulding of the fetal head was more marked in the former group (65% vs 28% [P = 0.001]). The overall incidence of detectable ophthalmological lesions was 16.9% (13/77). All ophthalmic injuries were mild, and most resolved with conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, external ophthalmic injuries were common after forceps delivery. We recommended ophthalmological consultation in newborns delivered by forceps with evidence of compressive trauma to rule out serious ophthalmological trauma.

The risk of childhood brain tumors associated with delivery interventions: A Danish matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Head trauma has been associated with increased brain tumor risk in adults. Instrument assisted delivery can be a cause of head trauma in newborns. The goal of this study was to determine if instrument-assisted deliveries influenced the odds of childhood brain tumors in Denmark.

METHODS

We conducted a matched case-control study of childhood (<20 years) brain tumors in Denmark born between 1978 and 2013 and diagnosed 1978-2016. A total of 1678 brain tumor cases were identified and 25 controls were matched to each case based on the child's sex and birth date (N = 40,934). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate effects (odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)) for variables of interest.

RESULTS

Compared to children birthed by spontaneous vaginal delivery, children who later developed ependymomas (N = 118) had a greater likelihood of having experienced vacuum assisted deliveries (OR=1.74, 95% CI 1.02-2.96). Forceps use was low, and declined across the study period. We did not observe an overall increase in all CNS tumors (combined) with either vacuum delivery (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.18) or forceps delivery (OR=1.26, 95% CI 0.78-2.03).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest an association between vacuum assisted deliveries and ependymomas.

Mediolateral episiotomy and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and adverse neonatal outcomes during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women: a propensity-score analysis

Background

The potential protective effect of mediolateral episiotomy for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) remains controversial during operative vaginal delivery because of the difficulties to take into account the risk factors and clinical conditions at delivery; in addition, little is known about the potential benefits of mediolateral episiotomy on neonatal outcomes.

The objectives were to investigate the associations between mediolateral episiotomy and both OASIs and neonatal outcomes, using propensity scores.

Methods

We performed a retrospective population-based observational study from a perinatal registry that includes all births in a French region between 2010 and 2017. All nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy delivering by operative vaginal deliveries at 37 weeks gestational age or later were included. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting with propensity scores was used to minimize indication bias. OASIs was defined as third and fourth-degree tears according to Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Two neonatal outcomes were studied: condition at birth (5-min Apgar score less than 7 and/or umbilical artery pH less than 7.10), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit.

Results

The study population consisted of 7589 women; 2880 (38.0%) received mediolateral episiotomy. After applying propensity scores, episiotomy was associated with a lower rate of OASIs in forceps/spatula delivery (2.3 vs 6.8%, Risk Ratio (RR) 0.38, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.28–0.52) and in vacuum delivery (1.3 vs 3.4%, RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.20–0.38) as compared with no episiotomy. Mediolateral episiotomy was associated with better condition at birth in case of forceps/spatula delivery (4.5 vs 8.8%, RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39–0.81). In cases of fetal distress (40.7%), mediolateral episiotomy was associated with better condition of infant at birth in women who delivered by forceps/spatula (4.2 vs 13.5%, RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.89). No association was found with neonatal unit admission (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.50–1.74).

Conclusions

Use of mediolateral episiotomy was associated with a lower rate of OASIs during operative vaginal delivery, and in infants it was associated with better condition at birth following forceps/spatula delivery.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04396-6.

Clinical Effects of Form-Based Management of Forceps Delivery under Intelligent Medical Model

Background

Forceps delivery is one of the most important measures to facilitate vaginal delivery. It can reduce the rate of first cesarean delivery. Frustratingly, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with forceps delivery have been frequently reported in recent years. There are two major reasons: one is that the abilities of doctors and midwives in forceps delivery vary from hospital to hospital and the other one is lack of regulations in the management of forceps delivery. In order to improve the success rate of forceps delivery and reduce the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications, we applied form-based management to forceps delivery under an intelligent medical model. The aim of this work is to explore the clinical effects of form-based management of forceps delivery.

Methods

Patients with forceps delivery in Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University were divided into two groups: form-based patients from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, were selected as the study group, while traditional protocol patients from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018, were chosen as the control group. Then, we compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes of these two groups.

Results

There were significant differences in the maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes such as rate of postpartum hemorrhage, degree of perineal laceration, and incidence of neonatal facial skin abrasions between the two groups, whereas differences in the incidence of asphyxia and intracranial hemorrhage were not significant.

Conclusions

Form-based management could help us assess the security of forceps delivery comprehensively, as it could not only improve the success rate of the one-time forceps traction scheme but also reduce the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes effectively.

Spatulas for operative vaginal birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Operative vaginal birth represents an alternative to address problems during the second stage of labor. Obstetricians have access to three different instruments forceps, vacuum, and spatulas.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of spatulas for operative vaginal birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, LILACS, SciELO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and OpenGrey.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled studies and non-randomized controlled studies (NRS) were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were independently assessed for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine NRS (n = 16  497 women) compared the use of spatulas versus forceps. Low-certainty evidence suggests that spatulas were not different in terms of failed operative vaginal delivery rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.52), but may decrease the incidence of birth canal trauma (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.91), birth canal laceration (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.91), and neonatal soft-tissue injury (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.29). Six NRS (n = 2992 women) compared the use of spatulas versus vacuum. Low-quality evidence suggests that spatulas may decrease failed operative vaginal delivery rate (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.26). There were no apparent differences in other maternal and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Low-certainty evidence suggests that, spatulas could be a safe and effective alternative for operative vaginal birth.

Association between Neuraxial Labor Analgesia and Neonatal Morbidity after Operative Vaginal Delivery

BACKGROUND

Up to 84% of women who undergo operative vaginal delivery receive neuraxial analgesia. However, little is known about the association between neuraxial analgesia and neonatal morbidity in women who undergo operative vaginal delivery. The authors hypothesized that neuraxial analgesia is associated with a reduced risk of neonatal morbidity among women undergoing operative vaginal delivery.

METHODS

Using United States birth certificate data, the study identified women with singleton pregnancies who underwent operative vaginal (forceps- or vacuum-assisted delivery) in 2017. The authors examined the relationships between neuraxial labor analgesia and neonatal morbidity, the latter defined by any of the following: 5-min Apgar score less than 7, immediate assisted ventilation, assisted ventilation greater than 6 h, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal transfer to a different facility within 24 h of delivery, and neonatal seizure or serious neurologic dysfunction. The authors accounted for sociodemographic and obstetric factors as potential confounders in their analysis.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 106,845 women who underwent operative vaginal delivery, of whom 92,518 (86.6%) received neuraxial analgesia. The proportion of neonates with morbidity was higher in the neuraxial analgesia group than the nonneuraxial group (10,409 of 92,518 [11.3%] vs. 1,271 of 14,327 [8.9%], respectively; P < 0.001). The unadjusted relative risk was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.34; P < 0.001); after accounting for confounders using a multivariable model, the adjusted relative risk was 1.19 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.26; P < 0.001). In a post hoc analysis, after excluding neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal transfer from the composite outcome, the effect of neuraxial analgesia on neonatal morbidity was not statistically significant (adjusted relative risk, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.16; P = 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cross-sectional study, a neonatal benefit of neuraxial analgesia for operative vaginal delivery was not observed. Confounding by indication may explain the observed association between neuraxial analgesia and neonatal morbidity, however this dataset was not designed to evaluate such considerations.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE