A case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis presented hypotensive shock during plasma exchange

Therapeutic plasma exchange in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is the most commonly identified cause of autoimmune encephalitis. Therapeutic plasma exchange has been increasingly employed to treat this disease. This expansion is a consequence of improved techniques and apheresis instruments, as well as the recognition of its applicability in neurological diseases. However, several aspects of treatment remain incompletely clarified, and treatment strategies are still heterogeneous, especially with regard to therapeutic plasma exchange in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. This review provides an overview of the use of therapeutic plasma exchange including the principle and mechanisms, the evidence, initial time, efficiency and complications in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Application of Plasma Exchange in Steroid-Responsive Encephalopathy

Plasma exchange has been widely used in autoimmune neurological diseases and is the standard treatment for myasthenia gravis crisis and Guillain-Barre syndrome. A growing body of research suggests that, in the clinical application of steroid-responsive encephalopathy, such as for Hashimoto's encephalopathy, limbic encephalitis, systemic lupus erythematosus encephalopathy, ANCA-associated vasculitis encephalopathy, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, plasma exchange is a safe, and effective option when steroids or other immunosuppressive therapies are ineffective in the short term or when contraindications are present. Additionally, plasma exchange can also be used alone or in combination with steroids, immunoglobulins, or other immunosuppressive agents to treat steroid-responsive encephalopathy. This paper reviews the clinical application of plasma exchange in steroid-responsive encephalopathy, including its indications, onset time, course, curative effects, and side effects.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in paediatric neurology: a critical review and proposed treatment algorithm

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been a key immunotherapeutic strategy in numerous neurological syndromes, predominantly during the acute phase of illness. This paper reviews the indications, strength of evidence, and safety of TPE in children with neurological conditions. The rarity of these immune conditions in children, alongside an often incomplete understanding of their pathobiology, has limited the development of a robust scientific rationale for TPE therapy and the feasibility of conducting larger controlled trials. TPE continues to be used, but is a costly therapy with common adverse effects. Uncertainty remains over how to compare the different TPE methods, the optimal dosage of therapy, and monitoring and integration of TPE with other immunotherapies. Further studies are also required to define the indications and benefits of TPE and assess evolving technologies such as immunoadsorption.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Studies investigating therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are small and mainly uncontrolled. They provide evidence for the efficacy of TPE in childhood neuro-inflammatory conditions. TPE is generally well tolerated provided key adverse effects are anticipated and avoided. Systematic dosing and objective assessment of treatment effect should be priorities for future research.

Plasma exchange in pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the most frequent modalities of use of plasma exchange (PE) in pediatric anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis and to establish the most effective association with other immunotherapies.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on PE in pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis (2007-2015).

RESULTS

Seventy-one articles were included (mostly retrospective), reporting a total of 242 subjects (73.2%, 93/127 females; median age at onset 12years, range 1-18). Median time to immunotherapy was 21days (range 0-190). In most cases, PE was given with steroids and IVIG (69.5%, 89/128), or steroids only (18%, 23/128); in a minority, it was associated with IVIG only (7%, 9/128), or was the only first-line treatment (5.5%, 7/128). In 54.5% (65/119), PE was the third treatment after steroids and IVIG, in 31.1% (37/119) the second after steroids or IVIG; only in 14.3% (17/119) was it the first treatment. Second-line immunotherapies were administered in 71.9% (100/139). Higher rates of full/substantial recovery at follow-up were observed with immunotherapy given ⩽30days from onset (69.4%, 25/36) compared to later (59.2%, 16/27), and when PE was associated with steroids (66.7%, 70/105) rather than not (46.7%, 7/15). Significant adverse reactions to PE were reported in 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

Our review disclosed a paucity of quality data on PE in pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis. PE use in this condition has been increasingly reported, most often with steroids and IVIG. Despite the limited number of patients, our data seem to confirm the trend towards a better outcome when PE was administered early, and when given with steroids.