Role of the medial septal area on pilocarpine-induced salivary secretion and water intake

Hydrogen peroxide attenuates the dipsogenic, renal and pressor responses induced by cholinergic activation of the medial septal area

Cholinergic activation of the medial septal area (MSA) with carbachol produces thirst, natriuresis, antidiuresis and pressor response. In the brain, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) modulates autonomic and behavioral responses. In the present study, we investigated the effects of the combination of carbachol and H2O2 injected into the MSA on water intake, renal excretion, cardiovascular responses and the activity of vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic (SON) nuclei. Furthermore, the possible modulation of carbachol responses by H2O2 acting through K+ATP channels was also investigated. Male Holtzman rats (280-320 g) with stainless steel cannulas implanted in the MSA were used. The pre-treatment with H2O2 in the MSA reduced carbachol-induced thirst (7.9±1.0, vs. carbachol: 13.2±2.0 ml/60 min), antidiuresis (9.6±0.5, vs. carbachol: 7.0±0.8 ml/120 min,), natriuresis (385±36, vs. carbachol: 528±46 μEq/120 min) and pressor response (33±5, vs. carbachol: 47±3 mmHg). Combining H2O2 and carbachol into the MSA also reduced the number of vasopressinergic neurons expressing c-Fos in the PVN (46.4±11.2, vs. carbachol: 98.5±5.9 c-Fos/AVP cells) and oxytocinergic neurons expressing c-Fos in the PVN (38.5±16.1, vs. carbachol: 75.1±8.5 c-Fos/OT cells) and in the SON (57.8±10.2, vs. carbachol: 102.7±7.4 c-Fos/OT cells). Glibenclamide (K+ATP channel blocker) into the MSA partially reversed H2O2 inhibitory responses. These results suggest that H2O2 acting through K+ATP channels in the MSA attenuates responses induced by cholinergic activation in the same area.

Central mechanisms involved in pilocarpine-induced pressor response

Pilocarpine (cholinergic muscarinic agonist) injected peripherally may act centrally to produce pressor responses; in the present study, using c-fos immunoreactive expression, we investigated the forebrain and brainstem areas activated by pressor doses of intravenous (i.v.) pilocarpine. In addition, the importance of vasopressin secretion and/or sympathetic activation and the effects of lesions in the anteroventral third ventricle (AV3V) region in awake rats were also investigated. In male Holtzman rats, pilocarpine (0.04 to 4μmol/kg b.w.) i.v. induced transitory hypotension followed by long lasting hypertension. Sympathetic blockade with prazosin (1mg/kg b.w.) i.v. or AV3V lesions (1 day) almost abolished the pressor response to i.v. pilocarpine (2μmol/kg b.w.), whereas the vasopressin antagonist (10μg/kg b.w.) i.v. reduced the response to pilocarpine. Pilocarpine (2 and 4μmol/kg b.w.) i.v. increased the number of c-fos immunoreactive cells in the subfornical organ, paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus, organ vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, median preoptic nucleus, nucleus of the solitary tract and caudal and rostral ventrolateral medulla. These data suggest that i.v. pilocarpine activates specific forebrain and brainstem mechanisms increasing sympathetic activity and vasopressin secretion to induce pressor response.

Muscarinic agonists and antagonists: effects on gastrointestinal function

Muscarinic agonists and antagonists are used to treat a handful of gastrointestinal (GI) conditions associated with impaired salivary secretion or altered motility of GI smooth muscle. With regard to exocrine secretion, the major muscarinic receptor expressed in salivary, gastric, and pancreatic glands is the M₃ with a small contribution of the M₁ receptor. In GI smooth muscle, the major muscarinic receptors expressed are the M₂ and M₃ with the M₂ outnumbering the M₃ by a ratio of at least four to one. The antagonism of both smooth muscle contraction and exocrine secretion is usually consistent with an M₃ receptor mechanism despite the major presence of the M₂ receptor in smooth muscle. These results are consistent with the conditional role of the M₂ receptor in smooth muscle. That is, the contractile role of the M₂ receptor depends on that of the M₃ so that antagonism of the M₃ receptor eliminates the response of the M₂. The physiological roles of muscarinic receptors in the GI tract are consistent with their known signaling mechanisms. Some so-called tissue-selective M₃ antagonists may owe their selectivity to a highly potent interaction with a nonmuscarinic receptor target.