Endobronchial brachytherapy for metastasis from extrapulmonary malignancies as an effective treatment for palliation of symptoms

A case of endobronchial metastasis of colon cancer mimics sarcoidosis, and a review of related literature

PURPOSE

Endobronchial metastases (EBM) are defined as bronchoscopically visible lesions histopathologically identical to extrapulmonary tumors. We summarized the literature on endobronchial metastasis of colorectal cancer and give a brief review.

METHOD

We present a rare case with an episode mistaken for sarcoidosis and unexpectedly identified as colon cancer by bronchoscopic biopsy. A 53-year-old man with dry cough and dyspnea had diffuse micro lung nodules and lymphadenopathy on CT and PET/CT. He was diagnosed with sarcoidosis and took steroid therapy, but the symptoms could not be alleviated. Bronchoscopy was suggested. He was finally identified with colon cancer by bronchoscopic biopsy, which was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy. We summarise the clinical manifestations, imaging, prognosis of EMB of colorectal cancer.

RESULT

EBM are rare. Colorectal cancer is common in EBM and the frequency is increasing.

CONCLUSION

EBM should be distinguished from primary lung cancer, sarcoidosis.

A two-center experience: The impact of COVID-19 on two brachytherapy programs in Ontario - virtual care, service suspension and radiation therapy workflow

INTRODUCTION

Most brachytherapy (BT) procedures require general anesthesia and are therefore considered aerosol generating medical procedures (AGMPs). The COVID-19 pandemic impacted BT as services were prioritized by balancing the harm associated with COVID-19 infection versus the effect of delay of potentially curative treatment. This article summarizes the impact of the pandemic on BT programs in two cancer centers in a Canadian province.

METHODS

As part of a quality assurance project, a retrospective study was conducted for the first five months of the pandemic (March 1 to July 31, 2020). Chart review and COVID-19 related mitigation strategies were identified by BT Clinical Specialist Radiation Therapists (bCSRT) in each center using electronic medical records, departmental reports, policies and procedures.

RESULTS

Impact included start of virtual care (VC), shortened fractionation, suspension of services and workflow changes.  Both centers implemented VC strategies to reduce clinic visits: "same-day size and treat" strategy for post-operative endometrial cancer patients and virtual patient education for all patients. BT services that were suspended were low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate treatments (Center 1), lung and esophagus HDR treatments (Center 2).  Workflow changes that affected staff and patients in both centers included COVID-19 screening and the use of personal protective equipment. The centers were marginally different in workflow adjustments for AGMP procedures.  Those considered high-risk AGMP and low-risk cancer were suspended temporarily with alternate treatment strategies sought for some patients. Others had temporizing treatment such as androgen deprivation therapy to facilitate oncological safe deferral of procedures.

CONCLUSION

Both BT programs delivered treatment to most patients with minimal delays and cancellations, where feasible. Some of the pandemic workflow changes continued to the current state of the pandemic. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the impact of COVID-19 and treatment interruptions on oncologic outcomes.

Systematic review of brachytherapy for symptom palliation

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy is most often applied in the curative or salvage setting, but many forms of brachytherapy can be helpful for symptom palliation. Declining utilization is seen, for multiple reasons, such as lack of awareness, insufficient expertise, or poor access to equipment. High level evidence for many types of palliative brachytherapy has been lacking. The objective of the current study was to review the evidence for utilization and efficacy of brachytherapy to palliate symptoms from cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search in EMBASE and MEDLINE for English-language articles published from January 1980 to May 2022 that described brachytherapy used for a palliative indication in adults with a diagnosis of cancer (any subtype) and at least one symptom related outcome. Individual case reports and conference abstracts were excluded. All publications were independently screened by two investigators for eligibility.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 3637 abstracts of which 129 were selected for in-depth review. The number of studies (total number of patients) included in the final analysis varied widely by tumor site with the majority (68.2%) involving either lung or esophageal cancer. Despite a limited number of prospective trials that assessed the efficacy of brachytherapy for symptom management, there was a positive effect on palliation of symptoms across all tumor types. There was no clear trend in the number of publications over time. The most commonly cited symptom indications for palliation by brachytherapy were dysphagia, dyspnea, pain and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy can provide palliation for patients with advanced cancer, across different tumor sites and clinical scenarios. However, high level evidence in the literature to support palliative applications of brachytherapy is lacking or limited for many tumor sites. There appears to be a strong publication bias towards positive studies in favor of brachytherapy. Beyond anecdotal reports and individual practices, outcomes research can further our understanding of the role of brachytherapy in palliating advanced cancers of all types, and should be encouraged.

Radiotherapy in the control of bleeding from primary and secondary lung tumours

This literature review clarifies the role of radiotherapy in the management of low-volume haemoptysis. Embase and Medline were interrogated, and PRISMA guidelines were then used to select relevant articles. Seventy-eight articles were considered relevant and manually reviewed. The evidence suggests that external beam radiotherapy is more effective than endobronchial brachytherapy at controlling low-volume haemoptysis. There is no evidence to recommend a combination of the two techniques. Different doses and fractionations appear equally effective, with a potential survival advantage of higher dose regimens for fitter patients. Palliative radiotherapy is effective at controlling low-volume haemoptysis. External beam radiotherapy is the first-line treatment, with endobronchial brachytherapy recommended following external beam radiotherapy failure. Choice of dose and fractionation should take into account the patient's performance status.

Endobronchial brachytherapy in the management of lung malignancies: 20 years of experience in an Australian center

OBJECTIVES

Management of end-stage lung cancers focuses on symptom control, requiring multimodality management. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) is an evidence-based approach allowing safe delivery of clinically meaningful radiation doses. We provide a summary of treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes of EBB in a single center.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our retrospective study examined all EBB procedures performed at St George Hospital, NSW, Australia, between 1997 and 2016. Patients received single-fraction brachytherapy treatment under procedural sedation, using either the pulsed-dose-rate or high dose-rate modality. Symptomatic response was noted at the 4- to 6-week followup consultation.

RESULTS

Ninety-two EBB procedures were identified in 83 patients, with 75 patients treated with pulsed-dose-rate and 17 with high-dose-rate. Clinical and/or radiological airway obstruction in a prior high-dose irradiated volume was the most common indication for treatment (85%). Sixty (72%) patients had a partial or complete response of symptoms. Patients with hemoptysis were more likely to respond than those with airway obstruction (92% vs. 70%; p = 0.036). There was no difference in clinical response between pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate patients (p = 0.24). Median overall survival was 8 months, with a statistically significant difference in those with clinical response (4 vs. 9 months; p = 0.0101). No Grade >2 toxicities were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the largest Australian series of EBB to date. We continue to demonstrate that despite a variety of symptomatic presentations and histologies, EBB is an effective approach to the palliation of malignant lung lesions. Given its low risk of toxicity, EBB is recommended as an option in the palliative treatment of endobronchial malignancies.

A Novel Tracheobronchial Stent Loaded with 125I Seeds in Patients with Malignant Airway Obstruction Compared to a Conventional Stent: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel radioactive bare metal stent (RBMS) compared with a conventional bare metal stent (CBMS) in patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction.

Methods

This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from each participant. Patients with malignant airway obstruction who had dyspnea were randomly assigned to receive RBMS or CBMS placement. The primary endpoint was stenosis grade, while the secondary endpoints were technical success, overall survival, and complications. A p value of <0·05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Between September 2013 and July 2015, 66 patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction received stent placement fluoroscopically (33 in either group). The median follow-up time was 154 days (range, 15–335 days). The baseline stenosis was immediately relieved in both groups after stent placement, and the stenosis grades in the RBMS group were significantly lower than that in the CBMS group since the second month (p < 0·05). The technical success rates of stent placement were 100% in both groups. The median survival in the RBMS group was significantly longer than that in the CBMS group (170 days vs. 123 days, p < 0·05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (p < 0·05).

Conclusions

The placement of RBMS in patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction is feasible and safe, and it significantly reduces restenosis and improves overall survival compared with the placement of CBMS.

•

The baseline stenosis was immediately relieved in both groups after stent placement.

•

The stenosis grades in the RBMS group were significantly lower than that in the CBMS group since the second month.

•

The technical success rates of stent placement were 100% in both groups.

•

The median survival in the RBMS group was significantly longer than that in the CBMS group.

•

There was no significant difference of the incidence of complications between the two groups.

Malignant airway obstruction (MAO) is a serious situation of 20-30% cases of lung cancer, resulting in dyspnea, decreased functional status, and asphyxiation risk. Conventional stent placement provides immediate palliation of dyspnea. However, stent restenosis occurs during the follow up. A novel radioactive bare metal stent (RBMS) loaded with ¹²⁵I seed was developed for preventing such restenosis. Our study showed that placement of RBMS in patients with inoperable malignant airway obstruction is feasible and safe, and it significantly reduces the restenosis and improves overall survival compared with placement of conventional stent.