Neurological complications after living-donor liver transplantation in children

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Pediatric Wilson's Disease-related Acute Liver Failure-Hard Work With High Rewards

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) is indicated for children with Wilson's disease (WD) presenting with acute liver failure (ALF) or with chronic liver disease (CLD) that has progressed to decompensation. We present our experience of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for pediatric WD, discuss the challenges of managing WD-ALF and compare outcomes of children presenting with WD-ALF with WD-CLD.

Methods

We compared presentation and outcomes of the WD-ALF and WD-CLD cohorts. Fifty-three children (WD-ALF: 28 (53%), WD-CLD: 25 (47%)) underwent LDLT for WD.

Results

WD-ALF group had higher Kings New Wilson Index (KNWI) (15 vs 9, P = 0.001), higher pediatric end-stage liver disease/model for end-stage liver disease score (35 vs 20, P = 0.001), were more frequently encephalopathic (64% vs 4%, P = 0.001), and had ongoing hemolysis (86% vs 28%, <0.001). Preoperative mechanical ventilation, operative continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was needed in 32%, 46.5%, and 89% of WD-ALF children, respectively. WD-ALF patients had longer postoperative ICU stay (4.5 days vs 3 days, P = 0.001), longer hospital stay (20.5 days vs 14 days, P = 0.001), more major complications (57% vs 20%, P = 0.006). WD-ALF cohort also had more postoperative neurological complications (42.9% vs 8%, P = 0.004) and invasive fungal infections (21.4% vs none, P = 0.024). There were two perioperative (90 day) mortalities in WD-ALF group and none in WD-CLD group. Patient survival of the entire cohort at median follow-up of 26 months was 94.3% and all survivors had good allograft function neurological sequelae. Patient survival was inferior for WD-ALF cohort though the difference was not statistically significant (88.5% vs 100%, log rank test, P = 0.089).

Conclusion

LDLT is a curative treatment for children with WD with excellent short-term and long-term outcomes. WD-ALF patients can have a complicated postoperative course but have good long-term survival.

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT): Short- and long-term outcomes during sixteen years period at a single centre- A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an effective tool for managing pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) with good long-term graft and patient survival, especially after improvement in peri-operative care, surgical tools and techniques; however, the morbidity and mortality after such a procedure are still a challenging matter. The study aimed to analyze short-and long-term outcomes after pediatric LDLT in a single centre.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 67 pediatric patients who underwent LDLT in the period from April 2003 to July 2018. The overall male/female ratio was 40/27.

RESULTS

Forty-one (61.2%) of patients had ≥1 early and/or late morbidities; the early (less than 3months) and late (≥3months) ones affected 36(53.7%) and 12(17.9%) of them respectively. The 16-year graft and patient survivals were 35(52.2%) while early and late mortalities were 23(34.3%) and 9(13.4%) respectively. Sepsis and chronic rejection were the most frequent causes of early and late mortalities respectively. Moreover, more packed RBCs transfusion units, bacterial infections, and pulmonary complications were independent predictors of poor patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

More packed RBCs transfusion units intra-operatively, and post-liver transplant (LT) bacterial infection, sepsis, chronic rejection, as well as pulmonary complications had a negative insult on our patients' outcomes, so proper management of them is mandatory for improving outcomes after pediatric LDLT.