Potential risk factors for dexmedetomidine withdrawal seizures in infants after surgery for congenital heart disease

Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal Syndrome in Children in the PICU: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review literature describing the clinical presentation, risk factors, and treatment for dexmedetomidine withdrawal in the PICU (PROSPERO: CRD42022307178).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies were published from January 2000 to January 2022 and reported clinical data for patients younger than 21 years old following discontinuation of dexmedetomidine after greater than or equal to 24 hours of infusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Abstracts identified during an initial search were screened and data were manually abstracted after full-text review of eligible articles. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Summary statistics were provided and Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to identify relationships between covariates and withdrawal signs. A weighted prevalence for each withdrawal sign was generated using a random-effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-three studies (22 of which were retrospective cohort studies) containing 28 distinct cohorts were included. Median cumulative dexmedetomidine exposure by dose was 105.95 μg/kg (range, 30-232.7 μg/kg), median dexmedetomidine infusion duration was 131.75 hours (range, 20.5-525.6 hr). Weighted estimates for proportion (95% CI) of subjects experiencing withdrawal signs across all cohorts were: hypertension 0.34 (range, 0.0-0.92), tachycardia 0.26 (range, 0.0-0.87), and agitation 0.26 (range, 0.09-0.77). Meta-analysis revealed no correlation between dexmedetomidine exposure variables and withdrawal signs. A moderate negative monotonic relationship existed between the proportion of patients who had undergone cardiac surgery and the proportion experiencing hypertension (correlation coefficient, -0.47; p = 0.048) and tachycardia (correlation coefficient, -0.57; p = 0.008), indicating that in cohorts with a higher proportion of patients who were postcardiac surgery, there were fewer occurrences of hypertension and or tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

On review of the 2000-2022 literature, dexmedetomidine withdrawal may be characterized by tachycardia, hypertension, or agitation, particularly with higher cumulative doses or prolonged durations. Since most studies included in the review were retrospective, prospective studies are needed to further clarify risk factors, establish diagnostic criteria, and identify optimal management strategies.

Weaning Dexmedetomidine in Non-ICU Areas: An Implementation Effort

OBJECTIVES

To develop and implement clinical practice guidelines for safely weaning dexmedetomidine infusions in non-ICU areas.

DESIGN

Development, implementation, and analysis of effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines.

SETTING

Quaternary care academic free-standing pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

Children, otherwise medically ready for transfer to non-ICU areas, who were undergoing a planned wean of a dexmedetomidine infusion.

INTERVENTIONS

Subject matter experts developed evidence-based guidelines for weaning dexmedetomidine in patients whose critical phase of illness had resolved.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Searches identified no prospective studies of dexmedetomidine weaning. We identified two retrospective reviews of withdrawal symptoms and one on the use of clonidine. There were case studies on withdrawal symptoms. Guidelines were piloted on a cohort of 24 patients while in the ICU. The guidelines were then implemented in non-ICU areas for patients undergoing dexmedetomidine weaning after ICU transfer. Over a 2-year period (October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2020), 63 patients (1 mo to 18 yr old) successfully weaned dexmedetomidine in non-ICU areas. The median time to discontinuation of dexmedetomidine after transfer to non-ICU areas was 5.8 days (interquartile range, 4.75-15 d). Fifty-eight percent (n = 41) of all patients were considered high risk for dexmedetomidine withdrawal based on the dose, duration of exposure, and the risk of experiencing physiologic detriment with more than mild withdrawal. Twenty-nine patients (46%) exhibited no signs or symptoms of withdrawal while weaning per guidelines. For those with signs and symptoms of withdrawal, the most common were tachycardia (n = 26, 40%), agitation (n = 9, 14%), and hypertension (n = 9, 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weaning dexmedetomidine in non-ICU areas is feasible and can be accomplished safely even among pediatric patients at high risk for withdrawal using standardized weaning guidelines. At our institution, implementation was associated with reduced ICU length of stay for patients recovering from critical illness.

Effects of a Clonidine Taper on Dexmedetomidine Use and Withdrawal in Adult Critically Ill Patients-A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

Prolonged use of dexmedetomidine has become increasingly common due to its favorable sedative and anxiolytic properties. Hypersympathetic withdrawal symptoms have been reported with abrupt discontinuation of prolonged dexmedetomidine infusions. Clonidine has been used to transition patients off dexmedetomidine infusions for ICU sedation. The objective of this study was to compare the occurrence of dexmedetomidine withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients transitioning to a clonidine taper versus those weaned off dexmedetomidine alone after prolonged dexmedetomidine infusion.

DESIGN

This was a single-center, prospective, double cohort observational study conducted from November 2017 to December 2018.

SETTING

Medical-surgical, cardiothoracic, and neurosurgical ICUs in a tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

We included adult ICU patients being weaned off dexmedetomidine after receiving continuous infusions for at least 3 days.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were either weaned off dexmedetomidine alone or with a clonidine taper at the discretion of the providers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the incidence of at least two dexmedetomidine withdrawal symptoms during a single assessment within 24 hours of dexmedetomidine discontinuation. Time on dexmedetomidine after wean initiation and difference in medication cost were also evaluated. Forty-two patients were included in this study: 15 received clonidine (Group C) and 27 weaned off dexmedetomidine alone (Group D). There was no significant difference in the incidence of two or more withdrawal symptoms between groups (73% in Group C vs 59% in Group D; p = 0.51). Patients in Group C spent less time on dexmedetomidine after wean initiation compared with patients in Group D (19 vs 42 hr; p = 0.02). An average cost savings of $1,553.47 per patient who received clonidine was observed. No adverse effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that patients receiving clonidine were able to wean off dexmedetomidine more rapidly, with a considerable cost savings and no difference in dexmedetomidine withdrawal symptoms, compared with patients weaned off dexmedetomidine alone. Clonidine may be a safe, effective, and practical option to transition patients off prolonged dexmedetomidine infusions.

Dexmedetomidine for Prolonged Sedation in the PICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to systematically describe the use of dexmedetomidine as a treatment regimen for prolonged sedation in children and perform a meta-analysis of its safety profile.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CINAHL were searched from inception to November 30, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies involving hospitalized critically ill patients less than or equal to 18 years old receiving dexmedetomidine for prolonged infusion (≥ 24 hr).

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction included study characteristics, patient demographics, modality of dexmedetomidine use, associated analgesia and sedation details, comfort and withdrawal evaluation scales, withdrawal symptoms, and side effects.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Literature search identified 32 studies, including a total of 3,267 patients. Most of the studies were monocentric (91%) and retrospective (88%); one was a randomized trial. Minimum and maximum infusion dosages varied from 0.1-0.5 µg/kg/hr to 0.3-2.5 µg/kg/hr, respectively. The mean/median duration range was 25-540 hours. The use of a loading bolus was reported in eight studies (25%) (range, 0.5-1 µg/kg), the mode of weaning in 11 (34%), and the weaning time in six of 11 (55%; range, 9-96 hr). The pooled prevalence of bradycardia was 2.6% (n = 10 studies; 14/387 patients; 95% CI, 0.3-7.3; I = 75%), the pooled prevalence incidence of bradycardia was 2.6% (n = 10 studies; 14/387 patients; 95% CI, 0.3-7.3; I = 75%), the pooled incidence of hypotension was 6.1% (n = 8 studies; 19/304 patients; 95% CI, 0.8-15.9; I = 84%). Three studies (9%) reported side effects' onset time which in all cases was within 12 hours of the infusion starting.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality data on dexmedetomidine use for prolonged sedation and a consensus on correct dosing and weaning protocols in children are currently missing. Infusion of dexmedetomidine can be considered relatively safe in pediatrics even when longer than 24 hours.

The brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine during surgery for paediatric patients with congenital heart disease

Objective

To study the brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) during surgery in paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods

This randomized single-blind controlled study enrolled paediatric patients aged 0–3 years with CHD who underwent surgery and randomized them into two groups: one group received DEX and the control group received 0.9% NaCl during anaesthesia. Demographic data, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) were recorded. Levels of neuron specific enolase (NES) and S-100β protein were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Results

The study enrolled 80 paediatric patients with CHD. Compared with the control group, HR, MAP and CVP were significantly lower in the DEX group at all time-points except for T0. At all time-points except for T0, the levels of jugular venous oxygen saturation in the DEX group were significantly higher compared with the control group. At all time-points except for T0, the levels of arterial venous difference and cerebral extraction of oxygen were significantly lower in the DEX group compared with the control group. Levels of NES and S-100β protein in the DEX group were significantly lower compared with the control group at all time-points except for T0.

Conclusion

DEX treatment during surgery for CHD improved oxygen metabolism in brain tissues and reduced the levels of NES and S-100β protein.

Dexmedetomidine Use in Critically Ill Children With Acute Respiratory Failure

OBJECTIVE

Care of critically ill children includes sedation but current therapies are suboptimal. To describe dexmedetomidine use in children supported on mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial.

SETTING

Thirty-one PICUs.

PATIENTS

Data from 2,449 children; 2 weeks to 17 years old.

INTERVENTIONS

Sedation practices were unrestrained in the usual care arm. Patients were categorized as receiving dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative, secondary sedative, periextubation agent, or never prescribed. Dexmedetomidine exposure and sedation and clinical profiles are described.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 1,224 usual care patients, 596 (49%) received dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative patients (n = 138; 11%) were less critically ill (Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-12 score median, 6 [interquartile range, 3-11]) and when compared with all other cohorts, experienced more episodic agitation. In the intervention group, time in sedation target improved from 28% to 50% within 1 day of initiating dexmedetomidine as a primary sedative. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary sedative usual care patients (n = 280; 23%) included more children with severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome or organ failure. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary sedative patients experienced more inadequate pain (22% vs 11%) and sedation (31% vs 16%) events. Dexmedetomidine as a periextubation agent patients (n = 178; 15%) were those known to not tolerate an awake, intubated state and experienced a shorter ventilator weaning process (2.1 vs 2.3 d).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the use of dexmedetomidine as a primary agent in low criticality patients offering the benefit of rapid achievement of targeted sedation levels. Dexmedetomidine as a secondary agent does not appear to add benefit. The use of dexmedetomidine to facilitate extubation in children intolerant of an awake, intubated state may abbreviate ventilator weaning. These data support a broader armamentarium of pediatric critical care sedation.