Dosimetric impact of contouring and image registration variability on dynamic 125 I prostate brachytherapy

Comparison between postoperative TRUS-CT fusion with MRI-CT fusion for postimplant quality assurance in prostate LDR permanent seed brachytherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Permanent seed Low-Dose-Rate brachytherapy is planned and delivered using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Post-implant evaluation for quality assurance is usually performed using Computed Tomography (CT). Registration of the CT images with MRI reduces subjectivity in contouring by improving prostate edge detection. We hypothesized that a set of TRUS images post procedure may provide the same benefit. MATERIAL/METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing Low-Dose-Rate prostate brachytherapy were recruited. TRUS images were recorded under anesthesia at completion of their implant. In addition, all patients underwent standard post-implant quality assurance including prostate CT and MRI at day 30. These were co-registered, contoured and seeds were identified. Three independent observers contoured and registered the post implant TRUS images to the Day 30 CT using seed matching. Prostate volumes and dosimetric parameters were compared through Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to evaluate the concordance between MRI and ultrasound (US). RESULTS 26 patients were recruited from 10/17 to 01/18. Mean prostate volume was 34.5 (SD 10.8) cm³ at baseline on planning TRUS images, 37.4 (SD 11.3) cm³ on Day 0 post implant TRUS and 36.7 (SD 11.7) cm³ on Day 30 MRI. D90 was 112.6% (SD 9.3) on CT-MRI and 112.9% (SD 11.1) on CT-US. V100 was 94.6% (SD 3.8) for CT-MRI, 95.1% (SD 4.3) for CT-US. Student t-tests were used to compare groups. No significant differences were noted. CONCLUSION Post implant TRUS may be useful for quality assurance for post-implant dosimetry particularly if access to an MRI is limited.

MR-guided 125I seed implantation treatment for maxillofacial malignant tumor

PURPOSE

This study assessed the therapeutic efficacy of postoperative magnetic resonance (MR)-guided interstitial 125 I seed implantation for treatment of oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 127 patients with oral or maxillofacial malignant tumors were included in this study who received interstitial 125 I treatment after the surgery resection. Before implantation, all the patients received MR scans to assess the lesion scope, extent, and nature. 125 I implantation target regions were based on the pre-operative imaging. 125 I seeds were delivered to target regions via puncture needles under the real-time guidance of MR. Computed tomography (CT)or MR was performed immediately after implantation and again every 3 months later.

RESULTS

After successful 125 I implantation, all patients were also examined regularly to detect tumor recurrence, lymphatic, and distant metastases. To date, CT or MR verification showed that 13/127 patients experienced tumor recurrence or lymphatic metastasis or distant metastasis. No seeds migration was observed, no serious treatment-related complications affected patient quality of life, and no important organ (such as major cervical vessels, spinal cord, etc.) injuries were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that MR-guided 125 I implantation is an effective approach to site-specific treatment for oral and maxillofacial tumor, which could potentially reduce postoperative complications and tumor recurrence rates, increase patient survival, and improve quality of life.

Cone-beam CT-based adaptive planning improves permanent prostate brachytherapy dosimetry: An analysis of 1266 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate adaptive planning for permanent prostate brachytherapy and to identify the prostate regions that needed adaptation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After the implantation of stranded seeds, using real-time intraoperative planning, a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-scan was obtained and contoured. The positions of seeds were determined on a C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scan. The CBCT-scan was registered to the TRUS-scan using fiducial gold markers. If dose coverage on the combined image-dataset was inadequate, an intraoperative adaptation was performed by placing remedial seeds. CBCT-based intraoperative dosimetry was analyzed for the prostate (D90, V100, and V150) and the urethra (D30). The effects of the adaptive dosimetry procedure for Day 30 were separately assessed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1266 patients. In 17.4% of the procedures, an adaptation was performed. Without the dose contribution of the adaptation Day 30 V100 would be < 95% for half of this group. On Day 0, the increase due to the adaptation was 11.8 ± 7.2% (1SD) for D90 and 9.0 ± 6.4% for V100. On Day 30, we observed an increase in D90 of 12.3 ± 6.0% and in V100 of 4.2 ± 4.3%. For the total group, a D90 of 119.6 ± 9.1% and V100 of 97.7 ± 2.5% was achieved. Most remedial seeds were placed anteriorly near the base of the prostate.

CONCLUSION

CBCT-based adaptive planning enables identification of implants needing adaptation and improves prostate dose coverage. Adaptations were predominantly performed near the anterior base of the prostate.