Computed tomography guided interstitial percutaneous high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of lung malignancies. A review of the literature

Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy for Dose Escalation in the Primary Treatment of Locally Advanced, Non-Resectable Superior Sulcus (Pancoast) Tumors: Results of a Monocentric Retrospective Study

Objectives: To analyze the results of interstitial (IRT) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) in the primary treatment of patients with unresectable superior sulcus tumors (SST) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Methods: Between 2013 and 2023, seven patients with unresectable SST were treated with combined BT and EBRT with or without concomitant chemotherapy. The patients' median age was 64 years (range, 49-79 years) and median tumor volume was 146.8 cm3 (range, 29.3-242.3 cm3). A median BT dose of 8 Gray (Gy) (range, 5-10 Gy) was prescribed and delivered in a single fraction. A median EBRT dose of 54 Gy (range, 30-59 Gy) was prescribed and administered normofractionated (single dose: 1.8 Gy). Results: We report the results of seven patients with SST treated with combined BT and EBRT and followed for a median of 38 months. The overall clinical response rate was 83.33% with five out of six patients achieving local control, while one out of six (16.66%) showed local and general progression. No deaths were attributed to the treatment itself; rather, one patient died during the course of therapy as a result of systemic progression. The most common radiation-related adverse events were grade I-II fatigue and mild paresthesia. No severe toxicity (CTCAE ≥ III°) was observed with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) BT combined with EBRT. Conclusions: For patients with unresectable superior sulcus tumors, interstitial HDR BT in combination with EBRT is a feasible treatment option that offers the potential for local control and long-term survival. The findings of this study should be validated in a larger patient cohort.

Advanced navigation technology enables endobronchial brachytherapy for peripheral lung cancer: An old technique plays a new role

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of super-selectively endobronchial brachytherapy in the treatment of peripheral lung cancer guided by advanced navigation technology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six patients with peripheral lung tumors successfully underwent treatment with super-selectively endobronchial brachytherapy guided by advanced navigation technology following pathway planning and were subsequently followed up to assess survival and treatment-related toxicities.

RESULTS

The endobronchial applicators were successfully placed inside the tumors of all patients using advanced navigation techniques according to the pretreatment plan, and brachytherapy was delivered at curative doses after evaluation using radiotherapy planning software. None of the patients showed local progression of the treated lesions during the follow-up for a duration ranging from 11 months to 35 months, with a median follow-up time of 23 months. The patient with the longest follow-up, nearly 3 years, exhibited a stable condition. After undergoing endobronchial brachytherapy, patients predominantly experienced localized fibrosis as indicated. No significant alterations in cardiopulmonary function were detected during the follow-up, and no other adverse effects were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of endobronchial brachytherapy for the curative treatment of peripheral lung cancers is feasible. Furthermore, the development of novel bronchial navigation techniques has the potential to broaden the application of endobronchial brachytherapy.

The occurrence and development of radiation-induced lung injury after interstitial brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy in SD rats

BACKGROUND

To compare the severity of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) after the right lung of SD rats received interstitial brachytherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

RILI rat model was established using interstitial brachytherapy and SBRT methods, respectively. CT scan was performed to analyze the lung volume and the CT value difference between the left and right lungs in rats. Then the lung tissues were analyzed through H&E staining, peripheral blood was extracted to detect the expression levels of serum inflammatory cytokines, pro-fibrotic cytokines, and fibrotic-inhibiting cytokines by ELISA.

RESULTS

The difference between right and left lung CT values was significantly elevated in the SBRT group when compared with the control group and the interstitial brachytherapy group (P < 0.05). The IFN-γ expression in the interstitial brachytherapy group was significantly different from that in the SBRT group at week 1, 4, 8 and 16. Besides, the expressions of IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 in SBRT group were significantly higher than that of interstitial brachytherapy group (P < 0.05). The TGF-β expression in interstitial brachytherapy group reached its peak with the increase of time from week 1 to week 16, and it was significantly lower than SBRT group (P < 0.05). The mortality rate in the SBRT group was 16.7%, which was significantly higher than that in the interstitial brachytherapy group.

CONCLUSION

The treatment method of interstitial brachytherapy is considered as an effective and safe tool by reducing the side effects of radiotherapy and increasing the radiation dose of radiotherapy.

BRACHY: A Randomized Trial to Evaluate Symptom Improvement in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiation With or Without High-Dose-Rate Intraluminal Brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Uncontrolled studies suggest that the addition of high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDRIB) to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) may improve palliation for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of adding HDRIB to EBRT in a multicenter randomized trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with symptomatic stage III or IV NSCLC with endobronchial disease were randomized to EBRT (20 Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week or 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions over 2 weeks) or the same EBRT plus HDRIB (14 Gy in 2 fractions separated by 1 week). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved symptomatic improvement in patient-reported overall lung cancer symptoms on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at 6 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included improvement in individual symptoms, symptom-progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The planned sample size was 250 patients based on detection of symptomatic improvement from 40% to 60% with a 2-sided α of .05 and 80% power.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were randomized over 4.5 years: 67 to each arm. The study closed early owing to slow accrual. The mean age was 69.8 years, and 67% of patients had metastatic disease. At 6 weeks, 19 patients (28.4%) in the EBRT arm and 20 patients (29.9%) in the EBRT plus HDRIB arm experienced an improvement in lung cancer symptoms (P = .84). When limited to patients who completed the LCSS, percentages were 40.4% versus 47.6%, respectively (P = .49). Between group differences in mean change scores (0.3-0.5 standard deviations) in favor of EBRT plus HDRIB were observed for overall symptoms, but only hemoptysis was significantly improved (P = .03). No significant differences were observed in progression-free or overall survival. Grade 3/4 toxicities were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Small to moderate improvements were seen in symptom relief with the combined therapy, but they did not reach statistical significance. Further research is necessary before recommending HDRIB in addition to EBRT for palliation of lung cancer symptoms.