MRI-based treatment planning and dose delivery verification for intraocular melanoma brachytherapy

Current and Emerging Radiotherapy Options for Uveal Melanoma

What treatment options are there for patients having uveal melanoma? A randomized, prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial (COMS) showed no difference in survival between brachytherapy and enucleation for medium-sized lesions. With the obvious benefit of retaining the eye, brachytherapy has flourished and many different approaches have been developed such as low-dose-rate sources using alternate low-energy photon-emitting radionuclides, different plaque designs and seed-loading techniques, high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources and applicators, and low- and high-dose-rate beta-emitting sources and applicators. There also have been developments of other radiation modalities like external-beam radiotherapy using linear accelerators with high-energy photons, particle accelerators for protons, and gamma stereotactic radiosurgery. This article examines the dosimetric properties, targeting capabilities, and outcomes of these approaches. The several modalities examined herein have differing attributes and it may be that no single approach would be considered optimal for all patients and all lesion characteristics.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Care for Uveal Melanoma Patients-A Systematic Review from an Ophthalmic Perspective

Conversely to most tumour types, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rarely used for eye tumours. As recent technical advances have increased ocular MRI's diagnostic value, various clinical applications have been proposed. This systematic review provides an overview of the current status of MRI in the clinical care of uveal melanoma (UM) patients, the most common eye tumour in adults. In total, 158 articles were included. Two- and three-dimensional anatomical scans and functional scans, which assess the tumour micro-biology, can be obtained in routine clinical setting. The radiological characteristics of the most common intra-ocular masses have been described extensively, enabling MRI to contribute to diagnoses. Additionally, MRI's ability to non-invasively probe the tissue's biological properties enables early detection of therapy response and potentially differentiates between high- and low-risk UM. MRI-based tumour dimensions are generally in agreement with conventional ultrasound (median absolute difference 0.5 mm), but MRI is considered more accurate in a subgroup of anteriorly located tumours. Although multiple studies propose that MRI's 3D tumour visualisation can improve therapy planning, an evaluation of its clinical benefit is lacking. In conclusion, MRI is a complementary imaging modality for UM of which the clinical benefit has been shown by multiple studies.

MR-based follow-up after brachytherapy and proton beam therapy in uveal melanoma

PURPOSE

MRI is increasingly used in the diagnosis and therapy planning of uveal melanoma (UM). In this prospective cohort study, we assessed the radiological characteristics, in terms of anatomical and functional imaging, of UM after ruthenium-106 plaque brachytherapy or proton beam therapy (PBT) and compared them to conventional ultrasound.

METHODS

Twenty-six UM patients were evaluated before and 3, 6 and 12 months after brachytherapy (n = 13) or PBT (n = 13). Tumour prominences were compared between ultrasound and MRI. On diffusion-weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion value (ADC), and on perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), the time-intensity curves (TIC), relative peak intensity and outflow percentages were determined. Values were compared between treatments and with baseline.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment prominences were comparable between MRI and ultrasound (mean absolute difference 0.51 mm, p = 0.46), but larger differences were observed post-treatment (e.g. 3 months: 0.9 mm (p = 0.02)). Pre-treatment PWI metrics were comparable between treatment groups. After treatment, brachytherapy patients showed favourable changes on PWI (e.g. 67% outflow reduction at 3 months, p < 0.01). After PBT, significant perfusion changes were observed at a later timepoint (e.g. 38% outflow reduction at 6 months, p = 0.01). No consistent ADC changes were observed after either treatment, e.g. a 0.11 × 10^-3mm²/s increase 12 months after treatment (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

MR-based follow-up is valuable for PBT-treated patients as favourable perfusion changes, including a reduction in outflow, can be detected before a reduction in size is apparent on ultrasound. For brachytherapy, a follow-up MRI is of less value as already 3 months post-treatment a significant size reduction can be measured on ultrasound.

Individualized dosimetry in Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy based on MRI-derived ocular anatomical parameters

PURPOSE

To estimate ocular geometry-related inaccuracies of the dosimetric plan in Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients with intraocular lesions were treated with brachytherapy using a Ru-106 plaque-shell of inner radius of 12 mm. Magnetic resonance imaging was employed to determine the external scleral radius at tumor site and the tumor margins. A mathematical model was developed to determine the distance between the external sclera and the internal surface of the plaque associated with the tangential application of the plaque on the treated eye. Differences in delivered dose to the tumor apex, sclera and tumor margins as derived by considering the default eye-globe of standard size (external sclera radius = 12 mm) against the individual-specific eye globe were determined.

RESULTS

The radius of external sclera at the tumor site was found to range between 10.90 and 13.05 mm for the patient cohort studied. When the patient specific eye-globe/tumor geometry is not taken into account, the delivered dose was found to be overestimated by 8.1% ± 4.1% (max = 15.3%) at tumor apex, by 1.5% ± 2.8% (max = 5.7%) at anterior tumor margin, by 16.6% ± 7.5% (max = 36.4%) at posterior tumor margin and 8.1% ± 3.8% (max = 13.2%) at central sclera of eyes with lower than the default radius. The corresponding dose overestimations for eyes with higher than the default radius was 13.5% ± 4.3% (max = 22.3%), 1.5% ± 2.8% (max = 5.7%), 12.6% ± 4.5% (max = 20.0%), and 15.1% ± 5.0% (max = 24.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed patient-specific approach for Ru-106 brachytherapy treatment planning may improve dosimetric accuracy. Individualized treatment planning dosimetry may prevent undertreatment of intraocular tumors especially for highly myopic or hyperopic eyes.

CT-MR Image Fusion for Post-Implant Dosimetry Analysis in Brain Tumor Seed Implantation- a Preliminary Study

Purpose

To calculate and evaluate postimplant dosimetry (PID) with CT-MR fusion technique after brain tumor brachytherapy and compare the result with CT-based PID.

Methods and Materials

16 brain tumor patients received MR-guided intervention with Iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed implantation entered this preliminary study for PID evaluation. Registration and fusion of CT and MR images of the same patients were performed one day after operation. Seeds identification and targets delineation were carried out on CT, MR, and CT-MR fusion images, each. The number and location of seeds on MR or CT- MR fusion images were compared with those of actually implanted seeds. Clinical target volume (CTV) and dosimetric parameters such as %D90, %V100 and external V100 were measured and calculated. In addition, the correlation of the fusion to CT CTV ratio and other factors were analyzed.

Results

The numbers of fusion seeds were not significantly different compared with reference seeds (t =1.76, p >0.05). The difference between reference seeds numbers and truly extracted MR seeds numbers was statistically significant (t =3.91, p <0.05). All dosimetric parameters showed significant differences between the two techniques (p <0.05). The mean CTV delineated on fusion images was 34.3 ± 33.6, smaller than that on CT images. The mean values of external V100, %V100 and %D90 on fusion images were larger than those on CT images. Correlation analysis showed that the fusion-CT V100 ratio was positively and significantly correlated with the fusion-CT volume ratio.

Conclusions

This preliminary study indicated that CT-MR fusion-based PID exhibited good accuracy for ¹²⁵I brain tumor brachytherapy dosimetry when compared to CT-based PID and merits further research to establish best-outcome protocols.

Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit

Simple Summary

The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective.

Abstract

The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.

Uveal melanoma incidentally diagnosed with neuroimaging, a case series of 3 patients

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy and can occur in the choroid, the ciliary body, or the iris. It is most often diagnosed based on clinical examination by an ophthalmologist. Nearly all patients present with visual symptoms. Characteristic findings on clinical examination include pigmented or pale choroidal masses with serous retinal detachments and acoustic hollowness seen with ocular ultrasonography. CT and MRI of the orbits are not traditionally utilized for the diagnosis of uveal melanoma. We present 3 cases in which uveal melanoma was an incidental finding on neuroimaging for unrelated conditions in asymptomatic patients. Radiologists should maintain a high suspicion for uveal melanoma when an intraocular mass of greater than 2 mm in thickness is seen on CT or MRI.

Radiobiological evaluation of organs at risk for electronic high-dose-rate brachytherapy in uveal melanoma: a radiobiological modeling study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to examine feasibility of single- or hypo-fraction of high-dose-rate (HDR) electronic brachytherapy (eBT) in uveal melanoma treatment.

Material and methods

Biologically effective doses (BED) of organs at risk (OARs) were compared to those of iodine-125-based eye plaque low-dose-rate brachytherapy (¹²⁵I LDR-BT) with vitreous replacement (VR). Single- or hypo-fractionated equivalent physical doses (SFEDs or HFEDs) for tumor were calculated from tumor BED of ¹²⁵I LDR-BT using linear-quadratic (LQ) and universal survival curve (USC) models. BED OARs doses to retina opposite the implant, macula, optic disc, and lens were calculated and compared among SFED, HFED, and ¹²⁵I LDR-BT. Electronic BT of 50 kVp was considered assuming dose fall-off as clinically equivalent to ¹²⁵I LDR-BT. All OARs BEDs were analyzed with and without silicone oil VR.

Results

For a single-fraction incorporating VR, the median/interquartile range of LQ (USC)-based BED doses of the retina opposite the implant, macula, optic disc, and lens were 16%/1.2% (33%/4%), 35%/19.5% (64%/17.7%), 37%/19% (75%/17.8%), and 27%/7.9% (68%/23.2%) of those for ¹²⁵I LDR-BT, respectively. SFED tumor values were 29.8/0.2 Gy and 51.7/0.5 Gy when using LQ and USC models, respectively, which could be delivered within 1 hour. SFED can be delivered within 1 hour using a high-dose-rate eBT. Even four-fraction delivery of HFED without VR resulted in higher OARs doses in the macula, optic disc, and lens (135 ~ 159%) than when using ¹²⁵I LDR-BT technique. A maximum p-value of 0.005 was observed for these distributions.

Conclusions

The simulation of single-fraction eBT, including vitreous replacement, resulted in significantly reduced OARs doses (16 ~ 75%) of that achieved with ¹²⁵I LDR-BT.

3D image-guided treatment planning for Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy of choroidal melanomas

BACKGROUND

Current standard treatment procedures for Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas do not use 3D image-guided treatment planning. We evaluated the potential impact of introducing 3D treatment planning and quantified the theoretical clinical benefits in terms of tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment plans for thirty-two patients were optimized using 3D image-guided treatment planning and compared to the original 2D clinical plans. Optimization of plans was done in an image-based treatment planning system by optimizing the plaque position and treatment time such that the entire tumour received the prescribed dose of 100 Gy. TCP and NTCP for 2D clinical plans and optimized 3D image-guided plans were estimated from published outcome prediction models and compared within patients using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The median minimum tumour dose (D_99% ) for 2D clinical plans was 93 Gy (range: 23-158 Gy), corresponding to 5-year TCP of 75% (IQR 61-86%), while median tumour D_99% for optimized 3D image-guided plans was 115 Gy (range 103-141 Gy), corresponding to TCP of 82% (IQR 80-84%). This was a statistically significant increase in estimated TCP (median increase in TCP 8% (IQR: -5-23, p = 0.006). While the dose to normal tissue increased somewhat, there was no significant change in NTCP.

CONCLUSION

3D treatment planning theoretically allows for improved tumour dose delivery for Ru-106 brachytherapy of choroidal melanomas, resulting in a significant increase in expected tumour control compared to traditional approaches using 2D calculations. The deliverability of optimized plans, and potential increased risk of late complications, will have to be confirmed in future clinical studies.

Comprehensive assessment of the effect of eye plaque tilt on tumor dosimetry

PURPOSE

Tilting of the posterior plaque margin during eye plaque brachytherapy can lead to tumor underdosing and increased risk of local recurrence. We performed a quantitative analysis of the dosimetric effects of plaque tilt as a function of tumor position, basal dimension, height and plaque type using 3D treatment planning software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Posterior and anterior tumors with largest basal dimensions of 6, 12 and 18 mm and heights of 4, 7 and 10 mm were modeled. Both Eye Physics and COMS plaques were simulated and uniformly loaded. Plans were normalized to 85 Gy at the tumor apex. Posterior plaque tilts of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm were simulated.

RESULTS

Volumetric coverage is more sensitive to tilt than the area coverage. Wide, flat tumors are more susceptible to tilt. Apical dose changed significantly as a function of tumor height and diameter. No other parameter exhibited significant differences. Posterior tumors are slightly more susceptible to tilt due to the use of notched plaques. Plaque type does not significantly alter the effect of plaque tilt.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide, flat tumors are the most susceptible to plaque tilt. Tumor location or plaque type does not have a significant effect on dosimetry changes from plaque tilt. Robust clinical procedures such as the use of mattress sutures, pre- and post-implant ultrasound and post-implant dosimetry can all mitigate the risk associated with plaque tilt.

A Retrospective Study on Using a Novel Single Needle Cone Puncture Approach for the Iodine-125 Seed Brachytherapy in Treating Patients With Thoracic Malignancy

Background

Patients with progressive thoracic malignancy characterized by large irregular tumors with necrosis and life-threatening symptoms lack effective treatments. We set out to develop a single needle cone puncture method for the Iodine-125 seed (SNCP-¹²⁵I) brachytherapy, and aim to report the initial results.

Methods

294 patients with advanced thoracic malignancy were treated with local SNCP-¹²⁵I brachytherapy between March 2009 and July 2020, followed by thorough evaluation of clinical outcome, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and procedure-related complications after treatment.

Results

The overall response rate (ORR) among the treated patients was 81.0% (238/294). Life-threatening symptoms due to tumor oppression, hemoptysis and large irregular tumor with necrosis were successfully alleviated after the SNCP-¹²⁵I treatment with a remission rate at 91% to 94%. The median OS and PFS were 13.6 months and 5.8 months, respectively. Procedure-related side effects including pneumothorax (32/294), blood-stained sputum (8/294), subcutaneous emphysema (10/294), puncture site bleeding (16/294) and chest pain (6/294) were observed. Patients who were able to follow with chemotherapy or immunotherapy experienced extended OS and PFS, as compared with patients who opted to receive hospice care (16.5 months Vs. 11.2 months). Further pathological and immunological analysis showed that SNCP-¹²⁵I induced tumor lymphocytes infiltration and long-term tumor necrosis.

Conclusion

SNCP-¹²⁵I brachytherapy effectively eliminates life-threatening symptoms due to local tumor oppression, hemoptysis and large irregular and necrotic tumors in patients with unresectable chest malignancy and significantly induces local tumor regression. SNCP-¹²⁵I brachytherapy combines with chemotherapy significantly prolong OS and PFS compare with SNCP-¹²⁵I brachytherapy alone.

Radiation therapy for uveal melanoma: a review of treatment methods available in 2021

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiation therapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of uveal melanoma. We intend to outline the current radiation therapy methods that are employed to treat uveal melanoma. We will outline their relative benefits over one another. We will also provide some background about radiation therapy in general to accustom the ophthalmologists likely reading this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four main options exist for radiation therapy of uveal melanoma. Because the eye is a small space, and because melanomas are relatively radioresistant, oncologists treating uveal melanoma must deliver highly focused doses in high amounts to a small space. Therapies incorporating external beams include proton beam therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery comes in two forms, gamma knife therapy and cyberknife therapy. Radiation may also be placed directly on the eye surgically via plaque brachytherapy. All methods have been used effectively to treat uveal melanoma.

SUMMARY

Each particular radiotherapy technique employed to treat uveal melanoma has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The ocular oncologist can choose amongst these therapies based upon his or her clinical judgment of the relative risks and benefits. Availability of the therapy and cost to the patient remain significant factors in the ocular oncologist's choice.

MRI and dual-energy CT fusion anatomic imaging in Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy with Ru-106 is widely used for the treatment of intraocular tumors, and its efficacy depends on the accuracy of radioactive plaque placement. Ru-106 plaques are MRI incompatible and create severe metal artifacts on conventional CT scans. Dual-energy CT scans (DECT) may be used to suppress such artifacts. This study examines the possibility of creating fusion images from MRI scans (preoperatively) and DECT scans (with the plaque in place) as a tool for confirming the anatomic accuracy of plaque placement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six patients with intraocular lesions (5 with choroidal melanoma and 1 with a retinal vasoproliferative lesion) were included. Fusion images of preoperative MRI scans and DECT scans with the plaque in place were created with the Demo version of the ImFusion suite (ImFusion GmbH, Munchen Germany). Clearance margins between the tumor and plaque edge in axial, transverse, and coronal planes as well as the elevation of the posterior plaque edge from the sclera were recorded and associated with the location of the lesion.

RESULTS

Plaque-tumor clearance margins for transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes were higher for anteriorly located lesions (5.13 mm ± 0.11 [5.0-5.2], 5.10 mm ± 0.26 [4.9-5.4], and 5.33 mm ± 0.45 [4.9-5.8] respectively) than for posteriorly located lesions (4.16 mm ± 1.44 [2.5-5.1], 4.13 mm ± 1.42 [2.5-5.1], and 4.2 mm ± 1.21 [2.8-5.0], respectively). The elevation of the posterior plaque edge from the sclera was 0.33 mm ± 0.28 [0-0.5] and 0.63 mm ± 0.60 [0.7-1.2] for posterior and anterior lesions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fusion images between DECT and MRI scans may be used as a tool to confirm the accuracy of Ru-106 plaque placement in relation with the intraocular tumors in ophthalmic brachytherapy.

Ophthalmic Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Where Are We (Heading To)?

Magnetic resonance imaging of the eye and orbit (MReye) is a cross-domain research field, combining (bio)physics, (bio)engineering, physiology, data sciences and ophthalmology. A growing number of reports document technical innovations of MReye and promote their application in preclinical research and clinical science. Realizing the progress and promises, this review outlines current trends in MReye. Examples of MReye strategies and their clinical relevance are demonstrated. Frontier applications in ocular oncology, refractive surgery, ocular muscle disorders and orbital inflammation are presented and their implications for explorations into ophthalmic diseases are provided. Substantial progress in anatomically detailed, high-spatial resolution MReye of the eye, orbit and optic nerve is demonstrated. Recent developments in MReye of ocular tumors are explored, and its value for personalized eye models derived from machine learning in the treatment planning of uveal melanoma and evaluation of retinoblastoma is highlighted. The potential of MReye for monitoring drug distribution and for improving treatment management and the assessment of individual responses is discussed. To open a window into the eye and into (patho)physiological processes that in the past have been largely inaccessible, advances in MReye at ultrahigh magnetic field strengths are discussed. A concluding section ventures a glance beyond the horizon and explores future directions of MReye across multiple scales, including in vivo electrolyte mapping of sodium and other nuclei. This review underscores the need for the (bio)medical imaging and ophthalmic communities to expand efforts to find solutions to the remaining unsolved problems and technical obstacles of MReye, with the objective to transfer methodological advancements driven by MR physics into genuine clinical value.

AAPM recommendations on medical physics practices for ocular plaque brachytherapy: Report of task group 221

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed Task Group 221 (TG-221) to discuss a generalized commissioning process, quality management considerations, and clinical physics practice standards for ocular plaque brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is also, in part, to aid the clinician to implement recommendations of the AAPM TG-129 report, which placed emphasis on dosimetric considerations for ocular brachytherapy applicators used in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). This report is intended to assist medical physicists in establishing a new ocular brachytherapy program and, for existing programs, in reviewing and updating clinical practices. The report scope includes photon- and beta-emitting sources and source:applicator combinations. Dosimetric studies for photon and beta sources are reviewed to summarize the salient issues and provide references for additional study. The components of an ocular plaque brachytherapy quality management program are discussed, including radiation safety considerations, source calibration methodology, applicator commissioning, imaging quality assurance tests for treatment planning, treatment planning strategies, and treatment planning system commissioning. Finally, specific guidelines for commissioning an ocular plaque brachytherapy program, clinical physics practice standards in ocular plaque brachytherapy, and other areas reflecting the need for specialized treatment planning systems, measurement phantoms, and detectors (among other topics) to support the clinical practice of ocular brachytherapy are presented. Expected future advances and developments for ocular brachytherapy are discussed.

Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma with Iodine-125 Plaque Brachytherapy: Ocular Oncology Study Consortium Report 5

Background

Treatment planning for I-125 plaque therapy for uveal melanoma has advanced significantly since the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study trial, with more widely available image-guided planning and improved dosimetry.

Objective

We evaluated real-world practice patterns for I-125 plaque brachytherapy in the United States by studying practice patterns at centers that comprise the Ocular Oncology Study Consortium (OOSC).

Methods

The OOSC database and responses to a treatment practice survey were evaluated. The database contains treatment information from 9 institutions. Patients included in the database were treated between 2010 and 2014. The survey was conducted in 2018 and current treatment planning methods and prescriptions were queried.

Results

Examination of the OOSC database revealed that average doses to critical structures were highly consistent, with the exception of one institution. Survey responses indicated that most centers followed published guidelines regarding dose and prescription point. Dose rate ranged from 51 to 118 cGy/h. As of 2018, most institutions use pre-loaded plaques and fundus photographs and/or computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in planning.

Conclusions

While there were differences in dosimetric practices, overall agreement in plaque brachytherapy practices was high among OOSC institutions. Clinical margins and planning systems were similar among institutions, while prescription dose, dose rates, and dosimetry varied.

Plaque brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma in 2018: improved techniques and expanded indications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Plaque brachytherapy remains the dominant globe-sparing therapy of uveal melanoma. This report highlights recent advances, which have expanded plaque brachytherapy's uses as well as improved the surgical technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

Plaque brachytherapy is effective for tumors that may previously have demanded enucleation. Plaque brachytherapy can be used to control large melanomas as well as melanomas touching the optic nerve. Improvements in planning and design have made plaque therapy simpler for the surgical operator and may reduce collateral radiation damage to normal ocular structures. The COMS implies a required dose of 85 Gy to the tumor apex for treatment of uveal melanoma. However, multiple reports indicate that lower doses may be equally effective for tumor control while reducing radiation dose to uninvolved structures. Vitreoretinal surgeons can be called upon safely to treat long-term side effects of radiation or tumor death such as intractable vitreous hemorrhage or inflammation. Further, vitreoretinal surgeons have employed tumor endoresection as primary local tumor control or in combination with plaque brachytherapy.

SUMMARY

Plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma remains highly effective for local tumor control and prevention of metastasis. Indications for plaque brachytherapy have expanded, and the technique has improved.